My account shows cleared just need to only pay the massive fee for never ever received payouts
Topic: LTCGear.com SCAM - Enough is enough, lets get some info together - page 4. (Read 55566 times)
June 22, 2015, 06:53:33 PM
WTB LTCGear accounts! PM me. Thank you! 
Is there a single person that sold an account to this man committed to charity? I'm still in doubt whether he is insane, or doing charity, or a sociopath like Chris, or ... you name it
Or gambler. Nothing wrong with that.
You said it right...
Thats the logic...by the way i think this sir doesn't reach the logic LOL
Lets see whats happen...at least something its happening, and thats not bad at all
Thats the logic...by the way i think this sir doesn't reach the logic LOL
Lets see whats happen...at least something its happening, and thats not bad at all
actually nothing is happening, this is just another part of his scheme ...
You said it right...
Thats the logic...by the way i think this sir doesn't reach the logic LOL
Lets see whats happen...at least something its happening, and thats not bad at all
Thats the logic...by the way i think this sir doesn't reach the logic LOL
Lets see whats happen...at least something its happening, and thats not bad at all
Well i think my account got cleared... LOOOL
Now i have to pay 2.38BTC to resume the minning and the week payments ROFL
So my question is: What about every week that doesn't receive?
This sir its really trolling us!
Now i have to pay 2.38BTC to resume the minning and the week payments ROFL
So my question is: What about every week that doesn't receive?
This sir its really trolling us!
Well, there is another possibility. If your amount due is the same to the amount he owes you, the only thing s missing is a link which makes you pay your maintenance from funds he owes you.
That s the only logic thing to do.
This guy have no clue about business LOL
Really...I owe me more than 2.38BTC actually LOL
Really...I owe me more than 2.38BTC actually LOL
Well i think my account got cleared... LOOOL
Now i have to pay 2.38BTC to resume the minning and the week payments ROFL
So my question is: What about every week that doesn't receive?
This sir its really trolling us!
Now i have to pay 2.38BTC to resume the minning and the week payments ROFL
So my question is: What about every week that doesn't receive?
This sir its really trolling us!
LOL. Still not on my account. I kind of feel left out. What a joke! Anyone who pays is a fool.
Well i think my account got cleared... LOOOL
Now i have to pay 2.38BTC to resume the minning and the week payments ROFL
So my question is: What about every week that doesn't receive?
This sir its really trolling us!
Now i have to pay 2.38BTC to resume the minning and the week payments ROFL
So my question is: What about every week that doesn't receive?
This sir its really trolling us!
So as i understand (Chris got an ewsome englishc).
We need to pay the anual fee to receive the payouts?
We need to pay the anual fee to receive the payouts?
His Engrish is better than my Cromanian.
So as i understand (Chris got an ewsome englishc).
We need to pay the anual fee to receive the payouts?
We need to pay the anual fee to receive the payouts?
Yep
So as i understand (Chris got an ewsome englishc).
We need to pay the anual fee to receive the payouts?
We need to pay the anual fee to receive the payouts?
And for backup purposes:
Quote
Share payments
Interval LTC DRK
2015/05/01 - 2015/05/07 0.01748197 LTC / 1 ASIC Share 0.06106851 DRK / 1 ASIC share
2015/04/24 - 2015/04/30 0.01712051 LTC / 1 ASIC Share 0.06528614 DRK / 1 ASIC share
2015/04/17 - 2015/04/23 0.01715260 LTC / 1 ASIC Share 0.06589402 DRK / 1 ASIC share
Interval LTC DRK
2015/05/01 - 2015/05/07 0.01748197 LTC / 1 ASIC Share 0.06106851 DRK / 1 ASIC share
2015/04/24 - 2015/04/30 0.01712051 LTC / 1 ASIC Share 0.06528614 DRK / 1 ASIC share
2015/04/17 - 2015/04/23 0.01715260 LTC / 1 ASIC Share 0.06589402 DRK / 1 ASIC share
Most of the user accounts not yet cleared, will be be cleared this week.
All new cleared accounts will be required to pay new year maintenance fee (via balance link) before the payments are resumed.
A second option will be available for those users with accounts valued over a threshold which do not want to continue to mine via hosted service.
For such accounts, a share conversion (both kinds) to self maintained hardware (boards equipped with ASIC chips) will be available via account page (details there).
A Q&A session will be conducted, arrangements yet to be made.
All new cleared accounts will be required to pay new year maintenance fee (via balance link) before the payments are resumed.
A second option will be available for those users with accounts valued over a threshold which do not want to continue to mine via hosted service.
For such accounts, a share conversion (both kinds) to self maintained hardware (boards equipped with ASIC chips) will be available via account page (details there).
A Q&A session will be conducted, arrangements yet to be made.
What's the latest news on this?
another new announcement on ltcgear.com
"An announcement regarding accounts not yet cleared will be posted Tuesday, May 12."
i haven't heard of any accounts that have been cleared. has anyone? (except three that got 1 ltc cleared to show that disbursement worked---i do not consider that being cleared accounts)
"An announcement regarding accounts not yet cleared will be posted Tuesday, May 12."
i haven't heard of any accounts that have been cleared. has anyone? (except three that got 1 ltc cleared to show that disbursement worked---i do not consider that being cleared accounts)
I've only seen of just the one, here in this thread. Where did you see the two other occurrences happening?
reply 3081 and other earlier ones on the litcointalk thread (https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=22433.msg265219;topicseen#msg265219) say three. then this is on the thread https://forum.gethashing.com/t/not-paying-ltcgear-discussions/2031/1301; "I spoke to one of the two guys who were there with Reini. He told me he got nothing but 1 LTC. How is that account cleared?
"---response 1269 and it was discussed in the same thread earlier by someone called "Reini" himself. another new announcement on ltcgear.com
"An announcement regarding accounts not yet cleared will be posted Tuesday, May 12."
i haven't heard of any accounts that have been cleared. has anyone? (except three that got 1 ltc cleared to show that disbursement worked---i do not consider that being cleared accounts)
"An announcement regarding accounts not yet cleared will be posted Tuesday, May 12."
i haven't heard of any accounts that have been cleared. has anyone? (except three that got 1 ltc cleared to show that disbursement worked---i do not consider that being cleared accounts)
I've only seen of just the one, here in this thread. Where did you see the two other occurrences happening?
another new announcement on ltcgear.com
"An announcement regarding accounts not yet cleared will be posted Tuesday, May 12."
i haven't heard of any accounts that have been cleared. has anyone? (except three that got 1 ltc cleared to show that disbursement worked---i do not consider that being cleared accounts)
"An announcement regarding accounts not yet cleared will be posted Tuesday, May 12."
i haven't heard of any accounts that have been cleared. has anyone? (except three that got 1 ltc cleared to show that disbursement worked---i do not consider that being cleared accounts)
April 27, 2015, 10:19:54 PM
Old info 1997, guess he really knows stuff;
http://insecure.org/sploits/solaris.passwd.overflow.html
http://insecure.org/sploits/solaris.fdformat.html
http://insecure.org/sploits/solaris.eject.html
http://cypherpunks.venona.com/date/1997/02/msg02624.html
http://www.dataguard.no/bugtraq/1997_1/0313.html
If he was 25y then, he would be about 43y now?
Google also linked one of these e-mailaddresses to http://www.cypherspace.org/
Here http://www.cypherspace.org/adam/cp-stats.txt
Which is probably related to this
http://www.cypherpunks.to/ thru http://cryptome.org/jya/cp-who.htm and http://cryptome.org/jya/
http://insecure.org/sploits/solaris.passwd.overflow.html
http://insecure.org/sploits/solaris.fdformat.html
http://insecure.org/sploits/solaris.eject.html
http://cypherpunks.venona.com/date/1997/02/msg02624.html
http://www.dataguard.no/bugtraq/1997_1/0313.html
If he was 25y then, he would be about 43y now?
Google also linked one of these e-mailaddresses to http://www.cypherspace.org/
Here http://www.cypherspace.org/adam/cp-stats.txt
Which is probably related to this
http://www.cypherpunks.to/ thru http://cryptome.org/jya/cp-who.htm and http://cryptome.org/jya/
you got the wrong guy there is another chris with the same last name that lives in bucharest and works for oracle.
EXACTLY why DOXXING is not allowed (generally).
April 27, 2015, 10:16:52 PM
WTB! Looking to buy LTCGear accounts. PM me. Thanks!
April 27, 2015, 10:08:29 PM
Old info 1997, guess he really knows stuff;
http://insecure.org/sploits/solaris.passwd.overflow.html
http://insecure.org/sploits/solaris.fdformat.html
http://insecure.org/sploits/solaris.eject.html
http://cypherpunks.venona.com/date/1997/02/msg02624.html
http://www.dataguard.no/bugtraq/1997_1/0313.html
If he was 25y then, he would be about 43y now?
Google also linked one of these e-mailaddresses to http://www.cypherspace.org/
Here http://www.cypherspace.org/adam/cp-stats.txt
Which is probably related to this
http://www.cypherpunks.to/ thru http://cryptome.org/jya/cp-who.htm and http://cryptome.org/jya/
http://insecure.org/sploits/solaris.passwd.overflow.html
http://insecure.org/sploits/solaris.fdformat.html
http://insecure.org/sploits/solaris.eject.html
http://cypherpunks.venona.com/date/1997/02/msg02624.html
http://www.dataguard.no/bugtraq/1997_1/0313.html
If he was 25y then, he would be about 43y now?
Google also linked one of these e-mailaddresses to http://www.cypherspace.org/
Here http://www.cypherspace.org/adam/cp-stats.txt
Which is probably related to this
http://www.cypherpunks.to/ thru http://cryptome.org/jya/cp-who.htm and http://cryptome.org/jya/
you got the wrong guy there is another chris with the same last name that lives in bucharest and works for oracle.
Jump to: