Topic: [LIST] USERS THAT ARE ABUSING MERIT SYSTEM - page 7. (Read 9417 times)

May i add this one on list? https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.28927677

This user were given 50 merits and 36 merits

Sent in the last 120 days
Today at 12:31:21 AM: 18 to Cean for (Deleted/Off-limits/Ignored)
Today at 12:20:11 AM: 31 to Neo-- for (Deleted/Off-limits/Ignored)

Received in the last 120 days
Today at 12:30:16 AM: 36 from Neo-- for (Deleted/Off-limits/Ignored)
January 25, 2018, 11:50:56 PM: 50 from Cean for (Deleted/Off-limits/Ignored)

Sent in the last 120 days
January 25, 2018, 03:54:44 PM: 20 to fxpc for (Deleted/Off-limits/Ignored)
January 25, 2018, 03:31:58 PM: 20 to petrcoin for Re: Запрещать биткоин уже бесполезно

Received in the last 120 days
January 25, 2018, 06:58:33 PM: 1 from fxpc for (Deleted/Off-limits/Ignored)
January 25, 2018, 06:57:09 PM: 1 from fxpc for (Deleted/Off-limits/Ignored)
January 25, 2018, 06:55:23 PM: 1 from fxpc for (Deleted/Off-limits/Ignored)
January 25, 2018, 06:53:45 PM: 1 from fxpc for (Deleted/Off-limits/Ignored)
January 25, 2018, 06:53:33 PM: 1 from fxpc for (Deleted/Off-limits/Ignored)
January 25, 2018, 06:53:21 PM: 1 from fxpc for (Deleted/Off-limits/Ignored)
January 25, 2018, 06:27:24 PM: 1 from fxpc for (Deleted/Off-limits/Ignored)
January 25, 2018, 06:25:07 PM: 1 from fxpc for (Deleted/Off-limits/Ignored)
January 25, 2018, 06:24:57 PM: 1 from fxpc for (Deleted/Off-limits/Ignored)
January 25, 2018, 06:24:42 PM: 1 from fxpc for (Deleted/Off-limits/Ignored)
January 25, 2018, 06:24:26 PM: 1 from fxpc for (Deleted/Off-limits/Ignored)
January 25, 2018, 06:21:57 PM: 1 from fxpc for (Deleted/Off-limits/Ignored)
January 25, 2018, 06:21:48 PM: 1 from fxpc for (Deleted/Off-limits/Ignored)
January 25, 2018, 06:20:34 PM: 1 from fxpc for (Deleted/Off-limits/Ignored)
January 25, 2018, 06:20:19 PM: 1 from fxpc for (Deleted/Off-limits/Ignored)
January 25, 2018, 05:53:13 PM: 1 from fxpc for Re: Федеральные каналы о криптовалюте
January 25, 2018, 05:52:54 PM: 1 from fxpc for Re: Запрещать биткоин уже бесполезно
January 25, 2018, 05:52:36 PM: 1 from fxpc for (Deleted/Off-limits/Ignored)
January 25, 2018, 05:51:30 PM: 1 from fxpc for (Deleted/Off-limits/Ignored)
January 25, 2018, 05:51:03 PM: 1 from fxpc for (Deleted/Off-limits/Ignored)
January 25, 2018, 11:51:50 AM: 20 from petrcoin for Re: Федеральные каналы о криптовалюте

I'm sure they don't feel 'random' about themselves and you may look pretty random from where I am.

What now? Should we do official random/special forum members classification?

I dunno, sounds pretty threatening. If you think that someone "deserves" red-trust, why would you stop yourself from doing that? You're essentially saying that you already have justification for red-tagging them and you're willing to use it.

The guy you replied to already have red-trust from you, so it won't work here, but your post can act as a nice little deterrent to anyone who would want to ever criticise you.

I'm leaning in favour of tagging unusual sMerit donations, but what your special, totally-non-random intellect refuses to comprehend is that you're making it much harder for the taggers.

Now they either have to admit the lack of integrity in their actions and having personal preferences in what is 'taggable' and what isn't. Or go through the mental gymnastics in explaining why it's OK for Lauda to send sMerits to whoever the fuck he wants, while some Russian guy will be tagged for doing exactly the same.

...
Doesn't work with random people.

No? Read the user's exactly wording, then read my wording ('deserve').

You are standing on the wrong side, easily being played by alts of people that I busted.

Tagged a couple users. Either for merit farming or for shitposting. They're usually interconnected anyway

I´ll explain why I think that your behavior is suspicious.
You test your assumption with the highest number and see that it works and you have
found a possible bug. Afterwards you login with yet another account and do
the same thing - again with the highest possible number. Instead of stopping you do the same
process an additional two times with two different accounts.

If you were doing this solely for the purpose of detecting bugs with the merit
system you would have stopped after the very first successful attempt at
verifying your assumption.

...

could not try the explanation principle. I do not know how much I can give. I wrote the highest number.
but it is normal to doubt this.
I certainly do not criticize this behavior. I would think the same.

Why not just give yourself 1 merit point then and not a whole bunch

Two things.

1. You could have easily prove there is a bug by sending 1 merit to your own account. No one would have even noticed that, by the way. Instead you decided to send yourself the maximum merit on 4 accounts. This was purely for your own gain, not bug testing.
2. You're admitting to ban evasion and this account should be banned as well. Well done.

I am not changing my feedback on this matter.

I have a special reason for this
I wanted to show all my memberships because the ban given to the ban is unfair.

I read the entire thread* and am well aware of your history.
I just don´t understand how you could have discovered this bug
without using 4 different accounts for that. If I understand
your bug report correctly you need other accounts in order for
that bug to occur at all.

Please correct me if I´m wrong.

*I don´t understand Turkish therefore I can´t comment on
the content of the quoted post in the Turkish local section.

my friend I found the bug the first day and reported it.
commenting without reading .




Read the date of messages first.



edit: I guess you have not noticed with that amazing intelligence.
Merit receipt report with banned memberships.those memberships do not already exist.

...

my friend I found the bug the first day and reported it.
commenting without reading .

...

OP, get a job. It's is basically not your business how anyone spends their merit.

I wonder whether this sudden change of heart and this
display of your sincerity was caused by the trust rating that
MadZ left on your account.

Besides, the merits that you received don´t look like genuine merits at
all, because most of them were received within a timespan of 3 minutes.

You literally received 154 merits within 180 seconds.

Seems legit.

In local merit topic this guy actually report this issue to theymos. Also in local topic,people start to complain about him and he send a screenshot about it. Here is the message, so i don't know now he is abusing or not but this is a serious issue.

Merit looks high.
I found the reason for this bug.
I reported theymos issue.





sorry Merit does not delete it.

...
to show my sincerity.
I deleted the messages, but Merit remains.

...

January 25, 2018, 06:00:37 PM: 20 from dakota neat for (Deleted/Off-limits/Ignored)
January 25, 2018, 06:00:14 PM: 20 from torikan for (Deleted/Off-limits/Ignored)
January 25, 2018, 05:59:06 PM: 30 from torikan for (Deleted/Off-limits/Ignored)
January 25, 2018, 05:58:40 PM: 27 from ikm for (Deleted/Off-limits/Ignored)
January 25, 2018, 05:58:18 PM: 27 from dnz gns for (Deleted/Off-limits/Ignored)
January 25, 2018, 05:57:50 PM: 30 from dakota neat for (Deleted/Off-limits/Ignored)

Accounts connected: torikan (uuid = 859512), dakota neat (uuid = 343531), ikm (uuid = 912598),
dnz gns (uuid = 911945), temmuz (uuid = 911706).
Abusing signature/bounty campaigns.

Why did those posts deserve thousands of merit?

Bullying is shitposting.

And you two couldn't at least pick a "deserving" posts to up-merit?

If you want to appreciate someone for his general contribution to the community, I'm sure you can find at least one posts that proves that positive contribution.

Now every Russian tagged for merit-abuse can use you as an example and defend themselves with: "I know his post was shitty, but I rewarded him for his overall contribution".

And ere you seriously threatening a guy with red-trust for "defamation" when all he did was to apply the same rules to you/aTriz as are being applied to other members?

Fuck integrity I guess.

Read the thread before shitposting, that was already posted above and is just a failed smear attempt.

How is that, whatever you are saying, relevant to this thread? Are you trying to *defend* your actions? Why are you posting if you have banned accounts?