posting for a confirmation that i am participating..
how long will i able to receive the token from the moment i have done all instruction? will it take days or week?
Topic: 🚀LOTTEREUM🚀 - complex of smart contracts. AIRDROP RESTART🚀 - page 8. (Read 23821 times)
Joined good luck guys.
at the start of the project I was hesitant, but it seems like the lottereum proves that they are serious about working on this project.... now I believe, this is a big project, good luck... thanks for 1000 LTE
I think that the project has a great future. But this project should be carried out by ICO. We need a website and a whole complex of smart contracts.
at the start of the project I was hesitant, but it seems like the lottereum proves that they are serious about working on this project.... now I believe, this is a big project, good luck... thanks for 1000 LTE
Is this airdrop still active?
It seems you're the only one playing an unfair game here. Fudmen/
Look better at this smart contract 0xc8C6A31A4A806d3710A7B38b7B296D2fABCCDBA8 Here the import functions are even duplicated, but it does not bother anyone!
Here, the developer gives out tokens for free, to conduct a lottery for a smart contract test.
Look better at this smart contract 0xc8C6A31A4A806d3710A7B38b7B296D2fABCCDBA8 Here the import functions are even duplicated, but it does not bother anyone!
Here, the developer gives out tokens for free, to conduct a lottery for a smart contract test.
You can see from the code that this function is blocked forever.
Code:
function lockBalanceChanges() {
if (tx.origin==devAddress) { // Dev address
balanceImportsComplete=true;
}
}
if (tx.origin==devAddress) { // Dev address
balanceImportsComplete=true;
}
}
What do you see my dishonest game? I do not want to harm the developer, I'm trying to achieve the truthful terms of the lottery. He hurts himself when he ignores such questions.
In blockchaine, you can trust only the code
Are you talking about ELIX? There, EXOR, and ELIX, the developer can add to any address)))
Here importAddresses is also not blocked by another function, but I think that this was done intentionally, since this smart contract should be linked to other smart contracts of the complex, and there it is not known which interaction conditions will be applied.
Do not pay attention to this fud. He's from some competing project.
Although I see this discussion as meaningless. Judging by the silence in the subject, the developer is cooking something.
I would recommend him to conduct a trial lottery with the number of participants who confirmed participation and after that deploy a smart contract only to those participants who will participate in the lottery.
Here importAddresses is also not blocked by another function, but I think that this was done intentionally, since this smart contract should be linked to other smart contracts of the complex, and there it is not known which interaction conditions will be applied.
Do not pay attention to this fud. He's from some competing project.
Although I see this discussion as meaningless. Judging by the silence in the subject, the developer is cooking something.
I would recommend him to conduct a trial lottery with the number of participants who confirmed participation and after that deploy a smart contract only to those participants who will participate in the lottery.
My friend wants to invest in this project a lot of money, but is afraid to buy a pig in a bag, so he asked me to understand the project.
It is impossible to understand, because there is no initial data. But it just wasn't meant to be....
Sorry dev, I will not bother you again...
Sorry dev, but it seems to me you are playing a dishonest game. Since there is still no code, I can assume that the importAddresses function can add an arbitrary number of tokens to the selected addresses.
This means that this function is not limited in any way and you can add to yourself tokens.
I hope this is not so. Waiting for clarification...
This means that this function is not limited in any way and you can add to yourself tokens.
I hope this is not so. Waiting for clarification...
It seems you're the only one playing an unfair game here. Fudmen/
Look better at this smart contract 0xc8C6A31A4A806d3710A7B38b7B296D2fABCCDBA8 Here the import functions are even duplicated, but it does not bother anyone!
Here, the developer gives out tokens for free, to conduct a lottery for a smart contract test.
Are you talking about ELIX? There, EXOR, and ELIX, the developer can add to any address)))
Here importAddresses is also not blocked by another function, but I think that this was done intentionally, since this smart contract should be linked to other smart contracts of the complex, and there it is not known which interaction conditions will be applied.
Do not pay attention to this fud. He's from some competing project.
Although I see this discussion as meaningless. Judging by the silence in the subject, the developer is cooking something.
I would recommend him to conduct a trial lottery with the number of participants who confirmed participation and after that deploy a smart contract only to those participants who will participate in the lottery.
Sorry dev, but it seems to me you are playing a dishonest game. Since there is still no code, I can assume that the importAddresses function can add an arbitrary number of tokens to the selected addresses.
This means that this function is not limited in any way and you can add to yourself tokens.
I hope this is not so. Waiting for clarification...
This means that this function is not limited in any way and you can add to yourself tokens.
I hope this is not so. Waiting for clarification...
It seems you're the only one playing an unfair game here. Fudmen/
Look better at this smart contract 0xc8C6A31A4A806d3710A7B38b7B296D2fABCCDBA8 Here the import functions are even duplicated, but it does not bother anyone!
Here, the developer gives out tokens for free, to conduct a lottery for a smart contract test.
Sorry dev, but it seems to me you are playing a dishonest game. Since there is still no code, I can assume that the importAddresses function can add an arbitrary number of tokens to the selected addresses.
This means that this function is not limited in any way and you can add to yourself tokens.
I hope this is not so. Waiting for clarification...
This means that this function is not limited in any way and you can add to yourself tokens.
I hope this is not so. Waiting for clarification...
Maybe the developer will go further and deploy a credit smart contract? This would raise interest, I think so.
It was very good!
It was very good!
Give the dev some time this project will have attention it wil be sure!!
Maybe the developer will go further and deploy a credit smart contract? This would raise interest, I think so.
It was very good!
It was very good!
Does anyone know if the TME to LTE exchange is still possible?
We are waiting for some unusual movements of the developer? Great ideas! Consecutive implementation is required. I hope the site will be launched soon!
Whats up with wrong spelling of bounty in both Google form and spreadshit, is it deliberately done?
Responsible for the bounty is not a native speaker. Wrote as this word is pronounced in its language.
Corrected.
Maybe a stupid question:
When is the lottery starting?
Last week we were almost at the needed minimum amount of participants?
When is the lottery starting?
Last week we were almost at the needed minimum amount of participants?
All received tokens, but not all confirmed their participation in the lottery. Without a site it's bad. Not obvious.
Can you check my status Dev? i confirmed the other day but im still at 101?
I have sent you PM with my address to check
I was previously yellow but now i have check both the googledocs and i am not there?
Just tried to participate again but i just get error not enough eth for this transaction - still showing 101 LTE
Can someone help get me on track please
As the full batch of addresses will be collected, the developer imports them into a smart contract. This has already been written.
So i have missed it? Still not really sure whats gone wrong
Whats up with wrong spelling of bounty in both Google form and spreadshit, is it deliberately done?
Responsible for the bounty is not a native speaker. Wrote as this word is pronounced in its language.
Corrected.
Maybe a stupid question:
When is the lottery starting?
Last week we were almost at the needed minimum amount of participants?
When is the lottery starting?
Last week we were almost at the needed minimum amount of participants?
All received tokens, but not all confirmed their participation in the lottery. Without a site it's bad. Not obvious.
Can you check my status Dev? i confirmed the other day but im still at 101?
I have sent you PM with my address to check
I was previously yellow but now i have check both the googledocs and i am not there?
Just tried to participate again but i just get error not enough eth for this transaction - still showing 101 LTE
Can someone help get me on track please
As the full batch of addresses will be collected, the developer imports them into a smart contract. This has already been written.
Whats up with wrong spelling of bounty in both Google form and spreadshit, is it deliberately done?
Responsible for the bounty is not a native speaker. Wrote as this word is pronounced in its language.
Corrected.
Maybe a stupid question:
When is the lottery starting?
Last week we were almost at the needed minimum amount of participants?
When is the lottery starting?
Last week we were almost at the needed minimum amount of participants?
All received tokens, but not all confirmed their participation in the lottery. Without a site it's bad. Not obvious.
Can you check my status Dev? i confirmed the other day but im still at 101?
I have sent you PM with my address to check
I was previously yellow but now i have check both the googledocs and i am not there?
Just tried to participate again but i just get error not enough eth for this transaction - still showing 101 LTE
Can someone help get me on track please
Hi, has this lottery been played already by now? I would like to know whether it turned out that transaction fees had a significant impact on the determination of the winner. Can that be answered?
First 1000 participants must confirm their participation in the lottery.
1000 transactions at one time. I do not think that the cost of gas will affect ....
Once the results are there, it would be really interesting to see who won and have some analytics about the gas paid among all participants. But there are many other prizes
We will see! It is not possible to set the gas limit programmatically for all...
So how exactly does the lottery work? Everyone sends something on his own to the smart contract correct? Then the gas plays a role, doesn't it? Or am I understanding this wrong?
There is a function of buying a lottery ticket in a smart contract. For the prize of 10,000 Lte, the price of gas may be important.
This is what I am saying all the time. If the gas price plays a role, this would not be an impartial lottery and I think there are superior solutions already to gamble on a blockchain if that is the case.
The maximum price for gas is 60 gvei! Therefore, I think that the price of gas is simply an element of the game. Who wants to get a super prize, he will use this element of the game.
Yes, you are certainly right about that. And what about latency? What if someone lives in an area where there are less nodes than somewhere else? Could that be an influencing factor?
Good luck for your project
Silence does not benefit your wallet, gentlemen owners of the token! We confirm participation in the lottery and play!
received 1000 LTE. Thanks dev
Jump to: