Pages:
Author

Topic: Long term OIL - page 59. (Read 91985 times)

legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1115
★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!
December 28, 2015, 02:25:14 PM
#57
Saudis are not immune to laws of economics. They can only run a loss on oil production until they've exhausted their cash reserves and can't borrow money any more. They can sustain losses longer than a business can, and they're trying to flood the market to force out high cost producers in the US and Canada. But they will cut back long before they're exhausted their cash reserves. They're playing a game of chicken, but they're still rational, and they'll respond to accordingly when forced to.

You only see a small part of the bigger picture. Not that I see the whole of it, but evidently my view grasps a larger part of it. The Saudis are the US puppets, all their cash reserves are in the US dollars and held by the US funds. Everyone is free to decide for themselves how "sovereign" their funds actually are thereby, but the events now transpiring (e.g. lifting the 40 years old ban on oil exports) leave little-to-no illusion that the US is interested in bringing the price of oil as low as possible. Why they are doing this seems to be pretty evident too. So the Saudis will pump as long as Uncle Sam deems it beneficial...

For himself, not the Saudi royal family, of course

This is relevant to my point:

http://money.cnn.com/2015/12/28/investing/saudi-arabia-budget-oil-opec/index.html?sr=fbmoney122815saudi-arabia-budget-oil-opec0553PMVODtopLink&linkId=19946097

Saudi Arabia is being hurt by low oil prices, but in their calculation, they have determined they are better off long term by flooding out the higher cost producers now. They will respond rationally to the economics of the situation though. They can only skate on their cash reserves for so long. Eventually, they have to let the price of oil rise or start borrowing, and the capital markets will not be kind to a country that frittered away a huge reserve and is a desperate borrower, and the ratings agencies have already started to sound that warning bell, which is why I think Saudi Arabia is starting to curb energy subsidies and take other cost saving measures.
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1145
December 24, 2015, 04:25:31 PM
#56
You are quoting stuff that you neither understand nor read.
You are a moron that thinks books are retarded and google and wikipedia can replace a school/college education.

Where is the total shale production chart since 2010-11 and till now? Should I repeat it again that rig count is irrelevant as long as the US oil production increases (or stays roughly the same)?

Oil production does not increase in the us lmao
The whole world except you agrees to that fact.

And it doesnt matter that oil production right now is higher then in 2010 because the oil price is at 36$ - a 11 year low - now...

Go spam more bullshit to earn 10 cent per post

No one urges you to reply to my posts in the first place. I guess you should find someone other to chase after, lol

It is important to show gullible noobs which hero and legendarys are complete morons and nutjobs - like you.
Else people like you put the bitcoin community in a light full of retards and conspiracy nutjobs.


Oh btw. Shale oil bonds in the US actually amount to a whopping 1.5 trillion $ it seems i will try to find more details.

It's actually less but 1.0 trillion is still a good number...(2013)

http://www.bis.org/publ/qtrpdf/r_qt1503f.htm

Quote
   US oil companies have also borrowed heavily. They account for around 40% of both syndicated loans and debt securities outstanding. Much of this debt has been issued by smaller companies, in particular those engaged in shale oil exploration and production. Indeed, while the ratio of total debt to assets has been broadly unchanged for large US oil firms, it has on average almost doubled for other US producers - including smaller shale oil companies. These firms borrowed heavily to finance the expansion of production capacity, often against the backdrop of negative operating cash flow. Indeed, shale investment accounts for a large share of the increase in oil-related investment. Annual capital expenditure by oil and gas companies has more than doubled in real terms since 2000, to almost $900 billion in 2013 (IEA (2014)).
legendary
Activity: 3514
Merit: 1280
English ⬄ Russian Translation Services
December 24, 2015, 03:38:02 PM
#55
You are quoting stuff that you neither understand nor read.
You are a moron that thinks books are retarded and google and wikipedia can replace a school/college education.

Where is the total shale production chart since 2010-11 and till now? Should I repeat it again that the rig count is irrelevant as long as the US oil production increases (or stays roughly the same)?

A starred first, wow. If you know what that means, of course

Go spam more bullshit to earn 10 cent per post

No one urges you to reply to my posts in the first place. I guess you should find someone other to chase after, lol
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1145
December 24, 2015, 03:25:38 PM
#54
"The Permian will continue its growth in November, EIA forecasts, with a 21,000-b/d rise to 2.03 million b/d"



I guess you need someone to explain it to you word for word....


http://www.marketwatch.com/story/what-the-latest-eia-report-tells-us-about-shale-oil-output-2015-11-10

Quote
Oil production from the Bakken and Eagle Ford shale plays in the U.S. has been falling since March, but traders shouldn’t be quick to assume that will translate into lower supplies and higher prices.

Total oil output from seven major U.S. shale regions is expected to fall by 118,000 barrels a day to about 4.95 million barrels a day in December, according to the Energy Information Administration’s monthly Drilling Productivity Report released Monday. The data show that production from the Bakken and Eagle Ford shale regions are both likely to show declines next month, which would mark 10 months in a row.

Williams, however, pointed out that the EIA report shows that the number of new oil barrels we can expect per rig showed no improvement in the Eagle Ford and Bakken, and the increase in the Permian was “minimal.”

You are quoting stuff that you neither understand nor read.
You are a moron that thinks books are retarded and google and wikipedia can replace a school/college education.

Go spam more bullshit to earn 10 cent per post.
legendary
Activity: 3514
Merit: 1280
English ⬄ Russian Translation Services
December 24, 2015, 03:03:28 PM
#53
"The Permian will continue its growth in November, EIA forecasts, with a 21,000-b/d rise to 2.03 million b/d", though

legendary
Activity: 3514
Merit: 1280
English ⬄ Russian Translation Services
December 24, 2015, 03:01:17 PM
#52
They are all good that is why the fracking rig count is down by over 60% and still decreasing?

It is production that counts, stupid

Quote
Cushing, Oklahoma is a major trading hub for crude oil and has been the delivery point for crude contracts and therefore the price settlement point for West Texas Intermediate on the New York Mercantile Exchange for over three decades

It is not you lier.
https://www.eia.gov/petroleum/drilling/#tabs-summary-2

http://www.ogj.com/articles/2015/10/eia-us-shale-oil-output-to-drop-93-000-b-d-in-november.html

Summary of several eia reports.

Did you read the texts yourself?

Quote
Crude oil production in November from seven major US shale plays is expected to drop 93,000 b/d to 5.12 million b/d, according to the US Energy Information Administration’s latest Drilling Productivity Report (DPR)

Expected decline of 93,000 b/d is mere 1.8% from the production of 5.12 million b/d (actually, no more than minor fluctuation). Still wanna talk about rig count going down by over 60%, and how it is related to shale plays total production and the total production of the whole US oil industry?

What about coming up with something more substantial?
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1145
December 24, 2015, 02:42:16 PM
#51
They are all good that is why the fracking rig count is down by over 60% and still decreasing?

It is production that counts, stupid

Quote
Cushing, Oklahoma is a major trading hub for crude oil and has been the delivery point for crude contracts and therefore the price settlement point for West Texas Intermediate on the New York Mercantile Exchange for over three decades

It is not you lier.
https://www.eia.gov/petroleum/drilling/#tabs-summary-2

http://www.ogj.com/articles/2015/10/eia-us-shale-oil-output-to-drop-93-000-b-d-in-november.html

Summary of several eia reports.
legendary
Activity: 3514
Merit: 1280
English ⬄ Russian Translation Services
December 24, 2015, 02:02:16 PM
#50
They are all good that is why the fracking rig count is down by over 60% and still decreasing?

It is total production that counts, stupid

Quote
Cushing, Oklahoma is a major trading hub for crude oil and has been the delivery point for crude contracts and therefore the price settlement point for West Texas Intermediate on the New York Mercantile Exchange for over three decades
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1145
December 24, 2015, 01:34:24 PM
#49
You only see a small part of the bigger picture. Not that I see the whole of it, but evidently my view grasps a larger part of it. The Saudis are the US puppets, all their cash reserves are in the US dollars and held by the US funds. Everyone is free to decide for themselves how "sovereign" their funds actually are thereby, but the events now transpiring (e.g. lifting the 40 years old ban on oil exports) leave little-to-no illusion that the US is interested in bringing the price of oil as low as possible. Why they are doing this seems to be pretty evident too. So the Saudis will pump as long as Uncle Sam deems it beneficial...

For himself, not the Saudi royal family, of course

What? The US wants to shoot themself in the foot?

We gonna see a repeat of 2008 if oil price goes a bit lower.
The oil industry is heavenly in debt - alone last year the fracking industry got 250 billion $ and their production cost ranges from 40-60$ per barrel.

You don't know a thing. Just accept this

First, frackers have hedged their production for years ahead. They essentially sold their future output at high prices ($60-70 per barrel), so, in a sense, they don't care. Second, their debts have already been socialized by the banks which issued that debt. It is an American taxpayer who is subsidizing the fracking industry...



There should be a worst and stupid poster rank/award just for you

They are all good that is why the fracking rig count is down by over 60% and still decreasing?

Also ignoring all my sources and citing yourself no one. Congratz.

legendary
Activity: 3514
Merit: 1280
English ⬄ Russian Translation Services
December 24, 2015, 01:22:01 PM
#48
You only see a small part of the bigger picture. Not that I see the whole of it, but evidently my view grasps a larger part of it. The Saudis are the US puppets, all their cash reserves are in the US dollars and held by the US funds. Everyone is free to decide for themselves how "sovereign" their funds actually are thereby, but the events now transpiring (e.g. lifting the 40 years old ban on oil exports) leave little-to-no illusion that the US is interested in bringing the price of oil as low as possible. Why they are doing this seems to be pretty evident too. So the Saudis will pump as long as Uncle Sam deems it beneficial...

For himself, not the Saudi royal family, of course

What? The US wants to shoot themself in the foot?

We gonna see a repeat of 2008 if oil price goes a bit lower.
The oil industry is heavenly in debt - alone last year the fracking industry got 250 billion $ and their production cost ranges from 40-60$ per barrel.

You don't know a thing. Just accept this

First, frackers have hedged their production for years ahead. They essentially sold their future output at high prices ($60-70 per barrel), so, in a sense, they don't care. Second, their debts have already been socialized by the banks which issued that debt. It is an American taxpayer who is subsidizing the fracking industry...

And last but not least, the fracking industry is not all US oil production
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1145
December 24, 2015, 12:36:05 PM
#47
Saudis are not immune to laws of economics. They can only run a loss on oil production until they've exhausted their cash reserves and can't borrow money any more. They can sustain losses longer than a business can, and they're trying to flood the market to force out high cost producers in the US and Canada. But they will cut back long before they're exhausted their cash reserves. They're playing a game of chicken, but they're still rational, and they'll respond to accordingly when forced to.

You only see a small part of the bigger picture. Not that I see the whole of it, but evidently my view grasps a larger part of it. The Saudis are the US puppets, all their cash reserves are in the US dollars and held by the US funds. Everyone is free to decide for themselves how "sovereign" their funds actually are thereby, but the events now transpiring (e.g. lifting the 40 years old ban on oil exports) leave little-to-no illusion that the US is interested in bringing the price of oil as low as possible. Why they are doing this seems to be pretty evident too. So the Saudis will pump as long as Uncle Sam deems it beneficial...

For himself, not the Saudi royal family, of course

What? The US wants to shoot themself in the foot?

We gonna see a repeat of 2008 if oil price goes a bit lower.
The oil industry is heavenly in debt - alone last year the fracking industry got 250 billion $ and their production cost ranges from 40-60$ per barrel.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-09-17/an-oklahoma-of-oil-at-risk-as-debt-shackles-u-s-shale-drillers
http://www.economist.com/news/business/21672253-shakeout-finally-hitting-debt-strapped-shale-producers-debt-and-alive


Tl.dr.: no just no Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 3514
Merit: 1280
English ⬄ Russian Translation Services
December 24, 2015, 11:12:08 AM
#46
Saudis are not immune to laws of economics. They can only run a loss on oil production until they've exhausted their cash reserves and can't borrow money any more. They can sustain losses longer than a business can, and they're trying to flood the market to force out high cost producers in the US and Canada. But they will cut back long before they're exhausted their cash reserves. They're playing a game of chicken, but they're still rational, and they'll respond to accordingly when forced to.

You only see a small part of the bigger picture. Not that I see the whole of it, but evidently my view grasps a larger part of it. The Saudis are the US puppets, all their cash reserves are in the US dollars and held by the US funds. Everyone is free to decide for themselves how "sovereign" their funds actually are thereby, but the events now transpiring (e.g. lifting the 40 years old ban on oil exports) leave little-to-no illusion that the US is interested in bringing the price of oil as low as possible. Why they are doing this seems to be pretty evident too. So the Saudis will pump as long as Uncle Sam deems it beneficial...

For himself, not the Saudi royal family, of course
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1115
★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!
December 24, 2015, 09:56:15 AM
#45
I'm buying USO (an oil based ETF) because it seems to me that oil is very likely undervalued over the long term.

Loooong term being the operative word. I agree with you that oil eventually rebounds. It's cyclical, and has always been cyclical, and people with short time horizons or investment objects always think that the current price of oil is the new paradigm, but history has repeatedly proved them wrong. Oil is likely to stay relatively low for the next 3 years, and trying to project longer than 5 years out is a crapshoot at best. China is complicated, and undergoing inner turmoil as the government tries to shift people to a consumption-based economy. This could work wonderfully and add to global economic growth and help oil rebound, or it could end disastrously, as China is currently pumping their stock market and the ensuing bubble pop could wipe out a lot of wealth in China and cause a major recession, which could further cull the demand for oil. Long term, oil isn't where I'd want to invest, personally, because there are better options in equities.

Oil pipeline operators are actually a good place to straddle the middle, as they've been whacked along with every other oil-based company, but actually make the vast majority of their money from operating the pipelines that move oil, so they make money no matter the price of oil. They're like a tollbooth operator, collecting fees for moving oil around the country. The fact that they've been sold off because oil is a scary topic right now presents a great investment opportunity. I like Spectra Energy for this reason (ticker: SE).
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1115
★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!
December 24, 2015, 09:47:22 AM
#44
The current low price makes oil a excellent investment.

While the big oil countries keep producing more and more, the price is going down and down. At 1 moment we will see such a low price that it water will cost more then oil

We'll never reach that point because there is a minimum price it costs to produce oil and the price cannot remain below that point for an extended period of time, and that point is much higher than the cost of water.

The laws of economics simply don't work here. The price of oil could actually fall very low (down to single digits). Why? Because Saudies will pump oil at any price, never ever looking back at the cost of production (or anything that economics would dictate). Otherwise, the ruling family of the KSA will be totally and ruthlessly exterminated, and no one would give a fuck about them...



Just like they exterminate all opposition, nip brewing dissent in the bud and drown any disobedience in blood


Saudis are not immune to laws of economics. They can only run a loss on oil production until they've exhausted their cash reserves and can't borrow money any more. They can sustain losses longer than a business can, and they're trying to flood the market to force out high cost producers in the US and Canada. But they will cut back long before they're exhausted their cash reserves. They're playing a game of chicken, but they're still rational, and they'll respond to accordingly when forced to.

I think the main difference between this oil drop and oil drops of the past is that we actually are at a point where there are feasible alternatives to oil. Technology will only push us further.

People talking about alternatives to oil arising due to oil falling in price don't have a clue that low oil prices beat the shit out of these alternatives

This is absolutely true. Oil isn't going anywhere in a major way in the next 100 years. Every developing economy will be building wealth off the back of oil. It is one of the most energy efficient sources on the planet (price:energy output), which is why it has come to dominate the world energy market.
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
December 23, 2015, 06:12:25 AM
#43
I think the main difference between this oil drop and oil drops of the past is that we actually are at a point where there are feasible alternatives to oil. Technology will only push us further.

Yes. Solar panel, hydro power, wind farm will generate more energy than ever. The oil will be mainly used in transportation and petrochemical in the future, not to generate electricity.

Solar panel would be the awesome solutions of all the power of the world or something nature friendly. We see now that a lot of country don't have snow and that comes with global warming. I am kinda sad that they are no snow. So OIL later won't be profitable I think.
sr. member
Activity: 742
Merit: 252
December 23, 2015, 04:15:36 AM
#42
I think the main difference between this oil drop and oil drops of the past is that we actually are at a point where there are feasible alternatives to oil. Technology will only push us further.

Yes. Solar panel, hydro power, wind farm will generate more energy than ever. The oil will be mainly used in transportation and petrochemical in the future, not to generate electricity.
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
December 23, 2015, 03:34:36 AM
#41
Oil has gone down quite a bit recently... With no signs of going up atm.

it's only mean that no one is thinking that the low volume is good for speculate more, maybe there is an increase demand in other sectors

it's very difficult that multiple market get a pump at the same time
legendary
Activity: 3514
Merit: 1280
English ⬄ Russian Translation Services
December 23, 2015, 02:44:14 AM
#40
I think the main difference between this oil drop and oil drops of the past is that we actually are at a point where there are feasible alternatives to oil. Technology will only push us further.

People talking about alternatives to oil arising due to oil falling in price don't have a clue that low oil prices beat the shit out of these alternatives
newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
December 22, 2015, 11:26:27 PM
#39
I think oil will rise on the long term, 35$ oil per barrel is not sustainable.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
December 22, 2015, 09:29:29 PM
#38
Oil has gone down quite a bit recently... With no signs of going up atm.
Pages:
Jump to: