Author

Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 2236. (Read 5352295 times)

norgan

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

Decentralize your hashing - p2pool - Norgz Pool

Quote from: mdude77 on November 10, 2014, 05:06:59 AM

Quote from: hurricandave on November 10, 2014, 03:44:05 AM

Well I would mention that Windows 10 is available for free and is quite easy to install and run VM as an Enterprise version is available as well, BUT, it would seem that because these are preview versions that there is an outside chance that Microsoft has a key logger included...............

Outside chance? I think it's well documented that they are recording EVERYTHING. I wouldn't use IE10 outside of a brief look in a VM.

M

Well documented? Do you have a cited source for that statement. It's well documented that MS have an opt out for the customer experience on all of their products.
They are one of the safest companies to use in regards to your privacy if you are comparing them to Apple and Google.

kano

legendary

Activity: 4634

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

... and regarding iDevices ...
A family member asked me if I wanted them to buy me one.
(It was actually due to the fact that my Nexus battery died recently and I'd not got around to doing anything about it)
So when I get that some time in the next week or so, I'll spend some more effort to make the drop down menus work properly for it.
There's a pull request related to it, but I'll wait until I can test it all properly.

kano

legendary

Activity: 4634

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

If anyone was concerned about not having an https connection to the web site, I've just added that also.
https://www.kano.is/
and
https://kano.is/
for anyone missing the w key

philipma1957

legendary

Activity: 4326

Merit: 8950

'The right to privacy matters'

Quote from: kano on November 09, 2014, 08:00:42 PM

Quote from: Trademan1 on November 09, 2014, 06:56:22 PM

...

Depends which way you look at it.

The block at 2014-11-07 06:44am took about 4 1/2 days .. actuallly

Either way, not bad for only 1.2Ph.

Yeah, the time for a single block is from the previous block to the time of the block.

Although you can say we found 7 blocks in a bit over a day, all the statistical calculations including the 1st block of those seven has to include the ~4.42days it took to find it.

I'm still amazed that the 6 blocks averaged less than 10.4% diff for all 6 ...

you are correct that is the right way to do it. but 7 in 27.5 hours sounds better even if it is playing with numbers a bit. LOL

hurricandave

legendary

Activity: 966

Merit: 1003

Quote from: wttbs on November 10, 2014, 04:57:36 AM

Quote from: HellDiverUK on November 10, 2014, 03:20:09 AM

To be fair, no-one should be using IE8 any more. Period.

To be very fair, no-one should be using any version of IE Grin

Sorry but the last Apple product I spent money on came with a whopping 128K Shocked

mdude77

legendary

Activity: 1540

Merit: 1001

Quote from: hurricandave on November 10, 2014, 03:44:05 AM

Outside chance? I think it's well documented that they are recording EVERYTHING. I wouldn't use ~~IE10~~ Windows 10 outside of a brief look in a VM.

M

EDIT: I meant Windows 10, not IE 10...

wttbs

legendary

Activity: 2210

Merit: 1109

Quote from: HellDiverUK on November 10, 2014, 03:20:09 AM

To be fair, no-one should be using IE8 any more. Period.

To be very fair, no-one should be using any version of IE Grin

hurricandave

legendary

Activity: 966

Merit: 1003

HellDiverUK

hero member

Activity: 1246

Merit: 501

To be fair, no-one should be using IE8 any more. Period.

kano

legendary

Activity: 4634

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

I've mentioned before about how the payout works such that the N in the PPLNS is usually a small amount more than the network difficulty when the block is found.
I updated the Help->Payouts page to include details about that.

When I later implement larger shifts, updating that page will also be easier since I can just change the ~30s to the new value

hurricandave

legendary

Activity: 966

Merit: 1003

Quote from: kano on November 09, 2014, 09:54:59 PM

Fixed the above on IE8 and that may also fix it for anyone else who had the same issue.
Seems like IE8 doesn't like 3 digit colours #000 and #00f
So I could just change it to #000000 and #0000ff - but instead I just used the colour names for the white and blue font.

Just got back from dinner, that did the trick. It looks great now. Thank You!

kano

legendary

Activity: 4634

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

kano

legendary

Activity: 4634

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Quote from: hurricandave on November 09, 2014, 08:00:57 PM

I don't know what could be so different about the color settings for safari vs. IE 11 but I can't make out any of the dark shaded % areas. Its like the offset colors for the digits isn't happening or lacks a proper brightness control to make them visible.
http://i.imgur.com/36N5V9A.png?1

The text colour is using:

Seems like your safari version is ignoring it?

OK better run the check across all the browsers I can test against ...

Checking menus and block page colours:

Windows:
FireFox 33.0.3 - OK (and 12.0 and 8.1 - it upgraded twice when I checked the version Tongue

)
Chrome 38.0 - OK
IE8 (WinXP) - Menus OK - Blocks background OK but font colour all black Sad

Safari 5.1.7 - OK

Linux:
FireFox 32.0 - OK
Chrome 38.0 - OK

Android:
Chrome - OK
FireFox - OK
Opera - OK
~~Safari - OK~~
Default Browser - OK
(the default browser in my Samsung GalaxyS3 reports itself to web sites as Safari)
Edit: but it seems it isn't Safari but most likely some Mozilla derivative

N.B. I don't test all versions - those are the versions I currently have installed on each device

Seems like IE8 and your browser both ignore the font setting.
Sigh - stupid browsers Tongue

I imagine that's simply a case of using a css class for the font will fix that one - I'll do that later.
Edit: oh on closer examination it might be the colours on those 2 are not getting it right ... anyway I'll look into it on IE8 and that will probably fix it for you also.

hurricandave

legendary

Activity: 966

Merit: 1003

kano

legendary

Activity: 4634

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Quote from: Trademan1 on November 09, 2014, 06:56:22 PM

...

Depends which way you look at it.

The block at 2014-11-07 06:44am took about 4 1/2 days .. actuallly

Either way, not bad for only 1.2Ph.

kano

legendary

Activity: 4634

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Quote from: philipma1957 on November 09, 2014, 06:39:29 PM

BTW the last block was under 50% cdf as I understand it.

I believe 39603666252 is the current diff. If you take exactly that number you are at 50% cdf.

Last block was 86.1% of that number.

@kano or ckolivas is that correct? if we match the diff shares cdf is 50%

The figure I have there on the blocks page is the % (the Diff amount next to it is) of network diff when the block was found.

I'm pretty sure CDF isn't exactly 50% when you match 100% diff.

Anyway, the colouring is black at 100%, red above 100% and green below 100%
The brighter the green, the better, the brighter the red, the worse, though red hits it's brightness limit at 562%
https://bitbucket.org/ckolivas/ckpool/src/aca254495ebfc20f9358995d3859b4a2ffd138dc/pool/page_blocks.php?at=master#cl-3

Trademan1

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: philipma1957 on November 09, 2014, 06:32:26 PM

Quote from: norgan on November 09, 2014, 05:41:47 PM

Quote from: Trademan1 on November 09, 2014, 05:24:49 PM

No, the last block took about 35hrs. There was 7 blocks over about 4 days though. The one before that took about 4 1/2 days.

ah yeah that's true. it just feels like 7 in 24 hours haha

actually we did 7 in 27 1/2 hours first of the 7 was block made 2014-11-07 06:44am last of the 7 was 2014-11-08 10:18 am
see below

Depends which way you look at it.

The block at 2014-11-07 06:44am took about 4 1/2 days .. actuallly

Either way, not bad for only 1.2Ph.

philipma1957

legendary

Activity: 4326

Merit: 8950

'The right to privacy matters'

judypug1956

sr. member

Activity: 355

Merit: 276

Quote from: norgan on November 09, 2014, 06:34:01 PM

Quote from: philipma1957 on November 09, 2014, 06:32:26 PM

Quote from: norgan on November 09, 2014, 05:41:47 PM

Quote from: Trademan1 on November 09, 2014, 05:24:49 PM

No, the last block took about 35hrs. There was 7 blocks over about 4 days though. The one before that took about 4 1/2 days.

ah yeah that's true. it just feels like 7 in 24 hours haha

actually we did 7 in 27 1/2 hours first of the 7 was block made 2014-11-07 06:44am last of the 7 was 2014-11-08 10:18 am

Awesome, see I wasn't that far off after all.

Go ckpool!

it was a tremendous run of luck

1ph at current diff should take 13 days to do what we did in 27.5 hours.

norgan

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

Decentralize your hashing - p2pool - Norgz Pool

Quote from: philipma1957 on November 09, 2014, 06:32:26 PM

Quote from: norgan on November 09, 2014, 05:41:47 PM

Quote from: Trademan1 on November 09, 2014, 05:24:49 PM

No, the last block took about 35hrs. There was 7 blocks over about 4 days though. The one before that took about 4 1/2 days.

ah yeah that's true. it just feels like 7 in 24 hours haha

actually we did 7 in 27 1/2 hours first of the 7 was block made 2014-11-07 06:44am last of the 7 was 2014-11-08 10:18 am

Awesome, see I wasn't that far off after all.

Go ckpool!