Obviously, it is the poorest classes of the population who most often play the lottery and possibly regularly lose small amounts of money. However, even though such people almost never win, we should not treat them as stupid and short-sighted and not smart people. The thing is that by buying a lottery for very little money, such a person buys hope for a possible, albeit almost unbelievable, opportunity to significantly increase his well-being and hope for a completely different, rich and carefree life. And those rare cases when such a dream comes true and which are always told to residents from the media constantly fueling interest in lotteries.
I think that such a cherished dream is still worth the little money that a person spends on the lottery. But, of course, if he buys a lottery ticket not with the last of his money set aside for food and accommodation for his entire family.
Can't agree more. If it's what makes these people happy and it is what keeps them motivated to dream, then I guess it shouldn't be an argument.
While it is really one in a million to won the lottery, these people are eyeing and clinging onto that hope no matter how small. I believe one of their mantra is as long as they are breathing, there is hope. And that's totally true. Although it just depends on how you will use that phrase to justify what you do. It's okay to gamble as long as you have a spare. It just becomes unreasonable if someone is so poor that he can't afford to buy a ticket, but still buys regardless of his financial capabilities because I think that's just plain irresponsible behavior. It's not wrong to buy a lottery ticket once in a while no matter what your social status is, but make sure that you don't sacrifice your necessities and your priorities just to be able to get a lotto ticket. Because winning isn't guaranteed after all.