So, even if sloanf has differing opinions (and a poor way of enlisting possible allies to carefully look at Armstrong more critically), hey, it's OK. I'm here to learn, bitchez.
You can’t be serious, man. I am not here for opinions or “enlisting possible allies”. I am here to bring facts. If nobody takes them, it’s their problem – you can’t prevent or stop people from being stupid as this thread clearly shows. But once you mentioned allies: look at this:
As for the disclosure, no one is more supportive of the unmoderated thread concept than me, but there is a difference of having an open dialogue about ideas or read over and over the condescending trolling of that sloanf boy who point out what an idiot TPTB_need_war is which itself a very ridiculous things to say. You can say a few things about TPTB_need_war if you really feel the world must know what is your fucking opinion about him, but you can't say with a straight face that he is an idiot - only a troll say that.
And this:
I am the most vocal cheerleader of the TPTB_need_war fanboy club, he is the best in the BCT forum on information technology related topics, he is an exceptionally smart and knowledgeable man,
This poor guy has been sucking cocks and licking asses in front of everybody and not only is not ashamed of it but is even enormously proud of doing so. What value does he bring to the discussion? Did he support any of his claims such as this:
Many of his clients - including government and the world's largest banks - have been with him for 30 years, and - even it is his nature and habit to hype his service and promote himself like a second hand car salesman does - his clients understand very well what he is selling.
Now we are really getting embarrassed for you. Do you at least realize how you sound when you reproduce such charlatanic bs without applying even 1% of common sense? What do you know about his clients and what could you possibly know? Do you have any evidence to support any of your claims? Neither governments nor world’s largest banks are MA’s clients. They cannot be his clients nor will they ever be. MA is an uneducated convicted fraudster and con artist who lost hundreds of millions and cheated Japanese investors. Any official entity especially governments cannot deal with convicted criminals even if they wanted to. They have policies, approval committees, security and background checks, etc to filter providers, counterparties, and all. How stupid is it to even think they could even remotely be in any relation with people like MA? It is possible of course that some junior analysts or alike at investment banks are MA’s clients. But as individuals, not as representatives of organizations let alone governments.
Can you name at least one client that has been with MA for 30 years?
Or look at this:
Which is exactly what gold did in 2011 and the resulting decline to $1050 before 2015.75. And in the 2014/5 gold report, MA further clarified that the final low would be in Q1 2016 < $1000 (perhaps < $850).
Gold < 850 in Q1? Ok, now gold is at 1160 and keeps rising. We have one month to go down more than $300. Should we wait till March to yet again witness your stupidity or shall we ask you to admit it right now?
Meanwhile, again, read all the reports I brought to you
Here (August 28th, 2009)
http://s3.amazonaws.com/armstrongeconomics-wp/2012/03/will-gold-reach-5000-809.pdf MA says “
It is coming into its own and is still poised to rally to at least test the $3,000 level if not much higher.” And “Government has promised the moon, and can no more keep their promise that Santa really eats the cookies. When there is no one who buys the US debt, that is when the ceiling will fall. We will see this most likely after 2010 and it appears the end may be 2015-2016. A 21 year bull market in stocks points to 2015 and a 17.2 year high in gold points to 2016.”
“No demand for the US debt and collapse by 2015-2016”? Completely the opposite is happening: no collapse and the US government bonds are rising.
“Gold is poised to rally to at least test the $3,000 level if not much higher into 2016”. Read again or get somebody to help you with it. High in gold in 2016, not low.
“A 21 year bull market in stocks points to 2015”. But then it “pointed” to 2017 and now it “points” to 2020. And then maybe to 2030, who knows.
I hope somebody will pull you aside and pass on this to you. It is better to say nothing and have people wonder if you are stupid rather than to open your mouth over and over again and prove to all that you are indeed really stupid beyond all doubt.
So allies among these dumb and useless idiots who are totally incapable of any independent thinking and fact-checking, insecure clowns who seek approvals for their copy-pasting and parroting MA bs?
And then we have people like this:
Around $6 trillion in sovereign debt is now yielding negative, with plenty of corporate debt heading down too.
http://davidstockmanscontracorner.com/the-war-on-savers-and-the-200-rulers-of-world-finance/There are very few voices mentioning any risk in this bond market, it is still regarded as the flight to safety. But neg yielding govt bonds to that extent, and so far out (almost to 10yrs for some) surely isn't a sign of health.
This would fit in with Armstrong's debt crisis phase transition call ; he says a collapse in confidence in govt or some event that shocks this bond market will see a rush out of govt bonds and into the private realm of stocks.
who talk about rising bonds but at the same time and in the same very post claim that MA prediction regarding the bond collapse is correct.
Again, MA is a highly overrated fraudster and a terrible forecaster whose only proven ability so far has been the ability to sell empty claims and bs reports and conferences to brainwashed and gullible idiots such as those proudly identified themselves in the thread.
