Pages:
Author

Topic: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk IV (2022 Q3) [MODERATED] - page 15. (Read 41032 times)

legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1775
2Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. Yhn45
2. Gunafunama

Proof:

Bitcointalk username: Yhn45
BSC BEB20 wallet address: 0x74AA10f0e4925233915317e81D85E6e3625926B3
[ Archive ]

Post by: Gunafunama
Quote
Bitcointalk Username: Gunafunama
BSC Wallet Address: 0x74AA10f0e4925233915317e81D85E6e3625926B3
[ Archive ]

Related Addresses:
Code:
BSC Wallet Address: 0x74AA10f0e4925233915317e81D85E6e3625926B3

Miscellaneous:

The Alt account above was also caught cheating in the campaign: :[Bounty] OzoneChain | OZO | 5000 USDT Will Be Shared | Weekly Payment | ICO LIVE, managed by: @sujonali1819. Content/article campaign section.

Inside: Spreadsheets also shows the two's underhanded involvement.



legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1775
3 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. Kulitkutu
2. DhaifahKeyshaSalsabil
3. BernadettePatriciaMabel

Proof:

Forum Username: BernadettePatriciaMabel
Telegram Username: @FarhanaRaqwani
BSC Wallet Address: 0x4F374E2e948B7FC79158Bda4617499c12E33877F
[ Archive ]

Post by: DhaifahKeyshaSalsabil
Forum Username: Kulitkutu
Telegram Username: @Dulex963
BSC Wallet Address: 0xd1aafbb191a7f492f78b9a882add51847d01b6c6
[ Archive ]

Bitcointalk Username: DhaifahKeyshaSalsabil
Telegram Username: @Dulex963
BSC Wallet Address: 0xd1aafbb191a7f492f78b9a882add51847d01b6c6
[ Archive ]

Related Addresses:
Code:
Telegram Username: @Dulex963
BSC Wallet Address: 0xd1aafbb191a7f492f78b9a882add51847d01b6c6

Miscellaneous:

The three of them are proven Alt accounts, based on the addresses used by the three in different campaigns, it can be proven from the Alt account named:@DhaifahKeyshaSalsabil, they use the same BSC address, even though the two addresses are different.

However, two of them commit fraud in the campaign: :[Bounty] OzoneChain | OZO | 5000 USDT Will Be Shared | Weekly Payment | ICO LIVE, in the (Content) section, which is managed by: @sujonali1819.

Written campaign rules:


Linked evidence can be seen above and evidence in: Spreadsheets. Can be seen below.




2 Accounts Connected:

1. FaadhillahNailah
2. Opoumbel11

Proof:

Telegram username: @FaadhillahNailah
BEP20 wallet address: 0x52E07fA6D8843B44FFabDADbccaa861084c24C4E
[ Archive ]

Bitcointalk username: Opoumbel11
BSC BEP20 wallet address: 0x52E07fA6D8843B44FFabDADbccaa861084c24C4E
[ Archive ]

Related Addresses:
Code:
BSC BEP20 wallet address: 0x52E07fA6D8843B44FFabDADbccaa861084c24C4E

Miscellaneous:

Both Alt above, also do the same affair in the campaign: OzoneChain | OZO

The proof of both of them can be seen above and also in the Spreadsheets both are recorded.




3 Accounts Connected:

1. AlanaLioraGantari
2. HafizahSyarifah
3. Polislend8

Proof:

Bitcointalk username: AlanaLioraGantari
BSC BEP20 wallet address: 0xf1fb049E62020Ce8854A357477e3c40DF32a2e3b
[ Archive ]

Forum Username: HafizahSyarifah
Telegram Username: @FaridaFakhriyyah
Participated Campaigns: Article
BSC Wallet Address: 0xf1fb049E62020Ce8854A357477e3c40DF32a2e3b
[ Archive ]

Bitcointalk username: Polislend8
Article/Review link: https://medium.com/@sandalselingku/secondlive-396f6575286f
Wallet Address[BSC - BEP20]: 0xf1fb049E62020Ce8854A357477e3c40DF32a2e3b
[ Archive ]

Related Addresses:
Code:
Wallet Address[BSC - BEP20]: 0xf1fb049E62020Ce8854A357477e3c40DF32a2e3b

Miscellaneous:

The same problem was also carried out by the three tools above, they ignored the rules set by @sujonali1819, as the campaign manager: OzoneChain | OZO. Cheating.

In Spreadsheets the three of them are also recorded as follows.





Specifically for the campaign section: content / articles.
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓
I don't understand is this thread open to all users? So why is the moderator deleting my post?

Read carefully what is written in the comment to the deleted post. Your post was deleted not by a moderator, but by the author of the topic. The topic is self-moderated so it can do that. Ask him why he didn't like your post and deleted it.

No. Don't ask me.

Read the first post. (The both of you)
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1359
I don't understand is this thread open to all users? So why is the moderator deleting my post?
~

This thread is not open to everyone. As a newbie, you can post your investigation in a new thread and post a link (once) to this thread. Read the fine print from the OP:

  • No "Newbie" or, "Junior Member" can post an investigation in this thread.  They can however post a link (once) to a thread in the reputation section where their investigations can be investigated and analised.
copper member
Activity: 588
Merit: 926
I don't understand is this thread open to all users? So why is the moderator deleting my post?

Read carefully what is written in the comment to the deleted post. Your post was deleted not by a moderator, but by the author of the topic. The topic is self-moderated so it can do that. Ask him why he didn't like your post and deleted it.
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓
Dude, you are a saint. But history tells a different story. I added only neutral feedback, only neutral.

I've just noticed he's taken out a loan in the last 24 hours which is probably why he's very tetchy that we don't find out he has THREE BANNED ACCOUNTS!




6 Accounts Connected:

1. SHAHKHAN22
2. Fazalshah
3. Mohsinshah
4. Cekokin
5. simpelplan
6. meshah


1. SHAHKHAN22 Cheating and abusing campaigns with alt accounts
7. ZAINmalik75

Posts archived here: https://web.archive.org/

have fun..

#80
8 . SHAHKHAN11 <--- ACTIVE ONE WEEK AGO

1. SHAHKHAN22 Evidence 1, Evidence 2
Eth address: 0x3fA06c384888BD540AD888111f3ec00D89756ee8

Proof of (II) the account is connected and involves the Alt Account in the BlockX campaign, the evidence can be seen below.


Accounts Connected:

4. Cekokin <-- active YESTERDAY
9. Dopping

Proof:

Accounts Connected:

10. HK88,
11. Plinteng (active one month ago),
5. simpelplan,
12. Loedong,
13. Petraxz,
14. Senar Gitar

Proof:

legendary
Activity: 2072
Merit: 4265
✿♥‿♥✿
At the moment this the only my active account is.

I'm going to have a look at your connected alts later on, but I'm wondering when you and irfan_pak10 exchanged positive DT trust and glowing trust feedback? 

At least two of your alts trust that UID.

(and some of your alts have been active as little as 24 hours ago)

Yes, he is now all white and fluffy. And at the time of creating his account with the name ZAINmalik75, he did not support his alternative accounts in any way.







It's really sad and unfair to tag someone multiple times for the old mistakes.. My this account ZAINmalik75 was created in 2020 so there's no way I could have created this after allegations in 2021.

Dude, you are a saint. But history tells a different story. I added only neutral feedback, only neutral.
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓
At the moment this the only my active account is.

I'm going to have a look at your connected alts later on, but I'm wondering when you and irfan_pak10 exchanged positive DT trust and glowing trust feedback? 

At least two of your alts trust that UID.

(and some of your alts have been active as little as 24 hours ago)
legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 2594
Top Crypto Casino

So please I don't deserve this tag, at least not this time please...

From what I can see, it looks like your account has only received one neutral feedback from a DT member, specifically from lovesmayfamilis. After reviewing the feedback, it appears to be based on factual information, and I don't see anything unfair about it.

lovesmayfamilis    2023-05-20    Reference    This account has a history of cheating with several alternate accounts.

Even if the feedback is negative, it would still be considered an appropriate use of the trust system in this case.
hero member
Activity: 1400
Merit: 664
At the moment this the only my active account is... in 2021 i had accounts but since that time I never used any account for the signature campaign... this is now my only account and you can see activity of this account i not participating in multiple campaigns with my alts....   
 
It's really sad and unfair to tag someone multiple times for the old mistakes.. My this account ZAINmalik75 was created in 2020 so there's no way I could have created this after allegations in 2021.
 
that was turning point and its true i carefully understood the rules at that time for signature campaigns but after 2021 when I understood I focused all my energy and effort on this account alone  ZAINmalik75 
 
The referenced connection which lovesmayfamilis linked is from the same era of 2021... so how is it fair since that time there is no single allegation, no cheating or using alts whatsoever.
 
So please I don't deserve this tag, at least not this time please...

Report link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.62270856
legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1775
2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. Gitahandsems
2. Fulan56

Proof:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.61743519
Bitcointalk username: Fulan56
Article/Review link: https://medium.com/@rumahtuan289/combo-45b410f04691
Wallet Address: 0xf336D7E69A651Cbe36f52720EeFBd6f57a6C0930
[ Archive ]

Related Addresses:
Code:
Wallet Address: 0xf336D7E69A651Cbe36f52720EeFBd6f57a6C0930

Miscellaneous:

I noticed a mystical activity singing with Alt in the Blog section of the campaign: COMBO Network ex COCOS-BCX, managed by: @irfan_pak10

The rules expressly say, don't involve Alt, but it doesn't apply to accounts above and below.

In addition to proof of connected addresses, anyone can see their involvement in: Spreadsheets. And also the screenshot below.





2 Accounts Connected:

1. Ilersemot
2. Oborlamok

Proof:

Bitcointalk username: ArethaZaybaAlmira
Telegram username: @Fakulzune009
ERC-20 wallet address: 0xb3B46D3de2E219fB0875a72243f3D0B8BDA651BE
[ Archive ]

Bitcointalk username: Ilersemot
Article/Review link: https://medium.com/@tisutisu305/combo-7a0991b6bd53
Wallet Address: 0xb3B46D3de2E219fB0875a72243f3D0B8BDA651BE
[ Archive ]

Bitcointalk Username: ArethaZaybaAlmira
Telegram Username: @Fakulzune009
BSC Wallet Address: 0x24a40E42A83a6C67854499e0693219F403327B35
[ Archive ]

Bitcointalk username: Oborlamok
Article/Review link: https://medium.com/@ss2842905/combo-a490dd0fec6c
Wallet Address: 0x24a40E42A83a6C67854499e0693219F403327B35
[ Archive ]

Related Addresses:
Code:
Wallet Address: 0x24a40E42A83a6C67854499e0693219F403327B35

Miscellaneous:

This is also an Alt cheat in the COMBO Network campaign ex COCOS-BCX.

What distinguishes them is the address used by the account that has been painted, is still used by the fraudulent account.

Evidence can be seen inside Spreadsheets. And below.



legendary
Activity: 2072
Merit: 4265
✿♥‿♥✿
2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. Jktv
2. Pushpa10

Proof:

Telegram account link: https://t.me/mamun5077
[ Archive ]

Telegram Username: @mamun5077
[ Archive ]

Related Addresses:
Code:
https://t.me/mamun5077

Miscellaneous:

cheating bounty programs.

🔵[BOUNTY ALADDIN - ACTIVE]🔵 Joseon Mun $JSM | ESCROWED | 2 WEEKS

Quote
● Use of multi-accounts, spam, bots and other is strictly forbidden, all attempts will be banned

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1DbyfMo6NpyZjaH2-DxUJwBdCfEn0TMZILJ5Y9BNsEoU/edit#gid=187081334
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓

7 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

Aum Ram, John White, Torwald Go, Art 111, Rampue, Bezdonov Art, Asgar 9,

Proof:

Self admitted alts admitted after being exposed by cheater detector:

Yes, of cours. Its:  https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/aum-ram-845847 - Aum Ram.   
                                          https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/torwald-go-1144374 - Torwald Go.
                                          https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/rampue-1145580 - Rampue.
                                          https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/john-white-1144304 -  John White.
                                          https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/asgar-9-1161971 - Asgar 9.
                                          https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/art-111-1144763 - Art 111.

But we only have photo approvals for the first five accounts, My nephew who is not yet 16 years old can not get a notarial confirmation because he does not yet have a passport.

Thank you for your reply - are you proposing to post the documents in the mail?

In any case I was just wondering how many BitCoinTalk accounts you have been the broker for?




Reporting:

These alts have been reported by me in the "[Report] Ban Evasion [Requesting Admin/mod to check those and ban]" thread for ban evasion - Yes

I have marked these user's trust feedback pages with distrust feedback.

(as has @The Sceptical Chymist )

The Sceptical Chymist    2018-02-07    Reference    Bounty cheater.

Related Addresses:

Plenty of ETH wallet addresses as uncovered by @cheater detector [HERE]

(note @TryNinja 's website does not appear to have scraped these addresses)

Miscellaneous:

The six alts of banned UID Aum Ram registered within a few days of each-other and have last active dates close to each-other too:

2016-05-23, 08:24:29 Date Registered:    Aum Ram

2017-09-08, 19:18:39 Date Registered:    John White
2017-09-08, 20:00:41 Date Registered:    Torwald Go
2017-09-09, 00:49:07 Date Registered:    Art 111
2017-09-09, 17:11:25 Date Registered:    Rampue
2017-09-11, 18:17:15 Date Registered:    Bezdonov Art
2017-09-20, 21:15:24 Date Registered:    Asgar 9

12/30/2019 1:33:48 PM    woke up   Aum Ram

7/22/2020 5:34:23 PM    woke up   Asgar 9

2020-11-20, 06:50:35 Last Active:    Asgar 9

2021-05-13, 21:12:04 Last Active:    Torwald Go

11/24/2021 12:06:29 PM    woke up   Aum Ram

5/19/2022 2:58:45 PM    woke up   John White

2022-08-03, 05:27:56 Last Active:    John White

2020-11-20, 06:46:00 Last Active:    Art 111

2021-12-21, 02:04:20 Last Active:    Rampue

6/11/2022 4:21:41 PM    woke up   Bezdonov Art
2022-06-12, 02:21:41 Last Active:    Bezdonov Art

10/9/2022 5:34:45 PM    woke up   Aum Ram
2022-10-10, 03:34:45 Last Active:    Aum Ram





Registration Date:5/22/2016 10:24:29 PM (Active 224 days ago)    Aum Ram
Registration Date:9/8/2017 9:18:39 AM (Active 292 days ago)    John White
Registration Date:9/8/2017 10:00:41 AM (Active 738 days ago)    Torwald Go
Registration Date:9/8/2017 2:49:07 PM (Active 913 days ago)    Art 111
Registration Date:9/9/2017 7:11:25 AM (Active 517 days ago)    Rampue
Registration Date:9/11/2017 8:17:15 AM (Active 344 days ago)    Bezdonov Art
Registration Date:9/20/2017 11:15:24 AM (Active 913 days ago)    Asgar 9
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓
I've taken the liberty of unlocking the Mark III Known Alts thread to enable anyone who is tec savvy to run the script from Ninja to replace broken images with working ones via the talkimg.com web site.

Please try not to post over there as I'll be relocking it soon once people have updated their images.
legendary
Activity: 2072
Merit: 4265
✿♥‿♥✿
2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. jacafbiz
2. disconnectme

Proof:

BSC Address: 0x5A500a9ebdBB07f88A233B7C1DADb1C1e82dd72B
[ Archive ]

0x5A500a9ebdBB07f88A233B7C1DADb1C1e82dd72B
[ Archive ]

Related Addresses:
Code:
Telegram Username: @ayooluwam
BSC Address: 0x5A500a9ebdBB07f88A233B7C1DADb1C1e82dd72B

Miscellaneous:

There is an exchange of merits.
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓
Just giving everyone the heads up of a new tool for the Forum at large:


Basically, as a means to preserve images uploaded will be able to be viewed in twenty years, not twenty weeks as is the case with some image upload serves already in place.
legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1775
Today I accidentally saw profile: @Veleor, by chance I saw Alt discovery linked published by @Veleor In thread: Topic: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2022 Q2)

Here I see there are 57 connected accounts, by transaction, Twitter, ETH Address, Facebook and also Alt's involvement in some campaigns and some have been banned by Forum Bitcointalk.

For clarity and certainty of their evidence Alt, connected and so on, can be seen below.

Topic: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2022 Q2)
Code:
Edit: Information about banned profiles was added, using data from the topic "List of Autobans" and bpip.org

57 Accounts Connected

_Legendary_
19Nov16
Angelina Nada
Ani1985
Anjing Lu
April2017
Bacotan Bae
Bedebah
Bitcoin0916 banned
Black Angel banned
Black Lizard
BlokF4No27 banned
Blue Jack
Bondho Kompeni
Byzantium.
Crypto Legend
dEjAvU97 banned
Dhimas Kanjeng
Gozlink1
Gudhal Untu
Hotel_Prodeo
JANGKRIK BOSS banned
Jembut Ireng banned
Jembut Iteng
Jose mourinho
King Sastro
Kisanaq
Kodok Bencot
Konthol Ngaceng
legdunes
LegendOF45
Liang_Kubur banned
lOvE mE forEvEr banned
Lubang Bawah
Mario Yamasaki
Mbah Djoko
Mbah Slamet banned
Memek Gatel
Mr. Legendaris
Napole0n
Ndlongap Ndlongop
Pejoh Asu
Polisi Ndeso banned
President79 banned
Pujangga
Punakawan
Quantum907
Sang Prabu
Sasha Grey
Sate Jamu
Setya Novanto
Senja Kemuning
Sir Legend
Sir paijoe
Tukang becak
Vivace92 banned
Wong Goblog

Bottom line: From the data I've seen and the evidence above, stating they are Alt linked to each other, by using addresses and twitter back and forth with Alt 1-57.

However, new stories and discoveries were discovered, based on evidence published by @Veleor, and I noticed four (4) other Alt accounts that were fraudulently involved in the campaign: Topic: [Bounty] COMBO Network ex COCOS-BCX | 🚀 100k USD Worth of Tokens 🚀 LISTED, signature section, Maintained by: @irfan_pak10.

The rules have been stated clearly by the manager.


These four accounts are included in the interrogation and investigation conducted by: @Veleor above.

4. Accounts Connected

1. Ani1985
2. Pujangga
3. Sang Prabu
4. Sir Legend

Evidence of their involvement and fraud can be seen below in the campaign: COMBO Network ex COCOS-BCX.

:(SPREADSHEETS):




So, from the available evidence, it's quite clear that they violated the written campaign rules and were involved fraudulently in the COMBO Network ex COCOS-BCX campaign.
legendary
Activity: 2072
Merit: 4265
✿♥‿♥✿
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1359
All information is removed, which only indicates that the user wanted to cover his tracks.
Payment received, I leave the information for the manager and his right to put a negative tag.
Hello, dear lovesmayfamilis
I want to give a little rebuttal to the case that you raised, which was just my attempt to help Dekleni, who at that time did not have his own exchange to cash out his BTC. 
~

Can you please provide a more detailed explanation of that part?


You and Dekleni used different addresses for the first time on the forum on the same day in the Seasonal Tokens Bounty Campaign:

Quote from: dekleni on 2022-03-21 06:47:52 UTC
Forum Username: dekleni
~
Bitcoin Wallet Address: bc1qrfz8eqqgr096xerd28ark33t9drrmzfppj9r75
https://ninjastic.space/post/59592248

Quote from: zaki12 on 2022-03-21 12:27:42 UTC
Forum Username: zaki12
~
Bitcoin Wallet Address: bc1q9xe2umzedsfcz0t872q6v69g2jjju84xex64tf
https://ninjastic.space/post/59595226

Based on the information from the blockchain explorer, it seems that these addresses are not associated with an exchange but rather a privately owned wallet. Moreover, both of these addresses have made transactions to a single address: bc1qtufnf2mxxkp3cak4lhfd2ky5xzw9z9fjs4pmr4, which appears to be a Binance deposit address. So, even if Dekleni did not have access to the exchange to "cash out his BTC", it is still possible for him to have a personal Bitcoin wallet address, right?

Another piece of evidence is that you used Dekleni's address again on the HUNNYPLAY Signature Campaign almost a year later:

Quote from: zaki12 on 2023-01-20 07:40:38 UTC
Current number of post (Including this one): 642
Rank: Full Member
Bech32 address: bc1qrfz8eqqgr096xerd28ark33t9drrmzfppj9r75
Merit earned in the last 120 days: 4
https://ninjastic.space/post/61623942
legendary
Activity: 2072
Merit: 4265
✿♥‿♥✿
All information is removed, which only indicates that the user wanted to cover his tracks.
Payment received, I leave the information for the manager and his right to put a negative tag.
Hello, dear lovesmayfamilis
I want to give a little rebuttal to the case that you raised, which was just my attempt to help Dekleni, who at that time did not have his own exchange to cash out his BTC.  But I don't know if it can be considered wrong by some people in this forum, but in this opportunity I just want to apologize to you and beg not to be negatively tagged because I only made that small mistake and never made more mistakes  besides that, because now I'm trying to be better than before.

You have applied for participation with a dekleni wallet number; look at the date, despite the fact that your second account could not participate according to the rules of the subscription company.


https://ninjastic.space/post/61623942

Provided that the dekleni account itself has been inactive since December 15th.


You decided to participate with a dekleni wallet number, most likely by mixing up the wallet numbers, and this is understandable since owning multiple account profiles very often leads to errors.
I don't need to talk about help. The second account has a registration on a forum not far from yours, I don't think that for several years it just existed on the forum.


What leads cheaters to the bottom is always called cowardice and lies.
Pages:
Jump to: