Everyone agrees a good leader can make or break a country's economy, but what makes a leader "good" with money? Is it like, having a brain the size of a financial textbook, or can they just hire a whiz-kid advisor and call it a day?
Some say a leader needs to be a financial guru, understanding every twist and turn of the economy. Sure, knowledge is power, but let's be honest, nobody knows it all. A good leader, even if they're not an economics whiz, knows how to build a strong team with diverse expertise. It's like having a rock band - you need a solid drummer, a killer guitarist, and maybe even a keyboardist for those fancy tunes.
Sure, a growing economy is cool, but it shouldn't just benefit the super rich, right? A good leader knows it's about fairness, making sure everyone gets a slice of the pie, not just the folks at the fancy tables. This means fighting income inequality, giving everyone a shot at success, and maybe even throwing some social programs into the mix to help those who need it most.
Topic: Leadership and Economics - page 5. (Read 1482 times)
leaders not only have good leadership that is good for the development of a region or country. because in your writing about leadership in government. but leadership alone is lacking must have high creativity so that the policies and regulations issued can develop a good business climate economy and the welfare of its people is well achieved.
Good leaders can make economic of a country to grow faster and remain stable, which we have seen in some developed countries where other undeveloped countries feel like going to seek for potential impart from their leaders so that they can improve in their economic to save their citizens destiny. Any country that is struggling in the area of economic in their country, check the type of leadership they have in that particular country either they are corrupt leaders or they forced themselves to such position that is causing failure to their economy system. I have seen many leaders informing their central bank to print more money to be in circulation to boost their economy and other things in the country.
If the leaders of a country are good then the country they lead will certainly be very good in the economic sector and we can also see economic growth in a prosperous society and if the leaders of a country only think about themselves and a group around them then economic growth in that country will not can develop well because leaders do not think about the society they lead. 
The leader becomes a reference for the followers for success, it can be seen from the performance of a leader, wherever it is, if the leader is good then the performance in that place will look good too.
but if it is bad then it will have a bad impact too.
I agree that leaders are one of the keys to success, of course coupled with the encouragement of each follower as well.
but if it is bad then it will have a bad impact too.
I agree that leaders are one of the keys to success, of course coupled with the encouragement of each follower as well.
what about you, do you agree with the right leader can make your life as a citizen, businessman or an investor comfortable?
Leaders determine the success and failure of every institution. The reason why some countries are underdeveloped is because of poor leadership. It is the leader that coordinates the activities of people to achieve the goals of the organization. Followers will always follow the footsteps or direction of the leader, so we could say that bad leadership leads to bad followership. In my country, corrupt leadership is breeding corrupt citizens and this has caused underdevelopment. Almost all the nations of the world are corrupt but the poorest nations are usually the ones that have bad leaders.
A business will not prosper if the leaders are not knowledgeable. The leaders make decisions and these steps will determine the success or failure of the business. Successful leaders like Bill Gates, Elon Musk, Mike Zuckerberg, etc, portrayed extraordinary leadership skills which is why they were able to build successful businesses.
I think leading a country and building a business on a very different scale, I agree that bad leadership causes bad things, but even a good leader doesn't necessarily mean good followers, there are still things that are inversely proportional, although not all of them.
Good leaders can make economic of a country to grow faster and remain stable, which we have seen in some developed countries where other undeveloped countries feel like going to seek for potential impart from their leaders so that they can improve in their economic to save their citizens destiny. Any country that is struggling in the area of economic in their country, check the type of leadership they have in that particular country either they are corrupt leaders or they forced themselves to such position that is causing failure to their economy system. I have seen many leaders informing their central bank to print more money to be in circulation to boost their economy and other things in the country.
I think leadership plays a crucial role in shaping the direction and economic success of a country or organisation. A visionary and effective leader is able to inspire and guide his or her team or people towards achieving sustainable economic goals. Strong leadership can create a stable business environment, encourage innovation and increase productivity. In addition, wise economic policies and decisions from leaders can provide support for economic growth, create jobs, and improve people's welfare. Therefore, the close relationship between leadership and the economy is key to forming a solid foundation for achieving prosperity and sustainable growth.
The prosperity of a country is clearly greatly influenced by a leader, that leader is not only able to maintain national stability but is also able to become a leader who has a strong influence at the international level. I really agree with your thoughts and I also need to add that the leader must also focus on strengthening the domestic economy so that the prosperity of his people can truly be realized. If the country's economy is strong then the bargaining power of the leader will also be very great.So people need to stop thinking that a political leader will be the one to make a big difference on their lives, and instead they need to find ways to achieve this on their own.
I think leadership plays a crucial role in shaping the direction and economic success of a country or organisation. A visionary and effective leader is able to inspire and guide his or her team or people towards achieving sustainable economic goals. Strong leadership can create a stable business environment, encourage innovation and increase productivity. In addition, wise economic policies and decisions from leaders can provide support for economic growth, create jobs, and improve people's welfare. Therefore, the close relationship between leadership and the economy is key to forming a solid foundation for achieving prosperity and sustainable growth.
The prosperity of a country is clearly greatly influenced by a leader, that leader is not only able to maintain national stability but is also able to become a leader who has a strong influence at the international level. I really agree with your thoughts and I also need to add that the leader must also focus on strengthening the domestic economy so that the prosperity of his people can truly be realized. If the country's economy is strong then the bargaining power of the leader will also be very great.But indeed in a case like this, of course we are aware that even though the role of the leader is an important condition but on the other hand, maintaining an order in the state is not enough just from a leader because all must contribute including from the citizens themselves. Even if the leader is great at organising a country but if in the end we as a society cannot obey the various policies carried out to support a country running well then this could also be a blunder in the end.
A good leader not only make the economic thrive but also will make the economic condition fair to everyone, and give the same chance and opportunity for everyone especially people who are not in fortune. And the goal is to make the economic gap between the richest and the less rich getting closer.
I agree.There is fairness in all sector that the leader sets for the country's economy to keep on moving forward and thrive. Because with global competition being tough, it's best to just focus on the goal of the country and on how to increase the benefits to everyone's livelihood.
The open opportunities that are given to citizens with fairness is also a big thing. This makes a lot of foreign investments to come in to them because they're seeing the light from the policies that a current administration is working on.
In the current international news, news continues to emerge about many countries competing with each other to get foreign investors into their countries because when foreign investment funds come in, the opportunity to create jobs is greater, just imagine how many people are currently unemployed, even employers have set an age limit for applicants.
Those isolated countries or those that have a difficult laws about welcoming partnerships and foreign investors, they're being avoided by those companies. Also, the cost of operations is being considered by many of them. So, the cheaper the labor is, that's where the companies are going in.
Becoming a great state leader is difficult because we have to be able to choose the best decision from the best proposal or idea and it's not an easy decision, the stake is trust.
Don't worry, we don't have to think about it as that's not for us. 
A good leader not only make the economic thrive but also will make the economic condition fair to everyone, and give the same chance and opportunity for everyone especially people who are not in fortune. And the goal is to make the economic gap between the richest and the less rich getting closer.
I agree.There is fairness in all sector that the leader sets for the country's economy to keep on moving forward and thrive. Because with global competition being tough, it's best to just focus on the goal of the country and on how to increase the benefits to everyone's livelihood.
The open opportunities that are given to citizens with fairness is also a big thing. This makes a lot of foreign investments to come in to them because they're seeing the light from the policies that a current administration is working on.
In the current international news, news continues to emerge about many countries competing with each other to get foreign investors into their countries because when foreign investment funds come in, the opportunity to create jobs is greater, just imagine how many people are currently unemployed, even employers have set an age limit for applicants.
Becoming a great state leader is difficult because we have to be able to choose the best decision from the best proposal or idea and it's not an easy decision, the stake is trust.
I think leadership plays a crucial role in shaping the direction and economic success of a country or organisation. A visionary and effective leader is able to inspire and guide his or her team or people towards achieving sustainable economic goals. Strong leadership can create a stable business environment, encourage innovation and increase productivity. In addition, wise economic policies and decisions from leaders can provide support for economic growth, create jobs, and improve people's welfare. Therefore, the close relationship between leadership and the economy is key to forming a solid foundation for achieving prosperity and sustainable growth.
The prosperity of a country is clearly greatly influenced by a leader, that leader is not only able to maintain national stability but is also able to become a leader who has a strong influence at the international level. I really agree with your thoughts and I also need to add that the leader must also focus on strengthening the domestic economy so that the prosperity of his people can truly be realized. If the country's economy is strong then the bargaining power of the leader will also be very great. A good leader not only make the economic thrive but also will make the economic condition fair to everyone, and give the same chance and opportunity for everyone especially people who are not in fortune. And the goal is to make the economic gap between the richest and the less rich getting closer.
I agree.There is fairness in all sector that the leader sets for the country's economy to keep on moving forward and thrive. Because with global competition being tough, it's best to just focus on the goal of the country and on how to increase the benefits to everyone's livelihood.
The open opportunities that are given to citizens with fairness is also a big thing. This makes a lot of foreign investments to come in to them because they're seeing the light from the policies that a current administration is working on.
Firstly, reducing entire countries' underdevelopment to solely "poor leadership" ignores historical, economic, and social realities. Colonial legacies, resource inequalities, and internal conflicts all contribute to complex development challenges. While leadership can certainly exacerbate or mitigate these issues, it's not the sole determinant.
Similarly, attributing business success solely to visionary CEOs like Gates or Musk overlooks the contributions of talented teams, strategic decisions, and market conditions. These leaders undoubtedly played pivotal roles, but their achievements were built upon the foundation of broader forces. Furthermore, leadership is not a static quality possessed by select individuals. It's a dynamic process involving learning, adaptation, and collaboration. Leaders can hone their skills through training, mentorship, and exposure to diverse perspectives. This ability to evolve and embrace new information is crucial in navigating complex challenges.
Similarly, attributing business success solely to visionary CEOs like Gates or Musk overlooks the contributions of talented teams, strategic decisions, and market conditions. These leaders undoubtedly played pivotal roles, but their achievements were built upon the foundation of broader forces. Furthermore, leadership is not a static quality possessed by select individuals. It's a dynamic process involving learning, adaptation, and collaboration. Leaders can hone their skills through training, mentorship, and exposure to diverse perspectives. This ability to evolve and embrace new information is crucial in navigating complex challenges.
As someone who lives in a nation where economy is doing terrible due to bad leadership, I can definitely say that they are very connected. We could deny this as much as we want, hell even half of the nation does deny it, but that doesn't change the fact that economy of any nation depends on the leader, if the leader rules the nation in a way that focuses on something other than the economy then the economy will keep on being terrible for a long term. Some focus on military, some focus on expansion, some focus on building bigger stuff (like china real estate crisis) and very rarely one focuses on economy itself, leaders unfortunately want to leave something behind, and this costs the public.
I think everyone will agree that a good leader will affect economic condition of a countries and people,
But the real question is what constitutes a good leader?
In term of economy, should a leader have a really good understanding on financial and fiscal condition, or they can just pick a good person and appoint him as an economic minister to handle the economy, or a good leader should handle it by himself. There are also some aspects other than economic that determine wether a leader is good or bad.
A good leader not only make the economic thrive but also will make the economic condition fair to everyone, and give the same chance and opportunity for everyone especially people who are not in fortune. And the goal is to make the economic gap between the richest and the less rich getting closer.
But the real question is what constitutes a good leader?
In term of economy, should a leader have a really good understanding on financial and fiscal condition, or they can just pick a good person and appoint him as an economic minister to handle the economy, or a good leader should handle it by himself. There are also some aspects other than economic that determine wether a leader is good or bad.
A good leader not only make the economic thrive but also will make the economic condition fair to everyone, and give the same chance and opportunity for everyone especially people who are not in fortune. And the goal is to make the economic gap between the richest and the less rich getting closer.
do you agree with the right leader can make your life as a citizen, businessman or an investor comfortable?
Of course having a good leader makes us comfortable as a citizen, businessman or an investor because stability in the country relies on his or her credibility as a leader. The reason why a specific country has stagnant economy is because after the political term of a good leader here comes a corrupt one that prioritize personal interest rather than continuing what needs to be improved and considered.
I think leadership plays a crucial role in shaping the direction and economic success of a country or organisation. A visionary and effective leader is able to inspire and guide his or her team or people towards achieving sustainable economic goals. Strong leadership can create a stable business environment, encourage innovation and increase productivity. In addition, wise economic policies and decisions from leaders can provide support for economic growth, create jobs, and improve people's welfare. Therefore, the close relationship between leadership and the economy is key to forming a solid foundation for achieving prosperity and sustainable growth.
It is said, right, that if a country has a good leader who truly cares about his people, who are subordinate and not corrupt, the country he leads will surely develop, the economy they have will grow, and if there is any difficulty that happens, it will for sure be resolved. It's still his in the end.
But if the leader of a country is greedy for power, greedy for money, and greedy for the rule of the country he is in charge of, it is certain that many people will suffer, the economy will collapse, and for sure there will be more corrupt officials in the government that he leads.
But if the leader of a country is greedy for power, greedy for money, and greedy for the rule of the country he is in charge of, it is certain that many people will suffer, the economy will collapse, and for sure there will be more corrupt officials in the government that he leads.
that's right, a corrupt leader will only bring suffering to all his citizens, look at how history happened, when former philippine president ferdinand marcos, former indonesian president soeharto and former nigerian president sani abacha led, their countries were really in chaos, the country's economy destroyed and many citizens have difficulty getting money because everything has been monopolized and strictly regulated by the elected president. meanwhile, in European countries, many of them are the most comfortable places and the people live in prosperity without economic difficulties, this all happens because their leaders are good.
I agree about having a good leadership in a country really defines and helps the economics and stability of the country. And that is because with policies that they enforce and as well as the partnership that they're getting, it boosts the economic status of the country.
So, it affects the citizens with the opportunities that are coming and living comfortably but as an individual, I wouldn't let the government define my life and success and won't be dependent to them.
What I am trying to say, they're helping a lot of people's lives to become comfortable but at the same time our success depends on us.
So, it affects the citizens with the opportunities that are coming and living comfortably but as an individual, I wouldn't let the government define my life and success and won't be dependent to them.
What I am trying to say, they're helping a lot of people's lives to become comfortable but at the same time our success depends on us.
I agree with you.Leaders are responsible for shaping a country's needs they make important decisions for the good of the people and the society,they implement the rules and regulations that will contribute to economical growth and sustainability.
In most cases,leaders are supposed to have the strongest effect on the people, but people say bad leadership can ruin and depreciate the working condition of the country and as a matter of fact even with the negative impact of a bad leader,one can still be successful because your success depends on you not the government or some leading figure.So in order to avoid such toxicity from your leader,step up your game,own your life and live it up to your satisfaction.
what about you, do you agree with the right leader can make your life as a citizen, businessman or an investor comfortable?
There is no doubt about that. A good leader knows what steps they need to take to make things work in the best way for their followers, whether it's about an organization, a company, an economy, or a country, it's the leader and their leadership skills that can make it progress in the best way possible.When we talk about a region or an economy, a leader would do things that will improve the overall economy, like finding ways for the region to make more money, increase the reserves and increasing the percentage of import and export of goods that can also generate money for them.
A good economic leader will also make sure that their country has the best quality of life for their people so that their people don't migrate to other places just to have a better quality life.
Jump to: