10 BTC giveaway to LARGE miners
Any new miner, who joined this year, with NON-RENTAL hash rate - i.e. their own miners, who shows on the rewards page a "Your N Avg" of exactly 9.5PH/s or more -
yes a large miner - for any block that they find, will get a bonus 1 BTC block finder reward.
... and to get the attention of anyone half that size ...
Any new miner, who joined this year, with NON-RENTAL hash rate - i.e. their own miners, who shows on the rewards page a "Your N Avg" of exactly 5.0PH/s or more -
yes a large miner - for any block that they find, will get a bonus 0.5 BTC block finder reward.
Total rewards for a single miner are a maximum of 3 block finder rewards per miner.
Total BTC I'll be giving out will be 10 BTC i.e. a total of ten 1 BTC block finder rewards or twenty 0.5 BTC block finder rewards or a combination of both up to a total of 10 BTC limit i.e. if a total of 9.5 BTC has been given out, the last reward will be limited to 0.5 BTC.
The bonus 0.5 or 1 BTC block finder reward will not be taken from the block reward to miners - i.e. no miners will be getting paid less due to the block finder reward.
Yep, sure. Little humble miners (50 Th or more) are not deserve even 0.1 BTC block finder reward...
Well if you prefer the pool to disappear, fine, but I'm trying to keep it going by using my own BTC to get large miners ... which is what we need to do, to stop the pool falling into the depths of massive losses due to blocks spanning multiple difficulty changes - like
ALL the smaller pools.
What I'm doing with the tiny 0.9% pool fees - is for the pool's sake, but is also my choice
You still get the fairest payout of all pools by mining here - lowest fees - no loss due to block finder rewards - no crappy payout systems based on share luck - even small miners get a reward here every time (not never, or every 2nd time - losing some of their small reward)
If you think you should be getting rewarded more, then you'll need to find some other (non existent) pool that does that
... also I fixed your quote to the current version of that