Block by bitminerpro! Whew! 
Dang, it's a good one at 14.22993506
Dang, it's a good one at 14.22993506
Let's get one of those 16+ blocks now. MINE ON!
Topic: KanoPool kano.is lowest 0.9% fee 🐈 since 2014 - Worldwide - 2432 blocks - page 682. (Read 5352527 times)
December 09, 2017, 06:42:41 PM
Let's get one of those 16+ blocks now. MINE ON!
December 09, 2017, 06:41:17 PM
The difficulty increase of 18.1% seems to have changed everything. We were going along pretty good until then. Is the only way to overcome that just adding hashing power? Would it take an 18.1% increase in miner hash to have stayed at the near 100% luck point?
edit: That would have been a 4.88PH/s increase needed just to stay current
It just moves the length of time it takes to submit enough shares to reach 100%. But since the pool hashrate jumped from ~21Ph/s to ~28Ph/s, we actually were ahead of the 18% diff increase and shortened the 5nd by a couple of days. edit: That would have been a 4.88PH/s increase needed just to stay current
December 09, 2017, 06:37:23 PM
bingo!!!
December 09, 2017, 06:28:13 PM
BLOCK!!!!!!!!!!!!
December 09, 2017, 06:28:01 PM
Block by bitminerpro! Whew!
Dang, it's a good one at 14.22993506
Dang, it's a good one at 14.22993506
December 09, 2017, 05:07:24 PM
What I have to do? If I use for example ccminer,
What's CCMiner?
December 09, 2017, 05:00:30 PM
You pay some cash for awesome miner but just one time, not annually.
Has been the best tool for me for monitoring.
Temps, fan speed, profit per miner, restart. The thing is a dream.
Has been the best tool for me for monitoring.
Temps, fan speed, profit per miner, restart. The thing is a dream.
December 09, 2017, 04:48:02 PM
Question on my own:
Is anybody using awesome miner in the professional version or higher?
I like my miners to be watched over without checking every single machine every couple of hours.
Is awesome miner the best choice or is there another maybe free software which does the job
by mail or sms to me when somethings wrong?
The software should work for avalons and antminers. ;-)
I would code some stuff by myself and build it into my house automation,
but if there is a handsome way around it I would save the coding time.
Let's get this BLOOOCK cracked!!
Is anybody using awesome miner in the professional version or higher?
I like my miners to be watched over without checking every single machine every couple of hours.
Is awesome miner the best choice or is there another maybe free software which does the job
by mail or sms to me when somethings wrong?
The software should work for avalons and antminers. ;-)
I would code some stuff by myself and build it into my house automation,
but if there is a handsome way around it I would save the coding time.
Let's get this BLOOOCK cracked!!
December 09, 2017, 04:39:56 PM
Hello,
Again a newbie here ... french and not very good english then question about to configure antminer to mining Bitcoin.
To be sure, is it enought following: stratum+tcp://stratum.kano.is:3333 ctr200hp.worker x
I am registered on Kanopool site with username ctr200hp. I can't understand how to create worker name, no option to do that.
What I have to do? If I use for example ccminer, can I just use stratum+tcp://stratum.kano.is:3333 ctr200hp.worker x in command line?
Thank's a lot
Again a newbie here ... french and not very good english then question about to configure antminer to mining Bitcoin.
To be sure, is it enought following: stratum+tcp://stratum.kano.is:3333 ctr200hp.worker x
I am registered on Kanopool site with username ctr200hp. I can't understand how to create worker name, no option to do that.
What I have to do? If I use for example ccminer, can I just use stratum+tcp://stratum.kano.is:3333 ctr200hp.worker x in command line?
Thank's a lot
I think you'll better point your miner to stratum+tcp://de.kano.is:3333 and the other one as fallback (second pool entry)
Just ping the pool-server in the topic (us.kano.is, de.kano.is,...) and take the one with the lowest latency.
Which from france should be de.kano.is I think.
You don't need to create any workers. They'll be created as soon as you point your miner with your username: username.workername (in your case for example "ctr200hp.worker1") to the pool.
Oh and I think spaces in workernames are not support. So "worker x" would be wrong.
December 09, 2017, 04:34:06 PM
Hello,
Again a newbie here ... french and not very good english then question about to configure antminer to mining Bitcoin.
To be sure, is it enought following: stratum+tcp://stratum.kano.is:3333 ctr200hp.worker x
I am registered on Kanopool site with username ctr200hp. I can't understand how to create worker name, no option to do that.
What I have to do? If I use for example ccminer, can I just use stratum+tcp://stratum.kano.is:3333 ctr200hp.worker x in command line?
Thank's a lot
Again a newbie here ... french and not very good english then question about to configure antminer to mining Bitcoin.
To be sure, is it enought following: stratum+tcp://stratum.kano.is:3333 ctr200hp.worker x
I am registered on Kanopool site with username ctr200hp. I can't understand how to create worker name, no option to do that.
What I have to do? If I use for example ccminer, can I just use stratum+tcp://stratum.kano.is:3333 ctr200hp.worker x in command line?
Thank's a lot
December 09, 2017, 02:40:44 PM
Reboot, reboot, reboot!
hehe, oh man can't get over that.
Anyway, let's get some blocks Lady Luck. It's time to pull the wool over Variances head!
what would a reboot do? Would it not, theoretically, reset the circumstance of probability and therefore, in the long run, actually increase the time to the next block?
hehe, oh man can't get over that.
Anyway, let's get some blocks Lady Luck. It's time to pull the wool over Variances head!
what would a reboot do? Would it not, theoretically, reset the circumstance of probability and therefore, in the long run, actually increase the time to the next block?
It's a running joke that every time Kano reboots some of his nodes we usually get a block shortly afterward.
It doesn't impact the times at all.
December 09, 2017, 02:02:46 PM
Reboot, reboot, reboot!
hehe, oh man can't get over that.
Anyway, let's get some blocks Lady Luck. It's time to pull the wool over Variances head!
hehe, oh man can't get over that.
Anyway, let's get some blocks Lady Luck. It's time to pull the wool over Variances head!
what would a reboot do? Would it not, theoretically, reset the circumstance of probability and therefore, in the long run, actually increase the time to the next block?
December 09, 2017, 12:24:49 PM
Is there anyway to figure out the payout for one s9 after 5nd per block?
http://tradebtc.net/bitcalc.php
December 09, 2017, 12:13:49 PM
Is there anyway to figure out the payout for one s9 after 5nd per block?
December 09, 2017, 12:13:30 PM
Reboot, reboot, reboot!
hehe, oh man can't get over that.
Anyway, let's get some blocks Lady Luck. It's time to pull the wool over Variances head!
hehe, oh man can't get over that.
Anyway, let's get some blocks Lady Luck. It's time to pull the wool over Variances head!
December 09, 2017, 12:07:31 PM
The difficulty increase of 18.1% seems to have changed everything. We were going along pretty good until then. Is the only way to overcome that just adding hashing power? Would it take an 18.1% increase in miner hash to have stayed at the near 100% luck point?
edit: That would have been a 4.88PH/s increase needed just to stay current
edit: That would have been a 4.88PH/s increase needed just to stay current
I dusted off some Jupiters that haven't ran in years.. 1.1TH added to the pool!!
hope it help!
December 09, 2017, 12:05:47 PM
The difficulty increase of 18.1% seems to have changed everything. We were going along pretty good until then. Is the only way to overcome that just adding hashing power? Would it take an 18.1% increase in miner hash to have stayed at the near 100% luck point?
edit: That would have been a 4.88PH/s increase needed just to stay current
edit: That would have been a 4.88PH/s increase needed just to stay current
It's affected most pools....we may be stuck in a rut for the next week and a half on this... GRRRR
BLOCK BLOCK BLOCK
Stuck in a rut? How is this anything than variance?
December 09, 2017, 10:54:54 AM
The difficulty increase of 18.1% seems to have changed everything. We were going along pretty good until then. Is the only way to overcome that just adding hashing power? Would it take an 18.1% increase in miner hash to have stayed at the near 100% luck point?
edit: That would have been a 4.88PH/s increase needed just to stay current
edit: That would have been a 4.88PH/s increase needed just to stay current
It's affected most pools....we may be stuck in a rut for the next week and a half on this... GRRRR
BLOCK BLOCK BLOCK
December 09, 2017, 10:10:56 AM
The difficulty increase of 18.1% seems to have changed everything. We were going along pretty good until then. Is the only way to overcome that just adding hashing power? Would it take an 18.1% increase in miner hash to have stayed at the near 100% luck point?
edit: That would have been a 4.88PH/s increase needed just to stay current
edit: That would have been a 4.88PH/s increase needed just to stay current
It's affected most pools....we may be stuck in a rut for the next week and a half on this... GRRRR
BLOCK BLOCK BLOCK
December 09, 2017, 09:37:54 AM
The difficulty increase of 18.1% seems to have changed everything. We were going along pretty good until then. Is the only way to overcome that just adding hashing power? Would it take an 18.1% increase in miner hash to have stayed at the near 100% luck point?
edit: That would have been a 4.88PH/s increase needed just to stay current
edit: That would have been a 4.88PH/s increase needed just to stay current
The expected block is allways 100% no matter how much hash rate we have. Sometimes it will be less than 100% and sometimes it will be more but the expected is 100%. Adding hash rate only speeds up the process so we would reach 100% on a block much faster than we do now but the expected block find will still be 100% for each block.
Jump to: