As long as they are clear about that from the beginning of the campain I don't have a problem with it.
Most people will give out their ID without a second thought, if they see an opportunity to make profits from a bounty or airdrop.
Topic: KYC of bounty hunters - page 44. (Read 6981 times)
to be honest if Bounty program need a KYC it should be asked before the joining of Bounty campaign , I Don't like to give my documents just for Bounty purpose unless the project really need it
KYC for the bounty of participants is still possible the right decision, only the most annoying for me is KYC for investors, for people who invest money do check their identity, why?
some country like US, not allowed their people to join some ICOs, that is why some projects always use KYC for their investor because they not want to get any problem because of country that ban ICOsI still do not understand this if a person from the United States and he is not allowed to participate in the ICO, but he found a loophole and still invested, he must be punished year-long as he violates the rules of the United States
I don't agree Kyc on bounty campaigns. I wouldn't risk my personal information for few hundred dollars. Maybe they can set the kyc for people who earned $2000+ in a campaign.
About kyc in shocked when i see first in polymath,idont understnd why they need kyc,if the crypto idea about anonimity is on first place...Imagine in future how this thing can get worse,in all ways.Kyc collectors need to say why is this all for?Security?Information for third person?
KYC for the bounty of participants is still possible the right decision, only the most annoying for me is KYC for investors, for people who invest money do check their identity, why?
some country like US, not allowed their people to join some ICOs, that is why some projects always use KYC for their investor because they not want to get any problem because of country that ban ICOs
It seems to me that this is a very good procedure but when the fees are very high. To pass the indentation should people who collect and who invest in this project and we advertise simply and in this there is nothing like that.
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
I think that it is quite possible to call fraudulent actions on the part of the ICO team. Signature campaign participants do not invest their money in conducting ICO and therefore are not subject to a KYC review. This is all the initiative of the ICO team, which is aimed at not paying the earned tokens to the signatory campaign participants. If the team, in terms of joining, wrote about the possible conduct of such a verification, or initiated such a verification before joining, I could still hardly understand it. However, to demand it after the completion of the ICO, I do not see any sense here, except that if someone for whatever reasons refuses to pass it, they will assign the tokens he counted to himself. This practice is unacceptable.
The major reason many of us joined cruptocurrency is because of it give the opportunity to be anonymous so I do not understand the reason for kyc verification
I am sure that such requirements are completely illegal, because this way it loses personal life and its anonymity in the network. It is better to conduct KYC for those people who are developing the project, this is the right decision.
I think that it is not surprising at least - I see different reasons for that; since they pay us - why should we accept their requirements?
How is this why? The fact of the matter is that you are paid money and they have the right to demand anything! Moreover, the state and new laws and inspections require them. Alas, soon everything will be through KYC.
I think that it is not surprising at least - I see different reasons for that; since they pay us - why should we accept their requirements?
I think this is because there are so many cheats nowadays because they are involved with many accounts at the same time
Fortunately, there are still very few bounty programs that require KYC verification. I think it is a wrong procedure because there is no regulation in the world that requires verification of identity to those who participate in the bounty campaigns. The speech is different for those who buy the tokens, in this case the KYC verification is right
KYC for the bounty of participants is still possible the right decision, only the most annoying for me is KYC for investors, for people who invest money do check their identity, why?
I am actually seeing less of this suddenly. I think there will still be airdrops that require KYC, because it does *seem* like a good way to weed out multiple accounts or bots.
Actually for me they are only following the rules because even if you get your money in western union if somebody sent you a money, you are obliged to fill up the kyc form to be sure that you are one, and still they want your Id to be checked. And also to check if somebody uses a multiple account as well.
KYC is requirements of centralized exchanged forced by govt. Without KYC token will remain on a decentralized exchange like etherdelta forever. It is not the goal of many ICO investors. They did it for quick profits and founder are the same. All people care is quick profits, ideally 5x and more. So KYC is inevitable. But what I don't understand, that exchanges use verification process and ask KYC from founders. Seems double job for me. For them, it might be extra cautiousness. Who will risk yet another raid by goverment autorities?
Well I think KYC is something that would be able to learn more about the consumer and of course to have the data base of all consumer. That the ICO team could verify that they are dealing with a real person and not a bot. KYC for a great tool to avoid scammers. 
I think the bounty or airdrop requires you to KYC to get the coins is just a scam. Scam for your personal information to join ico or doing some bad thing.
Leave away for that.
Leave away for that.
Jump to: