Author

Topic: List of Participant in the promotion of scam site. (Read 1584 times)

copper member
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1827
Top Crypto Casino
Well, I think that making it a neutral when they left is a bit of a respect for them because they have finally left the campaign but they still have to be reminded.
There are a few members who tried to join the campaign, there were even accepted but on realizing what kind of casino they were going to advertise. They opted out and never advertised them, I didn't tag any of those users because they made the right call.

The rest of them either don't care because their reputation is already fucked from previous tags, or it's money over reputation for them. No, such people don't even deserve any "bit of respect".

sr. member
Activity: 1274
Merit: 293
~
Feedback removal is entirely up to the person who left it. Most of the account involved in 1xbit signature campaign already have negative feedback from different untrustworthy behaviors such as account sales, Adkinsbet scam shills, bounty cheating alts among others.
Well, I think that making it a neutral when they left is a bit of a respect for them because they have finally left the campaign but they still have to be reminded.

Anyone capable of looking past their reputation in order to just earn some money from advertising scam for a few weeks can't be trusted, and forum members should know what he or she's capable of before they think about dealing with him/her, so the negative feedback I left will stay.
I agree with this one, if you try to make money out of something even though you know that it's not the best thing to do and there's a variety of option to choose from but still choose the bad one, you should bear the consequences of that action.
copper member
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1827
Top Crypto Casino
This is a good thread, will the users who will leave the campaign be removed from this list or got their red tags removed or at least moved to a neutral one?
Feedback removal is entirely up to the person who left it. Most of the account involved in 1xbit signature campaign already have negative feedback from different untrustworthy behaviors such as account sales, Adkinsbet scam shills, bounty cheating alts among others.

Anyone capable of looking past their reputation in order to just earn some money from advertising scam for a few weeks can't be trusted, and forum members should know what he or she's capable of before they think about dealing with him/her, so the negative feedback I left will stay.

I can't speak for others.
sr. member
Activity: 1274
Merit: 293
This is a good thread, will the users who will leave the campaign be removed from this list or got their red tags removed or at least moved to a neutral one? To everyone who will say studf like this is not a fair use of red tag, think of it like the people that got tagged for this reason as an accomplice or a direct participants to the scam because joining the campaign is a voluntary one.
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1804
guess who's back
i did not knowingly advertise them "now apparently i am" this guy who got scammed shows the situation i got into, and what made me join them.
What happened::

on February 2019 I created an account with 1xbit fully knowing that they have tons of scam accusations , was trying to see how they operate since pretty much all of the scam accusations here were coming from newbies and I thought maybe these accounts were actually arbitraging with them

Sorry for the late response but IDK how you can relate your situation with mine
since the day 1xbit started many complains were coming against them , I took the risk and tried the site with my own money knowing they have tons of complaints

promoting them is different since participants are getting paid to give them exposure and now it's 100% proven that they are scammers

you've been trying them and things are working for you but that doesn't mean they are not scammers , when profitable sports betters join their site they will end up losing their money ( best case they will get the difference between deposits and withdrwals only ) and that's a big scam as well even it may sound kinda fair for both sides
this way 1xbit is freerolling their punters , if the bets lose they will just take your money and if they win they will only give you deposit back
copper member
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1827
Top Crypto Casino
These cases were created before our return to this forum.
Really?
1. 1xBit.com
Date Registered - October 20, 2016  
Last Active - March 30, 2018

2. 1xBitMarketing
Date Registered - March 26, 2017  
Last Active - September 01, 2020

3. 1xbit.fr
Date Registered - March 12, 2018  
Last Active - July 12, 2018

4. 1xBit_com
Date Registered - May 15, 2018  
Last Active - December 12, 2018

5. 1xbit
Date Registered - August 07, 2018  
Last Active - August 07, 2018

6. 1xbit_official
Date Registered - July 31, 2020  
Last Active - Today

7. 1xBitManager
Date Registered - November 17, 2020  
Last Active - February 22, 2021

8. 1xBitCampaign
Date Registered - November 23, 2020
Last Active - November 23, 2020

9. Manager1xBit
Date Registered - May 21, 2021  
Last Active - Today

But all your rep accounts say otherwise, you have been present here since 2016. You were never absent, but probably just ignored the different complaints the victims made.

Also, they didn't contact our official account.
Most of them probably tried your support, which did not help. Registering in this forum and creating the scam accusations was their last resort.

copper member
Activity: 744
Merit: 23
why do you wait so long to solve the problems?
These cases were created before our return to this forum. Also, they didn't contact our official account.
Cases are being resolved by our security team without a request any way, it might take a while, but we assume these users are no longer active because of this reason.
Thus, resolution can't be confirmed.

Sincerely,
1xBit team
legendary
Activity: 3472
Merit: 3507
Crypto Swap Exchange

Just check the list and I find that the explanation for most of these cases is "resolution can not be confirmed, the user no longer active"
So, you waiting for six+ months and now you have a desire to solve it, but you can't find a user. is this fun for you or you really don't understand where you're wrong?
Do you understand that being late to solve someone's problem is not the solution?

why do you wait so long to solve the problems?
what exactly has changed in your business model when you want to improve your rating here?
copper member
Activity: 744
Merit: 23
they are a proven scam
People here are got used to the common opinion appeared due to our absence on this forum. Even though there are quite a lot of positive things that could be considered as a proof of 1xBit being legit:

- list of resolved cases: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.56150537
- another list: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.57260450
- honest review campaign with more than 50 positive or neutral reviews, only 2 negative: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/1xbitcom-honest-review-campaign-open-5339885
- 4 weeks signature campaign paid, 5th coming: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.57086933
- 3 BTC lottery with daily 1 mBTC contest: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/over-euromania-2020-3-btc-prize-fund-with-more-than-600-winners-5343260
hero member
Activity: 1876
Merit: 721
Top Crypto Casino
You're right here but most of the people who are hunting bounties or in the signature campaign, don't bother to see what they are promoting. Their only interest is to get accepted in the campaign and complete the post count to get paid. None of them wants to promote scam but they only want to earn money.
Yes, once they know this is scam site, they should stop prompting it and remove the signatures ASAP.

It's not always that they unknowingly promote scam projects, but sometimes they knowingly promote a scam project to get a big amount of payment. If you search BitcoIntalk, you will find many projects that have already been promoted by many members.
In order for bounty hunters to earn, they want to join all bounties without knowing the details of those projects. I think Bounty Hunters are responsible for promoting the scam project.
sr. member
Activity: 2030
Merit: 356
To everyone who thinks it's unfair, think about this, they are a proven scam site and you are promoting them meaning that there are more people that will see your signature advertising them and it's only a matter of time before these scam site will be seen by people who don't know anything about the site. In short, you are basically an enabler of scams in this forum.

You're right here but most of the people who are hunting bounties or in the signature campaign, don't bother to see what they are promoting. Their only interest is to get accepted in the campaign and complete the post count to get paid. None of them wants to promote scam but they only want to earn money.
Yes, once they know this is scam site, they should stop prompting it and remove the signatures ASAP.
member
Activity: 868
Merit: 63
To everyone who thinks it's unfair, think about this, they are a proven scam site and you are promoting them meaning that there are more people that will see your signature advertising them and it's only a matter of time before these scam site will be seen by people who don't know anything about the site. In short, you are basically an enabler of scams in this forum.
full member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 100
The difference is you knowingly advertised a scam casino. All the rep accounts of 1xbit in the forum have negative feedback and active flags. Are you trying to say you didn't see all that?

If any proven scam accusations ever came up against traderacemanager.com, and they weren't resolved. I would stop associating myself with them as soon as possible. If I continued advertising them despite all the pilled up negative feedback and flags and I eventually got tagged by DT members for promoting a scam, I would have no one to blame but my greedy self.
i did not knowingly advertise them "now apparently i am" this guy who got scammed shows the situation i got into, and what made me join them.
What happened::

on February 2019 I created an account with 1xbit fully knowing that they have tons of scam accusations , was trying to see how they operate since pretty much all of the scam accusations here were coming from newbies and I thought maybe these accounts were actually arbitraging with them
and you said "I would stop associating myself with them as soon as possible" and that's what i did, but you kept attacking me, even though i didn't even join for a week and i only posted 4 posts, and i came here and i removed my signature and avatar, and i saw you say that you give them like a week, but you didn't do that with me and you didn't give me any chance, so stopping ASAP as you said didn't work after all, i literally have nothing else to say.
copper member
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1827
Top Crypto Casino
i also think that you don't get my point, you have to put yourself in my shoes, let's say someone has a problem with the website of the signature you're wearing right now, which is traderacemanager.com, and for whatever reason his problem was not resolved, and he has the power to get you red flagged, would you consider that fair ?? and what if that person just seeing other people's problems and probably knows nothing about that website and never used it before, and then he comes to you and get you red flagged even though you trust your money with traderacemanager.com and you have been using it with no problem whatsoever for many years, and your intention was never to promote any scam, how is that fair ??

The difference is you knowingly advertised a scam casino. All the rep accounts of 1xbit in the forum have negative feedback and active flags. Are you trying to say you didn't see all that?

If any proven scam accusations ever came up against traderacemanager.com, and they weren't resolved. I would stop associating myself with them as soon as possible. If I continued advertising them despite all the pilled up negative feedback and flags and I eventually got tagged by DT members for promoting a scam, I would have no one to blame but my greedy self.
full member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 100
your accusation said "never trust a person willing to promote scam for a few bucks." with that being said, no one should trust and use or promote anything about binance, coinmarketcap, coingecko and or etherscan...etc since we can't trust them right ? just like the feedback i got, and if you share anything positive about any of them, you're helping with 1xbit "scam". that's my point and it's your words.
If you see anyone promoting Binance or whatever service, you are moaning about in their signatures, and you are sure the service is a scam. Feel free to tag them at your own discretion. Simple.

I am aware 1xbit is a scam casino with not one but dozens and dozens of unresolved accusations, and I am tagging anyone promoting the casino around the forum by wearing their signature. You don't seem to get my point, so I will leave you to figure it out.
i also think that you don't get my point, you have to put yourself in my shoes, let's say someone has a problem with the website of the signature you're wearing right now, which is traderacemanager.com, and for whatever reason his problem was not resolved, and he has the power to get you red flagged, would you consider that fair ?? and what if that person just seeing other people's problems and probably knows nothing about that website and never used it before, and then he comes to you and get you red flagged even though you trust your money with traderacemanager.com and you have been using it with no problem whatsoever for many years, and your intention was never to promote any scam, how is that fair ??
copper member
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1827
Top Crypto Casino
your accusation said "never trust a person willing to promote scam for a few bucks." with that being said, no one should trust and use or promote anything about binance, coinmarketcap, coingecko and or etherscan...etc since we can't trust them right ? just like the feedback i got, and if you share anything positive about any of them, you're helping with 1xbit "scam". that's my point and it's your words.
If you see anyone promoting Binance or whatever service, you are moaning about in their signatures, and you are sure the service is a scam. Feel free to tag them at your own discretion. Simple.

I am aware 1xbit is a scam casino with not one but dozens and dozens of unresolved accusations, and I am tagging anyone promoting the casino around the forum by wearing their signature. You don't seem to get my point, so I will leave you to figure it out.
full member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 100
and last but not least, i remember seeing ads of 1xbit on etherscan so many times and it's what made me trust them even more, and you can find now ads of 1xbit on coingecko and coinmarketcap, and the last one is owned by the biggest crypto exchange which is Binance, i am asking for at least a neutral feedback, because your accusation says that i promoted a "KNOWN" scam, which is not, and you believe that it is, then you shouldn't trust coingecko, coinmarketcap, etherscan and Binance and everyone who shares anything positive about them should get red flagged, since they're promoting a "known" scam.
Is the English used too hard for you to understand?
1xbit.com is a known scam because it's scammed a lot of people and there's proof with a lot of unresolved scam accusations. If you feel Binance scammed you, you know the drill. Create a scam accusation.

Coinmarketcap also listed hundreds of scam shitcoins, so what's your point?
your accusation said "never trust a person willing to promote scam for a few bucks." with that being said, no one should trust and use or promote anything about binance, coinmarketcap, coingecko and or etherscan...etc since we can't trust them right ? just like the feedback i got, and if you share anything positive about any of them, you're helping with 1xbit "scam". that's my point and it's your words.
copper member
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1827
Top Crypto Casino
first of all, i removed my signature and avatar when i got the red trust, and i came here and replied to you, but you insisted and didn't give me a chance, so i had nothing else to do but to put the signature back and keep on going, everyone with a brain would have done the same
Having a brain doesn't mean you are smart.
If your claims are true, you only removed the signature just because you received negative feedback, otherwise you wouldn't care advertising scam. Putting it back on means no work done.

, second, why do i have to believe the scam accusations when i had no problem with their website ?? you want me to ignore my personal experience since 2017 and pretend like it never happened and believe others ? can't someone have an opinion that's different from others here ?
Tell that to the people who lost money here

The few scam accusations I listed are just a tip of the iceberg. There are many more unresolved accusations that are yet to be included. Can you name any known casino that's trusted here that has that may accusations?

and last but not least, i remember seeing ads of 1xbit on etherscan so many times and it's what made me trust them even more, and you can find now ads of 1xbit on coingecko and coinmarketcap, and the last one is owned by the biggest crypto exchange which is Binance, i am asking for at least a neutral feedback, because your accusation says that i promoted a "KNOWN" scam, which is not, and you believe that it is, then you shouldn't trust coingecko, coinmarketcap, etherscan and Binance and everyone who shares anything positive about them should get red flagged, since they're promoting a "known" scam.
Is the English used too hard for you to understand?
1xbit.com is a known scam because it's scammed a lot of people and there's proof with a lot of unresolved scam accusations. If you feel Binance scammed you, you know the drill. Create a scam accusation.

Coinmarketcap also listed hundreds of scam shitcoins, so what's your point?
legendary
Activity: 2072
Merit: 4265
✿♥‿♥✿
]first of all, ....

I understand. Judging that your previous accounts are banned, and you are simply Ban evasion, and very successful. Getting a negative tag is a very offensive result. Although it is likely that if you have previously traded accounts, then losing one account is not a problem for you?


Have a relationship with Alt below, whether this is Alt @alvinmtp, for sale or vice versa.

1. Rabi3
2. saidnursin


full member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 100
]im not defending them and i don't want to be part of this at all, there a lot of accusations, which i really didn't see till now, because i opened my account and started using 1xbit in 2017, i searched about them before using it, because it seemed really suspicious since it looked just like the website of 1xbet, and i don't remember finding anything that proves it's a known scam, and i tried and had no problem with it, so i kept using it and didn't search about it again, when a lot of accusations were piling up overtime, i really don't want to ruin my reputation with this mistake.
But you are still part of them and I don't think it's a mistake. 1xbit has all of its rep accounts massively painted red by lots of members here. You have been here since 2017. Are you trying to say you don't know what negative feedback is?


There were lots of warnings even in the signature campaign thread way before you applied.
first of all, i removed my signature and avatar when i got the red trust, and i came here and replied to you, but you insisted and didn't give me a chance, so i had nothing else to do but to put the signature back and keep on going, everyone with a brain would have done the same, second, why do i have to believe the scam accusations when i had no problem with their website ?? you want me to ignore my personal experience since 2017 and pretend like it never happened and believe others ? can't someone have an opinion that's different from others here ? and last but not least, i remember seeing ads of 1xbit on etherscan so many times and it's what made me trust them even more, and you can find now ads of 1xbit on coingecko and coinmarketcap, and the last one is owned by the biggest crypto exchange which is Binance, i am asking for at least a neutral feedback, because your accusation says that i promoted a "KNOWN" scam, which is not, and you believe that it is, then you shouldn't trust coingecko, coinmarketcap, etherscan and Binance and everyone who shares anything positive about them should get red flagged, since they're promoting a "known" scam.
legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 2594
Top Crypto Casino
What we previously suspected has now been confirmed. The accounts involved in the 1xbit signature campaign, the so-called "Adkinsbet shills & sock-puppets", are owned/controlled by a single person. I've provided proof here.

Accounts Connected:

1. yayayo
2. BlackFor3st
3. gadado
4. wildan88
5. sempak
copper member
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1827
Top Crypto Casino
See some of the users in forum don't make a research of signature campaign before submitting application, it's obvious that from initial when this 1×bit launched this campaign many people portray negatively about the platform even labelled them as a scam site,  and even immediately you click their page in service board, warning as a scam site is been displayed in front page of their signature campaign, so those participants really want to advertise for 1×bit, when they are aware that the platform is made of scam, so am using this medium to invite the attention of @ logfiles that new list of  participants is out.
This is newly accepted members
1)barota
2)tessnik
3)sapnu
4)desmong
5(rokokgudanggaram
6)fearfulcalm

Thanks, I usually give them about a week before I leave any negative feedback so that there's no excuse. Nobody who's advertising the scam casino is going to be left out.



<...>
I thought I was the only one who had noticed it. There was something about Alisha-k and Ebede account. Good thing is, their greed is getting them exposed. Good work lovesmayfamilis
legendary
Activity: 2072
Merit: 4265
✿♥‿♥✿
It seems that some users are suicidal in their alternate accounts. After logfiles added a negative tag to the [BIN-BIN] account, we again see a desperate desire to promote this scam on his other accounts.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.57242610


Now, if you look at the Desmong account.
If you remember crying to Ebede and also look at the trust of another member, Alisha-k, then if you imagine that these accounts do not belong to one person, you will see that they send each other merits. That is, they observe each other well.
Accordingly, Desmong is aware of the scam he is promoting.
hero member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 711
Enjoy 500% bonus + 70 FS
See some of the users in forum don't make a research of signature campaign before submitting application, it's obvious that from initial when this 1×bit launched this campaign many people portray negatively about the platform even labelled them as a scam site,  and even immediately you click their page in service board, warning as a scam site is been displayed in front page of their signature campaign, so those participants really want to advertise for 1×bit, when they are aware that the platform is made of scam, so am using this medium to invite the attention of @ logfiles that new list of  participants is out.
This is newly accepted members
1)barota
2)tessnik
3)sapnu
4)desmong
5(rokokgudanggaram
6)fearfulcalm
legendary
Activity: 3472
Merit: 3507
Crypto Swap Exchange
I'm not defending the platform 1×bit neither soliciting for participants, i only emphasising for myself because this issues of red trust is making me to feel that my account is useless logfile red trust me, so am saying that during the commitment of 1×bit we the participants were not in forum and actually I don't know the Genesis of the problem, and me personally don't know, it's because i see people applying the campaign and i joined to apply, am not defending any platforms, I'm begging for myself to be free red trust.

Just reading your explanation and I must say, it's all a bunch of nonsense. All of you participants know very well what kind of signature you will wear, and you can very easily check the reputation of 1×bit here. Also, there is a lot of discussions just bass about the bearers of their signatures, lack of information is not an excuse in this case.
You beg for your non-red trust, but you still wear their signatures. So there is no initiative on your part here.

I am not the one who made your account useless, you are the one who did. You didn't value it, so you decided to advertise scam. How do you think people who got scammed are feeling?


I even carry the thought that they will be paid with money stolen from the victims of the 1xbit casino.
copper member
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1827
Top Crypto Casino
]im not defending them and i don't want to be part of this at all, there a lot of accusations, which i really didn't see till now, because i opened my account and started using 1xbit in 2017, i searched about them before using it, because it seemed really suspicious since it looked just like the website of 1xbet, and i don't remember finding anything that proves it's a known scam, and i tried and had no problem with it, so i kept using it and didn't search about it again, when a lot of accusations were piling up overtime, i really don't want to ruin my reputation with this mistake.
But you are still part of them and I don't think it's a mistake. 1xbit has all of its rep accounts massively painted red by lots of members here. You have been here since 2017. Are you trying to say you don't know what negative feedback is?



I'm not defending the platform 1×bit neither soliciting for participants, i only emphasising for myself because this issues of red trust is making me to feel that my account is useless logfile red trust me, so am saying that during the commitment of 1×bit we the participants were not in forum and actually I don't know the Genesis of the problem, and me personally don't know, it's because i see people applying the campaign and i joined to apply, am not defending any platforms, I'm begging for myself to be free red trust.
I am not the one who made your account useless, you are the one who did. You didn't value it, so you decided to advertise scam. How do you think people who got scammed are feeling?

There were lots of warnings even in the signature campaign thread way before you applied.
legendary
Activity: 2072
Merit: 4265
✿♥‿♥✿
I'm begging for myself to be free red trust.

You were given a good remark, but you ignored it. You have not removed your signature.

Why you still keep promoting 1xBit? Because you're already know the reputation of 1xBit itself when you notice got red tagged. IMO you're just ignoring the fact and keep promoting, however I'm not forcing you to quit the campaign as you want to take the risk.


So be it. So you continue to advertise this scam. You have made a choice. What kind of ignorance and innocence can we talk about? You choose a reward from scammers by promoting them, and despite this, you declare that you want to clean up your reputation.
Are you out of your mind?  Huh

member
Activity: 868
Merit: 38
Join hands and help me to grow everybody...

Most of the members don't know the offence of 1×bit before they join, now that their in the campaign, i don't think that we deserve red trust, and even though the platform has bad reputation according to what people tagged them, i believe that they have clarification that will make our anger to subside, at least the anger should not have extended to their participants especially new once precisely members rank, the official manager of 1×bit have explained concerning the issues.


I could have ignored you for wearing the 1xbit signature like all the others participants but defending and not even worrying that you are promoting a scam site is worth giving you a red trust, people are free to give bad ratings to scam and promoters of scams but giving a reason that they don't deserve it is just unacceptable.
I'm not defending the platform 1×bit neither soliciting for participants, i only emphasising for myself because this issues of red trust is making me to feel that my account is useless logfile red trust me, so am saying that during the commitment of 1×bit we the participants were not in forum and actually I don't know the Genesis of the problem, and me personally don't know, it's because i see people applying the campaign and i joined to apply, am not defending any platforms, I'm begging for myself to be free red trust.
legendary
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1225
Enjoy 500% bonus + 70 FS

Most of the members don't know the offence of 1×bit before they join, now that their in the campaign, i don't think that we deserve red trust, and even though the platform has bad reputation according to what people tagged them, i believe that they have clarification that will make our anger to subside, at least the anger should not have extended to their participants especially new once precisely members rank, the official manager of 1×bit have explained concerning the issues.


I could have ignored you for wearing the 1xbit signature like all the others participants but defending and not even worrying that you are promoting a scam site is worth giving you a red trust, people are free to give bad ratings to scam and promoters of scams but giving a reason that they don't deserve it is just unacceptable.
member
Activity: 868
Merit: 38
Join hands and help me to grow everybody...
In this kind of situation, my humble question is about the new members that doesn't know anything about the current problem with 1×Bit and had the opportunity of joining the signature campaign.So why should such person be red tagged? We shouldn't be in haste in tagging someone without properly checking how is the member ,My advice is that should be put into consideration before red tagging new members in this forum, we all novice to the system especially the new once at least the matter of 1×bit doesn't require massive punishment since the review of their company is there for verification. We no nothing concerning their initial problem with bitcointalk forum, i solicites for new users for removal of the massive red trust, this should be put into consideration because we don't know the disadvantages of these.
Assuming you really don't know about 1xBit reputation before even though I'm doubt of it.
Why you still keep promoting 1xBit? Because you're already know the reputation of 1xBit itself when you notice got red tagged. IMO you're just ignoring the fact and keep promoting, however I'm not forcing you to quit the campaign as you want to take the risk.

Most of the members don't know the offence of 1×bit before they join, now that their in the campaign, i don't think that we deserve red trust, and even though the platform has bad reputation according to what people tagged them, i believe that they have clarification that will make our anger to subside, at least the anger should not have extended to their participants especially new once precisely members rank, the official manager of 1×bit have explained concerning the issues.
hero member
Activity: 1876
Merit: 721
Top Crypto Casino
Proofs of payouts do not erase the proofs of scaming. My account is still closed and I had over 190mBT in it. I provided the evidences multiple times, if you have more questions see my posts or contact me.

My account got closed, my funds were never returned or the deposit sum.

They will show you different reasons so that you will never get your money back. There are a lot of customers like you who have blocked 1xbit accounts so they can't get their money back. In fact, their job is to generate revenue in this way and spend that money on marketing again. Bring more customers to their website and block those customer's accounts with money.

Now you can see that they are running a signature campaign using the money of the victims.
legendary
Activity: 3276
Merit: 2442

Proofs of payouts do not erase the proofs of scaming. My account is still closed and I had over 190mBT in it. I provided the evidences multiple times, if you have more questions see my posts or contact me.

My account got closed, my funds were never returned or the deposit sum.

Your money was spent on the signature campaign participants probably.  Cheesy The more they scam, the more funds they seize and fund more advertising for their scheme. Clever.
legendary
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1208
In this kind of situation, my humble question is about the new members that doesn't know anything about the current problem with 1×Bit and had the opportunity of joining the signature campaign.So why should such person be red tagged? We shouldn't be in haste in tagging someone without properly checking how is the member ,My advice is that should be put into consideration before red tagging new members in this forum, we all novice to the system especially the new once at least the matter of 1×bit doesn't require massive punishment since the review of their company is there for verification. We no nothing concerning their initial problem with bitcointalk forum, i solicites for new users for removal of the massive red trust, this should be put into consideration because we don't know the disadvantages of these.
Assuming you really don't know about 1xBit reputation before even though I'm doubt of it.
Why you still keep promoting 1xBit? Because you're already know the reputation of 1xBit itself when you notice got red tagged. IMO you're just ignoring the fact and keep promoting, however I'm not forcing you to quit the campaign as you want to take the risk.

Discussing about which tag is more proper about this case will be long discussion and won't end since each people has it's own opinion, only @theymos could solve this.
hero member
Activity: 2926
Merit: 567

It is normal to pass judgement on a user with not even one bad feedback and i was here since 2017 i am no scammer and i got a negative trust just for one mistake i think that is unfair

Although scam is not moderated in this forum, you should do the right thing in protecting our co-member here by giving the right information and not promoting scam project here, you have not scam anyone here but that does not mean that you do not deserve a red trust check your red trust and see what's on it, you have not scam anyone but you are helping a scam site.
member
Activity: 1120
Merit: 68
It's a good thing that people are taking an action in this one because this kind of thing obviously taints the reputation of signature campaigns having a scam website being promoted. And to the people who joins these campaign, are you really going to be an enabler to this scam website, are you really that scummy to stoop this low?
hero member
Activity: 3024
Merit: 614
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform


from my personal experience, i didn't have no problems with 1xbit, either making bets or withdrawing my profit, and i can provide screenshots of bets i made and withdrawals if needed, if it is an actual known scam, i think moderators should step in and delete their thread at least, because from my point of view, since i had no problem using their website, i thought that people with scam accusations made up some things, or used some flaws in their website, i hope you can give this another look, at least try and see it from my point of view.

So far you have one negative trust, I'll not get surprised if you will get more, the accusations are real don't put the blame on the victim it's adding insult to injury, you don't want someone kicking when you are down or putting salt to your wounds, don't make it appear that it is legit because it's not your time to get scam, they are picking people randomly to scam.
full member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 100
from my personal experience, i didn't have no problems with 1xbit, either making bets or withdrawing my profit, and i can provide screenshots of bets i made and withdrawals if needed, if it is an actual known scam, i think moderators should step in and delete their thread at least, because from my point of view, since i had no problem using their website, i thought that people with scam accusations made up some things, or used some flaws in their website, i hope you can give this another look, at least try and see it from my point of view.
The truth is you just decided to turn a blind eye even with all the warnings. Stop lying. You are making it look worse.

Are you going to say all this was made up?

im not defending them and i don't want to be part of this at all, there a lot of accusations, which i really didn't see till now, because i opened my account and started using 1xbit in 2017, i searched about them before using it, because it seemed really suspicious since it looked just like the website of 1xbet, and i don't remember finding anything that proves it's a known scam, and i tried and had no problem with it, so i kept using it and didn't search about it again, when a lot of accusations were piling up overtime, i really don't want to ruin my reputation with this mistake.
copper member
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1827
Top Crypto Casino
Hello guys,

we don't want users to be tagged for wearing our signature, especially when we believe that this would be unfair in regard to them.
Then you shouldn't have started a signature campaign to begin with. The best thing to first do would have been to resolve the scam accusation.
1. pay out those who deserved to be paid
2. If there was any form of cheating by the users? Post proof that they cheated. Simple

But... you don't care anyway.

Thus, we have launched a review campaign to show that 1xBit pays, and the complaints received do not reflect the real situation.
This campaign already have quite a lot of positive reactions confirming that the payments were proceeded.
That's not how it works. Solve the real damn problem!!!

Paid reviews are as good as fake



from my personal experience, i didn't have no problems with 1xbit, either making bets or withdrawing my profit, and i can provide screenshots of bets i made and withdrawals if needed, if it is an actual known scam, i think moderators should step in and delete their thread at least, because from my point of view, since i had no problem using their website, i thought that people with scam accusations made up some things, or used some flaws in their website, i hope you can give this another look, at least try and see it from my point of view.
The truth is you just decided to turn a blind eye even with all the warnings. Stop lying. You are making it look worse.

Are you going to say all this was made up?


full member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 100
Whether they don't care about negative feedback or not. I am personally going to red tag and flag all the accounts wearing the signature and advertising 1xbit which has been long known to be a scam site. This kind of thing should not be accepted in the community.

It makes no sense tagging adkinsbet shills but then leaving out those advertising 1xbit which we all know is scam and have lots of unresolved issues. I have never seen a casino with that many scam accusations like 1xbit.
from my personal experience, i didn't have no problems with 1xbit, either making bets or withdrawing my profit, and i can provide screenshots of bets i made and withdrawals if needed, if it is an actual known scam, i think moderators should step in and delete their thread at least, because from my point of view, since i had no problem using their website, i thought that people with scam accusations made up some things, or used some flaws in their website, i hope you can give this another look, at least try and see it from my point of view.
jr. member
Activity: 146
Merit: 1
Hello guys,

we don't want users to be tagged for wearing our signature, especially when we believe that this would be unfair in regard to them.

Thus, we have launched a review campaign to show that 1xBit pays, and the complaints received do not reflect the real situation.
This campaign already have quite a lot of positive reactions confirming that the payments were proceeded.

Also, since the beginning there were no straight proof of 1xBit scamming activities on this forum. Yet there were proofs of payouts - check out our signature post.

Sincerely,
1xBit team

Stop lying and payout my winnings, I won fair and stop with your bullshit.
Everytime you claim I won unfair, so proof it! Display my betting history and then everybody can judge for themself if it was unfair or not.
jr. member
Activity: 237
Merit: 3
Hello guys,

we don't want users to be tagged for wearing our signature, especially when we believe that this would be unfair in regard to them.

Thus, we have launched a review campaign to show that 1xBit pays, and the complaints received do not reflect the real situation.
This campaign already have quite a lot of positive reactions confirming that the payments were proceeded.

Also, since the beginning there were no straight proof of 1xBit scamming activities on this forum. Yet there were proofs of payouts - check out our signature post.

Sincerely,
1xBit team

Proofs of payouts do not erase the proofs of scaming. My account is still closed and I had over 190mBT in it. I provided the evidences multiple times, if you have more questions see my posts or contact me.

My account got closed, my funds were never returned or the deposit sum.
member
Activity: 868
Merit: 38
Join hands and help me to grow everybody...
In this kind of situation, my humble question is about the new members that doesn't know anything about the current problem with 1×Bit and had the opportunity of joining the signature campaign.So why should such person be red tagged? We shouldn't be in haste in tagging someone without properly checking how is the member ,My advice is that should be put into consideration before red tagging new members in this forum, we all novice to the system especially the new once at least the matter of 1×bit doesn't require massive punishment since the review of their company is there for verification. We no nothing concerning their initial problem with bitcointalk forum, i solicites for new users for removal of the massive red trust, this should be put into consideration because we don't know the disadvantages of these.
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 6403
Blackjack.fun
Thus, we have launched a review campaign to show that 1xBit pays, and the complaints received do not reflect the real situation.
This campaign already have quite a lot of positive reactions confirming that the payments were proceeded.
Also, since the beginning there were no straight proof of 1xBit scamming activities on this forum. Yet there were proofs of payouts - check out our signature post.


Call me Nostradamus!!!!!

~
but once the week is over they can claim look, we have paid more than 3000$ or whatever in signature earnings, we're legit!!!!! And actually,  I don't see this as a possibility rather I wonder why would anyone think this is not what's happening!

As for the payments for the reviews, I was pretty sure they were going to pay, it was clearly a promo move to gain trust if possible or at least have some comeback on the people accusing them of being scammers, they spend what, like 300$ on all this for those and just one 0.1 BTC from a gullible user that sees them throwing money around would make up for all the costs.

I mean do you think we are stupid or what?
You paid a few hundred dollars and there are scam accusations of over 100 times that piling up in these sections, and those are from the people that are reporting being cheated here, god knows how many are over another media or have simply given up on smaller sums of 1-2 mBTC.

But if you're that concerned with these users care to tell us why you have employed the complete shill brigade of Adkinsbet ?
All of them were tagged well before you started your campaign, why did you allow them to participate?

legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 3130
we don't want users to be tagged for wearing our signature, especially when we believe that this would be unfair in regard to them.

Thus, we have launched a review campaign to show that 1xBit pays, and the complaints received do not reflect the real situation.
This campaign already have quite a lot of positive reactions confirming that the payments were proceeded.

Also, since the beginning there were no straight proof of 1xBit scamming activities on this forum. Yet there were proofs of payouts - check out our signature post.

Sincerely,
1xBit team

I don't want to see those users burning their accounts, I feel the pain for each one posting in that thread, is like doing harakiri. But the problem is the quality of the people who write there, the smart guys and old members know that their reputation worth more than $140.

The review thread is a self-moderated topic where you give money to those who talk nice, but that is not honest at all, you should let all the users say what they have to say about the site and not to delete the answers that you don't like.

You are asking for straight proof, but the problem isn't the proof on the forum, just take a look to trust pilot and all the complaints from the users. https://www.trustpilot.com/review/1xbit.com

Things like:

Quote
Dear user
Quote
Account №XXXXXXX has been suspended due to violations of our T&C, meaning that a fraudulent act was committed in relation to 1xBit, therefore 1xBit reserves the right to stop cooperating.

If you keep freezing the user's balance and hold their money without giving them a withdraw option then more accusations will come day by day.

If users are doing fraudulent things is because your casino allows them, you should fix those bugs to stop them and not wait for them to make a depo and then freeze their accounts.
copper member
Activity: 744
Merit: 23
Hello guys,

we don't want users to be tagged for wearing our signature, especially when we believe that this would be unfair in regard to them.

Thus, we have launched a review campaign to show that 1xBit pays, and the complaints received do not reflect the real situation.
This campaign already have quite a lot of positive reactions confirming that the payments were proceeded.

Also, since the beginning there were no straight proof of 1xBit scamming activities on this forum. Yet there were proofs of payouts - check out our signature post.

Sincerely,
1xBit team
sr. member
Activity: 1246
Merit: 306
i am not commited to scams and didn't take a close look.
You never do...some people just don't deserve second chance...or third.


Usually she shows up and tells us how it is inappropriate to flag the accounts that didn't scam anybody
I believe that is purpose of warning flag. Accounts shilling for scams no matter what? If you ask me, that is damn good reason to flag them.
Well i knew 1xbit since a while and since i'm a member at their platform, i didn't face any problem with them that's why i agreed to promote them. I don't have any sources to know whether they scammed people or not since as i stated before i never had any problem with them, after seeing and reading the issues on the posts i saw that they have some problems and then i saw this subject and opted out.
This happened in the past with Yobit too, everyone was promoting yobit then everyone said that yobit is a scam. After that when yobit arranged a campaign with a manager, everyone was joining and they never said that yobit is a scam, why won't you tag that manager ?
Also, there is a huge problem with the managers whom are earning alot of funds from the other projects they agree with and they are selecting only the biggest merit earners which is unfair for us.
That's why suchmoon tagged my account last time, go back and checky posts, they are quality posts and not shitposting. His/Her main issue is my participation in Yobit's campaign, i might have been doing burst posting but what i insist on is that bitcoin talk is no longer fair, at least for me. I am not selling this forum for pennies but i didn't have any clue that these projects are scam/pyramid bla bla... once i knew i opted out and unfortunately it was late each time. I am not going to say that i was right, i think i did wrong moves but i didn't have any clue.
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 2272
i am not commited to scams and didn't take a close look.
You never do...some people just don't deserve second chance...or third.


Usually she shows up and tells us how it is inappropriate to flag the accounts that didn't scam anybody
I believe that is purpose of warning flag. Accounts shilling for scams no matter what? If you ask me, that is damn good reason to flag them.
legendary
Activity: 3276
Merit: 2442
Whether they don't care about negative feedback or not. I am personally going to red tag and flag all the accounts wearing the signature and advertising 1xbit which has been long known to be a scam site. This kind of thing should not be accepted in the community.

It makes no sense tagging adkinsbet shills but then leaving out those advertising 1xbit which we all know is scam and have lots of unresolved issues. I have never seen a casino with that many scam accusations like 1xbit.

Where is suchmoon? Usually she shows up and tells us how it is inappropriate to flag the accounts that didn't scam anybody and "technically" she is right. Suchmoon, honey somebody is not using the trust system as intended. Come here and say something please.
copper member
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1827
Top Crypto Casino
Finally, the spreadsheet is out, makes the work easier. Those who decided to advertise scam are some greedy chaps who should not be trusted, because they will choose scam for just a few bucks. The purpose of trust system is to identify scammers and those willing to promote scam here and should be tagged as members who should not be trusted, so I am tagging and flagging all accounts that are promoting the 1xbit scam.

Until 1xbit resolve all the issues and payback the people they scammed, I may not change my mind. This is my personal decision. You can't scam innocent people out there and bring the stolen money here to lure members into trying to paint a beautiful picture about your bloody scam site.


01. protech77 - Tagged
02. Tumanggor - Tagged
03. erdogan - Tagged
04. ebede - Tagged
05. alisha-k - Tagged
06. yayayo - Tagged
07. wildan88 - Tagged
08. gadado - Tagged
09. blackfor3st - Tagged
10. sempak - Tagged
11. neficopa - Tagged
12. jinxing - Tagged

If there are any new advertisers I missed, please alert me.
sr. member
Activity: 1246
Merit: 306
Hey guys especially the Pharmacist, i removed the signature i didn't have any clue on the status of 1xbit. Really sorry for such bad behaviour i am not commited to scams and didn't take a close look.
legendary
Activity: 1568
Merit: 6660
bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org
_BlackStar....DarkStar_

Any connection there, or am I imagining things?

You're just imagining. DS wouldn't try to get merit from OgNasty in a merit giveaway thread.
legendary
Activity: 2086
Merit: 1282
Logo Designer ⛨ BSFL Division1
I recognize many of the member names from this list because they participated in adkinscambet shitshow that was happening here for months, and they have been inactive for some time until now.
legendary
Activity: 3528
Merit: 7005
Top Crypto Casino
I don't understand why this person is willing to advertise scam on this forum simply out of greed. They ignored the warning and they also ignored the trust system so none of them would stop this stupid act.
Because they're just a bunch of spammers/shitposters.
And as OP already pointed out, they're greedy--and obviously they don't care about their reputation on the forum.  I haven't checked the ranks of the members in question, but I'm assuming most of these accounts are alts or throwaways.  The only username I recognize is FaucetKING; the rest I don't think I've ever seen (they probably post mostly in Altcoin Discussion).

_BlackStar....DarkStar_

Any connection there, or am I imagining things?

Edit:  I just took a look at the applicants for that campaign, and there were an alarmingly high number of Hero and Legendary members willing to tarnish their accounts for the sake of $140/week max.  Those still could be throwaway accounts, but given their ranks they shouldn't be.  Those accounts are worth money with a clean trust history and will probably be useless for campaigns in the future with negative trust on them (and I'm not promoting account sales, BTW).  Crazy.
legendary
Activity: 2408
Merit: 2226
Signature space for rent
Flag (or maybe not suitable) won't stop these participant either, so negative tag for them or neutral and then ignoring them is a solution that other manager like you might find useful.
It was quite ridiculous when I visit 1xbit signature campaign participants. Because I found only one participant who does not have red tags, but he has neutral feedback from other DT members as a spammer. I don't know who accepted or not, I just follow who has worn 1xbit signature. So I left only one neutral feedback to users since that profile wasn't tagged. I don't think it's necessary to tag who already have a red tag for a various reason since I do not accept red-tagged user usually in my campaigns.
copper member
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1827
Top Crypto Casino
Whether they don't care about negative feedback or not. I am personally going to red tag and flag all the accounts wearing the signature and advertising 1xbit which has been long known to be a scam site. This kind of thing should not be accepted in the community.

It makes no sense tagging adkinsbet shills but then leaving out those advertising 1xbit which we all know is scam and have lots of unresolved issues. I have never seen a casino with that many scam accusations like 1xbit.
legendary
Activity: 2618
Merit: 1181
They ignored the warning and they also ignored the trust system so none of them would stop this stupid act.
Who care about them? Take a look at the participant profile the manager accept because you will definitely know who they really are. The funny thing is, no one from participant has been accepted into a campaign voiced oppose the flag posted on a manager's profile and it is a sign that these people are only concerned with money regardless of the current situation.




Most probably I will take a look at applicants to leave neutral feedback because I have to mark them since I am a campaign manager.
Flag (or maybe not suitable) won't stop these participant either, so negative tag for them or neutral and then ignoring them is a solution that other manager like you might find useful.
legendary
Activity: 2408
Merit: 2226
Signature space for rent
Do you think they care about negative feedback that applies to the 1xbit campaign? I don't think so and most of the user who has applied there are red tagged. I don't think a flag against participants is appropriate. The best solution is to add neutral feedback for future reference, so other managers would notice them before accepting. Most probably I will take a look at applicants to leave neutral feedback because I have to mark them since I am a campaign manager. By the way, most participants are just spammer there. I am not sure how effective will this campaign at all.
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 3406
Crypto Swap Exchange
I quote everyone who wants to advertise scam site
An "archived" version would be better Wink

I don't understand why this person is willing to advertise scam on this forum simply out of greed. They ignored the warning and they also ignored the trust system so none of them would stop this stupid act.
Because they're just a bunch of spammers/shitposters.

Negative trust will not stop them and is activating the flag a viable option for all account involved?
I don't think creating a flag for each one of them would stop them either; I consider them as throwaway accounts but it might come in handy [flag] for warning the newbies/quests.
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1228
Playgram - The Telegram Casino
I quote everyone who wants to advertise scam site because they purposely signed up, using their signature, avatar and personal text on their profile. Most of them have received negative tag from member of DT and some have not. I don't understand why this person is willing to advertise scam on this forum simply out of greed. They ignored the warning and they also ignored the trust system so none of them would stop this stupid act.

The people on this list have the potential to increase the number of users who were tricked by the site because of the advertisement they distribute. Negative trust will not stop them and is activating the flag a viable option for all account involved?
Oh Lord, give me the strength to tag them more .......

Code:
target
jinxing
proTECH77
Tumanggor
Erdogan
Ebede
Alisha-k
yayayo
wildan88
gadado
BlackFor3st
Naficopa
sempak
Pealr12
Cacingkemi
perla
VanityWallets2015
pungopete468
qory
LimLims
terrorJR
BitcoinAccepted
FaucetKING
Jump to: