Author

Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 2237. (Read 5352633 times)

hurricandave

legendary

Activity: 966

Merit: 1003

Quote from: kano on November 09, 2014, 09:54:59 PM

Fixed the above on IE8 and that may also fix it for anyone else who had the same issue.
Seems like IE8 doesn't like 3 digit colours #000 and #00f
So I could just change it to #000000 and #0000ff - but instead I just used the colour names for the white and blue font.

Just got back from dinner, that did the trick. It looks great now. Thank You!

kano

legendary

Activity: 4634

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

kano

legendary

Activity: 4634

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Quote from: hurricandave on November 09, 2014, 08:00:57 PM

I don't know what could be so different about the color settings for safari vs. IE 11 but I can't make out any of the dark shaded % areas. Its like the offset colors for the digits isn't happening or lacks a proper brightness control to make them visible.
http://i.imgur.com/36N5V9A.png?1

The text colour is using:

Seems like your safari version is ignoring it?

OK better run the check across all the browsers I can test against ...

Checking menus and block page colours:

Windows:
FireFox 33.0.3 - OK (and 12.0 and 8.1 - it upgraded twice when I checked the version Tongue

)
Chrome 38.0 - OK
IE8 (WinXP) - Menus OK - Blocks background OK but font colour all black Sad

Safari 5.1.7 - OK

Linux:
FireFox 32.0 - OK
Chrome 38.0 - OK

Android:
Chrome - OK
FireFox - OK
Opera - OK
~~Safari - OK~~
Default Browser - OK
(the default browser in my Samsung GalaxyS3 reports itself to web sites as Safari)
Edit: but it seems it isn't Safari but most likely some Mozilla derivative

N.B. I don't test all versions - those are the versions I currently have installed on each device

Seems like IE8 and your browser both ignore the font setting.
Sigh - stupid browsers Tongue

I imagine that's simply a case of using a css class for the font will fix that one - I'll do that later.
Edit: oh on closer examination it might be the colours on those 2 are not getting it right ... anyway I'll look into it on IE8 and that will probably fix it for you also.

hurricandave

legendary

Activity: 966

Merit: 1003

kano

legendary

Activity: 4634

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Quote from: Trademan1 on November 09, 2014, 06:56:22 PM

...

Depends which way you look at it.

The block at 2014-11-07 06:44am took about 4 1/2 days .. actuallly

Either way, not bad for only 1.2Ph.

Yeah, the time for a single block is from the previous block to the time of the block.

Although you can say we found 7 blocks in a bit over a day, all the statistical calculations including the 1st block of those seven has to include the ~4.42days it took to find it.

I'm still amazed that the 6 blocks averaged less than 10.4% diff for all 6 ...

kano

legendary

Activity: 4634

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Quote from: philipma1957 on November 09, 2014, 06:39:29 PM

BTW the last block was under 50% cdf as I understand it.

I believe 39603666252 is the current diff. If you take exactly that number you are at 50% cdf.

Last block was 86.1% of that number.

@kano or ckolivas is that correct? if we match the diff shares cdf is 50%

The figure I have there on the blocks page is the % (the Diff amount next to it is) of network diff when the block was found.

I'm pretty sure CDF isn't exactly 50% when you match 100% diff.

Anyway, the colouring is black at 100%, red above 100% and green below 100%
The brighter the green, the better, the brighter the red, the worse, though red hits it's brightness limit at 562%
https://bitbucket.org/ckolivas/ckpool/src/aca254495ebfc20f9358995d3859b4a2ffd138dc/pool/page_blocks.php?at=master#cl-3

Trademan1

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Quote from: philipma1957 on November 09, 2014, 06:32:26 PM

Quote from: norgan on November 09, 2014, 05:41:47 PM

Quote from: Trademan1 on November 09, 2014, 05:24:49 PM

No, the last block took about 35hrs. There was 7 blocks over about 4 days though. The one before that took about 4 1/2 days.

ah yeah that's true. it just feels like 7 in 24 hours haha

actually we did 7 in 27 1/2 hours first of the 7 was block made 2014-11-07 06:44am last of the 7 was 2014-11-08 10:18 am
see below

Depends which way you look at it.

The block at 2014-11-07 06:44am took about 4 1/2 days .. actuallly

Either way, not bad for only 1.2Ph.

philipma1957

legendary

Activity: 4382

Merit: 9330

'The right to privacy matters'

judypug1956

sr. member

Activity: 355

Merit: 276

Quote from: norgan on November 09, 2014, 06:34:01 PM

Quote from: philipma1957 on November 09, 2014, 06:32:26 PM

Quote from: norgan on November 09, 2014, 05:41:47 PM

Quote from: Trademan1 on November 09, 2014, 05:24:49 PM

No, the last block took about 35hrs. There was 7 blocks over about 4 days though. The one before that took about 4 1/2 days.

ah yeah that's true. it just feels like 7 in 24 hours haha

actually we did 7 in 27 1/2 hours first of the 7 was block made 2014-11-07 06:44am last of the 7 was 2014-11-08 10:18 am

Awesome, see I wasn't that far off after all.

Go ckpool!

it was a tremendous run of luck

1ph at current diff should take 13 days to do what we did in 27.5 hours.

norgan

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

Decentralize your hashing - p2pool - Norgz Pool

Quote from: philipma1957 on November 09, 2014, 06:32:26 PM

Quote from: norgan on November 09, 2014, 05:41:47 PM

Quote from: Trademan1 on November 09, 2014, 05:24:49 PM

No, the last block took about 35hrs. There was 7 blocks over about 4 days though. The one before that took about 4 1/2 days.

ah yeah that's true. it just feels like 7 in 24 hours haha

actually we did 7 in 27 1/2 hours first of the 7 was block made 2014-11-07 06:44am last of the 7 was 2014-11-08 10:18 am

Awesome, see I wasn't that far off after all.

Go ckpool!

philipma1957

legendary

Activity: 4382

Merit: 9330

'The right to privacy matters'

Quote from: norgan on November 09, 2014, 05:41:47 PM

Quote from: Trademan1 on November 09, 2014, 05:24:49 PM

No, the last block took about 35hrs. There was 7 blocks over about 4 days though. The one before that took about 4 1/2 days.

ah yeah that's true. it just feels like 7 in 24 hours haha

actually we did 7 in 27 1/2 hours first of the 7 was block made 2014-11-07 06:44am last of the 7 was 2014-11-08 10:18 am
see below

kano

legendary

Activity: 4634

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Quote from: norgan on November 09, 2014, 05:08:35 PM

What's that now 7 blocks in 24 hours?

The blocks page is all OK again since I implemented the Markers yesterday
I put a fix in there to make sure it was OK even when I used the new -w option to reduce ram while I was working on the Markers
Before markers, CKDB (using a -w to greatly reduce the number of sharesummaries in ram) was using > 40GB ram
After Markers basic implementation it's now down to about 10GB and will drop more once I implement the longer marker shifts.
Yeah ckdb still has a memory image of the entire database.
There's a bunch of todos in the code to drop history from ram once I no longer need it - but the marker changes were required before that and at the moment it's back again well under control since the back end has more than enough ram and performance.

Edit: the % at the bottom is since the pool started and also correct

i.e. it doesn't count the orphan block as a block, so it's 2.69% just adds (correctly) on to the total

norgan

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

Decentralize your hashing - p2pool - Norgz Pool

Quote from: Trademan1 on November 09, 2014, 05:24:49 PM

No, the last block took about 35hrs. There was 7 blocks over about 4 days though. The one before that took about 4 1/2 days.

ah yeah that's true. it just feels like 7 in 24 hours haha

Trademan1

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

No, the last block took about 35hrs. There was 7 blocks over about 4 days though. The one before that took about 4 1/2 days.

norgan

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

Decentralize your hashing - p2pool - Norgz Pool

What's that now 7 blocks in 24 hours?

Xtra7973

newbie

Activity: 47

Merit: 0

And I just got all my miners up and running, damn internet problems. Just found another block, lets hope my internet demons stay away this time.

kano

legendary

Activity: 4634

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Quote from: Axiste on November 09, 2014, 05:24:49 AM

ok, menus still no good, now i can only click on help when im not logged in. Once logged in its the same as the others. Seems to be related to them not being available unless logged in as a user.

You can only access the Home and the Help->Payouts page unless you are logged in.

Edit: and we just found another block under 100%

Axiste

full member

Activity: 152

Merit: 100

ok, menus still no good, now i can only click on help when im not logged in. Once logged in its the same as the others. Seems to be related to them not being available unless logged in as a user.

kano

legendary

Activity: 4634

Merit: 1851

Linux since 1997 RedHat 4

Edit: oh, also, I paid out the last block, 329091, shortly after it matured

I implemented the majority of the Marker changes on the pool over the last hour.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9417792
Still a few more of the changes to do but I've done all the major design enhancements required.

The older blocks that weren't showing their stats before on the web page, now have their data they need that I deprived them of.

The next change regarding Markers will be a minor change to the payout.
The payout is (and will stay) N based on the network difficulty when a block is found.
However, even now it isn't exactly N, its a bit more.
Since CKDB doesn't store shares singly, but rather as sharesummaries per ~30s, the N value used if N+the rest of the shares in the starting summary
Thus this currently averages ~15s more shares above N, per payout.

With the markersummaries, the sharesummaries are summarised into markersummaries that will be (probably) 50 sharesummaries each - i.e. ~25 minutes of shares per markersummary.
So the N value used will be, on average, ~12.5 minutes more shares per payout (on average ~12 minutes more shares per payout than currently used)
I'll post again in here (whenever I get to doing that) before I make that change.

Trademan1

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Gday Kano and CK, ive just pointed my 2 S3s at your pool.

All the GHs adds up eh. Ive also had about 50GHs made up of a few USBs running at the solopool for a while now, just in case my lotto number comes up. Yanevano.

The S3s settled down showing pretty much what they should on your pool within 1 hr so its all looking pretty good.

The site looks good too, its got all the info we need, I just need to work out a way of not having to refresh the website to see the updated shares etc.

Anyway, well done with the pool, and lets hope it keeps growing and getting better.

Cheers.