Topic: KYC of bounty hunters - page 47. (Read 6981 times)
kyc makes people think again to follow a bounty and I do not want this to happen, hopefully not many bounty that apply the rules and only ico buyers who apply it
Submitting your identity in the name of bounty hunting is very risky, probably after the submission the identity documents can be sold out to some online sites who usually sell fake ID documentations, I belief this trend of KYC should totally be left out in bounty hunting, campaign managers should devise another means or method of detecting multiple account holder I.e cheaters.
In my opinion, this will not progress . Every one needs a sense of privacy for their own security. I don't have to open myself to some ICOs offering bounty for supporting their campaign.
I have never passed KYC, but if asked, it should be at least a top-level Binance exchange. ICO with KYC is quite a promising business, but at the same time it's aspiring, because 90% of the scams or at least will work exclusively at the auction of the released token.
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
this is very good. maybe this stops many of this bounty cheaters. i am in favor.
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
And why did they need the ID's?., It is personal belongings and maybe its delicate for us in the future, we are only just taking care of ourselves because we cannot avoid those people who maybe doing something that we dont want to do with us. Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
I don't like KYC but I think if you trust the project and you can see a good future in it, so you can afford to do KYC. It really depends on the project. I mean who would give personal data to a scam project? Just deepen the project and study, then make decisions!
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
I think, KYC will be standart and become necessary in bounty. Many country now want to regulate ICOs and crypto trading so its need necessary for government asking detail about ICOs investor and who get involved in marketing campaign
This is not okay for me because it can expose my identity here in crypto and maybe abuse by scammers or used by identity theft, even this can help with fake account in this forum but bounty hunters still used fake identity for their alt account, so this is useless then.
I think this is a good mechanism to ensure the validity of the person. This is also a security measure for bounty hunters just in case a scam or a fraud will happen. I know that for some it is a bit sketchy, but just think of the consequences of not having kyc.
I think it is a risky move but since it is a policy, people are left with no choice. I don't really like the KYC policy because there is a possibility that data leaks occur.
Human error exists and there are criminal minds who wanted to steal information of people. It is dangerous. The responsibility of handling the private information safely rests in the hands of the ICO team. People trusted them and whatever happen, they are accountable.
Human error exists and there are criminal minds who wanted to steal information of people. It is dangerous. The responsibility of handling the private information safely rests in the hands of the ICO team. People trusted them and whatever happen, they are accountable.
I also think KYC for bounty campaigns is not good. I believe KYC should only for investors. It is important that the money is not stolen etc. But why need KYC to the usual bounty hunters? This is not logical. I can't understand the reason why they need all these documents of bounty hunters? Soon it will be for airdops is necessary to pass KYC. This is a complete nonsense
I think it is not good at all giving away your personal information. In the bounty campaigns, we are helping the ICOs to be known in different mediums and in return they will compensate the participant. Actually, I think if KYC is very important to all ICOs then all ICO should have imposed it.
I think that maybe there should be a limit from where the KYC should start for those ICOs that require it - for example if you earned rewards bigger than 1.000$.
Definitely I agree with you. This should have a limit. Give you$ 100, kyc wants. Ridiculous. Bounty hunters are not customers, they are supportive.
I think that maybe there should be a limit from where the KYC should start for those ICOs that require it - for example if you earned rewards bigger than 1.000$.
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
It is a good idea to have this kind of regulation because it can determined a multi-accounts that being put in one signature campaigns. Not all but there are so many bitcoiners doing this way just to gained a lot of token rewards. It will be a good corrective action if it will be totally regulate here in crypto world.
No, it is not good at all. This is just another collection of data, that no one knows what will happen with. Soon or later we will have scandal. I don;t participate in programs that require KYC.
The main reason of this innovation is because many bounty hunters create a lot of fake accounts and due to this they get more reward than they deserve, and the KYC process will simply stop these scam actions from the bounty of hunters. But I think that this process should be simplistic and managers must certainly warn about it at the beginning of the campaign.
Well, I don't think that's the main reason why they ask for the KYC. And I don't think it's the solution either, since if you have several fake accounts, you can always resort to the identity of relatives or friends or other methods to validate all those accounts
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
I just think KYC makes me feel reluctant to participate in a bounty or ICO, there are some ICOs I want to invest, but I am hindered by identity, because my identity is valid for life (forever) even though the identity date is no longer valid, it has been preached by government in my country.
As for me, this is not a good trend. After all, crypto-currencies should be anonymous. For bounty hunter, you should avoid such bounties. Of course, if the project is very good, and you are confident in it, then I think that the kys can be passed.
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
it's absolutely bad bounty,just thinking what they will do our kyc? It so hard for me i don't have any kyc Jump to: