Topic: Lab Rat Data Processing, LLC (LabRatMining) Official Announcement - page 129. (Read 452224 times)

Yah, but the trolls might not, anyone who bought shares this week is probably showing as overpaid and doesn't want any self appointed enforcers bugging them to "send it back".

How does that make any sense? It is a copy paste right off the site for those two transactions, dumped into a text file and imported into the doc, then hand matched for the addresses and two dates of div payments.

Instead of just saying "update your data its out of date..." point out an inconsistency and I will be glad to edit anything I have wrong.


Indeed it does not take trades in to account... which is why I noted that in the post...


If you look... I am only highlighting those who got paid more than last week... those who bought more shares can obviously ignore their address in that highlighted area.

Flashman is correct, as you noted yourself, it doesn't take trades into account, and difficulty.

But it doesn't matter, grnbrg estables div/bond and he has the official list, so it's easy to reconcile now

Oh geez, what a mess. I hope it doesn't take too long to fix.

Please update your data, it's out of date even if it was based off blockchain.

Yay, I should be getting 0,001572922 more this week then

As we've figured out, correct payment per bond should have been 0.000524306 this week.


grnbrg

^^^^ Bearing in mind a flurry of trading activity this week due to recent announcements, DO NOT take this list as definitive.

If anyone cares, I did my own research...

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AsVvuskew8TmdFdOakpIVURJT3Jqcmx4bzNWUnk5dUE

13.9648905596108 BTC over paid give or take those who bought more shares that I am obviously not privy to that info.


Flashman apparently took a 3 second look and decided he knew exactly what I did... and he is incorrect... so ignore the post below... you can see my source linked below.

Flashman is correct about the below... because none of us has a fully up to date bond holder listing... all I can highlight is the difference per address from last week to this weeks payouts.

I have updated this using the LRM trade thread to reflect those who showed highlighted due to acquiring bonds this last week.

I have also added a column listing total bonds held based on payout and dividend per bond as of 1-18... it is not the current holdings as of today... I will add that shortly... but this will only be as accurate as grnbrg's postings in the trade thread.

1-25 txid https://blockchain.info/tx/00d5a7f30eb82873ce9d4950c4a084be47d25d5ce39bd0f245c763fb756ca197

1-18 txid https://blockchain.info/tx/7fcd3ceec1ed2aaf4a8305999f882f74fb50cf74360bde7b86f8842fa273f5e3

Can you tell us what the payout per share should be so we can confirm we have been paid correctly?

Some underpayment corrections went out about an hour ago.   The rest of the corrections should follow shortly.

As far as the people who were overpaid, I'll talk some more with Lab_Rat about how that is going to be handled.  I see a number of possibilities, and there's no reason to rush forward and complicate things any further.


grnbrg.

That is nice, Cex.IO actually pays for shares directly from the interface if you load up how much to allocate per, and it does it automatically. Might be a option to check out.

EDIT:

I got 0.01625349 BTC this week, against 0.03886648 BTC for last week for the same number of shares, doesnt seem right.

What we need is an LRM version of CEX.io

Some cost for dev up front but I have not doubt at all it would return big time to the bondholders - I for one vote we take 10 btc or so and get it coded up along the same lines

I got paid 0.01625349 for 31 bonds, or .000524306 per bond.

It seems this issue has a common history with the still unresolved method for bond trading. BitFunder didn't only make trading bonds as easy as it should be, but it apparently made dividend payouts easy & error resistant.

I got about 20x what I should have gotten.
Awaiting further instruction.

There is at least one copy/paste error.  The top list and bottom list are almost identical.  Notice how the same number sequence is repeating......

1NxdocxSrybTnr4ihzHFMwT88aTyCnqcKx 2.28702289 BTC
1ECfbpmtVCtH16yF3m3uhwjX9JrjyQazoh 0.1478543 BTC
18wTznDgoipN8VeZCbq2meLrikRjUad19j 0.01625349 BTC
1D79X6cjxfAzQ7ysSURrpihGhxfTbNH6eZ 0.00786459 BTC
1KtegEdSn6VDNJhZNU7RVEp5Pp4qneQ8vv 0.00419445 BTC
195hcSe3B6Fsqk2oSHqebTP6oZ97xD2pKB 0.07130562 BTC
1LxsHZGQ1Y5C2Jprh2ZU9iSNr2u3Z6UqR7 0.01572918 BTC
1JE1T2mTFmVN18VhrgiMRMpAujEdftkjiN 0.02516669 BTC
14vzHK1JpcFuu4Rxs3EfmDeFubJTohNeoW 0.00157292 BTC
1XxqsbzQQSiekHWtiJFWciwB9m2egpija 0.00314584 BTC
1Cy4ioFvbQn9GY8FUDpt5Q9xcyh7ytn6eB 0.03932295 BTC
1NqQ771kj8qJK7sA6BGgRJ96uyT8Ws1yag 1.04861206 BTC
18Yo74rf6Hwsx7c5BszRdtk7kNFTcpVNgN 0.08651049 BTC
1Ae4BgvxKBqGYe94tfe1oqg8t9RnSgqLZD 0.00104861 BTC
1F2yrQp1NXJqeuQdGvcM8dwG56FnTbhL88 0.00052431 BTC


19v8g4e94ZqcR7Cv3Q6k6nabGZBsM24Zhs 2.28702289 BTC
1AwNJJZzs7vnyizJvjb1YPD2xQHkNfbae 0.1478543 BTC
1ERESdsTjdUQBSsg46iihjyAzqFUZTMJ46 0.01625349 BTC
115uLwTHBQyeF5EqmPMwnskXAhaf3JU3JA 0.00786459 BTC
165QoG8JRzJggtbM9LuZjPDaBBZf5xL1tM 0.07130562 BTC
1yrdiDVQD14KmndGfmnXdjDsQa45zYndw 0.01572918 BTC
1AnibaWMJkgafBJCVjR5iW2NSqoaNsxsFP 0.02516669 BTC
1JMDsor5LLSxtoNTvysAkta4k22yWM1ZpN 0.00157292 BTC
1BuTc3Z6cdU7UQfBqU5Tv7FZ8Lp6X2819H 0.00314584 BTC
1D46jqdzpHFhugujaHdSoGeqiXcpeC6hMQ 0.03932295 BTC
1ENSExprPZxmAKEYB2nFqpYU9oUBL9ZS6t 1.04861206 BTC
127sdDBnQUkdzg1TwhWEPhb18y4MqkVyHx 0.08651049 BTC
1A5wVw3jThtjVhXpDN6fX85nxrwtucywBe 0.00052431 BTC

If they are honest, they just return it. If they are not honest, they most likely wont be getting any divs for a long time

How can a hand full of shares that got payed 1000x of the correct ammount can ever pay it back? This employee should fix the mess out of his own pocket...

You can always do the work of seeing who returns it and who doesn't, and from those people keep it from their future divs untill it's corrected again

grnbrg has an official list I believe