Topic: ⚡MARQUISE $MUSEUM - Generation 5 asset crypto (Read 24596 times)

Can produce global top 100 rank on $200 000 to $500 000 cash investment

Market cap will be pumped and sustained from $40 000 to $500m+ up to $5bn over 12 months using staking rewards from WX pool emissions and NEXO wallet USDT APR.


This is the monetization plan:

1. $200 000 to $500 000 base capitalization from new partner can be private buyer or institutional, minimum $20 000 brackets

2. Allocate funds into waves/nexo wallet/wx to produce APR profit

3. Collect capital interest routed into m2/waves market to sustain x100 000 pump over the coming 12 months

4. Build volume to activate cmc tracking

5. Deploy NFTs on waves and begin the erc-20 market making phase with corresponding NFTs and Vault on Ethereum

6. Partner with Binance and Artbasel, Christies

7. Monetize $500m paper profit by selling NFTs and vault shares to the public

https://medium.com/@MarquiseMuseum/the-marquise-museum-of-contemporary-art-8cc9127a00ab
https://medium.com/@MarquiseMuseum/gpt-4-o-assessment-75297fc6ec89

Marquise Museum proudly presents a cornerstone of this project with the publication of a teen romance adventure made in 2014, later translated into audio book by Lula Rae. The Audio Version will be republished in the future:

https://amazon.com/dp/B0DNTPJRHF

Business plan v 1.0

https://static1.squarespace.com/static/59f96db06957da0ad5ec0089/t/67322c77f9c6490bf8422616/1731341432800/MM+business+plan+v1.0.pdf

Royal library of Sweden retains a physical copy since 2018:

https://libris.kb.se/bib/21731534

ISBN is a unique numeric identifier for published media.

9789198369403 is the identifier for Pimp Fashion cryptobook referenced both by ISBN and title in Bitcointalk screenshots:

Page 3:
https://docdro.id/fbY6USO

Here is the unedited and still working 6 year old hyperlink to the book containing all artworks although not all of these originals were included in the NFT migration:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.30480040

These are the same images that are today integrated with the vaults on Eth, XCP and Waves:
https://www.marquisemuseum.com/

I also have an email from 2018 containing a full Binance listing application with alot of technical token and art association. It can be forwarded to prospective buyers.

ROI on the waves vault and v.2 NFT assets is easier to calculate now that the wx/m2 pool is operational as it receives wx emissions based on pool weight. ROI on $100k invested is 5 years and if wx goes up it can be a few months.

There is no onchain association except the website link in token description. There are several offchain references starting in 2017 mainly on bitcointalk. In essence this is not a vintage NFT it is ABT and it is the only Art backed ABT.

Most of the ABTs from 2017 are gold or fiat backed and if mine were too I would not make a claim that it was worth anything.
https://www.coingecko.com/en/categories/asset-backed-tokens

Vault utility stems from DeFi properties, royalty airdrops from NFT sales, IPO and tokenization/swap mechanics with LTV configurables similar to Punkbasic.

10 Million M2 from the waves vault can be swapped for rarible NFT priced at $100 000 and vice versa. The vault tokens are directly backed by the NFT supply consisting of 30 published and 30 unpublished artworks with 2017 certification. They were actually made in 2015-2016.

All ERC NFTs are minted with the same wallet that made the original token vault and retains 99.99% of that supply to this day. Which is yet another value enhancing continuity & provenance step.
0xC742BcE0c13E31F2BBEC650D3A26058b64038832

I have not yet decided where to mint the waves NFTs.

ps. Here is another picture from 2018 connecting the art with the tokens: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.35218483
It's Jörmungandr #3

https://rarible.com/token/0xc9154424b823b10579895ccbe442d41b9abd96ed:90128172362037492596080030408277925649239380377171115284703702150830520008708?tab=overview


Jörmungandr #3 has a quite interesting backstory where it was misinterpreted as a Neo Nazi Motif. My intent with this installment was a further exploration of the Jörmungandr subset within Pimp Fashion to capture kinetic dynamics and the illusion of movement in static imagery.

Jörmungandr #1 (which is awaiting republication but can be viewed in the link to the book in this topic on page 10) & #2 share this thematic whereas the kinetic illusion of #3 is the fusing hands, the kinetic of #1 is the pursuit of the symbolic midgård serpent in the shape of a bicycle tyre. In #2 it is the cogwheel.

All three of them also reflect on the mythology of the midgård battle between Thor and the Serpent. In #3 Thor is readying for imminent battle with Mjölnir on standby. In #1 the Midgård serpent is in phallic pursuit of the main Heroine of Pimp Fashion but it can also be interpreted as her guardian. The mythological motif in #2 is a bit different than the others because it reflects back on the artist in a self portrait as Odin/Antichrist.

The themes I incorporated into Pimp Fashion are expressive heavyweights with layers of contemporary and historical symbolism. The artistic merit compared to other crypto "art"/memes from 2017 is leagues above the rest because of my education as an artist. However I must admit that cryptopunks did capture a post modern attitude in its simplicity and vapidness that does express artistic merit and it also resonated with its contemporary audience. But more importantly the technical proficiency on the backend is more valued than artistry with NFT collectors. Especially true for Mitchell Chan.

The unique properties of this asset makes it without the shadow of a doubt in the bluechip category of vintage crypto art: $500m+ market value. However as a bastard this is not within my reach. It must first be sold for pennies on the dollar to a jet setter who will then be able to extract its complete alchemical value.

This project is irrelevant to the public at large it was always designated as a high brow curiosity and repository for the ruling class/institutional. There are only 60x3 original NFTs so scalability at maturity is only a few dozen to a few hundred users.


Update:

Found a direct connection between XCP vault and the art from january 2018:

https://forums.counterparty.io/t/ticker-marquimuseum-now-in-float-on-counterparty-platform-pegged-to-xcp-1-1/4396

Moontime if I can get financed with $30-$50k. Or 2.5m+ gwx pool vote.
https://wx.network/governance/wx_distribution_voting


UPDATE:

100% of #ERC20 vault supply was added to the Uniswap liquidity pool

https://matcha.xyz/tokens/ethereum/0xa4daae9552cd2390ee1dcdd1a76bc8d0eea22609

~$4200 $USDT = 1 M2 Vault token

1000 tokens can be swapped for NFT

Max supply 66 000 tokens/66 NFTs
Market cap interval $280m to $5bn

Update:

Another link with art+token references but its january 2021 or september 2020 not sure:
https://archive.org/details/vikingm1_20210121/mode/2up

It was before the NFT hype but then again this was never a vintage NFT, it is ABT with art as the backing asset, migrated to NFT in march 21.

You received a bid of $1M for 49% of the collection and you didn't take it? 

The ERC20 tokens being from 2017 is a good start, and it appears the images are also from around that time, but last I looked at it I didn't see anything that necessarily connected the art with the tokens on the blockchain or elsewhere.

What would help is links to something that proves the "off-chain provenance" of the artwork being associated with the tokens.

Q4 status:

-There is a new wx/M2 liquidity pool:
https://wx.network/liquiditypools/pools/Marquise%20Museum_WX/deposit

-400m M2 tokens from the waves vault are for sale in wx/m2 market for 4.2m wx ($25-$50k USDT)
https://wx.network/trading/spot/BS1KFNR8zrXKBEWdUUvpaP6G57Hic3aESkwK7qQKdLpB_WX

-Daily wx emission weight is 4000 on 2.5m gwx pool vote ($50) if you stake 90%+ of the wx/m2 share. 2.5m gwx costs $40k to obtain
https://wx.network/governance/wx_distribution_voting

ROI on $100k cash buyout is 5 years excluding calculated market growth from cmc activation, christies and artbasel partnership which is expected to be worth $100m+. If wx goes from $10m to $100m cap your ROI is only a few months as the monthly emission from pool will be worth $15k.

$100k cash buyout will also produce a paper profit of x5000-x50 000 from market cap base pump at $20k to $500m up to $5bn over 6 to 12 months. The sustained pump liquidity will be obtained from wx/m2 wx emissions ($1500/month). This $1500 will grow to $150 000 per month if wx goes to back to 2022 cap of $1bn compared to todays $10m.

After the pump to $500m we will leverage a cmc activation (top 100 ranking) along with artbasel and christies partnership marketed as the first crypto art vault with 2017 timestamp and high definition art catalogue with design similarity and functionality to cryptopunks and autoglyphs. Generational Monetization potential $500m+ as a pioneering crypto asset in vein of Warhol/Picasso.

https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/marquise-museum/
https://www.christies.com/en/artists/cryptopunks?lotavailability=All&sortby=relevance
https://www.christies.com/en/stories/a-to-z-nft-collecting-guide-b9f875b864c7488eb094595ced7d60cd

Marquise Museum NFT collection $2m SCC certified appraisal (june 2021) when cryptopunks reference was trading at $100m floor (today $1bn):
https://docdro.id/d42ND6g

*All vintage NFTs are erc-20 the difference is in hyperlinking and contract custom coding. I also have an ERC-20 vault minted in 2017.
*My project is an ABT with similarity to vintage art NFTs. Most ABTs are backed by gold and fiat, mine is backed by art and its the only one of its kind to do so. This is a primary innovation by Marquise Museum along with the first to market vaulting system for art based crypto assets (patent study 1800-14-04).
https://www.coingecko.com/en/categories/asset-backed-tokens

Nice project, and it seems like a very perspective, for a long term investments.

On a whole waveplatform, this M2 asset is the most liquid asset, which really allowed me to get some ROI, from my fucking investments in this scam-platform!

Thank you for your buyback, MarquiseMuseum.
I'll withdraw the received motherfucker's WAVES, ASAP, because I know it's really not cost even a piece of shit,
and maybe after long-term torment with this rat's pidorussians, I'll just buy the large dick for this fucking pennies, to suck it everyday.

New collection:
https://opensea.io/collection/sdchimeras
https://opensea.io/collection/sdfractals

Charity Collection from 21:
https://opensea.io/collection/indian-nations-community-fund

what happens to polarity.exchange ?

I am having problems with the two way swap function of the tokens because in the original patent filing redeemed tokens were specifically burnt and not recycled.

The issue with two way swap function and token recycling is what happens when NFTs are sold to third parties in the case of fixed supply. Token recycling is not a problem with reissuability but that in itself is a liability for value creation, non reissuability is a much stronger value proposition.

The two way swap function is useful for NFT owners who need rapid liquidity but the LTV is only 15-20% on such swap.

So in order to adhere to the original system design which is important for value building, in my mind it is difficult to reuse tokens for public trading on exchanges once redeemed for NFTs.

There are some 1 time recycling options in case of future minting of previously unpublished art of which I have a few dozen but it is only a 1 time recycling event for special publications.

So there is some recycling possible but essentially we are looking at a high degree of deflation through burning once tokens are redeemed so they will not re enter public trading. Like I said 15-20% of supply can be reintroduced if the NFT owner needs LTV lending but this mechanic can also be managed on NFT platforms or OTC using USDT. There is no apparent benefit of vault token intermediation because NFT platforms like rarible have a functional two way economic ledger between buyer and seller. Whereas when I created the system these NFT platforms did not yet exist and as such there was a greater need for vault tokens as a liquidity mechanism.

The reintroduction of a deflationary/burn step when swapping tokens for NFT will alleviate the logistical problems I encountered when attempting to integrate a two way swapping solution in the past year.

I would say the benefit of buying tokens instead of NFT right now is that the tokens are much lower priced compared to the NFT but this is only for waves supply as the ERC-20 is 100% in private Museum custody since 2017.

It is not viable or an intended part of the original design to utilize tokens for royalty payments on future aftermarket NFT sales. This is too easily circumvented through OTC dealing between NFT traders. It may be practical now that the two way swap mechanic was rolled back but it was not part of the original patent method and so it does not add legacy value it is more then behaving like a security/stock. The problem like I said is the consistency of aftermarket royalty cashflows because traders can circumvent it and there are indications that they are doing so when looking at punk sales history of which many are transfers between accounts and not sales.

So how will this rollback affect waves market?

It removes market uncertainty in how the token backing will be sustainable since no unbacked and redeemed tokens will re-enter circulation. This will concretize the value proposition of the tokens as a function of single use swapping. It also decreases fractional utility because of fixed swap rates and for this reason (high supply deflation) it may not be suitable for third party exchange listings.

I would expect a more fluent price inflation of the token base with such dramatic deflation (which is how the original idea was designed), but also lower long term liquidity which is a negative indicator for public trading. Because the behavioural correlation between tokens and NFTs will increase and NFTs as base asset are more illiquid.

It does not detract from fractional token utility on a small scale such as intermittent airdrops but it does diminish or remove speculative utility which in my opinion is the most beneficial long term outcome for the project. Because it is simply not viable to integrate two way swapping except for 15-20% LTV for investors who already own the NFTs but like I said this utility is diluted because of holistic NFT platforms and OTC.

It is possible to flip M2 with fractional amounts if you expect value increase of token base from future whale buyers with intent to swap full amounts for NFTs but there is no intrinsic reason to holding fractional shares. And it was this implementation (fractionalization) that was misleading myself as I wanted to expand the user base.

This style of project relies alot on legacy metrics and the mantra less is more applies in this case. Even though it will exclude new market segments.

Japan $20bn+:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tadashi_Yanai
Help my aunt million dollar business deal

France elite $40bn+
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fran%C3%A7ois-Henri_Pinault
Chevalier de la Légion d'Honneur

Help my young cousin million dollar model contract:
https://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/news-photo/nine-durso-and-tomas-maier-wearing-bottega-veneta-attend-news-photo/610193062
https://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/news-photo/francois-henri-pinault-and-tomas-maier-attend-the-dinner-news-photo/610193086


All these billionaires same friends, intelligence community deep state etc.

only help each other, children must be born inside marriage very important.

Unlimited power/money/network/own all world since 10 000 bc.

Lazard help again my young cousin in 2015 enter elite school in Lyon:
http://institutens.fr/

L’Institut est un organisme de formation agréé.

Il compte parmi ses adhérents des entreprises aussi diverses que la Caisse des Dépôts, Hermès International, Lazard Frères, MBDA, L’Oréal, BNP Paribas Cardif, LVMH…

https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jorf/id/JORFTEXT000031854375
Série lettres et arts
M. Gustav ABOLGASSEMI.
Mme Alice ALCARAS.
Mme Nina AYACHI.
Mme Elodie BÉNARD.
Mme Jodie BESSONNET.
Mme Lou BOUHAMIDI.
M. Julien BRETAUDEAU.
M. Adrien BRUSSOW.
Mme Salomé BURSTEIN.
Mme Sophie CACHERA.
Mme Ninon CHENIVESSE.
Mme Sara CUSSET.
M. Pablo DIAZ.
Mme Nine D'URSO.

So what i do with this information all this corruption?

I make this girl in my art:
https://rarible.com/token/0xc9154424b823b10579895ccbe442d41b9abd96ed:90128172362037492596080030408277925649239380377171115284703702150830520008706?tab=overview


This art project did not simply come from a vapid impulse in the sleeping mind of a street plebeian. It is a cultural heavy weight and I hope it can become part of a revolutionary counter movement similar to Germania and Revelations.

Well, if them really not able to pay, they are really not reachest, because they just not able to pay.
So they are not interesting, and market can payback my funds, which was been stolen. But a real market.
Just need to make a real fucking market. Is it so hard?
Every time, I just see only your orders there, on this shit-platform, and nowhere else... You not let M2 to grow, and idk why.
Maybe you afraid something, or maybe you are really the word with bold font, lol.
Anyway, I'm open on OTC. Contact me PM, anyone.

I understand your situation I have a half dozen artists who did get paid for their work in 2018 but are also waiting for payday from this project. It is unfortunate but it appears very stuck I don't have any good solutions.

My family richest in world but I am bastard so they don't help me. So I make this art to comment on jet set injustice.

People like us will never get ahead crypto trader, we must either fight the war or fade into oblivion and poverty.

Cousin $2b+:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alejandro_Santo_Domingo
Owner SAB Miller global brwery

Cousin richest in world $40b+:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alain_Wertheimer
Owner Chanel global fashion brand

Duke boss of my uncle in swiss $100m+:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Lorenz_of_Belgium

Aunt:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In%C3%A8s_de_La_Fressange
Chevalier de la Légion d'honneur‎

Prince of Monaco, Husband of cousin:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrea_Casiraghi

Former Finance minister of france boyfriend of aunt:
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denis_Olivennes
Chevalier de la Légion d'honneur‎

Cousin $500m+ Lazard bank boss (died 6 months ago):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michel_David-Weill
Grand'croix de la Légion d'honneur

Step father of uncle:
https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balthus

Bank my family:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lazard

I ask these people help in 2015 they send Interpol for me. So I make this art for them to sublimate rage and hate.

I try find gypsy warriors to help fight war but no loyalty for bastard only more problem:
https://opensea.io/collection/indian-nations-community-fund

These people deep state

https://www.theamericasgroup.net/team/howard-glicken
https://www.theamericasgroup.net/projects

Howard Glicken CIA Affairs USSOUTHCOM business partner Santo Domingo

French CIA equivalent all my family high ranking member:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legion_of_Honour

I should not to do nothing, I just propose to buy this asset, and I can sell or can do not sell it for this amount, at this price,
or I can burn this and do whatever I want with this, because it's my asset.

I have no fucking funds, because this rat's stolen my last money, and anyone can see this and check trading history in that fucking blockchains.
I wait my money back for a long time, but I see just dick-suckers on this fake-market, on this scam copro-platform.
And I see, your asset is illiquid there too. And this not trading NOWHERE, just for the motherfucker's waves.
Even if I'll have the fucking money, I do not see any sense, to pump it, to draw some ranks,
because within few years I see this fucking waves on coinmarketcap.com, and I know, this is a scam-shit,
but this have some rank, and I fucked this ranks, and fuck this waves, and fuck this coinmarketcap, and fuck the scam-shitcoins on this copro-site.
I do not believe coinmarketcap, and their fake ranks, and their shitcoins, and I do not recommend noone to believe in this shit. Fuck it.

Maybe your project and your asset, have some real capitalization, and have some real potential for growing,
and if it's right, I can sell 300M on OTC, using altcoins escrow-services, with garant.

It's because you trading there alone, on this fucking scam-platform, where this poor and greedy dirty rats stolen last money from me.
Moreover, as I remember, you dumped the price yourself, in 0.00000007 motherfucking waves, the last time.

If you have no fucking money, I no need your fucking pennies, I want my money back from market, the real market, because rat's not paying - it's scam.
I think, the some adequate people exists on real market, of course, if this market is real, lol.

I do not believe in this shit, and if I need 500k, this means I need 500k, not 70k.
My funds must to refund the fucking rats from wavesplatform, not your investors,
but if investors are enough wealthy, they can do it too, instead of that poor dick-suckers.

I do not recommend to invest even a pennie, in this scam-platform. Fuck them. Even a piece of shit, they not worth, as I can see for a long-term.

Pfff. What activity you waited from me? I were passive? I created such defficite, to make a large potential for growing this asset,
and I see, this not growing. You just took my fucking WAVES, and beginned dumps, because you are trading there alone.
Moreover, when I tryed to support this asset, using my own funds, my fucking funds was been stolen.
What activity you waited from me, after such shit? Just do nothing, and fuck this all.
And I see I'd be right with this, because no any market there, really.

Where you see, my volume is blocking something?
I do not have limit-orders to sell all volume, because I no need this shit - instant-mined waves,
it's not cost even a $1 for me, because they did not let me to exit from this scam at this price.
Also, is there any sense to pump it, using your own efforts, if there you are trading alone?

You can do whatever you want, with your new tokens, and assets, and your business, and your arts, to develop it.
I want to get my money back from this fucking rats, or from your investors, or from crypto-market at all,
because it's my own fucking money, and I need it asap, and this should not to be stolen, and anyone can check all shit happened with me, and this rats.

This trading only for instant-mined WAVES, which have no any real value, because it's scam.

I have no any fucking funds, because I'm live in Ukraine. My family bugdet was been stolen from degenerative greedy rats of waves-platform,
from those rats of coinomat, who issued scam-tokens WUSD and WEUR.
And noone can not help me, on bitcointalk, because noone contains here really.
It's scam-market, and fuck it. I have no any interest to insvest something in such fucking shit, even if I'll have this motherfucker's money.
And if I need 500 USDT to buy fucking food, I'll sell 30M of this M2, and buy this fucking food, and fuck it all.
Because this fucking 30M is not worth nothing for me, despite the fact, I invested there a real bitcoins.
Do not ask some money from me. I already let you all to suck for a long time, and can let you all to suck more, and more, and more, maybe even within decade of years.

So buy it, and do it. What's up?
Someone just do not know me, and just afraid me, right? Who is it? Some degenerative rat, from wavesplatform?
Fuck them, then, and move your ass in another place, to make business with adequate people.

Earlier, when I had my funds, I just planned to buy M2 on wavesplatform, to support your business, and to hold this asset,
and just sell later, or later just to buy listing on some solid exchange, and sell M2 there, at price 1 cent,
make some profit by this way, and let you asset be more valuable, to develop your business.
But for a long term, after progress a time-checking, and after I saw which illiquid asset it is really,
where there is no any market, this idea was been cancelled, of course.

I do not want to propose M2 for Japanese investors, because it's scam.
So, if someone think it's not true, you can buy M2 from me, and do whatever you want with this asset.
Because right now, I have no any fucking money, to raise this asset. My cryptoshit, my $500k - it's was been stolen, with proofs.

Well, you are collect some investments, but I do not collect.
I bought cryptoshit, just to save my funds there, but after this scammers stolen this cryptoshit,
I can't feed my family within 3 years.
I do not have fucking earnings. And I even have no any fucking job, because I have problem with passport.
If I'll had real job IRL, you think, I'll have some deals with cryptohit? Of course no.
But I have no any interest to have deals with this, after all this shit, which I saw here.

I already spent enough. Enough BTC, and enough time, and enough efforts, to talk about this fucking scam-platform, for a people...
All this is unpaid. I wait payouts from crypto-market, and fuck it all.

If you want $600 000 then you should pump it so it can rank on aggegators in top 2000 so other investors can see it which is what i was trying to do for past years but everyone is dumping when i try to pump.

$750 sell side to $2m market cap. I can provide monthly liquidity at $2m is not problem but i cannot pump to $2m when there is 350m tokens blocking it.

Some rich investors placed $70 000 worth of gwx up vote for M2 if this is verified on waves exchange so investors have a chance to actually see it and if it is cmc listed the market cap will be $2m-$30m easy.

https://waves.exchange/governance/tokens_verification
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/marquise-museum/

Nothing will change in next 5 years unless there is new funding $300k from IEO partner or private collector.

You were passive for 3.5 years already and I cannot help you when 350m tokens blocking the pump. I must focus instead on ERC-20 IEO but still need $300k to monetize $3m-$30m. Waves version is somewhat valuable because of 5 years price data which proves the first to market deployment of this patent studied system.

Everyday you are waiting to ambush dump the value is less and less. You must first do the pump to $2m then I can help with liquidity and only then will new investors come.
You are sabotaging your own token value.

Dozens of pages like this for 2 years I am trying to explain how to create market for M2 token but only spiteful reply:



With 330m tokens 50% of max supply you control the market not me or anyone else. If I had 50% of tokens tomorrow market cap will be $2m when x300 pump cost $750...In 1 day I am paper millionaire...

http://dev.pywaves.org/assets/BS1KFNR8zrXKBEWdUUvpaP6G57Hic3aESkwK7qQKdLpB

I don't understand why you are incapable of obtaining new money, Ivanov stole your waves 3 years ago how did you exist for 3 years without new money? In 3 years I have already maybe $30 000 easy for investment.

To get $600 000 you must spend first. No one will give me $30m for ERC-20 I must spend first maybe $300k in development and partnerships.

Want to sell 300,000,000 MARQUISE $MUSEUM for 600,000 USDT, at price 0.002 USDT/MARQUISE $MUSEUM.
Otherwise - I'll just burn this asset, and you will got nothing, and go fuck yourself.

This price was been set just because WavesPlatform stolen my crypto, with worth 500,000 USDT.
Proof: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.57072055
This our funds, from April 2020, still contains in this motherfucking scam rat's copro-platform.

Reply to Japanese private investor inquiry of $300 000:


Hello Mr * and thank you for the inquiry.

If you were connected with institutional firms such as art gallery or museum or a fintech broker then yes I would be in a position to offer a profitable venture.
However if you are a private or accredited investor without angel or VC network behind you I am not in a position to guarantee any form of profit on this type of investment for a number of reasons.

Marquise Museum is an asset backed crypto token issued in 2017. The asset consist of digital art and its system is a progenitor to the NFTx fractionalization that is recently popular with the NFT emergence.

Because it is a first to market implementation there is some legacy value that could grow in a trajectory similar to pioneering art like cubism, pop art, surrealism. There are many types of ABTs from 2017 but most of them are gold pegged and they did not go up in value over time. Mine is backed by digital art and this is the main USP due to the ensuing NFT boom.

The collection is comprised of 3 sets of 30 images that are published on rarible:
https://rarible.com/MarquiseMuseum

Collection #1 is priced at $100 000 per image and its corresponding token vault was deployed on ethereum which is the most valuable blockchain for crypto art:
https://etherscan.io/token/0xa4daae9552cd2390ee1dcdd1a76bc8d0eea22609

As you can see it was deployed in 2017 which makes it a first to market system.

If I can obtain a partnership with an esteemed crypto broker such as Korean BiThumb or other top 20 ranked exchange, then the IEO (public offer) is configured to $100x30 or $3 million USDT.

The project was appraised to $2m by Swedish Chamber of Commerce in 2021:
https://docdro.id/d42ND6g

This valuation presumed NFT coding in the token contract of which there is none since it is a generic deployment. However this does not invalidate the appraisal because it was completed during a time when legacy NFTs such as cryptopunks were trading at much lower price floor and they increased by a factor of x10 since then. And secondly I believe that this appraisal is correct because of the first to market vaulting system which was patent examined in 2018:
https://tc.prv.se/aktinsyn/servlet/akt/?lang=sv&ansnr=18001404

If this token contract did contain NFT specific programming the value today would not be $3 million it would be $3 billion. So there is a large premium already.

If you are private buyer I can send an offer to acquire one of the assets listed on rarible but you must not expect liquidity or profit on such investment it is simply put very speculative and may result in loss of substantial funds.

If you are institutionally connected I can send an offer to acquire the complete series 1 for a lower price than $3 million and together we can prepare the public offer. the price premium would be contigent on the immaterial services provided during the IEO but it will certainly be lower than $1m for the complete catalogue.

There are two more editions whose token vaults were deployed on XCP and Waves in 2017. The XCP set is reserved for Museum permanent exhibit and will be displayed internationally in galleries and public venues. It is not for sale.

The Waves set was acquired by russians in 2019 for a sum of 3500 waves.
https://waves.exchange/trading/spot/BS1KFNR8zrXKBEWdUUvpaP6G57Hic3aESkwK7qQKdLpB_WAVES
http://dev.pywaves.org/assets/BS1KFNR8zrXKBEWdUUvpaP6G57Hic3aESkwK7qQKdLpB
https://coincodex.com/crypto/marquise-museum/?period=3Y

There are 30 published artworks with a few more in reserve that may be published later if there is high demand. Everything can be tracked with satisfactory provenance:
https://docdro.id/fbY6USO
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.30480040
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QYncunJ_F5s

These 3 links prove causality between the art & token deployment and another important source of vintage certification is the patent study which is also linked in this reply.

Sebuhs market cap is 150k based on 0.01x840 give or take 50. He was exchanging miners but had some image files attached in messages on xcp as I understand it, i.e no artistic merit more so technical.

I suppose Sebuh and my ERC-20 stash were similarly dormant for years without market tracking but I also have a waves token from 2018 (and another dormant from 2017 with the difference between the two in reissuability).

The waves supply was already sold to russians in 2019 raising 3500 waves when waves 1.15 usd. There main purpose in maintaining the market for that token is because of consistent multi party price data going back to early 2018 on multiple aggregators except cmc and coingecko.

But as we know waves is not a hot spot for NFT collectors so this market is perhaps comlimentary to the dormant ERC-20 which indeed is 100% undistributed since minting and sitting in my wallet last time i checked.


Which leads me to the second point in the value prospective of NFTs that were minted recently on rarible or opensea. There is no on-chain provenance to attest that the art and tokens are inexchangeable for many reasons such as my focus on selling physical assets in 2017 because it would not be possible to sell jpgs at the time and secondly because the source files of this art is 30mb+ per image. Thirdly, I could have hyperlinked the art in token description but chose the www.MarquiseMuseum.com link in favor.

The art was finished in 2016 but was enhanced by artists over the course of years at great cost of thousands of dollars to make it commercially viable according to my technical standard which is related to scaling and printing, but also for NFT displaying in large format without pixelation.

These artists are following me on twitter and linkedin and are anticipating royalty payments from any future sales of the NFTs since that it a native feature of rarible and opensea. The rarible royalty is 15% and there is a whole section on how this profit will be divided with investor airdrops, artists and the company.

To conlude the second point in the above paragraph: the importance of the newly minted NFTs are secondary to its genesis wallet which is the holder wallet of the erc-20's deployed in 2017 and thus the source of value and irreplicability.

Collectors can view any genesis wallet in each NFTs history section on Rarible or Opensea and there they will find my company wallet as the source of the mint. This is the easiest method of cetification there are others such as custom contract deployment using vaulted or wrapped tokens from the erc-20 batch but this is very complex techincally and expensive. Cryptopunks uses a wrapped version on Opensea but their founders are technical prodigies and that is a big reason why their collection is worth billions.

The monetization problem as I find it after 5 years of examining this case is multi pronged:

1. The waves version is solid in terms of financial tracking but less so from a collectible viewpoint and the waves founder Sasha Ivanov and alot of the devs over there refuse to verify my token for wider investor visibility because they think it lacks RIDE programming functionality and relevance. If this was cmc and waves verified the market cap would go up alot. Unfortunately this is completely outside my control I even had a London team of attorneys try and help me in 2018 with verification free of charge.

2. The ERC-20 is listed on uniswap but there are no active participants because I want to IEO 100% of 66k supply with top 20 partner as I think it is more valuable intact and monetized with an experienced partner rather than distributed privately like the waves batch which sort of fizzled as there wasn't any insider leaders to support it over time and grow it. Secondly the waves batch was distributed in 2019 to passive investors and this only helped with short term funding but was not a good long term choice. So I am waiting for an insitutional buyer such as a museum or gallery or crypto exchange and this is of course very difficult to obtain with a project that is not as technically proficient and flush with on chain provenance like for example autoglyphs. I talked to Christies they don't touch this stuff without ample market liquidity and history. And how do I convince an institution to buy something for millions that I am only 75-80% confident may possess any value? This stuff can easily become problematic legally and it is impossible to use any mainstream marketing channels to build awareness I got blocked by google, ms, yahoo, reditt etc before the ads even were up.

3. A 60k NFT can be obtained for less than a thousand dollars when buying 20m M2 tokens on waves and swapping it. 19m are listed in market as of writing for 346 waves which is 865 dollars when waves 2.5. But yes generally this only concerns the first few NFTs because once there is proof of traction and demand, the price will increase.

4. There is some confusion on serialization of this collection. It is not a superrare as there is an XCP, Waves, ETH version each with corresponding swap tokens and all created in 2017. It is also early such that waves haven't yet produced a native NFT marketplace but when they do I will use the same 2017 waves wallet (if possible) to migrate rarible NFT there (waves nfts aren't yet minted on rarible for this reason, only eth version). The XCP version is in permanent exhibition so it is not for sale it is intended for the gallery circuit. The eth version is the one I am seeking to monetize at 25 NFTs x $100k which leads us back to point.2 in this explanation.

It is difficult for me to sell any of the ERC-20's to private buyers on Bitcointalk or wherever because two reasons. 1. It is a high price. 2. It is beyond speculative, risky and illiquid.

If there are a few consistent sales with good documentation then I would not be surprised if the first time buyers could flip them on Christies because then there would be third party price data. But there is no certainty that Christies will produce any profit for you. For the Museum it would be very beneficial to be a part of the Christies circuit with a few collection pieces.

So it is kind of a chicken egg paradox at the moment but if someone provides an OTC offer for a stack of ERC-20s or better yet a rarible NFT (which can be swapped for ERC-20 vault tokens) then shoot me a pm. I forgot to add another utility of the token vaule which is to provide liquidity to NFT investors as a form of LTV. This was initially 90% but more practially 25%-30% for the first cycles because this early funding must be used for important expenses.

Finally I think there is a lack of coherent and encompassing business document to destill all of the data of this project into a pagelet that prospective investors will feel confident in. I could rectify it with a legal partner but at its core this project is really not that hard to understand and there is really not any custom technology going on here its mostly turnkey solutions the only proprietary IP is the art which is what it is, and the timestamping of the token vaults.

So it maybe a hard sell to directly compete in vintage NFT price brackets without industry backing or expansion venues. understandably but at the same time anyone is free to make offers on both rarible and opensea. This lack of offers, even 1 dollars is obviously a sign that the market is not absorbing the content of this project adequately. Because I do believe that anyone would have time and resources to push an offer button for 1 usdc but it hasn't happened so clearly something is eluding me.

There is small activity on the waves token with buy and sell but its miniscule amounts. I am supporting it daily with liquidity to maintain trackers. In the end it must be acknowledged that this is NOT an NFT at inception it was an ABT with a focus on shifting physical books and prints (digitally created I may add) which were then converted into NFTs very recently. Most of the ABTs from 2017 mainly gold backed, have not moved at all in value. My ABT was unique because it was art backed, and it is the very first art based crypto project with a native token vault which is something that Punkbasic and APEs understood the need for years later. I filed a patent in 2018 for this business method because I recognized that it had industrial implications which was acknowledged by the patent examiners themselves!

Yeah this was all kind of railroaded during the boom last year and even today but not without reason. Would have been much worse if it was a bona fide vintage NFT that I had crafted in solidity. That would have been a shame but it probably wouldn't be the case then, had plenty of eyeballs on this one such as Leonidas.

Like you say probably some form of value here but I can't do much more at this point it will require community consensus around it similarly to Mitch's DZIPS which was a late comer in the vintage party last year. I was in his discord when it popped and these tech guys (nerds) were gushing over the SC they don't care about anything else like artistic merit and off chain stuff. And I don't blame them for it when dropping 100k or more on an investment in emergin asset need bullet proof DD.

The waves token is a good entry into a piece of the action on this side imo. Pretty much not alot of risk at 10k market cap.

*************


https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.30480040

https://wavesexplorer.com/transactions/CSVv91EkDn8nP8rqLcNKTBCLkGmwqtcbt725MgnuJ4Gx

On chain (waves) mention of the book 28th september 2018 and the full version of said book linked here on bitcointalk feb 17th 2018. The same link is embedded in a Binance listing application email that I have saved in my email account it is from early 2018 (https://opensea.io/assets/ethereum/0x495f947276749ce646f68ac8c248420045cb7b5e/90128172362037492596080030408277925649239380377171115284703702247587543252993).

This combination of provenance is the strongest evidence I can provide of the token and project intent. The first tokens were xcp and erc-20 minted ni 2017 and the art existed way back in 2016.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8WEVgWL3os
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bw2tU6l4RUY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QYncunJ_F5s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W4YMxEkshWs

People can say what they want about their intent when creating old NFTs and whatever tbh I dont see any form of coherent intent except for the larvalabs guys.
I had an entire architecture in mind, a 21st century mytholoy.

There is a reason for existence of this art and crypto integration. It is a mythos and philosophy with flavor and historical context.
In a cultural perspective it mirrors the other 2017 crypto art stuff. Mine is 9000x6000 pixels theirs is 24x24bit resolution.

They couldn't give you a plain english sentence for the reason of existence in a cultural sense.
My intent was always on a sovereign level with inspiration from Germania and Revelations. It was also the outcome of internal struggle with health complications and pariah of one of europes wealthiest dynastic clan.

An authentic attempt at breakaway and revolutionary mechanisms of sovereign empowerment compared to wishy washy and vapid NFTs that are gimmicky and without intent which is evident in their lack of original fintech implementations such as the vaults which were copy pasted ad hoc from systems such as my own.

Everybodys now looking for the first, original yadda yadda NFT. My stuff is not where you find the technical wizardry but it is the cultural cornerstone in the crypto art zeitgeist which includes NFTs in some key aspects such as the ad hoc vaults.

These projects like Sebuh are random dude, you gotta look beyond the timestamp because that's what the pros will be doing once it goes into aftermarket circulation. You people are clearly amateur art purveyors.

An cultural object must contain the potency to start a world religion or world war otherwise it is irrelevant as a historical centerpiece.

My categorization of this art is "invasion" and "weaponized mythos". I was exploring a stone age hunter/cave art dichotomy.
Here is nuance and complex manifold of the caliber in swiss watch making and pandoras box in hellraiser.

it was never intended for the commoners.

It was an exhibition of inclusive fitness targeted non verbally to a subset of jetset aristocrats. Purely an exploration and ascent in Social Dominance matrices. Way above the cultural pay roll of the mainstream, High Culture.

I am not in war with these people any more and I am at peace with myself.

This project is the highest caliber crypto art by far because of its foundational implications in a cultural sense. I studied all the others none even come close except cryptopunks.

Legacy players like Hirst completely missed the baal on this run up they are culturally obsolete. Mine is native from the start, the epicenter of this movement except in the technical area.

My contribution answers the questions of origin, why and where it is heading in a cultural mythologizing sense.
I did not invent this zeitgeist but as a contemporary observer I absorbed its momentum and combined it with personal contemplations and critiques to create something of cultural relevance.

The mythological framework I built on is heavily adapted from religious and silicon valley sources. As far as context this is holistic unlike the NFT counterparts which are doubling down on cultural vapidity. At least they are true to their nature and so am I so no I don't claim to be the inventor or NFTs at all but I claim to have contributed something unique into this space which did not come from nowhere it is part of a generational cultural momentum and for this reason it is an authentic center piece in this space. It is also quite old to be honest.

I do however claim to have invented what is today known as NFTx or NFT vaulting.

This entire era in crypto art is best designated as early "Neofeudal". I had to delete an entire paragraph because this becomes too long but this generation of crypto art may be best known for its silent commentary on social immobility and permanance of status quo. A muted revolution where the art itself is only a spring board for thought that feed into more practical upheavals.

Then again there is Cryptopunks and they made bank on meritocratic talent but how does this help the other 99.99% of people, so what is essentially cryptopunks relevance at large as a social commentary because retail is priced out anyway. They can't buy a whole CP right so mint punkbasic in a liquidity system which I invented 5 years ago now everyone has equal opportunity. There are different sides to this coin who and what are relevant for whatever reasons it isn't singular which is why there is some merit even to obscure projects. It is never easy to discovery value like the next Warhol, Picasso and it is not enough to invest only by timestamps because you will miss the thunder. Context by influence in an artistic movement is an important investment criteria and it is important for professional curators. Technical implementation is technicality where tectonic plates of cultural momentum is established. Crypto investors are not pricing in the worth of cultural capital.

And they are not pricing in the value of an essential liquidity component of NFTs which is NFTx to which I hold the graal token which is the first of a kind. Pony up if you want a piece of crypto art history. Or keep living in denial until the culture institutions catch up and I sell it off to a Museum for $200m.

I'd part with this 66k OG ABTx supply for $3m USDT straight up in a 1 time OTC deal. If the buyer is worth his grit and got the contacts he will turn this into x10 by top 20 partner and drumming up a christies auction. These nuggets are far and few inbetween and it only goes up in value over time, if the yardstick is 20th century art pioneers and previous price performance of similar assets.

Here it is in all its glory the very first liquidity mechanism for fractional asset trading specifically in the blockchain art category:
https://etherscan.io/token/0xa4daae9552cd2390ee1dcdd1a76bc8d0eea22609

Here is the vastly imitated (NFTx) patent application:
https://tc.prv.se/aktinsyn/servlet/akt/?lang=sv&ansnr=18001404

Service me an earlier deployment of similar character and I will change my mind until then price is $3m USDT for the lot.

$4m USD appraisal:
https://docdro.id/d42ND6g

If this was all NFT/x we'd be looking at 3-4 billion not million. This is ABT with ABTx progenitor system to NFTx so DD before buying please.

They are for sale, I just checked. You've set a floor price of $50k USDC for 1 NFT, $60k USDC for 22, and $100k for 28. They seem to be split up into 2 collections.

https://opensea.io/collection/marquise-museum-s-pimp-fashion
https://opensea.io/collection/pimpfashion2


Well, you have yet to sell a single NFT. Maybe you should consider lowering your prices? I just checked your listing history, and you seem to go the opposite direction. As in, when a listing expires, you increase the price instead of decrease it. Which doesn't make a whole lot of business sense.


Here's the thing: as tokens from 2018 are now being valued simply for their "historicalness", you might indeed have something here. I'm assuming

- the ERC20 tokens came first
- they were initially to be redeemed for physical artworks, and
- you are in control of the master stash.

There is some off-chain provenance that shows the artworks have been around for a while and were connected to the tokens (at least the WAVES tokens, but as the ERC20 tokens are older and on Ethereum they are actually more valuable from a collector's perspective).

There are relatively highly-valued tokens on Counterparty that were to be redeemed for physical artworks or other objects. For example, the SEBUH token owner recently launched a rather successful sale of his original token from 2014. An ERC20 token from 2017 might not fetch the same kind of prices, but you might be able to make them interesting from the perspective of a historical token collector.