It's going to explode on news of hashing.
That is absolutely true. Will that news ever come though?
Topic: [LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining) - page 635. (Read 1079974 times)
September 06, 2013, 02:46:21 PM
That is absolutely true. Will that news ever come though?
September 06, 2013, 02:45:15 PM
Do you continue to ask the same questions?
No, actually I've asked the 'Maths question' ONCE, then pointed out that the replies were vacuous point scoring.
If that's not alright with you then you must be very worried about these simple questions about div payout? Maybe div payout doesn't bother you in the slightest? Would that be because you will dump all your LC shares if the price gets to .005?
Everyone else be warned - if you don't sell at the same time that these guys who are all over this thread do YOU WILL LOOSE YOUR MONEY.
Now N_S, that is a statement of fact, just an observation - do you agree?
September 06, 2013, 02:44:51 PM
If the maths is right, then who cares who does it?
But everybody is coming up with different figures and saying this or that is wrong. So who is right? Possibly no-one. That's why LabCoin should be on here doing the correct and best possible Maths calculations.
Who cares? lol you should but clearly don't.
I think Labcoin has done extensive math, but are keeping it to themselves to benefit from it the most. At the end of the day, shareholders are competitors for their own shares.
September 06, 2013, 02:26:49 PM
We seem to be rising again, on no news?
Probably people anticipating the next few days left before the official announcement.
September 06, 2013, 02:22:32 PM
It's going to explode on news of hashing.
September 06, 2013, 02:21:23 PM
We seem to be rising again, on no news?
Only slightly, and no bid support for it yet.
Still, it fell on good news, so rising on nothing makes sense.
September 06, 2013, 02:20:10 PM
We seem to be rising again, on no news?
September 06, 2013, 02:14:49 PM
What are you people that keep shutting the questioners down on? Why won't you discuss these issues? Is there anything more important to be discussing than div payout??
Here's my thing with this: alright, you have questions that you deem legitimate and feel others should deem legitimate as well. You ask these questions and get nothing in response.
What's the play now?
Do you continue to ask the same questions? You'll likely get the same response (or lack thereof). Why do you feel people need to answer your questions (as legitimate as they may be)? If people are getting fleeced for not having answers to these questions, what can you do about that? Make them answer them? I don't think so.
So, please, come and ask questions. But leave it at that. If you don't get adequate responses, just move on - there isn't anything you can do.
People shut him down because concern trolling fools no one.
Simple as that.
September 06, 2013, 02:12:13 PM
What are you people that keep shutting the questioners down on? Why won't you discuss these issues? Is there anything more important to be discussing than div payout??
Here's my thing with this: alright, you have questions that you deem legitimate and feel others should deem legitimate as well. You ask these questions and get nothing in response.
What's the play now?
Do you continue to ask the same questions? You'll likely get the same response (or lack thereof). Why do you feel people need to answer your questions (as legitimate as they may be)? If people are getting fleeced for not having answers to these questions, what can you do about that? Make them answer them? I don't think so.
So, please, come and ask questions. But leave it at that. If you don't get adequate responses, just move on - there isn't anything you can do.
September 06, 2013, 02:11:43 PM
I have spent the entire day tirelessly reading up on Labcoin from every conceivable source I could find. The more I learn about Labcoin the more it simply doesn't add up although I think there may be some short term reward, albeit it high risk imo. Even self proclaimed Bitcoin mining guru Mabsark who's one man campaign to turn ActM shareholders failed, is himself jumping ship from LC to Actm in November as part of his well publicised strategy.
I wish you all the best with your venture folks and I will be popping in from time to time.
And that's it, I won't be investing so I'm out.
P.S. Get rid of that clock, it's a bad omen!
I wish you all the best with your venture folks and I will be popping in from time to time.
And that's it, I won't be investing so I'm out.
P.S. Get rid of that clock, it's a bad omen!
I've never claimed to be a mining guru and the reason I'll be jumping ship is not because I believe Labcoin will fail, it's because I think its price will have risen and will be levelling off, while ActM's will have crashed and will have started rising again when they come closer to getting their chips online.
I plan on riding the price increases of both Labcoin and ActM. I believe both Labcoin and ActM will be successful, with Labcoin seeing success first.
At the end of the year, I'll likely be holding AM, ActM and LC.
September 06, 2013, 02:02:23 PM
Just get out from here || buy shares @ market price like everyone else || do a real job || put a bid wall and let people who wants to dump, dump. Your market manipulation is obviously not working and this is just getting boring.
There we are again. I opened up a valid point about div forecasts and Maths that are giving conflicting results and suggested the company should be telling US what the Maths figures are. And what was the reply to my question? There was no answer, just point scoring.
What are you people that keep shutting the questioners down on? Why won't you discuss these issues? Is there anything more important to be discussing than div payout??
September 06, 2013, 01:57:08 PM
I would just like to say that people seem to be more interested in point scoring on this thread than in discussing LabCoin as a proposition.
Last night someone picked me up on my French spelling (missed out an 'e') but ignored my substantial points. If people are really going to be this petty when confronted with genuine concerns about the company then they do not have a rational view of the stock. They are too emotionally tied to it in my view and should be viewed with suspicion and their judgement questioned. All IMHO ofcourse.
Last night someone picked me up on my French spelling (missed out an 'e') but ignored my substantial points. If people are really going to be this petty when confronted with genuine concerns about the company then they do not have a rational view of the stock. They are too emotionally tied to it in my view and should be viewed with suspicion and their judgement questioned. All IMHO ofcourse.
September 06, 2013, 01:55:38 PM
I feels in my bones that soon will be message, message from Labcoin 
September 06, 2013, 01:53:11 PM
I'm only a native english speaker, so I could be wrong, but I believe he said if they're right then who cares?
A very sarcastic tone to your comment, but I will reply as this is important.
With his assumption being they ARE right. I questioned that assumption on the basis of none of the Maths corroborating each other.
It's a very very basic concept to understand - if three estimates from three different sources are all different then how can the Maths be right?
lol get back to me if you still don't get it.
Just get out from here || buy shares @ market price like everyone else || do a real job || put a bid wall and let people who wants to dump, dump. Your market manipulation is obviously not working and this is just getting boring.
September 06, 2013, 01:49:05 PM
I'm only a native english speaker, so I could be wrong, but I believe he said if they're right then who cares?
A very sarcastic tone to your comment, but I will reply as this is important.
With his assumption being they ARE right. I questioned that assumption on the basis of none of the Maths corroborating each other.
It's a very very basic concept to understand - if three estimates from three different sources are all different then how can the Maths be right?
lol get back to me if you still don't get it.
September 06, 2013, 01:40:56 PM
Who cares? lol you should but clearly don't.
I'm only a native english speaker, so I could be wrong, but I believe he said if they're right then who cares?
September 06, 2013, 01:40:22 PM
I have spent the entire day tirelessly reading up on Labcoin from every conceivable source I could find. The more I learn about Labcoin the more it simply doesn't add up although I think there may be some short term reward, albeit it high risk imo. Even self proclaimed Bitcoin mining guru Mabsark who's one man campaign to turn ActM shareholders failed, is himself jumping ship from LC to Actm in November as part of his well publicised strategy.
I wish you all the best with your venture folks and I will be popping in from time to time.
And that's it, I won't be investing so I'm out.
P.S. Get rid of that clock, it's a bad omen!
I wish you all the best with your venture folks and I will be popping in from time to time.
And that's it, I won't be investing so I'm out.
P.S. Get rid of that clock, it's a bad omen!
I think that's a bit unfair. I mean SOMEONE will make money from the crash when the hashing fails to turn up. Possibly the only way to make money from Labcoin now is to short sell it?
September 06, 2013, 01:38:06 PM
If the maths is right, then who cares who does it?
But everybody is coming up with different figures and saying this or that is wrong. So who is right? Possibly no-one. That's why LabCoin should be on here doing the correct and best possible Maths calculations.
Who cares? lol you should but clearly don't.
September 06, 2013, 01:33:45 PM
I have spent the entire day tirelessly reading up on Labcoin from every conceivable source I could find. The more I learn about Labcoin the more it simply doesn't add up although I think there may be some short term reward, albeit it high risk imo. Even self proclaimed Bitcoin mining guru Mabsark who's one man campaign to turn ActM shareholders failed, is himself jumping ship from LC to Actm in November as part of his well publicised strategy.
I wish you all the best with your venture folks and I will be popping in from time to time.
And that's it, I won't be investing so I'm out.
P.S. Get rid of that clock, it's a bad omen!
I wish you all the best with your venture folks and I will be popping in from time to time.
And that's it, I won't be investing so I'm out.
P.S. Get rid of that clock, it's a bad omen!
September 06, 2013, 01:28:14 PM
I think it's great that people are trying to do the Math to work out the exact divs were are expecting based on:
SEP - 130 chip Hashing power, deployment/difficulty then in NOV more 130 chip hashing power, more deployment/difficulty
And someone even mentioned hardware sales.
The one question I have is - why is it that shareholders are having to do all these calculations? I mean, with a few days to go before the hashing is supposed to start kicking in shouldn't LabCoin themselves be on here doing the calculations for us?
Atleast they have the accurate figures and time scales? I would say it's not good to base your investments on forecasts from other shareholders using figures that could be wide of the mark. You should only take these predictions onboard if they come from the company shouldn't you? What do they have to say about it?
SEP - 130 chip Hashing power, deployment/difficulty then in NOV more 130 chip hashing power, more deployment/difficulty
And someone even mentioned hardware sales.
The one question I have is - why is it that shareholders are having to do all these calculations? I mean, with a few days to go before the hashing is supposed to start kicking in shouldn't LabCoin themselves be on here doing the calculations for us?
Atleast they have the accurate figures and time scales? I would say it's not good to base your investments on forecasts from other shareholders using figures that could be wide of the mark. You should only take these predictions onboard if they come from the company shouldn't you? What do they have to say about it?
If the maths is right, then who cares who does it?
Jump to: