Topic: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk IV (2022 Q3) [MODERATED] - page 15. (Read 41500 times)

Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)



5. balqis adzra
6. Drie Wananta
7. Christina Kaisiri
8. DhaifahKeyshaSalsabil
9. Ejalumi
10. Wujudwajud

Proof:









Reporting:

I have marked these user's trust feedback pages with distrust.

Related Addresses:


Miscellaneous:

• Another alt account from a known bounty cheater.
• Ban evasion.
  

So what have I been doing for the past week?  Well, I've been reviewing my trust feedbacks and trimming the number of posts made.

This time last week I had a couple of dozen more than 3,000 trust feedbacks that I had placed on other UID's, plus sixty "flag created" posts which I have no control over.  Of the 3,000 trustfeedbacks left for others, some 90% to 95% have received negatives from others while of the remaining 5% - 10% about half had been nuked or were otherwise inactive (usually with an accusation against them).

A full third of the 90% - 95% had been banned.

So, to ensure my trust feedbacks are both accurate and relevant in five sessions over the last week I have deleted approx. 2,650 of my prior trust feedbacks and now have approx 350 remaining (plus the aforementioned sixty "flag" comments).  They were no longer relevant. As I said, a third have been banned while the rest have (usually multiple) negative trust feedbacks from others.  Although my comments were usually the first, others following have in a lot of instances copied my comments verbatim, so they live on and are unlikely to be removed.  

I could have easily just left them, but I can only pass on what I have done together with the suggestion that anyone reading considers taking on the same approach by asking yourselves a few quick questions?

Q. Is the UID banned or nuked (zero posts is usually a good indication they have been nuked) - A. Yes --> Your post probably doesn't need to remain in place.  Consider removing it.

Q.  Have you provided a link to a post or archive service back up of the post as "evidence" of your assertion?  A.  No -->  You may need to remove the post as you trust feedback may not be able to be substantiated.

Q.  Have you posted a short phrase such as "Scammer"  "Known Scammer"  "There is a scam accusation against this user" "I don't trust this user"  (even with a reason). A Yes -->  They may well be a scammer, but if someone else has posted a more substantial trust feedback accusation, then your shorter post is only going to be lost on a wall of Red Paint.

Q.  Is the user active?  A. No. -->  How many years has it been since they were last online?  Given what your comment is about, they probably ditched the account.  Suggestion:  If a UID has been offline for as little as three years and you remove your own comment (even if it's the only comment there was on the trust feedback page) when an account reactivates and there is shady activity, then numerous users will observe "This user has recently woken up" which if nothing else can be an orange flag.

Q.  Did you leave a negative for two alts?  A.  Yes.  -->  As a part of your investigation, did you uncover evidence that the two alts participated in claiming from the same campaign/merit or DT abuse/some other actual scam behaviour?  A.  No -->  Two alts who haven't scammed doesn't warrants negative trust feedback (that's been agreed to for quite some time) change the negative to a neutral.

Q.  Is there a flag against this user?  A.  Yes.  There will be a thread covering the allegations against the accused, so you can probably remove those trust feedback posts given the flag itself and other user's negative trust feedbacks will have covered the events.

Q.  Did you leave a positive saying "this person is a great guy/gal - I trust them!"  A. Yes.  Well ... there are some DT who will wiggle their fingers and tell you the trust feedback system is for trades only (but have whole pages of negatives against "scammers" and glowing posts for their circle of friends they think are great guy/gals).  Leaving aside the copious bags of salt for a moment - now is the time to review those glowing trust feedbacks.. You may be surprised to discover some of those glowing trust feedbacks have now gone on to scam.

Q.  Have you left a "This positive/negative trust feedback is to counter X's negative/positive trust feedback?  A.  Yes.  Don't be "That guy" as, in months and years to come, other users will come to realise you counter trust feedback is only due to your being a friend of the one receiving the initial trust/distrust.  Chances are it will prompt users reading YOUR comments will give YOU DT distrust.  Let people figure out whether a person's trust feedback comment is genuine or not based on evidence in a post, not because you're backing or countering someone else.

Q.  How often should I review my trust feedbacks?  A.  Good question.  How many do you do?  How often?  Are they neutral or otherwise? -->  I myself have done similar in the past (but not on this wholesale scale before), so, I might leave it for another six to nine months before I again review my posts.

Q.  What if my own trust feedback post count is even more than yours had at three thousand posts?  A.  Well, that's for you to decide.  "A Journey of a thousand miles begins with one step" aside, may I suggest you start as I did at the oldest trust feedbacks left and sift through and find just those UID's that have been nuked of banned and start with your comments against them.  It may take a while, but you will find a pattern and might just remove 90% of your trust feedbacks as I have done to remain accurate.

As always, comments welcome.

Thanks for reading.

Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)



4. Gunimoto
5. Razimcuy
6. Erma Novela Sabatin
7. Faadhillah Nailah
8. Ricky Tjahyadi
9. DilaraShafiyatunnisa

Proof:








Reporting:

I have marked these user's trust feedback pages with distrust.

Related Addresses:


Miscellaneous:

• Another alt account from a known bounty cheater.
• Ban evasion.
  

Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)




6. BusyraShabiyyah
7. Valentina Awes
8. Fataniah

Proof:





https://ninjastic.space/post/55146113

Reporting:

I have marked these user's trust feedback pages with distrust.

Related Addresses:


Miscellaneous:

• Another alt account from a known bounty cheater.
• Ban evasion.
  

2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

Questcry
Zazuu01

Proof:
Questcry
[Achieve]

Zazuu01
[Achieve]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:
These two users have registered the same bounty, used the same wallet for proof of Authentication twice, but i dont think it is a mistake. From my research i think these two accounts are operated by one person, these two users always register for the same bounty and they use the same pattern.
BOUNTY REGISTERED
Bounty registered; COMBO Network ex COCOS-BCX. Bounty manager; irfan_pak10. Questcry is number 17 on Twitter spreadsheet and Zazuu01 is number 514 on Twitter spreadsheet.
Bounty registered; BillionAir. Bounty manager; CryptopreneurBrainboss. Questcry is number 119 on Twitter spreadsheet and Zazuu01 is number 140 on Twitter spreadsheet.

---

2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

AlinaAdria
DimitriyMasterov

Proof:
AlinaAdria
[Achieve]

DimitriyMasterov
[Achieve]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:
These two users have registered the same bounty, used the same wallet for proof of Authentication once, but i dont think it is a mistake. From my research i think these two accounts are operated by one person, these two users always register for the same bounty and they use the same pattern.
BOUNTY REGISTERED
Bounty registered; [Bounty 2.0] COMBO Network. Bounty manager; irfan_pak10. AlinaAdria  is number 93 on Twitter spreadsheet and DimitriyMasterov is number 85 on Twitter spreadsheet.
Bounty registered; BillionAir. Bounty manager; CryptopreneurBrainboss. AlinaAdria is number 159 on Twitter spreadsheet and DimitriyMasterov is number 175 on Twitter spreadsheet.

---

2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

Lily lewis
Yamina87

Proof:
Lily lewis
[Achieve]

Yamina87
[Achieve]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:
These two users have registered the same bounty, used the same wallet for proof of Authentication once, but i dont think it is a mistake. From my research i think these two accounts are operated by one person, these two users always register for the same bounty and they use the same pattern.
BOUNTY REGISTERED
Bounty registered; COMBO Network ex COCOS-BCX. Bounty manager; irfan_pak10. Lily lewis is number 75 on Twitter spreadsheet and Yamina87 is number 60 on Facebook spreadsheet.
Bounty registered; Stretch To Earn. Bounty manager; BountyDetective. Lily lewis is number 600 on Twitter spreadsheet and Yamina87 is number 575 on Twitter spreadsheet.

2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

---

IrynaInna
EvinLewise

Proof:
IrynaInna
[Achieve]

EvinLewise
[Achieve]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:
These two users have registered the same bounty, used the same wallet for proof of Authentication multiple, but i dont think it is a mistake. From my research i think these two accounts are operated by one person, these two users always register for the same bounty and they use the same pattern.
BOUNTY REGISTERED
Bounty registered; COMBO Network ex COCOS-BCX. Bounty manager; irfan_pak10. IrynaInna is number 17 on Twitter spreadsheet and EvinLewise is number 514 on Twitter spreadsheet.
Bounty registered; Starzz. Bounty manager; BountyDetective. IrynaInna is number 342 on Facebook spreadsheet and EvinLewise is number 355 on Facebook spreadsheet.

Nice catch there @    Pandu Geddon - we need to be ever vigilant for scammers who will turn up when you least expect it.

 wizwiz7
 cryptosly
 Unique22

Proof:
https://ninjastic.space/post/44762661

https://ninjastic.space/post/62332345

https://ninjastic.space/post/62151154

Quote Post by cryptosly (delete)
https://ninjastic.space/post/58862823

https://ninjastic.space/post/59987902

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous: Bounty cheater with multiple alts

those alt accounts deserve to be banned. and 3 accounts I mentioned are still actively abusing to join the bounty campaign
[Bounty] OzoneChain | OZO | | Manager: sujonali1819 | SPREADSHEET | Content Writing #92 #95 #99 |

2Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. Yhn45
2. Gunafunama

Proof:

[ Archive ]

Post by: Gunafunama
[ Archive ]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:

The Alt account above was also caught cheating in the campaign: :[Bounty] OzoneChain | OZO | 5000 USDT Will Be Shared | Weekly Payment | ICO LIVE, managed by: @sujonali1819. Content/article campaign section.

Inside: Spreadsheets also shows the two's underhanded involvement.

---

3 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. Kulitkutu
2. DhaifahKeyshaSalsabil
3. BernadettePatriciaMabel

Proof:

[ Archive ]

Post by: DhaifahKeyshaSalsabil
[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:

The three of them are proven Alt accounts, based on the addresses used by the three in different campaigns, it can be proven from the Alt account named:@DhaifahKeyshaSalsabil, they use the same BSC address, even though the two addresses are different.

However, two of them commit fraud in the campaign: :[Bounty] OzoneChain | OZO | 5000 USDT Will Be Shared | Weekly Payment | ICO LIVE, in the (Content) section, which is managed by: @sujonali1819.

Written campaign rules:


Linked evidence can be seen above and evidence in: Spreadsheets. Can be seen below.

---

2 Accounts Connected:

1. FaadhillahNailah
2. Opoumbel11

Proof:

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:

Both Alt above, also do the same affair in the campaign: OzoneChain | OZO

The proof of both of them can be seen above and also in the Spreadsheets both are recorded.

---

3 Accounts Connected:

1. AlanaLioraGantari
2. HafizahSyarifah
3. Polislend8

Proof:

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:

The same problem was also carried out by the three tools above, they ignored the rules set by @sujonali1819, as the campaign manager: OzoneChain | OZO. Cheating.

In Spreadsheets the three of them are also recorded as follows.

---

Specifically for the campaign section: content / articles.

No. Don't ask me.

Read the first post. (The both of you)

This thread is not open to everyone. As a newbie, you can post your investigation in a new thread and post a link (once) to this thread. Read the fine print from the OP:

Read carefully what is written in the comment to the deleted post. Your post was deleted not by a moderator, but by the author of the topic. The topic is self-moderated so it can do that. Ask him why he didn't like your post and deleted it.

I've just noticed he's taken out a loan in the last 24 hours which is probably why he's very tetchy that we don't find out he has THREE BANNED ACCOUNTS!

---

---

Yes, he is now all white and fluffy. And at the time of creating his account with the name ZAINmalik75, he did not support his alternative accounts in any way.






Dude, you are a saint. But history tells a different story. I added only neutral feedback, only neutral.

I'm going to have a look at your connected alts later on, but I'm wondering when you and irfan_pak10 exchanged positive DT trust and glowing trust feedback? 

At least two of your alts trust that UID.

(and some of your alts have been active as little as 24 hours ago)

From what I can see, it looks like your account has only received one neutral feedback from a DT member, specifically from lovesmayfamilis. After reviewing the feedback, it appears to be based on factual information, and I don't see anything unfair about it.


Even if the feedback is negative, it would still be considered an appropriate use of the trust system in this case.

At the moment this the only my active account is... in 2021 i had accounts but since that time I never used any account for the signature campaign... this is now my only account and you can see activity of this account i not participating in multiple campaigns with my alts....   
 
It's really sad and unfair to tag someone multiple times for the old mistakes.. My this account ZAINmalik75 was created in 2020 so there's no way I could have created this after allegations in 2021.
 
that was turning point and its true i carefully understood the rules at that time for signature campaigns but after 2021 when I understood I focused all my energy and effort on this account alone  ZAINmalik75 
 
The referenced connection which lovesmayfamilis linked is from the same era of 2021... so how is it fair since that time there is no single allegation, no cheating or using alts whatsoever.
 
So please I don't deserve this tag, at least not this time please...

Report link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.62270856

2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. Gitahandsems
2. Fulan56

Proof:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.61743519
[ Archive ]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:

I noticed a mystical activity singing with Alt in the Blog section of the campaign: COMBO Network ex COCOS-BCX, managed by: @irfan_pak10

The rules expressly say, don't involve Alt, but it doesn't apply to accounts above and below.

In addition to proof of connected addresses, anyone can see their involvement in: Spreadsheets. And also the screenshot below.

---

2 Accounts Connected:

1. Ilersemot
2. Oborlamok

Proof:

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:

This is also an Alt cheat in the COMBO Network campaign ex COCOS-BCX.

What distinguishes them is the address used by the account that has been painted, is still used by the fraudulent account.

Evidence can be seen inside Spreadsheets. And below.

---

2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. Jktv
2. Pushpa10

Proof:

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:

cheating bounty programs.

🔵[BOUNTY ALADDIN - ACTIVE]🔵 Joseon Mun $JSM | ESCROWED | 2 WEEKS


https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1DbyfMo6NpyZjaH2-DxUJwBdCfEn0TMZILJ5Y9BNsEoU/edit#gid=187081334

7 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

Aum Ram, John White, Torwald Go, Art 111, Rampue, Bezdonov Art, Asgar 9,

Proof:

Self admitted alts admitted after being exposed by cheater detector:

---

---

Reporting:

These alts have been reported by me in the "[Report] Ban Evasion [Requesting Admin/mod to check those and ban]" thread for ban evasion - Yes

I have marked these user's trust feedback pages with distrust feedback.

(as has @The Sceptical Chymist )


Related Addresses:

Plenty of ETH wallet addresses as uncovered by @cheater detector [HERE]

(note @TryNinja 's website does not appear to have scraped these addresses)

Miscellaneous:

The six alts of banned UID Aum Ram registered within a few days of each-other and have last active dates close to each-other too:

2016-05-23, 08:24:29 Date Registered:    Aum Ram

2017-09-08, 19:18:39 Date Registered:    John White
2017-09-08, 20:00:41 Date Registered:    Torwald Go
2017-09-09, 00:49:07 Date Registered:    Art 111
2017-09-09, 17:11:25 Date Registered:    Rampue
2017-09-11, 18:17:15 Date Registered:    Bezdonov Art
2017-09-20, 21:15:24 Date Registered:    Asgar 9

12/30/2019 1:33:48 PM    woke up   Aum Ram

7/22/2020 5:34:23 PM    woke up   Asgar 9

2020-11-20, 06:50:35 Last Active:    Asgar 9

2021-05-13, 21:12:04 Last Active:    Torwald Go

11/24/2021 12:06:29 PM    woke up   Aum Ram

5/19/2022 2:58:45 PM    woke up   John White

2022-08-03, 05:27:56 Last Active:    John White

2020-11-20, 06:46:00 Last Active:    Art 111

2021-12-21, 02:04:20 Last Active:    Rampue

6/11/2022 4:21:41 PM    woke up   Bezdonov Art
2022-06-12, 02:21:41 Last Active:    Bezdonov Art

10/9/2022 5:34:45 PM    woke up   Aum Ram
2022-10-10, 03:34:45 Last Active:    Aum Ram

---

---

Registration Date:5/22/2016 10:24:29 PM (Active 224 days ago)    Aum Ram
Registration Date:9/8/2017 9:18:39 AM (Active 292 days ago)    John White
Registration Date:9/8/2017 10:00:41 AM (Active 738 days ago)    Torwald Go
Registration Date:9/8/2017 2:49:07 PM (Active 913 days ago)    Art 111
Registration Date:9/9/2017 7:11:25 AM (Active 517 days ago)    Rampue
Registration Date:9/11/2017 8:17:15 AM (Active 344 days ago)    Bezdonov Art
Registration Date:9/20/2017 11:15:24 AM (Active 913 days ago)    Asgar 9