Pages:
Author

Topic: ▂▃▅▆▇⫷[ 🆉🅿🅾🅾🅻.🅲🅰 ]⫸⫷[!KAWPOW!]⫸⫷[ the miners multipool ]⫸ ▇▆▅▃▂ - page 93. (Read 279601 times)

newbie
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
I am trying sgminer to mine xvg with x17 algo..it's running but getting no shares as the cmd window below.. Do your pool support sgminer x17 algo for AMD gpu?

sgminer 4.2.2 - Started: [2017-12-25 02:29:29] - [0 days 00:01:50]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5s):22.27M (avg):20.29Mh/s | A:0  R:0  HW:9  WU:0.000/m
ST: 2  SS: 0  NB: 4  LW: 180  GF: 0  RF: 0
Connected to x17.mine.zpool.ca (stratum) diff 0.050 as user DAob8CB4A6tvFvT79gAFDHBx3LW4hNGvCb
Block: 710d1adc...  Diff:6.84K  Started: [02:30:34]  Best share: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[P]ool management [G]PU management [Settings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
GPU 0:  69.0C  383RPM | 4.964M/4.741Mh/s | R:  0.0% HW:2 WU:0.000/m I:20
GPU 1:  66.0C  652RPM | 5.708M/5.343Mh/s | R:  0.0% HW:0 WU:0.000/m I:20
GPU 2:  62.0C  794RPM | 5.721M/5.343Mh/s | R:  0.0% HW:4 WU:0.000/m I:20
GPU 3:  68.0C  156RPM | 5.336M/5.120Mh/s | R:  0.0% HW:4 WU:0.000/m I:20
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[02:29:24] Started sgminer 4.2.2
[02:29:24] * using Jansson 2.6
[02:29:24] Probing for an alive pool
[02:29:28] Startup GPU initialization... Using settings from pool x17.mine.zpool.ca.
[02:29:28] Startup Pool No = 0
[02:29:28] x17.mine.zpool.ca difficulty changed to 0.050
[02:29:28] Initialising kernel x17.cl with bitalign, unpatched BFI, nfactor 10, n 1024
[02:29:28] Initialising kernel x17.cl with bitalign, unpatched BFI, nfactor 10, n 1024
[02:29:29] Initialising kernel x17.cl with bitalign, unpatched BFI, nfactor 10, n 1024
[02:29:29] Initialising kernel x17.cl with bitalign, unpatched BFI, nfactor 10, n 1024[/s][/s]



It works, you just have to wait for your miner to find a share or wait for the difficulty to adjust to your system speeds.

Secret you will make more xvg if you were mining neoscrypt with your amd gpu's as it is more profitable than mining verge directly.

@cryptominer thanks for the advice.. I did mine various neoscrypt coins.. now I want xvg.
The diff was changed from 0.05 to 0.025.. both are not high.. it seems not working.. some other thing is wrong..
hero member
Activity: 677
Merit: 500
you can check your wallet stats for the diff when it starts up and it would print it in more legible value probably But equihash is 128 starting so can supply d=64 for it and it should work.

Thanks.  It looks like that's the lowest it'll go.  Still a bit difficult for a 300 Sol miner, but oh well.
sr. member
Activity: 450
Merit: 255
I am trying sgminer to mine xvg with x17 algo..it's running but getting no shares as the cmd window below.. Do your pool support sgminer x17 algo for AMD gpu?

sgminer 4.2.2 - Started: [2017-12-25 02:29:29] - [0 days 00:01:50]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5s):22.27M (avg):20.29Mh/s | A:0  R:0  HW:9  WU:0.000/m
ST: 2  SS: 0  NB: 4  LW: 180  GF: 0  RF: 0
Connected to x17.mine.zpool.ca (stratum) diff 0.050 as user DAob8CB4A6tvFvT79gAFDHBx3LW4hNGvCb
Block: 710d1adc...  Diff:6.84K  Started: [02:30:34]  Best share: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[P]ool management [G]PU management [Settings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
GPU 0:  69.0C  383RPM | 4.964M/4.741Mh/s | R:  0.0% HW:2 WU:0.000/m I:20
GPU 1:  66.0C  652RPM | 5.708M/5.343Mh/s | R:  0.0% HW:0 WU:0.000/m I:20
GPU 2:  62.0C  794RPM | 5.721M/5.343Mh/s | R:  0.0% HW:4 WU:0.000/m I:20
GPU 3:  68.0C  156RPM | 5.336M/5.120Mh/s | R:  0.0% HW:4 WU:0.000/m I:20
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[02:29:24] Started sgminer 4.2.2
[02:29:24] * using Jansson 2.6
[02:29:24] Probing for an alive pool
[02:29:28] Startup GPU initialization... Using settings from pool x17.mine.zpool.ca.
[02:29:28] Startup Pool No = 0
[02:29:28] x17.mine.zpool.ca difficulty changed to 0.050
[02:29:28] Initialising kernel x17.cl with bitalign, unpatched BFI, nfactor 10, n 1024
[02:29:28] Initialising kernel x17.cl with bitalign, unpatched BFI, nfactor 10, n 1024
[02:29:29] Initialising kernel x17.cl with bitalign, unpatched BFI, nfactor 10, n 1024
[02:29:29] Initialising kernel x17.cl with bitalign, unpatched BFI, nfactor 10, n 1024[/s][/s]



It works, you just have to wait for your miner to find a share or wait for the difficulty to adjust to your system speeds.

Secret you will make more xvg if you were mining neoscrypt with your amd gpu's as it is more profitable than mining verge directly.
newbie
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
I am trying sgminer to mine xvg with x17 algo..it's running but getting no shares as the cmd window below.. Do your pool support sgminer x17 algo for AMD gpu?

sgminer 4.2.2 - Started: [2017-12-25 02:29:29] - [0 days 00:01:50]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5s):22.27M (avg):20.29Mh/s | A:0  R:0  HW:9  WU:0.000/m
ST: 2  SS: 0  NB: 4  LW: 180  GF: 0  RF: 0
Connected to x17.mine.zpool.ca (stratum) diff 0.050 as user DAob8CB4A6tvFvT79gAFDHBx3LW4hNGvCb
Block: 710d1adc...  Diff:6.84K  Started: [02:30:34]  Best share: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[P]ool management [G]PU management [Settings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
GPU 0:  69.0C  383RPM | 4.964M/4.741Mh/s | R:  0.0% HW:2 WU:0.000/m I:20
GPU 1:  66.0C  652RPM | 5.708M/5.343Mh/s | R:  0.0% HW:0 WU:0.000/m I:20
GPU 2:  62.0C  794RPM | 5.721M/5.343Mh/s | R:  0.0% HW:4 WU:0.000/m I:20
GPU 3:  68.0C  156RPM | 5.336M/5.120Mh/s | R:  0.0% HW:4 WU:0.000/m I:20
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[02:29:24] Started sgminer 4.2.2
[02:29:24] * using Jansson 2.6
[02:29:24] Probing for an alive pool
[02:29:28] Startup GPU initialization... Using settings from pool x17.mine.zpool.ca.
[02:29:28] Startup Pool No = 0
[02:29:28] x17.mine.zpool.ca difficulty changed to 0.050
[02:29:28] Initialising kernel x17.cl with bitalign, unpatched BFI, nfactor 10, n 1024
[02:29:28] Initialising kernel x17.cl with bitalign, unpatched BFI, nfactor 10, n 1024
[02:29:29] Initialising kernel x17.cl with bitalign, unpatched BFI, nfactor 10, n 1024
[02:29:29] Initialising kernel x17.cl with bitalign, unpatched BFI, nfactor 10, n 1024[/s][/s]

newbie
Activity: 182
Merit: 0
You are NOT "mining XVG".

You are mining Lyra2v2 and collecting a pay-out in XVG.  Any ninja/mona/vert coins mined by the pool are split among the pool members, and your share is paid to you as XVG.

Look at it like this:  You (and a thousand other people) are digging in a hillside that potentially contains gold, silver, and aluminum.  Whatever you happen to find gets sold @market and split among all the people.  You've opted to get paid in gold.  You don't get any silver or aluminum.  You could, if you like, opt to be paid in mushrooms... but that presumes that someone on another hillside in Zpoolville is mining mushrooms.

Thanks thats helpful.. So could I mine any of the available algos on the pool such as "blakecoin" and get paid out in XVG?

Yes, as long as there's enough XVG being mined by the pool to pay you.

f.ex.: Nobody on Zpool mines Ethereum, so you can't be paid in ETH.


 Zpool will not go to an exchange and buy a particular coin to pay you if its short.  The only thing Zpool "fetches" is bitcoin.
legendary
Activity: 3486
Merit: 1126
What is the problem with the difficulty setting at this pool?!
Doesn't work anymore. Can't set lower difficulty (d=xxx) at some algos!
Smaller miners are no longer welcome?!
 

d= should work but right now is limited to 1/2 the started diff.

So if you connect your miners and the diff says 1000 and lowest you can set d= below the starting diff is 500

Its to protect the stratum from being flooded intentionally with low diff

Thanks!  What's the starting diff for equihash?  My miner doesn't really say (or at least maybe I don't understand it).

Code:
Pool sets new share target: 0x0003fffc (diff: 16384H)

What does that mean?

0003fffc (if hex) is 262140 in dec.

Dividing 262140 in half didn't work, nor did giving it a bit more to make sure it's just above half.

Treating 16384H as a dec didn't help either.  Treating it like HEX (and converting it to dec) didn't work.




you can check your wallet stats for the diff when it starts up and it would print it in more legible value probably But equihash is 128 starting so can supply d=64 for it and it should work.
legendary
Activity: 3486
Merit: 1126
You are NOT "mining XVG".

You are mining Lyra2v2 and collecting a pay-out in XVG.  Any ninja/mona/vert coins mined by the pool are split among the pool members, and your share is paid to you as XVG.

Look at it like this:  You (and a thousand other people) are digging in a hillside that potentially contains gold, silver, and aluminum.  Whatever you happen to find gets sold @market and split among all the people.  You've opted to get paid in gold.  You don't get any silver or aluminum.  You could, if you like, opt to be paid in mushrooms... but that presumes that someone on another hillside in Zpoolville is mining mushrooms.

Thanks thats helpful.. So could I mine any of the available algos on the pool such as "blakecoin" and get paid out in XVG?

yup
newbie
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
You are NOT "mining XVG".

You are mining Lyra2v2 and collecting a pay-out in XVG.  Any ninja/mona/vert coins mined by the pool are split among the pool members, and your share is paid to you as XVG.

Look at it like this:  You (and a thousand other people) are digging in a hillside that potentially contains gold, silver, and aluminum.  Whatever you happen to find gets sold @market and split among all the people.  You've opted to get paid in gold.  You don't get any silver or aluminum.  You could, if you like, opt to be paid in mushrooms... but that presumes that someone on another hillside in Zpoolville is mining mushrooms.

Thanks thats helpful.. So could I mine any of the available algos on the pool such as "blakecoin" and get paid out in XVG?
hero member
Activity: 677
Merit: 500
What is the problem with the difficulty setting at this pool?!
Doesn't work anymore. Can't set lower difficulty (d=xxx) at some algos!
Smaller miners are no longer welcome?!
 

d= should work but right now is limited to 1/2 the started diff.

So if you connect your miners and the diff says 1000 and lowest you can set d= below the starting diff is 500

Its to protect the stratum from being flooded intentionally with low diff

Thanks!  What's the starting diff for equihash?  My miner doesn't really say (or at least maybe I don't understand it).

Code:
Pool sets new share target: 0x0003fffc (diff: 16384H)

What does that mean?

0003fffc (if hex) is 262140 in dec.

Dividing 262140 in half didn't work, nor did giving it a bit more to make sure it's just above half.

Treating 16384H as a dec didn't help either.  Treating it like HEX (and converting it to dec) didn't work.


newbie
Activity: 182
Merit: 0
I also have the same question. I'm mining XVG with lyra2v2 and my user parameter is an XVG address.  So can we also collect these other coins (Ninja and Mona) somehow, or is it just understood that we cannot get them?

You are NOT "mining XVG".

You are mining Lyra2v2 and collecting a pay-out in XVG.  Any ninja/mona/vert coins mined by the pool are split among the pool members, and your share is paid to you as XVG.



Look at it like this:  You (and a thousand other people) are digging in a hillside that potentially contains gold, silver, and aluminum.  Whatever you happen to find gets sold @market and split among all the people.  You've opted to get paid in gold.  You don't get any silver or aluminum.  You could, if you like, opt to be paid in mushrooms... but that presumes that someone on another hillside in Zpoolville is mining mushrooms.

newbie
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
you get them geeez. What you see is what you get. Everything is converted to your payout currency

Thanks, the "Last 50 Earnings" UI is a little confusing (at least to a newbie).  Is there any advantage to getting paid out in BTC vs XVG? Is it just the risk that the coin could theoretically be removed from the system at some time, or is there another reason to prefer a BTC payout (besides personal preference)?

newbie
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
Current zpool value for X17 Hash Looks rather too good to be true !,
Nemosminer is telling me I 'm earning 85 USD / day with a single GTX 980
which would be nice if it was real :-)

Looks like an off by *10 ish ?
legendary
Activity: 3486
Merit: 1126
So I'm new to mining and running two miners mining XVG with identical setups.

Why am I also mining Ninja and Mona as well as XVG is that normal with this pool or did I set something up improperly?

Thanks for the help.

you mine whatever is on the pool. It's NOT a solo pool as mentioned on the main page.

I also have the same question. I'm mining XVG with lyra2v2 and my user parameter is an XVG address.  So can we also collect these other coins (Ninja and Mona) somehow, or is it just understood that we cannot get them?

you get them geeez. What you see is what you get. Everything is converted to your payout currency
newbie
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
So I'm new to mining and running two miners mining XVG with identical setups.

Why am I also mining Ninja and Mona as well as XVG is that normal with this pool or did I set something up improperly?

Thanks for the help.

you mine whatever is on the pool. It's NOT a solo pool as mentioned on the main page.

I also have the same question. I'm mining XVG with lyra2v2 and my user parameter is an XVG address.  So can we also collect these other coins (Ninja and Mona) somehow, or is it just understood that we cannot get them?
newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
legendary
Activity: 3486
Merit: 1126
is there ant dedicated nicehash port


no, if you need a higher diff use the d= option in the password.
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
help me for xvg mining on nvidia gpu rig
-o stratum+tcp://x17.mine.zpool.ca:3737 -u wallet_address -p c=XVG
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
wanted to mine XVG and this is my setup on L3+
scrypt.mine.zpool.ca:3433#xnsub
DBtEgYQKDYSK4385Tpazzb5YHUUsebDsiS
c=,d=128000

but on http://www.zpool.ca/?address=DBtEgYQKDYSK4385Tpazzb5YHUUsebDsiS it say

We are short of this currency (5.74209790 UNO). Please STOP your miners and switch to BTC until we find more UNO blocks.
YOU are responsible if you continue to mine for UNO dispite this warning.


it mine uno ? what i did wrong ?


also , just for the GPU, digging XVG shows the balance of UNO
member
Activity: 117
Merit: 10
newbie
Activity: 182
Merit: 0
Anyone experience this behavior before?

Code:
*** ccminer alexis-hsr for nVidia GPUs from alexis78@github ***
*** Built with VC++ 2013 and nVidia CUDA SDK 8.0 (Not recommended prefer 7.5)

*** Based on tpruvot@github ccminer
*** Originally based on Christian Buchner and Christian H. project
*** Include some of the work of djm34, sp, tsiv and klausT.

[2017-12-23 22:10:30] Starting on stratum+tcp://nist5.mine.zpool.ca:3833
[2017-12-23 22:10:30] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled.
[2017-12-23 22:10:30] 1 miner thread started, using 'nist5' algorithm.
[2017-12-23 22:11:23] Stratum difficulty set to 0.1
[2017-12-23 22:11:23] nist5 block 20299, diff 27144.096
[2017-12-23 22:11:23] GPU#0: Intensity set to 21, 2097152 cuda threads
[2017-12-23 22:11:24] GPU#0: Gigabyte GTX 1080, 8678.72kH/s
[2017-12-23 22:12:02] [S/A/T]: 0/1/1, diff: 0.299, 46.34MH/s yes!
[2017-12-23 22:12:06] GPU#0: Gigabyte GTX 1080, 64.31MH/s
[b][2017-12-23 22:12:20] [S/A/T]: 0/2/2, diff: 2.102, 53.63MH/s yes!
[2017-12-23 22:12:21] [S/A/T]: 0/3/3, diff: 2.102, 53.63MH/s yes![/b]
[2017-12-23 22:12:23] [S/A/T]: 0/4/4, diff: 0.178, 55.51MH/s yes!
[2017-12-23 22:12:33] nist5 block 20300, diff 30527.196
[2017-12-23 22:12:59] GPU#0: Gigabyte GTX 1080, 62.77MH/s
[2017-12-23 22:13:23] [S/A/T]: 0/5/5, diff: 0.163, 60.25MH/s yes!
[b][2017-12-23 22:13:25] [S/A/T]: 0/6/6, diff: 0.320, 60.55MH/s yes!
[2017-12-23 22:13:25] [S/A/T]: 0/7/7, diff: 0.320, 60.55MH/s yes!
[2017-12-23 22:13:25] [S/A/T]: 0/8/8, diff: 0.320, 60.55MH/s yes!
[2017-12-23 22:13:25] [S/A/T]: 0/9/9, diff: 0.320, 60.55MH/s yes![/b]
[2017-12-23 22:13:25] [S/A/T]: 0/10/10, diff: 0.320, 60.55MH/s yes!
[2017-12-23 22:14:09] [S/A/T]: 0/11/11, diff: 0.105, 61.90MH/s yes!
[2017-12-23 22:14:19] GPU#0: Gigabyte GTX 1080, 64.38MH/s
[b][2017-12-23 22:14:21] [S/A/T]: 0/12/12, diff: 0.210, 62.11MH/s yes!
[2017-12-23 22:14:21] [S/A/T]: 0/13/13, diff: 0.210, 62.11MH/s yes!
[2017-12-23 22:14:21] [S/A/T]: 0/14/14, diff: 0.210, 62.11MH/s yes!
[2017-12-23 22:14:21] [S/A/T]: 0/15/15, diff: 0.210, 62.11MH/s yes!
[2017-12-23 22:14:21] [S/A/T]: 0/16/16, diff: 0.210, 62.11MH/s yes!
[2017-12-23 22:14:21] [S/A/T]: 0/17/17, diff: 0.210, 62.11MH/s yes!
[2017-12-23 22:14:21] [S/A/T]: 0/18/18, diff: 0.210, 62.11MH/s yes!
[2017-12-23 22:14:21] [S/A/T]: 0/19/19, diff: 0.210, 62.11MH/s yes!
[2017-12-23 22:14:21] [S/A/T]: 0/20/20, diff: 0.210, 62.11MH/s yes![/b]
[2017-12-23 22:14:25] [S/A/T]: 0/21/21, diff: 0.348, 62.22MH/s yes!
[b][2017-12-23 22:15:04] [S/A/T]: 0/22/22, diff: 6.736, 64.28MH/s yes!
[2017-12-23 22:15:04] [S/A/T]: 0/23/23, diff: 6.736, 64.28MH/s yes!
[2017-12-23 22:15:04] [S/A/T]: 0/24/24, diff: 6.736, 64.28MH/s yes!
[2017-12-23 22:15:04] [S/A/T]: 0/25/25, diff: 6.736, 64.28MH/s yes!
[2017-12-23 22:15:04] [S/A/T]: 0/26/26, diff: 6.736, 64.28MH/s yes!
[2017-12-23 22:15:04] [S/A/T]: 0/27/27, diff: 6.736, 64.28MH/s yes!
[2017-12-23 22:15:04] [S/A/T]: 0/28/28, diff: 6.736, 64.28MH/s yes!
[2017-12-23 22:15:04] [S/A/T]: 0/29/29, diff: 6.736, 64.28MH/s yes![/b]
[2017-12-23 22:15:10] [S/A/T]: 0/30/30, diff: 0.249, 64.26MH/s yes!
[2017-12-23 22:15:14] [S/A/T]: 0/31/31, diff: 0.558, 64.23MH/s yes!


Duplicate shares being submitted to the NIST5 pool.  Happens with both ccminer-2.2.3 and with the alexis-mod.  Was doing this a few days ago, then it stopped for a while, and now its back again.

Something on my side?  Something pool-side?
Pages:
Jump to: