Actually, 0.01 is the very-long-term 'fair' ratio for LTC. Granted that long-term relationships are brittle in this sector (ouch), but this one has held up and is still holding up.
If we consider the number of coin in total, the ration should be 0.25. However, litecoin is just a clone, and does not offer new features, so 0.01 might be appropriate.
From where exactly those numbers are coming from? My understanding was we are talking about a completely worthless digital excrement which real value (zero) is determined by the fact that it is used by absolutely nobody in any real world economic process. Therefore, any arbitrary number could be pulled out from the thin air and you could say 0.00001 or 0.5 just like you said 0.01 or 0.25.
Why is relevant that how many number of those shit exist, which again used by no absolutely nobody outside of a few (in economic terms) completely irrelevant crypto currency exchanges? I thought common sense dictates that if a thing is useless and in fact used by nobody, then its value is zero and then the combined value of all existing thing should be zero as well.
I fully understand currently it is not the case as as few wankers pumping and dumping this thing on crypto currency exchanges, and then fanboys and delusional wannabe rich speculators trading it as well, but it doesn't mean you can apply a rational pricing model such as volume per price ratio to that worthless thing.
