Topic: ⚡MARQUISE $MUSEUM - Generation 5 asset crypto - page 2. (Read 24523 times)

Sebuhs market cap is 150k based on 0.01x840 give or take 50. He was exchanging miners but had some image files attached in messages on xcp as I understand it, i.e no artistic merit more so technical.

I suppose Sebuh and my ERC-20 stash were similarly dormant for years without market tracking but I also have a waves token from 2018 (and another dormant from 2017 with the difference between the two in reissuability).

The waves supply was already sold to russians in 2019 raising 3500 waves when waves 1.15 usd. There main purpose in maintaining the market for that token is because of consistent multi party price data going back to early 2018 on multiple aggregators except cmc and coingecko.

But as we know waves is not a hot spot for NFT collectors so this market is perhaps comlimentary to the dormant ERC-20 which indeed is 100% undistributed since minting and sitting in my wallet last time i checked.


Which leads me to the second point in the value prospective of NFTs that were minted recently on rarible or opensea. There is no on-chain provenance to attest that the art and tokens are inexchangeable for many reasons such as my focus on selling physical assets in 2017 because it would not be possible to sell jpgs at the time and secondly because the source files of this art is 30mb+ per image. Thirdly, I could have hyperlinked the art in token description but chose the www.MarquiseMuseum.com link in favor.

The art was finished in 2016 but was enhanced by artists over the course of years at great cost of thousands of dollars to make it commercially viable according to my technical standard which is related to scaling and printing, but also for NFT displaying in large format without pixelation.

These artists are following me on twitter and linkedin and are anticipating royalty payments from any future sales of the NFTs since that it a native feature of rarible and opensea. The rarible royalty is 15% and there is a whole section on how this profit will be divided with investor airdrops, artists and the company.

To conlude the second point in the above paragraph: the importance of the newly minted NFTs are secondary to its genesis wallet which is the holder wallet of the erc-20's deployed in 2017 and thus the source of value and irreplicability.

Collectors can view any genesis wallet in each NFTs history section on Rarible or Opensea and there they will find my company wallet as the source of the mint. This is the easiest method of cetification there are others such as custom contract deployment using vaulted or wrapped tokens from the erc-20 batch but this is very complex techincally and expensive. Cryptopunks uses a wrapped version on Opensea but their founders are technical prodigies and that is a big reason why their collection is worth billions.

The monetization problem as I find it after 5 years of examining this case is multi pronged:

1. The waves version is solid in terms of financial tracking but less so from a collectible viewpoint and the waves founder Sasha Ivanov and alot of the devs over there refuse to verify my token for wider investor visibility because they think it lacks RIDE programming functionality and relevance. If this was cmc and waves verified the market cap would go up alot. Unfortunately this is completely outside my control I even had a London team of attorneys try and help me in 2018 with verification free of charge.

2. The ERC-20 is listed on uniswap but there are no active participants because I want to IEO 100% of 66k supply with top 20 partner as I think it is more valuable intact and monetized with an experienced partner rather than distributed privately like the waves batch which sort of fizzled as there wasn't any insider leaders to support it over time and grow it. Secondly the waves batch was distributed in 2019 to passive investors and this only helped with short term funding but was not a good long term choice. So I am waiting for an insitutional buyer such as a museum or gallery or crypto exchange and this is of course very difficult to obtain with a project that is not as technically proficient and flush with on chain provenance like for example autoglyphs. I talked to Christies they don't touch this stuff without ample market liquidity and history. And how do I convince an institution to buy something for millions that I am only 75-80% confident may possess any value? This stuff can easily become problematic legally and it is impossible to use any mainstream marketing channels to build awareness I got blocked by google, ms, yahoo, reditt etc before the ads even were up.

3. A 60k NFT can be obtained for less than a thousand dollars when buying 20m M2 tokens on waves and swapping it. 19m are listed in market as of writing for 346 waves which is 865 dollars when waves 2.5. But yes generally this only concerns the first few NFTs because once there is proof of traction and demand, the price will increase.

4. There is some confusion on serialization of this collection. It is not a superrare as there is an XCP, Waves, ETH version each with corresponding swap tokens and all created in 2017. It is also early such that waves haven't yet produced a native NFT marketplace but when they do I will use the same 2017 waves wallet (if possible) to migrate rarible NFT there (waves nfts aren't yet minted on rarible for this reason, only eth version). The XCP version is in permanent exhibition so it is not for sale it is intended for the gallery circuit. The eth version is the one I am seeking to monetize at 25 NFTs x $100k which leads us back to point.2 in this explanation.

It is difficult for me to sell any of the ERC-20's to private buyers on Bitcointalk or wherever because two reasons. 1. It is a high price. 2. It is beyond speculative, risky and illiquid.

If there are a few consistent sales with good documentation then I would not be surprised if the first time buyers could flip them on Christies because then there would be third party price data. But there is no certainty that Christies will produce any profit for you. For the Museum it would be very beneficial to be a part of the Christies circuit with a few collection pieces.

So it is kind of a chicken egg paradox at the moment but if someone provides an OTC offer for a stack of ERC-20s or better yet a rarible NFT (which can be swapped for ERC-20 vault tokens) then shoot me a pm. I forgot to add another utility of the token vaule which is to provide liquidity to NFT investors as a form of LTV. This was initially 90% but more practially 25%-30% for the first cycles because this early funding must be used for important expenses.

Finally I think there is a lack of coherent and encompassing business document to destill all of the data of this project into a pagelet that prospective investors will feel confident in. I could rectify it with a legal partner but at its core this project is really not that hard to understand and there is really not any custom technology going on here its mostly turnkey solutions the only proprietary IP is the art which is what it is, and the timestamping of the token vaults.

So it maybe a hard sell to directly compete in vintage NFT price brackets without industry backing or expansion venues. understandably but at the same time anyone is free to make offers on both rarible and opensea. This lack of offers, even 1 dollars is obviously a sign that the market is not absorbing the content of this project adequately. Because I do believe that anyone would have time and resources to push an offer button for 1 usdc but it hasn't happened so clearly something is eluding me.

There is small activity on the waves token with buy and sell but its miniscule amounts. I am supporting it daily with liquidity to maintain trackers. In the end it must be acknowledged that this is NOT an NFT at inception it was an ABT with a focus on shifting physical books and prints (digitally created I may add) which were then converted into NFTs very recently. Most of the ABTs from 2017 mainly gold backed, have not moved at all in value. My ABT was unique because it was art backed, and it is the very first art based crypto project with a native token vault which is something that Punkbasic and APEs understood the need for years later. I filed a patent in 2018 for this business method because I recognized that it had industrial implications which was acknowledged by the patent examiners themselves!

Yeah this was all kind of railroaded during the boom last year and even today but not without reason. Would have been much worse if it was a bona fide vintage NFT that I had crafted in solidity. That would have been a shame but it probably wouldn't be the case then, had plenty of eyeballs on this one such as Leonidas.

Like you say probably some form of value here but I can't do much more at this point it will require community consensus around it similarly to Mitch's DZIPS which was a late comer in the vintage party last year. I was in his discord when it popped and these tech guys (nerds) were gushing over the SC they don't care about anything else like artistic merit and off chain stuff. And I don't blame them for it when dropping 100k or more on an investment in emergin asset need bullet proof DD.

The waves token is a good entry into a piece of the action on this side imo. Pretty much not alot of risk at 10k market cap.

*************


https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.30480040

https://wavesexplorer.com/transactions/CSVv91EkDn8nP8rqLcNKTBCLkGmwqtcbt725MgnuJ4Gx

On chain (waves) mention of the book 28th september 2018 and the full version of said book linked here on bitcointalk feb 17th 2018. The same link is embedded in a Binance listing application email that I have saved in my email account it is from early 2018 (https://opensea.io/assets/ethereum/0x495f947276749ce646f68ac8c248420045cb7b5e/90128172362037492596080030408277925649239380377171115284703702247587543252993).

This combination of provenance is the strongest evidence I can provide of the token and project intent. The first tokens were xcp and erc-20 minted ni 2017 and the art existed way back in 2016.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8WEVgWL3os
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bw2tU6l4RUY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QYncunJ_F5s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W4YMxEkshWs

People can say what they want about their intent when creating old NFTs and whatever tbh I dont see any form of coherent intent except for the larvalabs guys.
I had an entire architecture in mind, a 21st century mytholoy.

There is a reason for existence of this art and crypto integration. It is a mythos and philosophy with flavor and historical context.
In a cultural perspective it mirrors the other 2017 crypto art stuff. Mine is 9000x6000 pixels theirs is 24x24bit resolution.

They couldn't give you a plain english sentence for the reason of existence in a cultural sense.
My intent was always on a sovereign level with inspiration from Germania and Revelations. It was also the outcome of internal struggle with health complications and pariah of one of europes wealthiest dynastic clan.

An authentic attempt at breakaway and revolutionary mechanisms of sovereign empowerment compared to wishy washy and vapid NFTs that are gimmicky and without intent which is evident in their lack of original fintech implementations such as the vaults which were copy pasted ad hoc from systems such as my own.

Everybodys now looking for the first, original yadda yadda NFT. My stuff is not where you find the technical wizardry but it is the cultural cornerstone in the crypto art zeitgeist which includes NFTs in some key aspects such as the ad hoc vaults.

These projects like Sebuh are random dude, you gotta look beyond the timestamp because that's what the pros will be doing once it goes into aftermarket circulation. You people are clearly amateur art purveyors.

An cultural object must contain the potency to start a world religion or world war otherwise it is irrelevant as a historical centerpiece.

My categorization of this art is "invasion" and "weaponized mythos". I was exploring a stone age hunter/cave art dichotomy.
Here is nuance and complex manifold of the caliber in swiss watch making and pandoras box in hellraiser.

it was never intended for the commoners.

It was an exhibition of inclusive fitness targeted non verbally to a subset of jetset aristocrats. Purely an exploration and ascent in Social Dominance matrices. Way above the cultural pay roll of the mainstream, High Culture.

I am not in war with these people any more and I am at peace with myself.

This project is the highest caliber crypto art by far because of its foundational implications in a cultural sense. I studied all the others none even come close except cryptopunks.

Legacy players like Hirst completely missed the baal on this run up they are culturally obsolete. Mine is native from the start, the epicenter of this movement except in the technical area.

My contribution answers the questions of origin, why and where it is heading in a cultural mythologizing sense.
I did not invent this zeitgeist but as a contemporary observer I absorbed its momentum and combined it with personal contemplations and critiques to create something of cultural relevance.

The mythological framework I built on is heavily adapted from religious and silicon valley sources. As far as context this is holistic unlike the NFT counterparts which are doubling down on cultural vapidity. At least they are true to their nature and so am I so no I don't claim to be the inventor or NFTs at all but I claim to have contributed something unique into this space which did not come from nowhere it is part of a generational cultural momentum and for this reason it is an authentic center piece in this space. It is also quite old to be honest.

I do however claim to have invented what is today known as NFTx or NFT vaulting.

This entire era in crypto art is best designated as early "Neofeudal". I had to delete an entire paragraph because this becomes too long but this generation of crypto art may be best known for its silent commentary on social immobility and permanance of status quo. A muted revolution where the art itself is only a spring board for thought that feed into more practical upheavals.

Then again there is Cryptopunks and they made bank on meritocratic talent but how does this help the other 99.99% of people, so what is essentially cryptopunks relevance at large as a social commentary because retail is priced out anyway. They can't buy a whole CP right so mint punkbasic in a liquidity system which I invented 5 years ago now everyone has equal opportunity. There are different sides to this coin who and what are relevant for whatever reasons it isn't singular which is why there is some merit even to obscure projects. It is never easy to discovery value like the next Warhol, Picasso and it is not enough to invest only by timestamps because you will miss the thunder. Context by influence in an artistic movement is an important investment criteria and it is important for professional curators. Technical implementation is technicality where tectonic plates of cultural momentum is established. Crypto investors are not pricing in the worth of cultural capital.

And they are not pricing in the value of an essential liquidity component of NFTs which is NFTx to which I hold the graal token which is the first of a kind. Pony up if you want a piece of crypto art history. Or keep living in denial until the culture institutions catch up and I sell it off to a Museum for $200m.

I'd part with this 66k OG ABTx supply for $3m USDT straight up in a 1 time OTC deal. If the buyer is worth his grit and got the contacts he will turn this into x10 by top 20 partner and drumming up a christies auction. These nuggets are far and few inbetween and it only goes up in value over time, if the yardstick is 20th century art pioneers and previous price performance of similar assets.

Here it is in all its glory the very first liquidity mechanism for fractional asset trading specifically in the blockchain art category:
https://etherscan.io/token/0xa4daae9552cd2390ee1dcdd1a76bc8d0eea22609

Here is the vastly imitated (NFTx) patent application:
https://tc.prv.se/aktinsyn/servlet/akt/?lang=sv&ansnr=18001404

Service me an earlier deployment of similar character and I will change my mind until then price is $3m USDT for the lot.

$4m USD appraisal:
https://docdro.id/d42ND6g

If this was all NFT/x we'd be looking at 3-4 billion not million. This is ABT with ABTx progenitor system to NFTx so DD before buying please.

They are for sale, I just checked. You've set a floor price of $50k USDC for 1 NFT, $60k USDC for 22, and $100k for 28. They seem to be split up into 2 collections.

https://opensea.io/collection/marquise-museum-s-pimp-fashion
https://opensea.io/collection/pimpfashion2


Well, you have yet to sell a single NFT. Maybe you should consider lowering your prices? I just checked your listing history, and you seem to go the opposite direction. As in, when a listing expires, you increase the price instead of decrease it. Which doesn't make a whole lot of business sense.


Here's the thing: as tokens from 2018 are now being valued simply for their "historicalness", you might indeed have something here. I'm assuming

- the ERC20 tokens came first
- they were initially to be redeemed for physical artworks, and
- you are in control of the master stash.

There is some off-chain provenance that shows the artworks have been around for a while and were connected to the tokens (at least the WAVES tokens, but as the ERC20 tokens are older and on Ethereum they are actually more valuable from a collector's perspective).

There are relatively highly-valued tokens on Counterparty that were to be redeemed for physical artworks or other objects. For example, the SEBUH token owner recently launched a rather successful sale of his original token from 2014. An ERC20 token from 2017 might not fetch the same kind of prices, but you might be able to make them interesting from the perspective of a historical token collector.

I don't know about you, but for me 6 months of work paid off yesterday and all positions are prepared for x100 so there is nothing more to say for the next 2-3 years which is the benefit of having created all value in 2017.

The core situation with this project was exactly the same 5 years ago as in the present and will be 5 years from now. Look at APE how they destroyed value by creating stupid add ons to the NFTs. Curating art takes decades and must follow a provenance protocol and delicate touch which is palatable to sensitive collectors inorder to maintain and build value slowly.

As far as Waves/TN buy alot here (price at time of writing 2.36/0.0019), then hold for 2-3 years avoid leverage and usdn staking. Day trade only inside waves exchange.

My plan going forward is to provide low intensity liquidity in waves/M2 market and some buy support for big holders but everything else that relies in third party power except rarible and waves/uniswap (and website of course) is shelved indefinately because it is outside my sphere of influence.

The more silent it is from this point on, the higher the purification grade it signals. From coal into diamond is a process of generations. Let the transient shadow people spam worthless noise, here it is an ocean of illuminated silence because the inreplicable work is completed.

Money talks, wealth whispers.

can't surf any more...no wind in the sails...

Edition 1 was migrated to rarible because Opensea downscaling.
https://rarible.com/MarquiseMuseum

Rarible collection (25 assets) turned out very good and is hosted on IPFS for native resolution.

The Opensea collections will be retained for timestamp reference but not for sale.

Still looking for top 15 IEO partner for the 2017 ERC-20 swap tokens.
Should be able to monetize 3 million USDT on E.1 ERC-20 version. Perhaps as much as 30 million in next bull cycle.

Waves E.2 is worth similar as E.1 the token market cap is only 50k does not reflect accurate value.
https://coincodex.com/crypto/marquise-museum/
https://waves.exchange/trading/spot/BS1KFNR8zrXKBEWdUUvpaP6G57Hic3aESkwK7qQKdLpB_WAVES

E.2 is not minted on Rarible yet but the integrity of technical quality is restored with the migration to reassure waves investors that their tokens are backed by Museum quality NFTs. Waves investors can anytime swap 20m ABTx-M2 for x1 rarible NFT priced at $60k which is minted on request.
http://dev.pywaves.org/assets/BS1KFNR8zrXKBEWdUUvpaP6G57Hic3aESkwK7qQKdLpB

TurtleNetwork version was discontinued in favor of XCP with a 66k supply from 2017 even older than the ERC-20, but it is in permanent exhibition so not relevant for speculators.
https://xchain.io/asset/MARQUIMUSEUM

Rarible aftermarket royalty is 15% which is distributed to top 100 swap wallets on every NFT sale.

All in all the value of this portfolio will only increase with time. It doesnt matter that Opensea sabotaged this and we lost 18 month timestamp from march 2021 mint because the rarible genesis is same wallet as the erc-20 swap tokens from 2017 (https://etherscan.io/txs?a=0xc742bce0c13e31f2bbec650d3a26058b64038832) which are also with patent databse provenance and alot of other documents to support the legacy status. It is not a true vintage NFT but it is the worlds first ABTx/ABT backed by art. This business method was copied by punkbasic and all of the new NFTx tokenizations because I already described in the patent that it will require liquidity mechanisms to function as intended and this is something none of the NFT vintage devs thought about at the time, all of their tokenizations is 2021 or newer mine is 2017.

I wrote at length in here about the entire NFT boom years in advance have the ss from bitcointalk articles
https://docdro.id/fbY6USO
https://opensea.io/collection/vintageprovenance

This was overlooked because the 30+mb image assets were not properly ported onchain like cryptopunks. There is a technical inferiority but it is compensated by other USPs such as the high resolution and art style.

If this was a true vintage NFT market value would be billions not 3-30m. the premium is already discounted, once it pops expectation is trillion dollar cap 2055.
https://docdro.id/d42ND6g

Same as Andy Warhol growth rate 1960-1995 3:1 over index. This cant be copied by anyone unless they invent timetravel because all the value was produced in 2017.

Talked to the agent today, they want me to start jumping through hoops so if they deliver we proceed otherwise I am declining.

excellent,
congrats.

Six figure equity offer received on Edition 1, more info coming soon.

https://twitter.com/MarquiseMuseum/status/1555902598858825731

As soon as one NFT is sold on Opensea there will be an avalanche with christies auctions and top 10 listing because this will affirm post revenue traction and proof of market.

100k USDC will monetize 3 million, 30?, 300? million. There is no upper market cap limit but someone must first draw the sword from the stone:

https://opensea.io/collection/marquise-museum-s-pimp-fashion


Diablo clan is up and active, join for daily token drops:
https://twitter.com/MarquiseMuseum/status/1546457189627400193

This is a good way to access the Museum's player and crypto community aswell as the leadership.

Simply download and install Diablo Immortal through Battle Net downloader and reach level 30 to join the clan. Send activation email to [email protected] with your BN handle and start earning today.

The reward bracket is not final but here is a preliminary ranking list:

25 000 M2 base membership reward for logging in every day, 750k monthly equal to $10 per month if you sell in in waves market

30 000 Paragon 30+ daily activity
40 000 Paragon 80+ daily activity

20 million M2 can be swapped for Edition 2 NFTs worth $60k a pop.  

Reward rate is subject to adjustment if M2 market cap increases.

The highest reward tier is almost 10 Eternal orbs per month so the value is x10 better than the ingame hilts trader which also does not generate tradable gems from the rift.

The Diablo Immortal clan rewards are currently paid out of Edition 2 Waves M2 Vault:
http://dev.pywaves.org/assets/BS1KFNR8zrXKBEWdUUvpaP6G57Hic3aESkwK7qQKdLpB


This may in the future be updated or replaced with TurtleNetwork Vault 4:
http://statistics.turtlenetwork.eu/assets/9EdFjezCLwhjeNpgC3fyVgLpttwmq4DRc3krgHBizKks

[email protected]

https://static1.squarespace.com/static/59f96db06957da0ad5ec0089/t/629237d9323eb9477084700f/1653749722158/q2+2022+report+Marquise+Museum.pdf

I am using a special system of including other artists already.

M2 investors with 20m tokens should swap for NFTs  to claim ownership (requires KYC)

Vault tokens are intended to provide liquidity for asset owners and a lesser extent branding airdrops

The value is the 28 E.2 NFTs on Opensea but they remain unclaimed

$100 swap fee per item

Do you plan to implement only your project or is there an opportunity for different artists to join the platform later?

$M2 is trading at substance value as production cost of $M2 NFT collection was $125-$200 ex $100 Opensea Tx fee for interchain swap

2021-12-24:

a new collection is published:

https://opensea.io/collection/indian-nations-community-fund

"INCF is an unregistered NFT fundraiser for the Gypsy people in Bohemia. All proceeds are audited by Marquise Museum in partnership with accredited accountant & public annual reporting. 20% management fee.
Examples of revenue redistribution from NFT image sales:
Basic Clothing/Medicine/Dental care/Educational material/Childrens Toys
Public transportation, Orphanage field trips/Seasonal gifts/Small events funding
Food, Limited Housing & Utility support, Tele Communications/Internet
The complete list of expenditures is presented in annual report and remains similar in character to given examples"

2022-01-10:

Progress update:

https://docdro.id/16w9roe

Royalty for Edition #2 was increased from 5% to 10% and a share will be airdropped to M2 investors:



http://dev.pywaves.org/assets/BS1KFNR8zrXKBEWdUUvpaP6G57Hic3aESkwK7qQKdLpB

For Edition #2, 6 000 000 M2 is required for swap in exchange for Opensea NFT Equivalent to $300

→ https://waves.exchange/trading/spot/BS1KFNR8zrXKBEWdUUvpaP6G57Hic3aESkwK7qQKdLpB_WAVES
→ https://www.marquisemuseum.com/cube
→ https://opensea.io/collection/pimpfashion2

The collection was appraised to $47 000 per NFT but there is no custom coding in the ERC-20 contract so price is reduced:

https://docdro.id/d42ND6g

Thank you for the detailed answer.
I am the holder of Desire coins and it is sad to realize that these coins are worthless.
You probably have a lot of coins too?

Mercatox did not agree to reverse take over of DSR when offered. I complained about delisting but dev abandoned ship, explorer stopped and it was also delisted from Stex and Coinexchange which were two liquidity sources. Coinexchange itself went belly up in 2018 during the worst bear market in any industry since the inception of the industrial revolution 150 years ago. Think about that for a second.

If Mercatox agreed to DSR M2 swap then anyone with DSR could now access this NFT supply. There were other issues with that coin besides the botched Mercatox deal because one guy was mining everything and probably had 51% access. But the wallet and tech was solid I never had any problems but now it doesn't work anymore.

The masternodes from 2018 failed because they weren't part of an integrated enough ecosystem. Too many nano caps trying to make it they were all clones of each other without USP.

Lazyboozer thought he could pull a Satoshi and vanish like Houdini. He didn't understand that once a crypto is deployed it must be monitored with community management and market making. In his case it would not have mattered if he stayed around because masternodes as a concept was too weak and the market segment was saturated.

90% of all small business fail after 5 years this is true for NFTs too, everything commercial. It is a high risk venture which is why investment amount should be limited until evidence of consistent traction whch takes time and insider connections at this stage of market maturity.

The NFTs today all use third party NFTx platforms and only very few NFTs on those platforms qualify for any form of lending as the vetting is gated by platform operators.

The opportunity for unestablished artists to launch stand alone cryptos is over because barrier to entry is too high and gated by crypto leaders in China and Russia but also New York and West Coast.

The biggest problem when going at it alone on zero budget is lack of consistent visibility but even when paying for marketing ROI is dubious because you need to pay $1000 or more up front and compete with huge platforms for ad positions and search ranking and they can afford to overpay because their business model is different and backed by VC. So how many times do I pay this $1000 for fleeting marketing before pulling a $300 sale? And How do I verify that the clicks are non diluted by click farms? Impossible to know but more probable than not.

By the way I am considering stopping support for M2 on waves after WA expressedly told me that they will not enable verified ticker. If these large platforms are actively sabotaging micro projects there is no chance for survival and organic trading interest seems low. The NFTx token is not a requirement to operate NFTs it was simply a second layer solution to increase liquidity and use as a branding option.

NFT collectors on Ethereum do not value NFTx as a concept at all.

If the market is not supported in the future investors will be able to swap their M2 for NFTs on Opensea. M2 supply will then be burned and replaced with Uniswap when NFT prices go up.

If you want to keep the M2/Waves market then it is time to call WA and complain about the ticker issue.

So it is right around that 90% 5 year mark as far as waves integration but the project is completed and by its nature NFTs dont require any form of maintenance.

Commercially this appears to have joined the rest of the 90% startup failure rate but this was a personal hobby that was field tested for commercial viability and there was never any real expectation that it would sell.

$300 is nothing just buy and hold it if you like the art. It's no sensation but there is an edge compared to new NFTs and it is 1000 time cheaper than Bona fide Vintage NFTs.

If I hadn't owned the entire supply myself and knew about it from the forum, I would buy some. No other ABT so far as 2017 is backed by artworks they are mostly Stables, Gold.

This was originally appraised at $47 000 per NFT by Swedish Chamber of Commerce with accolades for outstanding stylistic delivery compared to its 24 bit counterparts. Because of a technicality that there is no custom coding in the generic ERC-20 contract, price was reduced to $300.

https://docdro.id/d42ND6g

$300 is only to get the ball rolling and attain supply decentralization after which the 5% aftermarket residuals will kick in and ascend in pace with organic price growth. Some of this 5% royalty can be shared with investors and I can calibrate it to 5% or 20% it is a matter of preference. You should buy the Edition #2 at $300 it is a good generational bet but no quick flip. There is very low risk because the project is quite simple at its core and and can be operated by a hamster in a spinning wheel if needed a 5 year old can do this at this point but getting here was the hard part and expensive in time and money.

So the risk you take is do I get my $300 back? This is such an insignificant factor that I can almost insure the Museum can post buy back offers at this rate in perpetuity to your Opensea account if you place it for aftermarket sale.

Prices were reduced from $89 000 to $300 10 days ago and the only reason why someone hasn't already sniped the entire collection is because of very low visibility and no one had time to react to it yet.

Someone will take these NFTs eventually it is a matter of who it is and when.

https://opensea.io/collection/pimpfashion2



Once Edition 2 is sold at $300 E#3 will cost double and demand will also increase because all of the sudden there is now proof of traction and organic volume on Opensea which will enable the collection to rank on the main page which causes feedback loop. This is a narrow window of opportunity for retail to get onboard because they will be priced out immediately. If you have $10k to invest in this moment this is where it goes simple as that, everything else already x20-x100 since this time last year and it's only on a technicality that this isn't already trading $4m as the SCC appraisal concluded in August.

To put it in context Edition 1 is not even obtainable with 17 of the 34 NFTs listed as English auctions ending in March 2035. The remaining 17 average $350 000 total $5.9m.

MarquiseMuseum, I remember you in the topic of cryptocurrency Desire spoke about its application, the future.
But now this coin is dead.
Don't you believe in her anymore?
What was the reason for your choice?

Online is priority

I saw a post about a physical showroom in Germany, is it already in operation and if not, when is it planned? and is there any specifics about its location?

All ABTs are now converted and this is the end of a 4 year crypto journey.

Returning when there are sales and this project is ungated by the gatekeepers.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.58382506