Author

Topic: [ANN][XCP] Counterparty - Pioneering Peer-to-Peer Finance - Official Thread - page 359. (Read 1276928 times)

legendary
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
its not an argument, its just a different perspective on the fact its hard to move around XCP, to do with supply and demand , and your obviously mis interpreting my point from it
i want a gui out as i want cheap coins

 so i am not sure your point here.
member
Activity: 114
Merit: 10
I'm disappointed at the ease of use after this long.  I burned with the web wallet but I'm still struggling to actually move my XCP anywhere or do anything with it.  That's definitely holding the value of this down...real people can't do anything except speculate while it's sitting in an exchange.


on the other hand it Equally Might be holding the price up as its not so easy to move the coins into exchanges- , counter wallet is out soonish, not long too wait and find out

Sorry but that is a completely ridiculous argument.  That means that you're hoping that locking people's money up who aren't tech savvy enough to sell it is a good idea for the overall health of the coin.  It's frankly absurd that in 3 months a decent GUI can't be produced; or even Windows based instructions for Boottle.
legendary
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
I'm disappointed at the ease of use after this long.  I burned with the web wallet but I'm still struggling to actually move my XCP anywhere or do anything with it.  That's definitely holding the value of this down...real people can't do anything except speculate while it's sitting in an exchange.


on the other hand it Equally Might be holding the price up as its not so easy to move the coins into exchanges- , counter wallet is out soonish, not long too wait and find out
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
why is not the ideal solution?
how long does counter party have to implement it? more so, the question,
when is luke JR getting rid of multisig?
how quickly qould it take development wise to change to something like that miltisig p2sh


1) The implementation complexity is greater than with OP_RETURN.
2) The fees are higher, too.
3) You are still creating outputs that are not immediately provably prunable.
4) It's generally hackish.

jgarzik, for one, would probably dislike the idea of using P2SH because of 3) and 4), I'd guess.

On the other hand, both P2SH and bare multi-sig give us a lot more space to work with than 80 bytes, so in the long run, unless the size of the OP_RETURN space gets increased dramatically, we also have a significant incentive to keep putting our data in fake ECDSA public keys.

There's no rush at all to move away bare multi-sig, which it has not been decided to retire anyway. It won't take long to start using other encoding methods, and I'm working on this (including pay-to-pubkeyhash) right now anyway.

PhantomPhreak,
are you in contact with the btc core devs so that there will no be any kind of negative surprise that Counterparty can not adapt to fast enough?
member
Activity: 114
Merit: 10
I'm disappointed at the ease of use after this long.  I burned with the web wallet but I'm still struggling to actually move my XCP anywhere or do anything with it.  That's definitely holding the value of this down...real people can't do anything except speculate while it's sitting in an exchange.
full member
Activity: 209
Merit: 148
hi !

before excuse my english... i m french !

during XCP ipo, i proof of burn 4 times btc in XCP on the same address but never above 1 btc in tot.

today, i import my XCP on boottle xcp great but just the first transaction of four appaear in boottle xcp... Cry

how can i credit the others transactions ?

Thks for your help.

JMTOOCOOL

have you checked your address with the http://blockscan.com ?


Yes, on blockscan.com, my 4 transactions appear on my btc address. The XCP sum of four transactions are correctly.

And you still get total balance in bottle xcp?

my total balance in bottle xcp is just about my first transaction, not the third others

Use the command line tool and not the Bootle XCP. Can you see the 4 transactions. (were the total of all 4 transactions < 1 BTC).

If you got the Windows build of boottle, You can skip installing the Daemon from scratch by just holding down SHIFT while clicking on the icon.  Then you can type counterpartyd -h to see the available commands
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
hi !

before excuse my english... i m french !

during XCP ipo, i proof of burn 4 times btc in XCP on the same address but never above 1 btc in tot.

today, i import my XCP on boottle xcp great but just the first transaction of four appaear in boottle xcp... Cry

how can i credit the others transactions ?

Thks for your help.

JMTOOCOOL

have you checked your address with the http://blockscan.com ?


Yes, on blockscan.com, my 4 transactions appear on my btc address. The XCP sum of four transactions are correctly.

And you still get total balance in bottle xcp?

my total balance in bottle xcp is just about my first transaction, not the third others

Use the command line tool and not the Bootle XCP. Can you see the 4 transactions. (were the total of all 4 transactions < 1 BTC).
newbie
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
hi !

before excuse my english... i m french !

during XCP ipo, i proof of burn 4 times btc in XCP on the same address but never above 1 btc in tot.

today, i import my XCP on boottle xcp great but just the first transaction of four appaear in boottle xcp... Cry

how can i credit the others transactions ?

Thks for your help.

JMTOOCOOL

have you checked your address with the http://blockscan.com ?


Yes, on blockscan.com, my 4 transactions appear on my btc address. The XCP sum of four transactions are correctly.

And you still get total balance in bottle xcp?

my total balance in bottle xcp is just about my first transaction, not the third others
member
Activity: 61
Merit: 10
hi !

before excuse my english... i m french !

during XCP ipo, i proof of burn 4 times btc in XCP on the same address but never above 1 btc in tot.

today, i import my XCP on boottle xcp great but just the first transaction of four appaear in boottle xcp... Cry

how can i credit the others transactions ?

Thks for your help.

JMTOOCOOL

have you checked your address with the http://blockscan.com ?


Yes, on blockscan.com, my 4 transactions appear on my btc address. The XCP sum of four transactions are correctly.

And you still get total balance in bottle xcp?
newbie
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
hi !

before excuse my english... i m french !

during XCP ipo, i proof of burn 4 times btc in XCP on the same address but never above 1 btc in tot.

today, i import my XCP on boottle xcp great but just the first transaction of four appaear in boottle xcp... Cry

how can i credit the others transactions ?

Thks for your help.

JMTOOCOOL

have you checked your address with the http://blockscan.com ?


Yes, on blockscan.com, my 4 transactions appear on my btc address. The XCP sum of four transactions are correctly.
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 300
Counterparty Chief Scientist and Co-Founder
why is not the ideal solution?
how long does counter party have to implement it? more so, the question,
when is luke JR getting rid of multisig?
how quickly qould it take development wise to change to something like that miltisig p2sh


1) The implementation complexity is greater than with OP_RETURN.
2) The fees are higher, too.
3) You are still creating outputs that are not immediately provably prunable.
4) It's generally hackish.

jgarzik, for one, would probably dislike the idea of using P2SH because of 3) and 4), I'd guess.

On the other hand, both P2SH and bare multi-sig give us a lot more space to work with than 80 bytes, so in the long run, unless the size of the OP_RETURN space gets increased dramatically, we also have a significant incentive to keep putting our data in fake ECDSA public keys.

There's no rush at all to move away bare multi-sig, which it has not been decided to retire anyway. It won't take long to start using other encoding methods, and I'm working on this (including pay-to-pubkeyhash) right now anyway.
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1002
Bitcoin is new, makes sense to hodl.
hi !

before excuse my english... i m french !

during XCP ipo, i proof of burn 4 times btc in XCP on the same address but never above 1 btc in tot.

today, i import my XCP on boottle xcp great but just the first transaction of four appaear in boottle xcp... Cry

how can i credit the others transactions ?

Thks for your help.

JMTOOCOOL

have you checked your address with the http://blockscan.com ?
legendary
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
why is not the ideal solution?
how long does counter party have to implement it? more so, the question,
when is luke JR getting rid of multisig?
how quickly qould it take development wise to change to to multi sig p2sh
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 300
Counterparty Chief Scientist and Co-Founder
Are the counterparty developers opposed to moving from bare multisig to encoding within P2SH multisig scriptsig inputs?

If so, why?

If not, problem solved?

I'm not at all opposed to doing it. It's not, however, by anyone's account, the ideal solution.
sr. member
Activity: 276
Merit: 251
Are the counterparty developers opposed to moving from bare multisig to encoding within P2SH multisig scriptsig inputs?

If so, why?

If not, problem solved?
newbie
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
hi !

before excuse my english... i m french !

during XCP ipo, i proof of burn 4 times btc in XCP on the same address but never above 1 btc in tot.

today, i import my XCP on boottle xcp great but just the first transaction of four appaear in boottle xcp... Cry

how can i credit the others transactions ?

Thks for your help.

JMTOOCOOL
member
Activity: 111
Merit: 10
Digitizing Valuable Hard Assets with Crypto
JahPowerBit, developer of BootleXCP and pyrpcwallet, will join Counterparty full-time.

https://www.counterparty.co/fulltime-developer-counterparty/

+1

Congratulations Jah and Counterparty Devs. Excellent work! A very logical and great move for XCP.
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 500
JahPowerBit, developer of BootleXCP and pyrpcwallet, will join Counterparty full-time.

https://www.counterparty.co/fulltime-developer-counterparty/

Wow !

Excellente décision Jah !!
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
JahPowerBit, developer of BootleXCP and pyrpcwallet, has joined Counterparty full-time.

https://www.counterparty.co/fulltime-developer-counterparty/
+1 Yeah
Correction: JahPower bit will join the counterparty team soon (instead of has already joined)
hero member
Activity: 647
Merit: 510
Counterpartying
JahPowerBit, developer of BootleXCP and pyrpcwallet, will join Counterparty full-time.

https://www.counterparty.co/fulltime-developer-counterparty/
Jump to: