Topic: Leadership and Economics - page 2. (Read 1469 times)

Strict laws in a country are good, but there is absolutely no guarantee that bad things will not happen, such as theft, robbery and so on. Because the leader will definitely find a way to do the bad things he wants if he has the intention to do so, so the strictness of the law is also not a serious obstacle to prevent bad things from happening in a particular country. Because the only thing that can be a barrier to preventing bad things from happening in a country is an honest heart's intention not to want to do that thing.

The overall benchmark is not just a leader, but also the voters of that leader in the country, because the leaders of most countries are definitely chosen by the people so it is the people who determine what their best choice is. Now choosing a leader must be filtered seriously and correctly because from this a good leader will be born, even though all of this is also based on a leader's heart in carrying out his leadership period for a country. Because there are also good leaders, but the people are not good and there must be something wrong with that leader.

Enacting strict laws by a leader can indeed reduce crime in his country. However, its effectiveness depends on a number of factors, including law enforcement policies, fairness in the legal system, and other social and economic factors. Although providing strict punishments can be one way to reduce crime, attention is also needed to prevent crime, improve socio-economic conditions, and increase legal awareness in society.

...and here we come to a very subtle discovery - "bad leaders" are chosen.... by the people themselves, the citizens of the country !  Unless it is a totalitarian one - it is the people who choose the "bad" or "good" ruler, and the government. So I do not understand the claims of many people, where they first choose populists, corruptors, just not very smart rulers, because they offer them a fairy-tale version of how under them all will live richly and happily, and "you don't have to do anything - just vote for me". At the same time, people themselves consciously refuse from the difficult paths that would really bring changes, which are offered by smart candidates ...

A leader is like a pioneer who has to stress out for the followers to be enjoy, it can be of political leadership to rule the people in an expected lawful and abiding manners to make everyone lives orderly and finding solutions to their needs.
And in a team work, a leader is the sharpened edge sphere  representing a group of persons to a certain goal.

A leader is ought to understand that unproductive times can not be recovered so should always be dedicated in striving to meet up with the goals according to a stipulated period of times scheduled on the tasks of reaching an entitled magnitude.

In a group of people with a leader, let us win First is a priority considerations even if there are disputes and understanding between teammates so it's the leaders mandate to disputes the teams differences of grudge and focus on how to achieve an aim before any other anxieties.
And every leaders must be aware that Power is given to be controlled in targets of achieving a team goal and not to be used for personalities.

If we want to achieve major and sustainable growth in the economy, we must take an extensive strategy that considers all of the issues involved. Social decisions, for example, can have an important influence on how the economy operates. Governments can take advantage of policy to encourage both companies and people to invest and develop, or to create obstacles to growth. Market conditions are another important issue that cannot be overlooked. Demand and availability, opposition, and other industry variables all influence the expansion of the economy. So, while leadership is important it is not the only factor that counts. So while leadership is important, a single component of the equation.

If every leader is given very strict laws in his country, then theft, robbery, bad deeds etc. will be less or will not happen in his country. 




 If the leadership of every country is good, its country will be very prosperous, if its leadership is bad, then the people of that country will also be bad.  Every leadership should be given fairly and no false shelter should be given so that everyone in their country can receive a fair trial.  If the leadership in his country is good, the people will behave in order, the word of their leadership will spread all over the world and criticism of them that they are running the country very well will be reflected in their actions.

Actually handling of all activities of whole country is very difficult and these hardships can be understand by that person who act as a leader of a country. We are saying that government is not providing resources for us but we are not understanding that resources are numerous but people put all burden on the leader of a country without doing anything by himself.

There are large number of jobs but jobs requires skills and education whereas every individual don't possess it so instead of learning well everyone is in struggles to blame the leader. The prices of things is getting expensive because of limited amount so it can be reduces by increasing the quantity and a country can become prosperous if everyone becomes thankful for everything they have.

One can never achieve leadership unless one has great skills in the economy of leadership.  To be a period leader, you must earn false profits and invest them in you.  You have to invest wisely because at present the price of bitcoin is increasing, if everyone invests in bitcoin then not everyone will be able to earn money.  Or if you can't profit, if you want to make a profit, check each one's skills and invest on other tokens, but you can choose your own leader by yourself. To achieve leadership, you have to invest a lot and make sacrifices, which are new markets.  Come or well any girl or.  70% if your copy is not possible if you have a good list of good quality or you do not invest in a good exchanger.

Of course, I agree. It's not rocket science. A good leader brings political stability and political stability is like a gravity to investors if there's a market in the area. A good leader provides what is needed for a business to thrive. In a capitalist state, all the government has to do is create an environment where people can do business.

Good leadershcreatesate jobs and makes sure all sectors of the economy work well, it doesn't have to be perfect, but it'll work justly. Good jobs mean more money in the accounts of the citizens and since there's good governance, inflation would be reduced so it means they have more purchasing power for the people.
In my opinion, every country has what it takes to make life easier for its citizens, all they need is good and competent leaders who are ready to work for the country and not themselves.

Funny enough, a leader doesn't need to be an economist to make the economy of the country better. All they need is to understand how an economy works and know how to lead. They can hire the right people in strategic positions that would pilot the affairs of the state in different departments.

The impact of a leader on the lives of citizens, businessmen, and investors can be significant. A competent and effective leader can create policies that promote economic growth, stability, and opportunities for citizens, businessmen, and investors. Good leadership can lead to a stable and predictable business environment, encourage investment, create jobs, and improve the quality of life for citizens.

On the other hand, poor leadership can result in economic instability, corruption, lack of investment, and a decline in living standards for citizens. Political instability, weak governance, and unpredictable policies can deter businesses and investors, leading to economic stagnation and hardship for the population.

It is important to note that the impact of a leader on society is complex and multifaceted, and many factors beyond just leadership play a role in shaping the economic and social environment of a country. While a good leader can certainly contribute to a comfortable life for citizens, businessmen, and investors, other factors such as institutional strength, rule of law, economic conditions, and external factors also play critical roles in shaping the overall environment.

Leadership is the driving force to economy efficiency and sustainability of every nation because it takes a good leader to make a good economic decision that will foster development and bring good dividend to the citizen. If we articulated you will see that any nation that have bad economy most of the leadership of such nation are corrupt and greedy.
To have a better economy there must be transparency and integrity in those that are vested with the power to make decisions. Many part of the world mostly Africa sees leadership position as a business that they can buy with their money and as such all their interest will be centre on what they can get from the office instead of what they will do to boost the economy of the nation and alleviate poverty among the citizens.

There’s no doubt that when a country has a good governance and reliable leaders they will be progress in that country, there’s no country that’s is poor they just have bad leaders who his mismanaging the country funds leaving the people in extreme poverty. Let’s take Argentina as a case study, their new president is doing a very wonderful job in Argentina. The president has been able to cut down the inflation rate  from 25.5% to 13.2% in just the space of 3 month. Argentina has also just recorded its 1st budget SURPLUS in 12years of $589m. The most interesting thing is that their president was just inaugurated 3 months ago. When there are positive changes in a country and the economy is blazing up, foreign investors will be attracted  to the country this will even bring economic prosperity to the country.
  Whereas a country with bad governance will just remain stagnant or steadily decline its economy leaving their countrymen in advent poverty. These poverty can lead to agitation from the people leading them to take laws into thier hands. Like I said earlier they are no poor country only corrupt leaders. We are seeing the effect of corruption in some of these countries, like the one we are currently seeing where a gang leader in Haiti forced its sitting Prime Minister to resign unless they was going to be a “ bloody revolution” as stated by the gang leader. This can only result when there’s bad governance and corruption in the country, the people are tired leaving life from hand to mouth, the can only hope for this kind of things, this is why the people in Haiti are seen praising the gang leader (Barbecue) for doing what he did.  Irrespective of what the Media will try to circulate, they can’t be any revolution if they were no exploitation and corruption from their leaders.

It cannot be denied that whether a country is good or not really depends on the figure of the leader. However, of course there is no perfect leader when leading a country, there are certainly weaknesses, but the most important task of a leader is to improve the welfare of his people starting from providing as many jobs as possible for the people, and being able to stabilize the prices of the people's basic needs so that the people will be prosperous and the country will be more developed.

yes, a good leader can make the country beautiful. A good leader means a leader who has lots of good qualities, with the help of those qualities he can manage all the work. i agree with tou the economy of a country depends on a good leader. If the leader of the country involved in corruption or if he only thinks about his own well being then the country will face lots of problems. A good leader always tries to make his country more developed. It is also important for leaders to have the ability to create a vision and inspire others to follow it.

If it had been this way, that the citizens would successfully choose their leader when they vote, without the manipulation of the voting system, we would be seeing lots of good users because the citizens know what is best for them. Rather, the democratic system has been damaged to the extent that the common man has a lot of patriotic right to fight against the contingent when they ruin elections with their allies.

The leader of each country is the one who is most scrutinized when it comes to the good and bad of the economic sector in the country he leads. So it is important to choose a leader who is good in character and also good at managing the country so that he is able to manage his country's economy very well because that is how a country can progress and develop well. I also agree with the option you said because the leader is the first person that many people will look to when a country has made more progress in all sectors.

Likewise, when a country starts experiencing more problems and bad things, its leaders will also receive more scrutiny from all parties to find out what the basic causes are. So choosing a good leader is the duty of the citizens themselves by looking at and researching the character of the potential leaders who will lead the country through the general election.

San Salvador seems to make a difference.
At least from the outside he looks pretty promising.

In this day and age, there are no perfect leaders, almost all countries whose leaders have personal interests rather than prioritizing their people. However, at least we must be able to choose existing leaders and be able to compare the candidates with each other starting from their track record as to who is better than the potential leaders. But be assured that if his leadership does not help the poor, the people will definitely demand him in various ways to bring down leaders who act unjustly towards their people.

Unlike some other nations where their economies are operating so poorly and are not expanding well, the leaders of the country always make sure that they are keeping their people happy and that the country's economic position is progressing well. Additionally, a leader should constantly check in with those around them to make sure everyone has something to do on their own. Because that is the job of a nation's leaders, they are only chosen in order to provide some of the resources that the nation lacks and to ensure that the nation remains in a state of perfect peace, since most nations are at war with one another due to a lack of leaders.

That's true. If a person is naturally good then he/she might be a good leader, but one can't be a good leader over a night, it takes time. The nature of a good leader mostly depends on the country's government rule and policies.

For example- You know according to CPI, Myanmar is the 14th most corrupt country in the world. It means most of the leaders are corrupted. They do not follow the government rules properly. They just think about their own well-being which is not right.
So in such a situation if any people come up with innovative activities and try to be successful those political leaders have obstructed their work, all civil people have to unite against such leaders.