Author

Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 891. (Read 2347659 times)

legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1046
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
That's your conclusion.
And I'm not sure that you are honest in your calculation : windows is not free, your modded kernals are not free and the extra electricity consumption (for more TdP) is not free : what is the best now ?

Most of my modded kernals are opensource and free. Take the quark kernal f.ex.. The latest linux optimized version from tvpruvot (1.6.6) is producing 21MHASH on a gtx980ti (cuda 7.5).

My opensource mod is doing 28.5MHASH on the same card and clock on windows. This is a 35% free gain.

10% loss cuda 7.5
10% loss linux
10% loss 64bit
5% loss Made in France
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1046
I am OK with these results (I work witk quark and lyra2rev2, Ubuntu and standard kernel/clock, for lower TdP) :
 Cuda 7.5 is faster rhan Cuda 6.5
 release 1.5.71/70/69 are lower than the previous 1.5.68 (the faster release for me).
Thanks for the table, skunk :-).
 
What hashrates do you get? You can get 10% more coins by using x86 cuda6.5 and windows.
No windows for me, sorry :-).

So the conclusion is:

1. Don't buy the gtx 960 for mining.(100% more power. but only 10% more hashgain than the 750ti in the lyra2v2 algo)
2. Don't use linux. (10% loss)
3. Don't use cuda 7.5(40% loss in the hashrate (neoscrypt)
4. Don't use 64 bit builds. (10% loss)

My modded kernals are made for windows, x86 and cuda 6.5 and they are always the fastest.

That's your conclusion.
And I'm not sure that you are honest in your calculation : windows is not free, your modded kernals are not free and the extra electricity consumption (for more TdP) is not free : what is the best now ?
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 501
I am OK with these results (I work witk quark and lyra2rev2, Ubuntu and standard kernel/clock, for lower TdP) :
 Cuda 7.5 is faster rhan Cuda 6.5
 release 1.5.71/70/69 are lower than the previous 1.5.68 (the faster release for me).
Thanks for the table, skunk :-).
 
What hashrates do you get? You can get 10% more coins by using x86 cuda6.5 and windows.
No windows for me, sorry :-).

So the conclusion is:

1. Don't buy the gtx 960 for mining.(100% more power. but only 10% more hashgain than the 750ti in the lyra2v2 algo)
2. Don't use linux. (10% loss)
3. Don't use cuda 7.5(40% loss in the hashrate (neoscrypt)
4. Don't use 64 bit builds. (10% loss)

My modded kernals are made for windows, x86 and cuda 6.5 and they are always the fastest.


And additionally to this, use NiceHash Miner so you always mine most profitable algorithm.
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
@sp_, I mined Trinity at coinspool last night at around 1.13 GH for about two hours, but it didn't seem like the pool was going to credit me any coins even though i was getting accepts in the miner.  Only diff .0039xxxx was working for me to avoid "above target share" errors.  Should I just leave all my gigahashes there and see what happens?  b/t/w I was using commit number 1124.

The gui of the pool is broken, but you should have coins in your wallet.
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
I am OK with these results (I work witk quark and lyra2rev2, Ubuntu and standard kernel/clock, for lower TdP) :
 Cuda 7.5 is faster rhan Cuda 6.5
 release 1.5.71/70/69 are lower than the previous 1.5.68 (the faster release for me).
Thanks for the table, skunk :-).
 
What hashrates do you get? You can get 10% more coins by using x86 cuda6.5 and windows.
No windows for me, sorry :-).

So the conclusion is:

1. Don't buy the gtx 960 for mining.(100% more power. but only 10% more hashgain than the 750ti in the lyra2v2 algo)
2. Don't use linux. (10% loss)
3. Don't use cuda 7.5(40% loss in the hashrate (neoscrypt)
4. Don't use 64 bit builds. (10% loss)

My modded kernals are made for windows, x86 and cuda 6.5 and they are always the fastest.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1046
I am OK with these results (I work witk quark and lyra2rev2, Ubuntu and standard kernel/clock, for lower TdP) :
 Cuda 7.5 is faster rhan Cuda 6.5
 release 1.5.71/70/69 are lower than the previous 1.5.68 (the faster release for me).
Thanks for the table, skunk :-).
 

What hashrates do you get? You can get 10% more coins by using x86 cuda6.5 and windows.
No windows for me, sorry :-).
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
since i was curious about the evolution of the miner, i've performed some benchmarks on a 960 with various popular building with both cuda 6.5 and 7.5...
Code:
cuda 6.5.19

version    x11       x13   neoscrypt   qubit     quark    lyra2v2
-----------------------------------------------------------------
1.5.61   4896.75   3817.49   307.50   7370.82   9901.39   4975.50
1.5.62   4830.94   3824.48   308.17   7367.76   9832.79   4892.54
1.5.63   4829.33   3827.89   307.98   7329.33   9942.74   5064.79
1.5.64   4830.37   3828.82   305.08   7364.21   9939.97   5022.05
1.5.65   4833.80   3829.02   308.03   7316.46   9935.27   5128.57
1.5.66   4841.17   3828.98   308.19   7309.84   9945.59   4964.04
1.5.67   4843.54   3842.94   304.59   7307.92   9895.11   5311.58
1.5.68   4871.72   3849.88   304.81   7333.10   9897.92   5284.52
1.5.69   4871.32   3846.09   305.23   7316.51   9926.38   5291.48
1.5.70   4850.56   3840.83   300.97   7325.78   9928.29   5274.59
1.5.71   4864.87   3848.43   302.00   7311.15   9938.50   5434.95
HEAD     4859.92   3846.95   279.25   7309.49   9943.24   5442.70


cuda 7.5.18

version    x11       x13   neoscrypt   qubit     quark    lyra2v2
-----------------------------------------------------------------
1.5.61   4545.64   3557.33    na      6833.08   9649.00   5137.34
1.5.62   4548.16   3536.73    na      6765.00   9741.35   5082.66
1.5.63   4549.85   3552.70    na      6766.62   9595.26   5254.05
1.5.64   4469.91   3544.88    na      6766.10   9772.69   5268.54
1.5.65   4537.04   3558.38    na      6760.28   9845.07   5329.07
1.5.66   4379.26   3547.62    na      6816.86   9779.27   5404.03
1.5.67   4572.08   3575.58    na      6764.94   9649.66   5782.35
1.5.68   4568.98   3576.28    na      6763.20  10016.10   5752.82
1.5.69   4564.96   3576.59    na      6760.18   9971.33   5747.59
1.5.70   4566.48   3564.19    na      6775.10   9936.68   5737.31
1.5.71   4529.04   3568.78    na      6756.01   9961.33   5505.06
HEAD     4564.34   3580.72    na      6748.33  10013.80   5506.37
edit: this is under linux

So neoscrypt isn't working on cuda 7.5? Last time I checked it was fine, just 40% slower :-)
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
I am OK with these results (I work witk quark and lyra2rev2, Ubuntu and standard kernel/clock, for lower TdP) :
 Cuda 7.5 is faster rhan Cuda 6.5
 release 1.5.71/70/69 are lower than the previous 1.5.68 (the faster release for me).
Thanks for the table, skunk :-).
 

What hashrates do you get? You can get 10% more coins by using x86 cuda6.5 and windows.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1046
since i was curious about the evolution of the miner, i've performed some benchmarks on a 960 with various popular building with both cuda 6.5 and 7.5...
Code:
cuda 6.5.19

version    x11       x13   neoscrypt   qubit     quark    lyra2v2
-----------------------------------------------------------------
1.5.61   4896.75   3817.49   307.50   7370.82   9901.39   4975.50
1.5.62   4830.94   3824.48   308.17   7367.76   9832.79   4892.54
1.5.63   4829.33   3827.89   307.98   7329.33   9942.74   5064.79
1.5.64   4830.37   3828.82   305.08   7364.21   9939.97   5022.05
1.5.65   4833.80   3829.02   308.03   7316.46   9935.27   5128.57
1.5.66   4841.17   3828.98   308.19   7309.84   9945.59   4964.04
1.5.67   4843.54   3842.94   304.59   7307.92   9895.11   5311.58
1.5.68   4871.72   3849.88   304.81   7333.10   9897.92   5284.52
1.5.69   4871.32   3846.09   305.23   7316.51   9926.38   5291.48
1.5.70   4850.56   3840.83   300.97   7325.78   9928.29   5274.59
1.5.71   4864.87   3848.43   302.00   7311.15   9938.50   5434.95
HEAD     4859.92   3846.95   279.25   7309.49   9943.24   5442.70


cuda 7.5.18

version    x11       x13   neoscrypt   qubit     quark    lyra2v2
-----------------------------------------------------------------
1.5.61   4545.64   3557.33    na      6833.08   9649.00   5137.34
1.5.62   4548.16   3536.73    na      6765.00   9741.35   5082.66
1.5.63   4549.85   3552.70    na      6766.62   9595.26   5254.05
1.5.64   4469.91   3544.88    na      6766.10   9772.69   5268.54
1.5.65   4537.04   3558.38    na      6760.28   9845.07   5329.07
1.5.66   4379.26   3547.62    na      6816.86   9779.27   5404.03
1.5.67   4572.08   3575.58    na      6764.94   9649.66   5782.35
1.5.68   4568.98   3576.28    na      6763.20  10016.10   5752.82
1.5.69   4564.96   3576.59    na      6760.18   9971.33   5747.59
1.5.70   4566.48   3564.19    na      6775.10   9936.68   5737.31
1.5.71   4529.04   3568.78    na      6756.01   9961.33   5505.06
HEAD     4564.34   3580.72    na      6748.33  10013.80   5506.37
edit: this is under linux
I am OK with these results (I work witk quark and lyra2rev2, Ubuntu and standard kernel/clock, for lower TdP) :
 Cuda 7.5 is faster rhan Cuda 6.5
 release 1.5.71/70/69 are lower than the previous 1.5.68 (the faster release for me).

Thanks for the table, skunk :-).
 
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
Most coins not supported by Multipools or Nicehash have really low market caps and difficulty. The moment you hop on them they get squashed. Looks like there is a total of 1.5BTC buys for Joincoin.

5,5BTC worth of joincoins are mined everyday. The 1.5BTC support seems to hold. The coin will go POS soon, and people are investing.
full member
Activity: 253
Merit: 100
Sp
 
what hashrate on your Pentablake mod for the 750 ti?

is the miner available?

edit

all good noticed the info above  Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
Down and down everything goes, this is the worst I've seen algos in a long time...

Thats why you need to mine algos that aren't supported by nicehash / multipools..

I have continued to mod pentablake now. 90MHASH on the gtx970..

the opensource does 15MHASH on the 750ti.

So with my modded kernal 1 gtx970 is producing the same as 6 750ti's running the opensource kernal.

@200 MHASH i get around 82 Joincoins/day (0.02BTC / day)

Pentablake is X5. (5 rounds of (blake-512 16 rounds))


Most coins not supported by Multipools or Nicehash have really low market caps and difficulty. The moment you hop on them they get squashed. Looks like there is a total of 1.5BTC buys for Joincoin.
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
Down and down everything goes, this is the worst I've seen algos in a long time...

Thats why you need to mine algos that aren't supported by nicehash / multipools..

I have continued to mod pentablake now. 90MHASH on the gtx970..

the opensource does 15MHASH on the 750ti.

So with my modded kernal 1 gtx970 is producing the same as 6 750ti's running the opensource kernal.

@200 MHASH i get around 82 Joincoins/day (0.02BTC / day)

Pentablake is X5. (5 rounds of (blake-512 16 rounds))


The 80MHASH@970 kernal is for sale.  it does 32MHASH on the 750ti. (More than 100% faster than the open source)

The price is 0.3BTC

pm for details.
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
Down and down everything goes, this is the worst I've seen algos in a long time...
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
Try -i 12.
member
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
What intensity value were you using to hit 5.4MH/s on 750Ti apart from +200 core/mem overclock?
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
since i was curious about the evolution of the miner, i've performed some benchmarks on a 960 with various popular building with both cuda 6.5 and 7.5...
Code:
cuda 6.5.19

version    x11       x13   neoscrypt   qubit     quark    lyra2v2
-----------------------------------------------------------------
1.5.61   4896.75   3817.49   307.50   7370.82   9901.39   4975.50
1.5.62   4830.94   3824.48   308.17   7367.76   9832.79   4892.54
1.5.63   4829.33   3827.89   307.98   7329.33   9942.74   5064.79
1.5.64   4830.37   3828.82   305.08   7364.21   9939.97   5022.05
1.5.65   4833.80   3829.02   308.03   7316.46   9935.27   5128.57
1.5.66   4841.17   3828.98   308.19   7309.84   9945.59   4964.04
1.5.67   4843.54   3842.94   304.59   7307.92   9895.11   5311.58
1.5.68   4871.72   3849.88   304.81   7333.10   9897.92   5284.52
1.5.69   4871.32   3846.09   305.23   7316.51   9926.38   5291.48
1.5.70   4850.56   3840.83   300.97   7325.78   9928.29   5274.59
1.5.71   4864.87   3848.43   302.00   7311.15   9938.50   5434.95
HEAD     4859.92   3846.95   279.25   7309.49   9943.24   5442.70


cuda 7.5.18

version    x11       x13   neoscrypt   qubit     quark    lyra2v2
-----------------------------------------------------------------
1.5.61   4545.64   3557.33    na      6833.08   9649.00   5137.34
1.5.62   4548.16   3536.73    na      6765.00   9741.35   5082.66
1.5.63   4549.85   3552.70    na      6766.62   9595.26   5254.05
1.5.64   4469.91   3544.88    na      6766.10   9772.69   5268.54
1.5.65   4537.04   3558.38    na      6760.28   9845.07   5329.07
1.5.66   4379.26   3547.62    na      6816.86   9779.27   5404.03
1.5.67   4572.08   3575.58    na      6764.94   9649.66   5782.35
1.5.68   4568.98   3576.28    na      6763.20  10016.10   5752.82
1.5.69   4564.96   3576.59    na      6760.18   9971.33   5747.59
1.5.70   4566.48   3564.19    na      6775.10   9936.68   5737.31
1.5.71   4529.04   3568.78    na      6756.01   9961.33   5505.06
HEAD     4564.34   3580.72    na      6748.33  10013.80   5506.37
edit: this is under linux

What card is this (memclock/coreclock)? And how long did you run the benchmark

You get bether rates under windows x86 builds. Asus strix 960 should do above 6MHASH on lyra2v2 and 10.7 in quark. (cuda 6.5)

Qubit and neoscrypt has been untouched in the last 10 releases. (compute 5.2 cards) They are running the exact same kernals as in release 61.

For more accurate benchmarking you should use the --timelimit option.

ccminer -a quark --benchmark --timelimit 500  (will mine for 500 seconds and then exit)

If your card trottle, (hashrate is decreasing over time) The gpu-clock is downlocked automaticly and hashrate is lost. To avoid trottling reduce the intenstiy, increase the tdp in the bios, increase the temp limits of the card. (overclock) make sure that you always run in p0 mode.

Interesting that my junior asus strix 750ti with +200 on the mem-clock/gpu-clock is almost running faster than your gtx 960 in lyra. I get 5.4MHASH.

(640 shaders vs 1024)
full member
Activity: 181
Merit: 100
This is kind of a vs2013 question.  I installed cuda 7.5, so now I have both on the pc.  How to I tell vs to use 7.5 instead of default which is 6.5?
full member
Activity: 162
Merit: 102
what should i use for settings on lyra2REv2 on nicehash
i tried --diff .5 like i use on gimmiecoins but i get share above target so i tried lower settings and at .01 nothing gets accepted and everything i tried above goes same problem

ccminer.exe -a lyra2v2 -o stratum+tcp://lyra2re.usa.nicehash.com:3342 -u address -p x -t 1 -d gtx750ti --diff .011

NICEHASH ALGO NAME--

NiceHash does not require a "diff" setting.  This was argued out in the thread after the release of Lyra 2 revision 2.  NiceHash uses the SGminer syntax for naming their Lyra2v2 pool!

Your launch string should be as follows:

ccminer.exe -a lyra2v2 -o stratum+tcp://lyra2rev2.usa.nicehash.com:3347 -u address -p x -t 1 -d gtx750ti

In your string above, there is a typo.  You called the algo correctly for CCminer, but the pool name was not correct.  No difficulty correction is needed.


--scryptr

lol thx yea guess i pulled the wrong stratum when setting up just now
quark payouts just dropped below what id consider worth it so switching to lyra
all working well now and all 750ti cards running higher than i remember on the 71 release at 4.4-4.5Mh lyra2REv2
next time ill make sure i double check all settings thx again
Jump to: