unambiguously I consider kyc to be unacceptable, because Bounty Hunters are not those individuals who must provide personal data. Another thing is an investor who can go through different registrations while investing their funds. But this practice will scare off all investors.
Topic: KYC of bounty hunters - page 40. (Read 6981 times)
I think that's a good thing, because KYC is great for making bounty hunters not using multiple accounts.
If only for bounty do not need KYC. If it's for Crowdsale it does not matter. If just for the requirements of receiving the award is not necessary because we only do bounty limited to signature and social media. not using money or investing.
The process is very expensive and who is going to pay for it? I am hunting bounty to get money not to spend it and the campaign would not be able to afford it.
KYC for bounty hunters is not fair because they are not customers. This market is valued for anonimity. I don't see a reason to do that for bounty hunters. It is just a collecting of personal information.
the main advantage of cryptocurrency is anonymity. when I send or receive my coins I want to be sure that it's anonymous. I am opposed when ICO organizers are required from participants to provide document confirming the identity. this is a violation of the main rule of cryptocurrency. but unfortunately there's nothing we can do about it.
The good thing in having KYC is, the administration can limit the cheating on the ICO specially on the referral programs but what I don't like about the KYC is you are sending your personal info which is very dangerous.
KYC for bounty hunters is a great thing, especially with all those referral programs, and fake referrals that are going on. There will always be some people that would try to cheat the system, and with KYC we can in one hand prevent that from happening.
I think that if the project asks investors and members of the bounty campaign to undergo the KYC procedure, then surely it is necessary and it is not what that difficult or threatening for us! If a project asks me to pass KYC, I do not even think about it, I have copies of all the necessary documents for this!
This is a good pont to talk about it...when you ask for id so why you use crypto for your project...the main tarfet of the crypto is the desentralization and the anonymity
KYC for bounty is totally unnecessary., except you want to kill your project I will advice that it should be avoided. Cryptocurrency community take issue of privacy very seriously and most KYC project have not done well as a result of this
I don't recommend giving away personal informations though, your personal information might be leaked and that is not good.
I think I'm going to take part in the bounty thread that doesn't need KYC.
Because the current KYC data cannot be well managed, so when we submit the information, it is completely possible to be leaked.
Because the current KYC data cannot be well managed, so when we submit the information, it is completely possible to be leaked.
KYC is good for bounty hunters It will help the management to know those spammers and those who has multiple accounts. I'm surprised why some of the Bounty participants do find it difficult to submit there KYC if truly they are not spammers.
I think KYC is good for bounty hunters, I am surprised why some bounty hunters worried to submit there KYC documents if they are not spammers . It is good way to find out fake bounty hunters and stop to rewarding to spammers.
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
think it's good and not hard to do. although there is little concern if our data is sent to another party. if there is no bad purpose and precisely to make sure the truth of the data is not a problem for me.actually before the project is done should provide information that there will be a kyc, so for those who do not want the identity given can immediately prevent themselves not to follow the bounty, but after the completion of new information given, this is what I consider to be in violation.
for me the identity data is a secret that should not be given to anyone, let alone not the authorities to organize and manage the need with the relationship of interest.
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
I don't think it is necessary for the bounty hunters to undergo KYC. The bounty hunters will only receive a little portion of the tokens sold or minted. It is not that significant actually. What I agree with the KYC implementation is that it will cover those who invested in any ICO with a significant amount. Those who invested with little amounts can even be exempted from such process.
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
think it's good and not hard to do. although there is little concern if our data is sent to another party. if there is no bad purpose and precisely to make sure the truth of the data is not a problem for me.
Bounty hunters do not need this type of a procedure. But i also met few cases that asking KYC documents for bounties and airdrops. But it is very dangerous for giving KYC documents for them.
I don't want to give my KYC to anyone. In many telegram groups, I can see a lot of people selling KYC materials. Maybe these KYC materials are the ones you submitted to the ICO team.
This sounds terrible, so I won't take any ICO project that requires KYC data.
I'm afraid then you can stay without work and good projects. I have been meeting more and more bounty where KYC is needed, and this tendency is growing. Our task is only to put up with this and follow the rulesThis sounds terrible, so I won't take any ICO project that requires KYC data.
Jump to: