Im looking to buy some v9’s i know hey r s7’s but they r very cheap compared to s7 hardware
Cheap is relative, based on your power costs. V9's only make sense right now if your power is hovering around "free."na mine is free and still went s9
Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 414. (Read 5352527 times)
March 04, 2018, 04:25:11 PM
na mine is free and still went s9
March 04, 2018, 04:07:33 PM
Im looking to buy some v9’s i know hey r s7’s but they r very cheap compared to s7 hardware
Cheap is relative, based on your power costs. V9's only make sense right now if your power is hovering around "free." March 04, 2018, 03:38:14 PM
Hey does anyone know anything about the Antminer V9.
...
The V9 is an old (used) S7 - literally...
March 04, 2018, 02:55:09 PM
What is your internet connection? I'm near the beach in Virginia and it's only 93ms to the stratum from here.
Pinging nya.kano.is [104.207.132.42] with 32 bytes of data:
Ping statistics for 104.207.132.42:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 33ms, Maximum = 36ms, Average = 34ms
Pinging stratum.kano.is [45.32.140.110] with 32 bytes of data:
Ping statistics for 45.32.140.110:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 93ms, Maximum = 95ms, Average = 93ms
It could be a problem with the service too. I had very little connection around 1am and 2am. I live about 1.5 miles away from our "tower",
but being out in the middle of farm fields, probably doesn't help. From our "tower" to the main "tower" is about 50 miles, might be getting
delayed in there somewhere.
EDIT: 2hrs uptime with, 1 reject, and ALOT less hardware errors.
do we know what exactly is a hw error ? it makes no sence to me since only 1 board seems to get em out of 3
March 04, 2018, 12:56:50 PM
What is your internet connection? I'm near the beach in Virginia and it's only 93ms to the stratum from here.
Pinging nya.kano.is [104.207.132.42] with 32 bytes of data:
Ping statistics for 104.207.132.42:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 33ms, Maximum = 36ms, Average = 34ms
Pinging stratum.kano.is [45.32.140.110] with 32 bytes of data:
Ping statistics for 45.32.140.110:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 93ms, Maximum = 95ms, Average = 93ms
It could be a problem with the service too. I had very little connection around 1am and 2am. I live about 1.5 miles away from our "tower",
but being out in the middle of farm fields, probably doesn't help. From our "tower" to the main "tower" is about 50 miles, might be getting
delayed in there somewhere.
EDIT: 2hrs uptime with, 1 reject, and ALOT less hardware errors.
March 04, 2018, 12:20:27 PM
Must be something in the air. My internet service bottle necked the signal around 6 UTC, then again at 7 UTC. Strange thing was, it only affected 1 miner at a time.
Did a reboot, because it seemed I was getting alot of rejects. All looks good now.
What part of the globe is the node for stratum+tcp://stratum.kano.is:3333??? Curious if I should switch to nya.
Did a reboot, because it seemed I was getting alot of rejects. All looks good now.
What part of the globe is the node for stratum+tcp://stratum.kano.is:3333??? Curious if I should switch to nya.
It's on the west coast in Vegas. Ping all of the nodes to see which one is the best for you.
stratum.kano.is
de.kano.is
jp.kano.is
nl.kano.is
nya.kano.is
Thanks! nya. is looking like the best, which makes sense, since I'm in Michigan.
Pinging stratum.kano.is [45.32.140.110] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 45.32.140.110: bytes=32 time=120ms TTL=46
Reply from 45.32.140.110: bytes=32 time=147ms TTL=46
Reply from 45.32.140.110: bytes=32 time=141ms TTL=46
Reply from 45.32.140.110: bytes=32 time=146ms TTL=46
Ping statistics for 45.32.140.110:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 120ms, Maximum = 147ms, Average = 138ms
Pinging nya.kano.is [104.207.132.42] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 104.207.132.42: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=53
Reply from 104.207.132.42: bytes=32 time=117ms TTL=53
Reply from 104.207.132.42: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=53
Reply from 104.207.132.42: bytes=32 time=116ms TTL=53
Ping statistics for 104.207.132.42:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 107ms, Maximum = 117ms, Average = 113ms
What is your internet connection? I'm near the beach in Virginia and it's only 93ms to the stratum from here.
Pinging nya.kano.is [104.207.132.42] with 32 bytes of data:
Ping statistics for 104.207.132.42:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 33ms, Maximum = 36ms, Average = 34ms
Pinging stratum.kano.is [45.32.140.110] with 32 bytes of data:
Ping statistics for 45.32.140.110:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 93ms, Maximum = 95ms, Average = 93ms
March 04, 2018, 12:12:31 PM
Must be something in the air. My internet service bottle necked the signal around 6 UTC, then again at 7 UTC. Strange thing was, it only affected 1 miner at a time.
Did a reboot, because it seemed I was getting alot of rejects. All looks good now.
What part of the globe is the node for stratum+tcp://stratum.kano.is:3333??? Curious if I should switch to nya.
Did a reboot, because it seemed I was getting alot of rejects. All looks good now.
What part of the globe is the node for stratum+tcp://stratum.kano.is:3333??? Curious if I should switch to nya.
It's on the west coast in Vegas. Ping all of the nodes to see which one is the best for you.
stratum.kano.is
de.kano.is
jp.kano.is
nl.kano.is
nya.kano.is
Thanks! nya. is looking like the best, which makes sense, since I'm in Michigan.
Pinging stratum.kano.is [45.32.140.110] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 45.32.140.110: bytes=32 time=120ms TTL=46
Reply from 45.32.140.110: bytes=32 time=147ms TTL=46
Reply from 45.32.140.110: bytes=32 time=141ms TTL=46
Reply from 45.32.140.110: bytes=32 time=146ms TTL=46
Ping statistics for 45.32.140.110:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 120ms, Maximum = 147ms, Average = 138ms
Pinging nya.kano.is [104.207.132.42] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 104.207.132.42: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=53
Reply from 104.207.132.42: bytes=32 time=117ms TTL=53
Reply from 104.207.132.42: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=53
Reply from 104.207.132.42: bytes=32 time=116ms TTL=53
Ping statistics for 104.207.132.42:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 107ms, Maximum = 117ms, Average = 113ms
March 04, 2018, 12:01:15 PM
Must be something in the air. My internet service bottle necked the signal around 6 UTC, then again at 7 UTC. Strange thing was, it only affected 1 miner at a time.
Did a reboot, because it seemed I was getting alot of rejects. All looks good now.
What part of the globe is the node for stratum+tcp://stratum.kano.is:3333??? Curious if I should switch to nya.
Did a reboot, because it seemed I was getting alot of rejects. All looks good now.
What part of the globe is the node for stratum+tcp://stratum.kano.is:3333??? Curious if I should switch to nya.
It's on the west coast in Vegas. Ping all of the nodes to see which one is the best for you.
stratum.kano.is
de.kano.is
jp.kano.is
nl.kano.is
nya.kano.is
March 04, 2018, 11:56:59 AM
Yeah the failover and failback seems to have changed all the difficulties for the miners and threw more invalids. First time I've ever been higher than the pool invalids.
Glad it wasn't just me seeing this!!! Hahaha!!! I was becoming paranoid for a moment....well, more than usual.
March 04, 2018, 11:50:02 AM
Yeah the failover and failback seems to have changed all the difficulties for the miners and threw more invalids. First time I've ever been higher than the pool invalids.
March 04, 2018, 11:38:37 AM
Must be something in the air. My internet service bottle necked the signal around 6 UTC, then again at 7 UTC. Strange thing was, it only affected 1 miner at a time.
Did a reboot, because it seemed I was getting alot of rejects. All looks good now.
What part of the globe is the node for stratum+tcp://stratum.kano.is:3333??? Curious if I should switch to nya.
Did a reboot, because it seemed I was getting alot of rejects. All looks good now.
What part of the globe is the node for stratum+tcp://stratum.kano.is:3333??? Curious if I should switch to nya.
March 04, 2018, 04:04:06 AM
Had a failover/fail back 'event' on the Silicon Valley half of the main stratum server at 08:50 UTC
This is caused by the fact that a node requires a permanent connection to the main pool server and if it disconnects and reconnects immediately, it kicks everyone off the node and they reconnect i.e. failover/fail back (which takes cgminer 5 minutes)
A lot of the miners on stratum.kano.is will have failed over to their 2nd pool and will have already failed back.
Reminder to make sure your 2nd pool is another kano.is node so that if this happens, you simply failover to your 2nd pool node for 5 minutes then back again.
Thus you hardly notice any gap in your submitted shares.
This is caused by the fact that a node requires a permanent connection to the main pool server and if it disconnects and reconnects immediately, it kicks everyone off the node and they reconnect i.e. failover/fail back (which takes cgminer 5 minutes)
A lot of the miners on stratum.kano.is will have failed over to their 2nd pool and will have already failed back.
Reminder to make sure your 2nd pool is another kano.is node so that if this happens, you simply failover to your 2nd pool node for 5 minutes then back again.
Thus you hardly notice any gap in your submitted shares.
March 04, 2018, 02:48:03 AM
Well to be more specific 
Bitmain is the largest and worst competitor of every person who buys miners from them.
And they apparently can't set up an e-mail service either. I've been getting the same coupon notice once a minute for the last 2+ hours from them. and they're still coming in. Bitmain is the largest and worst competitor of every person who buys miners from them.
March 03, 2018, 11:48:29 PM
thx bud but was looking fer avatar pic which apparently cant have yet 
Probably gonna take forever too, now that theymos started the merit system.
yea i got no merrit
tis to bad too i got the best dog photo for avatrar 
March 03, 2018, 11:00:12 PM
thx bud but was looking fer avatar pic which apparently cant have yet
Probably gonna take forever too, now that theymos started the merit system.
March 03, 2018, 10:51:05 PM
It's not working Pecker........such an odd phrase!
GO to this link and upload your image: https://imgur.com/
once uploaded copy the link address of the pic you uploaded/create on the right side
come back to the post page here and click insert hyperlink
will look like this: ..ignore the quote marks
paste your copied link inside those brackets
then post...
here is a sample of what it will look like:
[url=https://imgur.com/a/AboRT]https://imgur.com/a/AboRT
thx bud but was looking fer avatar pic which apparently cant have yet
March 03, 2018, 10:06:59 PM
You think they repackaged used boards?
40th/s for $3000. If you could hook 3 to a A3++, it might be worth it
40th/s for $3000. If you could hook 3 to a A3++, it might be worth it
Bitmain usually sends out used equipment that they say was "tested". That's where their pool gets most of the hashrate that it
has. If you get free or dirt cheap electricity, it might be worth it, otherwise not at all.
Bitmain is the largest and worst competitor of every person who buys miners from them.
i.e. they have mining, bazillions of S7s and S9s and of course now whatever their next miner is, that they will let everyone buy some time in the future.
They need to get rid of their old garbage - S7s - and use the power for better miners than the S7s
That's what the V9s are - their way of making MORE profit out of the old S7s they've been mining with.
March 03, 2018, 09:59:16 PM
You think they repackaged used boards?
40th/s for $3000. If you could hook 3 to a A3++, it might be worth it
40th/s for $3000. If you could hook 3 to a A3++, it might be worth it
Bitmain usually sends out used equipment that they say was "tested". That's where their pool gets most of the hashrate that it
has. If you get free or dirt cheap electricity, it might be worth it, otherwise not at all.
March 03, 2018, 09:56:02 PM
It looks like the V9 consumes just over 1000 Watts. You won’t power 2 of them with one apw3++ psu. Also 3 of them together won’t equal 1 S9 in hashing speed and still consume over 3000 Watts of electricity. The S9 still wins.
March 03, 2018, 09:32:51 PM
You think they repackaged used boards?
40th/s for $3000. If you could hook 3 to a A3++, it might be worth it
[/quote]
The V9 is an old (used) S7 - literally
[/quote]
40th/s for $3000. If you could hook 3 to a A3++, it might be worth it
[/quote]
The V9 is an old (used) S7 - literally
[/quote]
Jump to: