KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 2232.

Cheeseater

sr. member

Activity: 351

Merit: 250

Quote from: -ck on November 13, 2014, 07:27:00 PM

Quote from: philipma1957 on November 13, 2014, 07:16:10 PM

question. to ck do you think you will set this pool to allow for the asicminer prisma . no biggie if you don't .

Quote from: kano on November 12, 2014, 06:40:46 PM

If they still have the same problem as the original, yep it wont work on the settings I'm running ckpool.
The original ignores some of the pool settings and thus if the pool doesn't match the tube settings, it wont work.
That's why ckolivas has extra tube solo pool instances, the extra hacked to match the tube.

ckdb doesn't yet support multiple ckpools talking to it.

Long term plan, but not any time soon.

Ugh! I guess all my hopes reside in Sidehack to figure a way to proxy them to you.

-ck

legendary

Activity: 4088

Merit: 1631

Ruu \o/

Quote from: philipma1957 on November 13, 2014, 07:16:10 PM

question. to ck do you think you will set this pool to allow for the asicminer prisma . no biggie if you don't .

Quote from: kano on November 12, 2014, 06:40:46 PM

If they still have the same problem as the original, yep it wont work on the settings I'm running ckpool.
The original ignores some of the pool settings and thus if the pool doesn't match the tube settings, it wont work.
That's why ckolivas has extra tube solo pool instances, the extra hacked to match the tube.

ckdb doesn't yet support multiple ckpools talking to it.

Long term plan, but not any time soon.

philipma1957

legendary

Activity: 4326

Merit: 8950

'The right to privacy matters'

blocks blocks blocks and more to come. coins are still up around 415usd. I think I will have a nice holiday season.

question. to ck do you think you will set this pool to allow for the asicminer prisma . no biggie if you don't .

bgibso01

legendary

Activity: 1218

Merit: 1001

Quote from: -ck on November 13, 2014, 06:41:35 PM

Quote from: bgibso01 on November 13, 2014, 06:38:52 PM

Luck would be how many tries before solving the hash with a 38B diff. If I understand this correctly, doesn't the 594M diff mean that there weren't as many leading zeroes to the hash as to what was supposedly required?

Or does it mean that I have a chance for a 2.5M best share being the correct answer? At which point I question what is the 38B diff.

The listing of 594M diff means 594 million diff1 share equivalents, it doesn't mean the share itself was only 594M or it wouldn't have solved the block as you correctly said.

Great. Thanks for the quick reply. I understand now. The 594M was just how many diff1 equivalent shares had been submitted when it was solved.

-ck

legendary

Activity: 4088

Merit: 1631

Ruu \o/

And another block for good measure Grin

I was developing on a rig at the time I spotted this:

Code:

 [2014-11-13 16:45:58] Pool 0 message: Block 329896 solved by ckpool!
 [2014-11-13 16:45:59] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block

Pool console output was still up showing this:

Code:

[2014-11-14 10:46:01] Possible block solve diff 48144757906.104950 !
[2014-11-14 10:46:01] Submitting block data!
[2014-11-14 10:46:02] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2014-11-14 10:46:02] Solved and confirmed block 329896

https://blockchain.info/tx/50a545448349cf7b6982593185f1657d599a7f9d38e1887e311b4b19fd2a5f6c

EDIT: Confirmed

-ck

legendary

Activity: 4088

Merit: 1631

Ruu \o/

Quote from: warrensgun on November 12, 2014, 09:10:47 AM

Would it be better to run it in passthru proxy or standalone? I've used it as standalone for some other pools before. It worked pretty well. Way easier than having 40 smaller miners opening their own connections.

Passthrough is really only designed for the server end as it is simply designed to collate connections into one. Clients (users) should be using the proxy mode themselves if they wish to consolidate their connections to the pool so as to set up only one pool for all of their devices.

-ck

legendary

Activity: 4088

Merit: 1631

Ruu \o/

Quote from: bgibso01 on November 13, 2014, 06:38:52 PM

Luck would be how many tries before solving the hash with a 38B diff. If I understand this correctly, doesn't the 594M diff mean that there weren't as many leading zeroes to the hash as to what was supposedly required?

Or does it mean that I have a chance for a 2.5M best share being the correct answer? At which point I question what is the 38B diff.

The listing of 594M diff means 594 million diff1 share equivalents, it doesn't mean the share itself was only 594M or it wouldn't have solved the block as you correctly said.

bgibso01

legendary

Activity: 1218

Merit: 1001

Quote from: norgan on November 13, 2014, 03:42:54 PM

Quote from: bgibso01 on November 13, 2014, 12:42:49 PM

Silly question, but inquiring minds want to know. How do we get a 594M diff solution if the network is requiring 38B?

Luck 😉

Luck would be how many tries before solving the hash with a 38B diff. If I understand this correctly, doesn't the 594M diff mean that there weren't as many leading zeroes to the hash as to what was supposedly required?

Or does it mean that I have a chance for a 2.5M best share being the correct answer? At which point I question what is the 38B diff.

norgan

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

Decentralize your hashing - p2pool - Norgz Pool

Quote from: bgibso01 on November 13, 2014, 12:42:49 PM

Silly question, but inquiring minds want to know. How do we get a 594M diff solution if the network is requiring 38B?

Luck 😉

bgibso01

legendary

Activity: 1218

Merit: 1001

Silly question, but inquiring minds want to know. How do we get a 594M diff solution if the network is requiring 38B?

kano

legendary

Activity: 4634

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Added CDF in case anyone wants it and understands it

Calculation courtesy of organofcorti - thanks!

hurricandave

legendary

Activity: 966

Merit: 1003

Its really convenient to be able to check confirmations without logging in too.

kano

legendary

Activity: 4634

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Just added a public Pool->Blocks menu so non-members can see the awesomeness of our past luck on the web site without having to login Cheesy

kano

legendary

Activity: 4634

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Quote from: ?? on ??

Hi Kano,

Just wanted to let you know something about "REGISTERING."

The first time I registered under the user name "Proud Clown" [with a space], my rigs never did want to connect to your pool with Proud Clown_worker1 in my S3's.

When I went back in and created another account with the user name "ProudClown" [no space], my rigs connected just fine with ProudClown_worker1 in my S3's.

When registering, it never told me I could not use a space. I was quite happy at first because it appeared that I could WHEN REGISTERING. However, when I entered my worker name with a space in my worker box in "miner configuration" it would not connect. It was dead every time.

So, when you have the time [which I know that is limited at the moment] you might want to look into making it where people cannot register with a user name with a space in it.

Proud Clown

I'd guess you missed putting quotes around it like "Proud Clown_worker1" for cgminer?

I've registered a username on my home test pool with a space and it works ok for me - so that's probably the reason.

Yeah the home pool is the same thing - it's where I test changes also before they go live - so far I'm 1.85% of a block on my home pool since I started writing ckdb

Though that keeps going down ... since I don't mine much there ... diff rises make it go down each time - I think it was above 2% once.

RoadStress

legendary

Activity: 1904

Merit: 1007

This is tempting!

philipma1957

legendary

Activity: 4326

Merit: 8950

'The right to privacy matters'

Quote from: kano on November 12, 2014, 06:40:46 PM

Quote from: philipma1957 on November 12, 2014, 06:30:26 PM

Quote from: norgan on November 12, 2014, 06:00:12 PM

Quote from: kano on November 12, 2014, 05:46:51 PM

Another block

74% diff

https://blockchain.info/block-index/491090/00000000000000000dc85348919480f04044764491d60dd5cf0f290ab6d40205

dodo dood dood dood another one bites the dust, and another one down and another one down, another one bites the dust......

yep and the blocks keep coming plus coins are now 420 usd!!

having an issue with a new long tube that came in today. I have it running at www.mmpool.org but can't get it to run here. using minera will post a screen shot after supper.

If they still have the same problem as the original, yep it wont work on the settings I'm running ckpool.
The original ignores some of the pool settings and thus if the pool doesn't match the tube settings, it wont work.
That's why ckolivas has extra tube solo pool instances, the extra hacked to match the tube.

ckdb doesn't yet support multiple ckpools talking to it.

no worries then I will move some other miners around to you.

kano

legendary

Activity: 4634

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Quote from: philipma1957 on November 12, 2014, 06:30:26 PM

Quote from: norgan on November 12, 2014, 06:00:12 PM

Quote from: kano on November 12, 2014, 05:46:51 PM

Another block

74% diff

https://blockchain.info/block-index/491090/00000000000000000dc85348919480f04044764491d60dd5cf0f290ab6d40205

dodo dood dood dood another one bites the dust, and another one down and another one down, another one bites the dust......

yep and the blocks keep coming plus coins are now 420 usd!!

having an issue with a new long tube that came in today. I have it running at www.mmpool.org but can't get it to run here. using minera will post a screen shot after supper.

If they still have the same problem as the original, yep it wont work on the settings I'm running ckpool.
The original ignores some of the pool settings and thus if the pool doesn't match the tube settings, it wont work.
That's why ckolivas has extra tube solo pool instances, the extra hacked to match the tube.

ckdb doesn't yet support multiple ckpools talking to it.

philipma1957

legendary

Activity: 4326

Merit: 8950

'The right to privacy matters'

Quote from: norgan on November 12, 2014, 06:00:12 PM

Quote from: kano on November 12, 2014, 05:46:51 PM

Another block

74% diff

https://blockchain.info/block-index/491090/00000000000000000dc85348919480f04044764491d60dd5cf0f290ab6d40205

dodo dood dood dood another one bites the dust, and another one down and another one down, another one bites the dust......

yep and the blocks keep coming plus coins are now 420 usd!!

having an issue with a new long tube that came in today. I have it running at www.mmpool.org but can't get it to run here. using minera will post a screen shot after supper.

norgan

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

Decentralize your hashing - p2pool - Norgz Pool

Quote from: kano on November 12, 2014, 05:46:51 PM

Another block

74% diff

https://blockchain.info/block-index/491090/00000000000000000dc85348919480f04044764491d60dd5cf0f290ab6d40205

dodo dood dood dood another one bites the dust, and another one down and another one down, another one bites the dust......

kano

legendary

Activity: 4634

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Quote from: warrensgun on November 12, 2014, 09:10:47 AM

Would it be better to run it in passthru proxy or standalone? I've used it as standalone for some other pools before. It worked pretty well. Way easier than having 40 smaller miners opening their own connections.

I leave that for ckolivas to reply later since he'll get the technical reasons right

Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 2232. (Read 5352295 times)