Topic: KYC of bounty hunters - page 45. (Read 6981 times)
It is big problem for me, I don`t want to join bounties where KYC needed. I am here for my 20$, i don`t wont to sell my photo, say where I live or even send my documents photo!!!!
as if today we were talking about the fact that our security can be exchanged for some number of tokens. Up folly to give up their data for some drop our ability of course different and who perhaps uses some of the documents that do not point directly at them, not that just have nothing and because they did not care about safety. And there are those with already all in order with security. I just don't see any other way to participate in these events. And what are the options?
As for me, this is a great idea, because during the passage, not all get tokens, and at the same time I will get more. But I often forget about this check ...
NOt good at all. cryptocurrencies are based on the decentralized system while ICO requires KYC. THis is somehow ridiculous because they will know all of your information. And not yet, bounty hunters have to do the KYC ? Fuck this is madness. I think that they should do the IPO instead of ICO
it is a stupid innovation for bounty hunter. moreover if manager announce about it in the end of campaign. and finally you spend several month. dont pass KYC and get nothing
That mean you are good enough for daily Bounty routine but not enough for taking your salary. 
I think it will be more throughout honest and aboveboard if Bounty managers write about KYC BEFORE campaigns start.
Then hunters can make his own decision join or find another one.
I think it's a very bad idea to ask bounty hunters about their KYC because a lot of ICO's website is not secure and now they're asking for our private information when they can not even keep our private email
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
You have to avoid this KYC as much as you can because most of them are just gathering your data and leak them over the internet. One of the main purposes of crytocurrency is to have a privacy of the investors and the people involve in it. This new development is quite alarming because KYC requires your passport, ID and proof of billing.
it is a stupid innovation for bounty hunter. moreover if manager announce about it in the end of campaign. and finally you spend several month. dont pass KYC and get nothing
Submitting your identity in the name of bounty hunting is very risky, probably after the submission the identity documents can be sold out to some online sites who usually sell fake ID documentations, I belief this trend of KYC should totally be left out in bounty hunting, campaign managers should devise another means or method of detecting multiple account holder I.e cheaters.
I don't like bounty programs that ask their participants for kyc. Kyc is only for investor who like to invest. As a bounty hunter we don't need that because we are currently working under them to promote their ico. Aside from risking our documents maybe they will sold our info to other users which is bad.
For me, i always ask admin of bounty campaign that i have to KYC after bounty program is end, if they ask i will not join because i can't know what will they use my ID in the future. I dont want have trouble because of this.
Asking bounty hunters for KYC ridicule the core idea of the anonymity in cryptoworld. But some ICO teams go even further forcing hunters to give their ID after their job has down
In this case, it's clear that the team not only doesn't care who promotes its ICO but also not willing to pay at all) Good way to save lots of money under the guise of KYC.
All project need to make KYC for bounty hunters. Because there are already a lot of multiacc in all bounty. Need to make for KYC /NOKYC for bounty hunters.
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
Well, why not? What's wrong with that? At least this way removed a lot of multi-accounts. This has a positive impact on profitability.
Why we give our id information? Identity is specific, not shared with everyone. If we provide our credentials for every campaign we participate in, we have hundreds of credentials. This is a very dangerous thing
I welcome this decision, I think it is quite adequate, since the process of confirming the identity is a powerful argument for getting your rewards and thanks to this decision many problems are solved so that it will positively affect the bounty companies
If the ICO is legit well this is a good move from them,they will easily find bounty hunters cheating or joining multiple accounts in one campaign,this will open a new opportunity with the new bounty hunters around the forum and will prevent cheaters from abusing campaigns to get more stakes.
Yes, you just right nothing to worried about implementation about KYC as long as the ICO is accredited. Impact we have to be protected by the scammers. Because through this KYC the scammers can easily be monitored. And its our responsibity also to take advantage in our KYC before we submit it. We should look it clear that the ICO that we are joining is legit.
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
Well, why not? What's wrong with that? At least this way removed a lot of multi-accounts. This has a positive impact on profitability.
Who knows what they do with the info they got from you? I am strongly against KYC in bounties and airdrops. It's okay if they say from the start that you have to complete KYC before you can get your tokens. People who are not against it can go ahead and hand over their personal info. It's up to them. It's completely different story when you've done the job and they ask you for KYC even though they didn't state it in the first place.
Bounty programs are asking bounty hunters to do KYC before they are paid for work done . What do you think of this development.
Well, why not? What's wrong with that? At least this way removed a lot of multi-accounts. This has a positive impact on profitability.
For the survival of the crypto business world the KYC registration cant be avoided by most ICOs. These requirements are necessary for the protection of the investors, that's what they say.
And if you are doing something wrong then it is fine for as long as you are not manipulating something or scamming. If its required then you have to do it as it is for your own protection, so don't worry much about it. It is for your own protection if you are investor so it is fine. Actually I'm not fully agree with using KYC for bounty hunter.but On the one hand, it will help get rid of multi accounting and honest participants will get more reward. But I don't want to give my personal information to people who it unfairly use it.
On the one hand you send your ID to unknown project #1 for KYC.
On the other hand in a month a bad guy will buy your ID on Dark Web and do his own KYC with YOUR ID in project #2.
For the survival of the crypto business world the KYC registration cant be avoided by most ICOs. These requirements are necessary for the protection of the investors, that's what they say.
I think KYC is not safe. Firstly, it does not guarantee the success of the project. Secondly, I give my personal data to unknown people.
The abbreviation KYC stands for Know Your Customer. Bounty hunters are not customers, we do not purchase anything from them, so technically they cannot ask bounty hunters KYC submission. Recently I have seen some scamming projects tend to do this to delay token payments.
well i understand that you are right but i think that it is not good for other people who joined the airdrop and buy coins before launching.thank you for confirmation. Jump to: