[LIST] USERS THAT ARE ABUSING MERIT SYSTEM - page 8.

pawel7777

legendary

Activity: 2436

Merit: 1561

Quote from: Lauda on January 26, 2018, 08:47:24 AM

...
Absolute bullshit. The amount of merit that each of us deserves is within thousands, and you complain about double digit numbers. Roll Eyes

If anyone deserves negative trust, it is you for your defamatory nonsense.

And you two couldn't at least pick a "deserving" posts to up-merit? If you want to appreciate someone for his general contribution to the community, I'm sure you can find at least one posts that proves that positive contribution.
Now every Russian tagged for merit-abuse can use you as an example and defend themselves with: "I know his post was shitty, but I rewarded him for his overall contribution".

And ere you seriously threatening a guy with red-trust for "defamation" when all he did was to apply the same rules to you/aTriz as are being applied to other members? Fuck integrity I guess.

stingers

legendary

Activity: 1183

Merit: 1013

Quote from: Lauda on January 26, 2018, 10:36:47 AM

Quote from: stingers on January 26, 2018, 10:32:08 AM

...
What was so meritorious about this post that aTriz gave 5 + 45 merit to Lauda (the maximum that aTriz could award anyone)? Either they are alt of each other(they also run a service together), or if they are not alts of each other then they are trying to conserve merit withing themselves and create extra 50% merit points? Who does that except for alts?

Read the thread before shitposting, that was already posted above and is just a failed smear attempt.

Quote from: temmuz on January 26, 2018, 10:25:46 AM

Merit looks high.
I found the reason for this bug.
I reported theymos issue.

How is that, whatever you are saying, relevant to this thread? Are you trying to *defend* your actions? Why are you posting if you have banned accounts?

Being abully doesnt always anwer questions. Bullying someone for giving them a negative trust just because they questioned your merit isnt valid.
You didnt answer anything above.
Why did those posts deserve thousands of merit?
Its hillarious to see alts telling each other that they deserve much more merit points.
What you are doing is shit posting. Bullying is shitposting. Just because you are in DT2 doesnt make you a boss around here.

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 2965

Terminated.

Quote from: stingers on January 26, 2018, 10:32:08 AM

...
What was so meritorious about this post that aTriz gave 5 + 45 merit to Lauda (the maximum that aTriz could award anyone)? Either they are alt of each other(they also run a service together), or if they are not alts of each other then they are trying to conserve merit withing themselves and create extra 50% merit points? Who does that except for alts?

Read the thread before shitposting, that was already posted above and is just a failed smear attempt.

Quote from: temmuz on January 26, 2018, 10:25:46 AM

Merit looks high.
I found the reason for this bug.
I reported theymos issue.

How is that, whatever you are saying, relevant to this thread? Are you trying to *defend* your actions? Why are you posting if you have banned accounts?

stingers

legendary

Activity: 1183

Merit: 1013

aTriz gave Lauda 50 merit for this post :

Quote from: Lauda on January 24, 2018, 03:09:22 AM

Quote from: Scam Exposey on January 23, 2018, 11:23:53 PM

On the other hand what can you say about them joining on sig camp and busting their competitors and gain fame to have slot on every camp they wish to join?

Quote from: Lauda on January 23, 2018, 02:50:45 PM

How about the following: I could give him a permanent spot in any of my campaigns. Therefore, he can not be biased as he is never in competition for a spot with anyone? Roll Eyes

Oh right OP, you'd still complain because you're a butthurt idiot.

Quote from: shesheboy on January 24, 2018, 12:57:17 AM

locations is not accurate and can still be spoofed or faked..

Let me just fake my own timezone by posting during the night time and sleeping during the day. Genius.

What was so meritorious about this post that aTriz gave 5 + 45 merit to Lauda (the maximum that aTriz could award anyone)? Either they are alt of each other(they also run a service together), or if they are not alts of each other then they are trying to conserve merit withing themselves and create extra 50% merit points? Who does that except for alts?

Or if suppose 1% they are not alts, then wouldnt this be merit abuse? Creating 50% more merit by sending your close relatives / work oartners merit. If trust abuse is a thing then merit abuse should also be tagged.

temmuz

sr. member

Activity: 784

Merit: 425

Merit looks high.
I found the reason for this bug.
I reported theymos issue.

sorry Merit does not delete it.

digaran

copper member

Activity: 1330

Merit: 899

🖤😏

Quote from: Cean on January 26, 2018, 09:01:31 AM

OP, get a job. It's is basically not your business how anyone spends their merit.

What if some body is using merits to rape young and beautiful runaway teenager girls? they are vulnerable, all it takes is for you to slap them in the face, and they will submit to you, we don't want that here, we prefer to pay a professional lady for our jumping purposes.
Look at the links in the OP, idiots were given merits to (deleted/off limits/ignored).

krishnaverma

full member

Activity: 1274

Merit: 106

Quote from: johhnyUA on January 26, 2018, 09:22:18 AM

You just "burning" smerit sending it to your friends. Sorry, but i don't think that it's good idea. I mean in such numbers like +20, +50 . Undecided

That will be taken for sure. If someone is doing that repetitively on useless posts, that is a clear indication of his intentions. You should report them.

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 2965

Terminated.

Quote from: johhnyUA on January 26, 2018, 09:22:18 AM

You just "burning" smerit sending it to your friends.

Which is perfectly fine. If I want to let my sMerit decay to 0, that is also fine. Since this forum has libtard policies, then it is my freedom to choose whether to: a) Send sMerits to "friends". b) Send sMerits to randoms. c) Send to nobody. d) Whatever.

Quote from: johhnyUA on January 26, 2018, 09:22:18 AM

Sorry, but i don't think that it's good idea. I mean in such numbers like +20, +50 . Undecided

50 is the send limit for a particular user per month, a nice and round number to give. Sending me merit can never account for farming nor abuse as >1k merit is useless anyways. aTriz, on the other hand, will need more merit to rank up. The +20 is actually not enough given the results of the campaign that I created and I escrow. Roll Eyes

TMAN

legendary

Activity: 1414

Merit: 1808

Exchange Bitcoin quickly-https://blockchain.com.do

Quote from: johhnyUA on January 26, 2018, 09:22:18 AM

Quote from: Lauda on January 26, 2018, 08:54:02 AM

I don't merit randoms[1] as I'm not a source, especially not those that post in Russian.

[1] Exceptions apply.

You just "burning" smerit sending it to your friends. Sorry, but i don't think that it's good idea. I mean in such numbers like +20, +50 . Undecided

BUTTHURT...

Lauda admitted to not being a source.. so they will burn through the merits they have like I will.. so what if I turned around and gave lauda a cheeky fidy??

I respect them and I love the way they bash Tards.. would that make me a farmer/Multiaccounter/whatever the new word is for being a merit whore?

johhnyUA

legendary

Activity: 2422

Merit: 1834

Crypto for the Crypto Throne!

Quote from: Lauda on January 26, 2018, 08:54:02 AM

I don't merit randoms[1] as I'm not a source, especially not those that post in Russian.

[1] Exceptions apply.

You just "burning" smerit sending it to your friends. Sorry, but i don't think that it's good idea. I mean in such numbers like +20, +50 . Undecided

Cean

hero member

Activity: 807

Merit: 522

OP, get a job. It's is basically not your business how anyone spends their merit.

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 2965

Terminated.

Quote from: johhnyUA on January 26, 2018, 08:51:20 AM

Quote from: FFrankie on January 26, 2018, 08:22:16 AM

The merit for lauda I see it has it doesn't matter because they are all ready legendary and aTriz made a great post that is formatted nicly

Lol, "great post". Bro, check my topic i have more usefull and great posts. Will Lauda merit me with +20?
You're just trying to clean them. It's unfair.

I don't merit randoms[1] as I'm not a source, especially not those that post in Russian.

[1] Exceptions apply.

johhnyUA

legendary

Activity: 2422

Merit: 1834

Crypto for the Crypto Throne!

Quote from: FFrankie on January 26, 2018, 08:22:16 AM

The merit for lauda I see it has it doesn't matter because they are all ready legendary and aTriz made a great post that is formatted nicly

Lol, "great post". Bro, check my topic i have more usefull and great posts. Will Lauda merit me with +20?
You're just trying to clean them. It's unfair.

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 2965

Terminated.

Quote from: akram143 on January 26, 2018, 05:01:57 AM

Hi OP,I have some big cats for you,surely they abused the merit system so they also deserves negative trust.Highly untrustworthiness from them.The source is below

Quote from: playboy654 on January 26, 2018, 01:03:13 AM

First of all I am not against the merit,I just want to figure out the negativities.
If someone said DT will be fair while distributing the merits.I will say no,
Here I have a reference for that,Lauda and aTriz most well know members of our forum exchanging merits between them.
1.Lauda merited aTriz for running a twitter campaign ( https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.25417254 )
2.aTriz merited Lauda for a shit answer ( https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.28801076 )
If you are saying that posts deserves 50 and 20 merits.I am totally against you.So all the merits are going to stuck between the well known forum member.

Absolute bullshit. The amount of merit that each of us deserves is within thousands, and you complain about double digit numbers. Roll Eyes

If anyone deserves negative trust, it is you for your defamatory nonsense.

Quote from: FFrankie on January 26, 2018, 08:22:16 AM

The merit for lauda I see it has it doesn't matter because they are all ready legendary and aTriz made a great post that is formatted nicly

I could merit him or anyone comparable on random posts and it wouldn't be close to *abuse*. E.g., this is a perfectly valid post to merit:

Quote from: TMAN on January 26, 2018, 08:44:53 AM

No. bye.

LogitechMouse

legendary

Activity: 2422

Merit: 1036

Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks

Is there anything that the admins can do with this shitty users abusing the merit system? I suggest for a temporary or permanent ban if it is proven that this users are really abusing the merit system. Its unfair for us who are striving to post high quality posts in order to get some merits. Although I commend the OP because he/she saw this abusers abusing the merit system.

FFrankie

hero member

Activity: 2254

Merit: 960

100% Deposit Match UP TO €5000!

Quote from: akram143 on January 26, 2018, 05:01:57 AM

Hi OP,I have some big cats for you,surely they abused the merit system so they also deserves negative trust.Highly untrustworthiness from them.The source is below

Quote from: playboy654 on January 26, 2018, 01:03:13 AM

First of all I am not against the merit,I just want to figure out the negativities.
If someone said DT will be fair while distributing the merits.I will say no,
Here I have a reference for that,Lauda and aTriz most well know members of our forum exchanging merits between them.
1.Lauda merited aTriz for running a twitter campaign ( https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.25417254 )
2.aTriz merited Lauda for a shit answer ( https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.28801076 )
If you are saying that posts deserves 50 and 20 merits.I am totally against you.So all the merits are going to stuck between the well known forum member.

The merit for lauda I see it has it doesn't matter because they are all ready legendary and aTriz made a great post that is formatted nicly

Samarkand

sr. member

Activity: 658

Merit: 282

Quote from: Jet Cash on January 26, 2018, 05:59:07 AM

I haven't read all the posts in this thread, so apologies if this is already included.

This guy is number 4 in the merit awards.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/explorder-1108331

I don´t think this qualifies as abuse.

Look at the thread for that he received nearly all of his merits:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.28857585

It basically is a Russian FAQ for the new merit system and people obviously appreciate
this information. If you look at the top-merited recent topics you will see that
out of the top 10 topics more than half of the topics are related to the new
merit system (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;stats=toptopics).

Jet Cash

legendary

Activity: 2688

Merit: 2444

https://JetCash.com

I haven't read all the posts in this thread, so apologies if this is already included.

This guy is number 4 in the merit awards.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/explorder-1108331

tweetbit

full member

Activity: 560

Merit: 112

Quote from: actmyname on January 26, 2018, 05:19:43 AM

Quote from: tweetbit on January 26, 2018, 04:52:13 AM

What if the merit system will be use in other purpose? Example: someone really hates me a lot then make tweetbit1 account and merit my post just to use as an evidence against me for having an alt account or account farming or do multiple account for this ultimate purpose. This can also ruin one innocent account. Leave an opinion what you think about it. #throlling

It's an A-->B linkage, not an A<-->B linkage. Therefore, anything negative should apply to the person that is giving the merit away. After checking and ensuring (with a high probability) that the other is indeed an alt of the sender, then you tag them and connect the accounts with an A<-->B linkage.

Thanks for the answer actmyname, but still confused. I made a new thread on Meta for the same concern so that everyone will be aware of this possible scenario that can be a big problem sooner. I hope the number of DT is enough for this, if my fear came to reality.

Update : I’ve got my answer already, Brand new accounts have zero merit for that purpose and already locked the thread I made.

BlackPanda

legendary

Activity: 1414

Merit: 1001

Quote from: tweetbit on January 26, 2018, 04:52:13 AM

What if the merit system will be use in other purpose? Example: someone really hates me a lot then make tweetbit1 account and merit my post just to use as an evidence against me for having an alt account or account farming or do multiple account for this ultimate purpose. This can also ruin one innocent account. Leave an opinion what you think about it. #throlling

I think the merit system is still being developed and there must be another benchmark that can determine it real or fake. We all here must be worried about what you say, it could happen and we just wait for how there is an appropriate reference to strengthen the merit into an accurate benchmark.

Topic: [LIST] USERS THAT ARE ABUSING MERIT SYSTEM - page 8. (Read 9367 times)