Topic: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk IV (2022 Q3) [MODERATED] - page 14. (Read 41032 times)

Vladimir KW

Proof:
Vladimir KW
[Achieve]

allahhafeez
[Achieve]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:
These three users have registered the same bounty, used the same wallet for proof of Authentication twice, but i dont think it is a mistake. From my research i think these three accounts are operated by one person, these three users always register for the same bounty and they use the same pattern.
BOUNTY REGISTERED
Bounty registered; OzoneChain. Bounty manager; sujonali1819. juthimukarji is number 33 on Twitter spreadsheet, allahhafeez is number 4 on Twitter spreadsheet and Vladimir KW is number 275 on Twitter spreadsheet.

 

---

3 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

SSC.2K22
Khadumoni
Vangaghor

Proof:
SSC.2K22
[Achieve]

Khadumoni
[Achieve]

Vangaghor
[Achieve]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:
These three users have registered the same bounty, used the same wallet for proof of Authentication multiple times, but i dont think it is a mistake. From my research i think these three accounts are operated by one person.
BOUNTY REGISTERED
Bounty registered; OzoneChain. Bounty manager; sujonali1819. SSC.2K22 is number 9 on Twitter spreadsheet,  Khadumoni is number 52 on Twitter spreadsheet and Vangaghoris number 0 on Twitter spreadsheet.

---

2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

Sadiss
Fatemafh

Proof:
Sadiss
[Achieve]

Fatemafh
[Achieve]


Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:
These two users have registered the same bounty, used the same wallet multiple times, but i dont think it is a mistake. From my research i think these three accounts are operated by one person.
BOUNTY REGISTERED
Bounty registered; OzoneChain. Bounty manager; sujonali1819.Sadiss is number 16 on Twitter spreadsheet and Fatemafh number 15 on Twitter spreadsheet.
Bounty registered; Starzz. Bounty manager; BountyDetective.Sadiss is number 128 on Twitter spreadsheet and Fatemafh number 255 on Twitter spreadsheet.

---

3 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

Alla-Bounty
Hmm270i
[Konabari17

Proof:
Alla-Bounty
[Achieve]

Hmm270
[Achieve]

Konabari17
[Achieve]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:
These three users have registered the same bounty, used the same wallet for proof of Authentication once, but i dont think it is a mistake. From my research i think these three accounts are operated by one person.
BOUNTY REGISTERED
Bounty registered; OzoneChain. Bounty manager; sujonali1819. Alla-Bounty is number 24 on Twitter spreadsheet,  Hmm270 is number 99 on Twitter spreadsheet and Konabari17 number 8 on Twitter spreadsheet.

Bounty registered; BillionAir. Bounty manager; CryptopreneurBrainboss. Alla-Bounty is number 380 on Twitter spreadsheet,  Hmm270 is number 367 on Twitter spreadsheet and Konabari17 number 370 on Twitter spreadsheet.

---

2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

Biddutbam
tarekmoin

Proof:
Biddutbam
[Achieve]

tarekmoin
[Achieve]


Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:
These two users have registered the same bounty, used the same wallet once, but i dont think it is a mistake. From my research i think these three accounts are operated by one person.
BOUNTY REGISTERED
Bounty registered; Vinc. Bounty manager; Cryptoworldman.Biddutbam is number 3 on Twitter spreadsheet and tarekmoin number 340 on Twitter spreadsheet.

Over time, users will see that you are an active member of the Known Alts community and will be able to go back and review your old posts.  Then, they (might) DT trust you.  Over time, you will have built up enough trust that you then qualify for the monthly DT lottery and become DT1.  In the meantime, some of those along the way may already be DT1 and so their DT trust of you will mean you are DT2.  Once that were to occur your previous trust feedback will light up in the "trusted" as opposed to "untrusted" section.

It's a convoluted system, but it's all we've got (and anyone suggesting anything else will usually be shouted down).

---

---

Having a look at your DT trust list for this week you have a smattering of users you distrust - I'm not going to tell you who to trust or distrust, however, may I suggest you don't just distrust users from one region (even if that is where you are from)

This:


won't get you DT trust - comments such as that should be neutral, short and to the point.  (plus the fact they are DT distrusted by you means you just have a grudge against them.

---

---

Your only two other trust feedbacks are also negative and although I can't read them based on the first post quoted by me above, I can guess what they say.

If you haven't already done so, have a read of this: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.62401411 to get a feel for how your trust feed-backs should be and what to look for when clearing out no longer valid posts.

As to your DT list you might want to up the number to (say) ten to spread out who you trust - (just don't expect others to DT trust you because you are trusting them)

What's the point of posting your findings in this thread if you're not going to use it as a reference for trust feedback? Besides, your trust review that you leave will help other investigators in the future.

By the way, if you don't give your trust feedback, other members will never add you to their trust lists, and as a result, you won't become a DT. It's sort of like a chicken and egg situation.

the tags you put on your catch account that prove to be connected can help your investment in the future. as well as other investigators who can assist while investigating your current arrest. just mark them, when you become a member of DT in the future maybe there will be many accounts that send PM to you because their accounts appear red-tagged.

maybe it won't be useful for some bounty managers, but maybe your negative feedback can be a bounty manager's consideration if you want to accept them in the campaign. some bounty managers allow negative tags to be in their campaigns, as long as no alt accounts are also participating.

Yes, I have archived those posts. The link to the archive is in my post above. And of course you can use ninjastic.


What good would my records in the trust do? I am not a member of DT1 or DT2. My reviews won't have any effect. I think so.

Given AGUNG PRATAMA posted the identical information *before* romeo senja did cements that they are alts and not just "copied my homework".  Did you archive these posts?  The second one no longer exists - Fortunately I was able to find it here:

https://ninjastic.space/search?author=romeo%20senja&topic_id=5331064

---

---

Keep digging

3. Macani1980
4. ??






Don't forget to leave them trust feedback.  You should always label them yourself.

---

---

2018-02-07, 12:24:15 Date Registered:    AGUNG PRATAMA

2018-03-06, 12:48:34 Date Registered:    Macani1980

6/15/2019 2:49:07 PM    woke up      AGUNG PRATAMA
6/18/2019 8:54:14 AM    woke up    Macani1980

2019-07-08, 06:12:32 Date Registered:    romeo senja

3/23/2021 4:20:38 PM    woke up      AGUNG PRATAMA
3/24/2021 5:01:51 AM    woke up      romeo senja

3/29/2021 9:36:22 AM    Profile woke up    New post   romeo senja
3/30/2021 5:01:34 PM    woke up    Macani1980

4/24/2021 3:08:11 PM    Profile woke up    New post   AGUNG PRATAMA

2023-06-10, 18:04:50 Last Active:    Macani1980
2023-06-16, 03:29:16 Last Active:    AGUNG PRATAMA
2023-06-18, 21:26:25 Last Active:    romeo senja

Nice catch there.

2: Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)

1. AGUNG PRATAMA
2. romeo senja

Proof:

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:

It looks like the user mixed up their accounts and posting information to the wrong account. But he didn't correct it.

Even if what you claim is true, your explanation falls apart when you consider that two or more users participate in campaigns using the same wallet addresses and social media accounts. How do you explain the connection between two accounts if not that they are owned by the same user or group?


The whole point of this thread is to expose cheaters like you: greedy and selfish jerks who take advantage of their fellow campaign participants.

Since it wont show as it wont show as red that was why i didn't even tag all my findings, but since you have corrected me then i will start tagging them.

---

2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

juthimukarji
allahhafeez

Proof:
juthimukarji
[Achieve]

allahhafeez
[Achieve]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:
These two users have registered the same bounty, used the same wallet for proof of Authentication twice, but i dont think it is a mistake. From my research i think these two accounts are operated by one person, these two users always register for the same bounty and they use the same pattern.
BOUNTY REGISTERED
Bounty registered; OzoneChain. Bounty manager; sujonali1819. juthimukarji is number 33 on Twitter spreadsheet and allahhafeez is number 4 on Twitter spreadsheet.
Bounty registered; BillionAir. Bounty manager; CryptopreneurBrainboss. juthimukarji is number 363 on Twitter spreadsheet and allahhafeez is number 224 on Twitter spreadsheet.

---

2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

Xavier pz
Shahinbd

Proof:
Xavier pz
[Achieve]

Shahinbd
[Achieve]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:
These two users have registered the same bounty, used the same wallet to submit work multiple times, but i dont think it is a mistake. From my research i think these two accounts are operated by one person, these two users always register for the same bounty and they use the same pattern.
BOUNTY REGISTERED
Bounty registered; The OGz Club. Bounty manager; BountyDetective. Xavier pz is number 406 on Facebook spreadsheet and Shahinbd is number 351 on Facebook spreadsheet.
Bounty registered; BillionAir. Bounty manager; CryptopreneurBrainboss. Xavier pz is number 307 on Twitter spreadsheet and Shahinbd is number 64 on Twitter spreadsheet.

---

That so found of him any once mistake done at bounty registration he took it up to report and it won't check may be transactions of  those wallet have been connected once before,in my county here we do have a WhatsApp group which we posted Bounties update and we do beg gas fee from each other to move out tokens for sale and return back to the address which we borrowed it from.. though I don't blame him that only what he did to gets all his merit to this level he flagged me when his was a senior member now hero and you guys keep giving him power to do more... Lol😂

so after you made the mistake of using someone else's wallet in bounty registration. maybe coincidentally your social media is also used by the same person in the bounty report.

[ Archive ]

[ Archive ]


and maybe another coincidence that the addresses of your two accounts are also connected to each other.
https://bscscan.com/tx/0x2fac3232800862c4633eeded81833a189a54020f0cb9e0673e725e7e238f763b



@Issa56 I don't know why you didn't tag your findings as you did before.
tag them even though it won't show up in red, but it will help in future investigations if possible.
for those two accounts, I'll tag them.

Were you paid to the "wrong" address?

If so, what steps did you take to recover those funds?

Issa56
I don't really know why you're so against me but I common mistake you took advantage of me, someone text me his wallet to make a transaction which doesn't work out later, but I mistakenly paste it because it was save on my clipboard,and when I'm registering for a project and now you're saying we're same operation, you're talking about participating in same project, is that normal for all Bounty hunters.
I think multiple people would have make same mistakes like that because to me wallet address looks same that if you're in rush to register mistake can happen.
I hope you all should review this and proof me.

Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)



5. balqis adzra
6. Drie Wananta
7. Christina Kaisiri
8. DhaifahKeyshaSalsabil
9. Ejalumi
10. Wujudwajud

Proof:









Reporting:

I have marked these user's trust feedback pages with distrust.

Related Addresses:


Miscellaneous:

• Another alt account from a known bounty cheater.
• Ban evasion.
  

So what have I been doing for the past week?  Well, I've been reviewing my trust feedbacks and trimming the number of posts made.

This time last week I had a couple of dozen more than 3,000 trust feedbacks that I had placed on other UID's, plus sixty "flag created" posts which I have no control over.  Of the 3,000 trustfeedbacks left for others, some 90% to 95% have received negatives from others while of the remaining 5% - 10% about half had been nuked or were otherwise inactive (usually with an accusation against them).

A full third of the 90% - 95% had been banned.

So, to ensure my trust feedbacks are both accurate and relevant in five sessions over the last week I have deleted approx. 2,650 of my prior trust feedbacks and now have approx 350 remaining (plus the aforementioned sixty "flag" comments).  They were no longer relevant. As I said, a third have been banned while the rest have (usually multiple) negative trust feedbacks from others.  Although my comments were usually the first, others following have in a lot of instances copied my comments verbatim, so they live on and are unlikely to be removed.  

I could have easily just left them, but I can only pass on what I have done together with the suggestion that anyone reading considers taking on the same approach by asking yourselves a few quick questions?

Q. Is the UID banned or nuked (zero posts is usually a good indication they have been nuked) - A. Yes --> Your post probably doesn't need to remain in place.  Consider removing it.

Q.  Have you provided a link to a post or archive service back up of the post as "evidence" of your assertion?  A.  No -->  You may need to remove the post as you trust feedback may not be able to be substantiated.

Q.  Have you posted a short phrase such as "Scammer"  "Known Scammer"  "There is a scam accusation against this user" "I don't trust this user"  (even with a reason). A Yes -->  They may well be a scammer, but if someone else has posted a more substantial trust feedback accusation, then your shorter post is only going to be lost on a wall of Red Paint.

Q.  Is the user active?  A. No. -->  How many years has it been since they were last online?  Given what your comment is about, they probably ditched the account.  Suggestion:  If a UID has been offline for as little as three years and you remove your own comment (even if it's the only comment there was on the trust feedback page) when an account reactivates and there is shady activity, then numerous users will observe "This user has recently woken up" which if nothing else can be an orange flag.

Q.  Did you leave a negative for two alts?  A.  Yes.  -->  As a part of your investigation, did you uncover evidence that the two alts participated in claiming from the same campaign/merit or DT abuse/some other actual scam behaviour?  A.  No -->  Two alts who haven't scammed doesn't warrants negative trust feedback (that's been agreed to for quite some time) change the negative to a neutral.

Q.  Is there a flag against this user?  A.  Yes.  There will be a thread covering the allegations against the accused, so you can probably remove those trust feedback posts given the flag itself and other user's negative trust feedbacks will have covered the events.

Q.  Did you leave a positive saying "this person is a great guy/gal - I trust them!"  A. Yes.  Well ... there are some DT who will wiggle their fingers and tell you the trust feedback system is for trades only (but have whole pages of negatives against "scammers" and glowing posts for their circle of friends they think are great guy/gals).  Leaving aside the copious bags of salt for a moment - now is the time to review those glowing trust feedbacks.. You may be surprised to discover some of those glowing trust feedbacks have now gone on to scam.

Q.  Have you left a "This positive/negative trust feedback is to counter X's negative/positive trust feedback?  A.  Yes.  Don't be "That guy" as, in months and years to come, other users will come to realise you counter trust feedback is only due to your being a friend of the one receiving the initial trust/distrust.  Chances are it will prompt users reading YOUR comments will give YOU DT distrust.  Let people figure out whether a person's trust feedback comment is genuine or not based on evidence in a post, not because you're backing or countering someone else.

Q.  How often should I review my trust feedbacks?  A.  Good question.  How many do you do?  How often?  Are they neutral or otherwise? -->  I myself have done similar in the past (but not on this wholesale scale before), so, I might leave it for another six to nine months before I again review my posts.

Q.  What if my own trust feedback post count is even more than yours had at three thousand posts?  A.  Well, that's for you to decide.  "A Journey of a thousand miles begins with one step" aside, may I suggest you start as I did at the oldest trust feedbacks left and sift through and find just those UID's that have been nuked of banned and start with your comments against them.  It may take a while, but you will find a pattern and might just remove 90% of your trust feedbacks as I have done to remain accurate.

As always, comments welcome.

Thanks for reading.

Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)



4. Gunimoto
5. Razimcuy
6. Erma Novela Sabatin
7. Faadhillah Nailah
8. Ricky Tjahyadi
9. DilaraShafiyatunnisa

Proof:








Reporting:

I have marked these user's trust feedback pages with distrust.

Related Addresses:


Miscellaneous:

• Another alt account from a known bounty cheater.
• Ban evasion.
  

Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue/Active)




6. BusyraShabiyyah
7. Valentina Awes
8. Fataniah

Proof:





https://ninjastic.space/post/55146113

Reporting:

I have marked these user's trust feedback pages with distrust.

Related Addresses:


Miscellaneous:

• Another alt account from a known bounty cheater.
• Ban evasion.
  

2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

Questcry
Zazuu01

Proof:
Questcry
[Achieve]

Zazuu01
[Achieve]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:
These two users have registered the same bounty, used the same wallet for proof of Authentication twice, but i dont think it is a mistake. From my research i think these two accounts are operated by one person, these two users always register for the same bounty and they use the same pattern.
BOUNTY REGISTERED
Bounty registered; COMBO Network ex COCOS-BCX. Bounty manager; irfan_pak10. Questcry is number 17 on Twitter spreadsheet and Zazuu01 is number 514 on Twitter spreadsheet.
Bounty registered; BillionAir. Bounty manager; CryptopreneurBrainboss. Questcry is number 119 on Twitter spreadsheet and Zazuu01 is number 140 on Twitter spreadsheet.

---

2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

AlinaAdria
DimitriyMasterov

Proof:
AlinaAdria
[Achieve]

DimitriyMasterov
[Achieve]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:
These two users have registered the same bounty, used the same wallet for proof of Authentication once, but i dont think it is a mistake. From my research i think these two accounts are operated by one person, these two users always register for the same bounty and they use the same pattern.
BOUNTY REGISTERED
Bounty registered; [Bounty 2.0] COMBO Network. Bounty manager; irfan_pak10. AlinaAdria  is number 93 on Twitter spreadsheet and DimitriyMasterov is number 85 on Twitter spreadsheet.
Bounty registered; BillionAir. Bounty manager; CryptopreneurBrainboss. AlinaAdria is number 159 on Twitter spreadsheet and DimitriyMasterov is number 175 on Twitter spreadsheet.

---

2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

Lily lewis
Yamina87

Proof:
Lily lewis
[Achieve]

Yamina87
[Achieve]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:
These two users have registered the same bounty, used the same wallet for proof of Authentication once, but i dont think it is a mistake. From my research i think these two accounts are operated by one person, these two users always register for the same bounty and they use the same pattern.
BOUNTY REGISTERED
Bounty registered; COMBO Network ex COCOS-BCX. Bounty manager; irfan_pak10. Lily lewis is number 75 on Twitter spreadsheet and Yamina87 is number 60 on Facebook spreadsheet.
Bounty registered; Stretch To Earn. Bounty manager; BountyDetective. Lily lewis is number 600 on Twitter spreadsheet and Yamina87 is number 575 on Twitter spreadsheet.

2 Accounts Connected: (Note: Banned shown in red / Inactive in Blue / Active profile (in ordinary link colour))

---

IrynaInna
EvinLewise

Proof:
IrynaInna
[Achieve]

EvinLewise
[Achieve]

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous:
These two users have registered the same bounty, used the same wallet for proof of Authentication multiple, but i dont think it is a mistake. From my research i think these two accounts are operated by one person, these two users always register for the same bounty and they use the same pattern.
BOUNTY REGISTERED
Bounty registered; COMBO Network ex COCOS-BCX. Bounty manager; irfan_pak10. IrynaInna is number 17 on Twitter spreadsheet and EvinLewise is number 514 on Twitter spreadsheet.
Bounty registered; Starzz. Bounty manager; BountyDetective. IrynaInna is number 342 on Facebook spreadsheet and EvinLewise is number 355 on Facebook spreadsheet.

Nice catch there @    Pandu Geddon - we need to be ever vigilant for scammers who will turn up when you least expect it.

 wizwiz7
 cryptosly
 Unique22

Proof:
https://ninjastic.space/post/44762661

https://ninjastic.space/post/62332345

https://ninjastic.space/post/62151154

Quote Post by cryptosly (delete)
https://ninjastic.space/post/58862823

https://ninjastic.space/post/59987902

Related Addresses:

Miscellaneous: Bounty cheater with multiple alts

those alt accounts deserve to be banned. and 3 accounts I mentioned are still actively abusing to join the bounty campaign
[Bounty] OzoneChain | OZO | | Manager: sujonali1819 | SPREADSHEET | Content Writing #92 #95 #99 |