Do you think there's a mathematical advantage to including more rather than less transactions to candidate blocks?
I'm wondering if when all the transactions are hashed together if it inherently skews the resulting hash value higher or lower.
That'd be pretty interesting if the way we try to get new blocks is actually the best way (i.e. The heavier the block the better).
No idea why anyone would want less transaction fees
Hashing is pseudo random ... transaction numbers are truly random ... it's all so random that it's pointless trying to find any sort of pattern.
There are no patterns to find in mining.
if u can see where all particals are and know where they are going then u can predict the future forever therefor there is no such thing as random
all thought is particles in motion i dont believe there is some magical unseen power within the human mind to be able to change the laws of physics and change the movement of particals simply with his "will" lol. this from the only species of animal that gains pleasure out of torturing its own
If it all started with a “Big Bang” then choice does not exist. We are all merely reacting to that first initial blast set in motion so many years ago. No?