Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 363. (Read 5352229 times)

Right. That's what I was trying to clarify above. Thanks for clearing it up in case that wasn't easily understood.

Speaking of patterns... That recent block by Sidewinder was number 2222.

Just a note: Kano's 10 BTC Giveaway is funded by Kano personally, NOT the pool.


MINE ON!!!

That would be me. 

That makes me think of "Ding! Block is done!"

Here's a throwback for ya!

https://m.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=59&v=ZvvHXjKloNs

Once again, just MINE ON WITH KANO-SAN!

Block was on the reward page literally a couple minutes after the block was found.

I was just wondering the same thing. The next shift should have ended already.



EDIT: And just like that. Ka-pow

How long does it takento see the block on the reward page?
Thought it was a couple of min 🙈

I hope this was the first of dozens of blocks for Sidewinder.

Yep. I locked myself out before too. However, I have found that if you know what the best average work diff for you miner is--chart out your shifts in a spreadsheet to see which work diff results in the highest share diff per minute with the lowest invalids--you can just set it directly to that work diff (e.g. 3586 for my Avalon6) and reduce all those invalids from when it tries to default to 4098 and throws a bunch of invalids.

Looks like I was only a few blocks early with my prediction for the FIRST qualifying 10BTC Giveaway block reward!

Look at sidewinder go, Go, GO!!!

Finally Sidewinder have got 1 BTC block reward due to recent block find. Let's hope he gets 2 more soon..

Congrats and let's crack another whipping block!

yep last guy who tinkered with the numbers ended up haveing alot of problems and locked himself out of the pool fer awile by accedent

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ksOCraawZME

Each share the miner submits has a different difficulty - this is normalised to a number of shares based on difficulty.

Auto difficulty tries to set your miner to submit 18 shares per minute according to Kano.

Seems to work fine for my S9's so I'd keep it variable. Higher difficulty settings just change the variance I.e. The number and frequency your shares are submitted but shouldn't impact overall hashing rate in the long run.

Below is the present snapshot of my Workers page. Ironically although I'd let them run for a few weeks without tinkering to test them, I just noticed today that worker #1 had 1 PCI-E connector loose and I'm not sure how long it had been that way... it's now been fixed as of maybe 1 hour ago, whether that impacts the numbers, you tell me. (Just refresh'd my workers page and we hit a block,  )

Worker Name:   Work Diff   :Last Share   Shares   :Diff   :Share Rate   «Elapsed   :Invalid   Block %   :Hash Rate
BMCA_1           12.238k   1s                   41   501,758   14.37THs   2m 30s   2.381%   0.016%   13.69THs
BMCA_2           11.543k   1s                   34   392,462   11.24THs   2m 30s   0.000%   0.013%   13.82THs
BMCA_3           12.339k   1s                   39   481,221   13.78THs   2m 30s   0.000%   0.016%   13.46THs
Total: 3                                                         111 375,441   39.38THs       0.882%   0.045%   40.98THs


Apologies for the shitty formatting.  I am aware that all Antminer's will vary on Hashrate given the luck of the draw, but would a manually configured difficulty produce a higher hashrate? This brings us back full circle to my initial question, are all shares equal and is maximizing amount of shares the objective?


Thanks in advance for your help Kano friends.

I guess I picked the right time to get here because December 10, January 8, February 5, but March already 14 blocks! Keep it up guys.


[/quote]

I would be curious to see if fixing the plug fixed your Invalid %. I have 4 s9's and leave the work diff alone and let them do their thing. The seem to do fine and even better recently.

Hey all, newer member to the pool, have a quick question for you.

Most of my mining experience was with GPU rigs. I have some S9's now, presently 3 plugged in, more getting settled in.

I have been mining on Kano since March 7, (I like the vibe, the reward structure and the size) and now that I've let them mine for several weeks to sample some numbers, I have a couple of questions.

General question regarding pool & mining:

Are all shares equal?
Is the # of shares the most important statistic in terms of rewards?

I've attempted to do some research on this but there is a lot of dated information as well as varying pool reward structures so please bare with me.


I am using 13.5 S9's.

Is it better to leave it on variable difficulty and let it find it's own nirvana or is there a specific number that will work better?

Below is the present snapshot of my Workers page. Ironically although I'd let them run for a few weeks without tinkering to test them, I just noticed today that worker #1 had 1 PCI-E connector loose and I'm not sure how long it had been that way... it's now been fixed as of maybe 1 hour ago, whether that impacts the numbers, you tell me. (Just refresh'd my workers page and we hit a block,  )

Worker Name:   Work Diff   :Last Share   Shares   :Diff   :Share Rate   «Elapsed   :Invalid   Block %   :Hash Rate
BMCA_1           12.238k   1s                   41   501,758   14.37THs   2m 30s   2.381%   0.016%   13.69THs
BMCA_2           11.543k   1s                   34   392,462   11.24THs   2m 30s   0.000%   0.013%   13.82THs
BMCA_3           12.339k   1s                   39   481,221   13.78THs   2m 30s   0.000%   0.016%   13.46THs
Total: 3                                                         111 375,441   39.38THs       0.882%   0.045%   40.98THs


Apologies for the shitty formatting.  I am aware that all Antminer's will vary on Hashrate given the luck of the draw, but would a manually configured difficulty produce a higher hashrate? This brings us back full circle to my initial question, are all shares equal and is maximizing amount of shares the objective?


Thanks in advance for your help Kano friends.

I guess I picked the right time to get here because December 10, January 8, February 5, but March already 14 blocks! Keep it up guys.


Edit: Once again a snapshot of worker page, since we hit the last block.

Worker Name:   Work Diff   :Last Share   Shares   :Diff   :Share Rate   «Elapsed   :Invalid   Block %   :Hash Rate
BMCA_1   12.238k   0s   271   3,316,498   15.47THs   9m 24s   0.368%   0.017%   13.90THs
BMCA_2   11.543k   2s   256   2,955,008   11.78THs   9m 24s   0.000%   0.015%   13.66THs
BMCA_3   12.339k   3s   258   3,183,462   13.72THs   9m 24s   0.000%   0.016%   13.57THs
Total: 3 (3 active workers)   785   9,454,968   40.97THs       0.129%   0.047%   41.12THs

#1 was the one with loose PCI connectors which have since been fixed but still throwing up invalids... can't imagine its due to networking as they are all hardwired into a 20 port switch on a short run next to each other...

Here I am at 0530 waiting for my coffee water to boil...doing my usual business of checking the pool, spot, etc. finding nothing exciting as yet...and as I log on the board, BLOCK...

I just love it when a plan comes together...

 

wow another block!