Regarding UI:
Yes, you need to read the instructions (tutorial) to use Masterchain web wallet. Sorry, it simply works differently than what you may be used to. This is mostly because Masterchain chose an unusual security model. However, within a few minutes, you'll have an "a ha!" moment and be off to the races. I have personally found it to be quite usable once I understood what was going on.
Please DO open issues on each of the github repos. We're devoting the remainder of March to making these wallets easier to use. Like Ron, I hope that omniwallet will be easier for casual users to use (won't require you to skim a tutorial before you can get started).
Regarding dEX:
Bitcoin/MSC trading is one-sided because posting a MSC buy order means nothing (it is unenforceable at best, spam at worst). Sure, you can signal your intention to buy MSC with BTC, but nobody can actually make you do it.
Once you are in the MSC ecosystem, order books are two-sided, and are automatically matched as you would hope.
Regarding speed of progress:
We've chosen to be more decentralized, with more implementations, and that means more time. Consequently we have a lot of beneficial cross-checking and redundancy (both technical and legal redundancy). However, we are narrowing down our number of officially supported implementations as we go forward to one PC wallet and one web wallet, as we have realized that the time sink of maintaining all these implementations is just too high.
I'm personally very happy with our progress. I realize it looks slow from the outside, but we are simply doing more, and our final product will be better for it.
You all know (or should know) that venture capital groups have lined up millions of dollars to pour into MSC-based initiatives. The Houstan hack-a-thon was completely dominated by Mastercoin projects. Probably 90% of the projects being worked on were targeted at MSC. Our competitors consist of several systems which have a long way to go to catch up with us, and one knock-off which literally forked our spec and rushed some half-baked stuff out the door.
I'm not saying that our project can rest on our laurels, but rather that we have the momentum right now, and we don't intend to lose it.
I am interested in the long term success of both xcp and msc, but to call counterparty a half-baked project running out of money is like a joke. they hired two of the most well-known experts (lerner and todd) to audit the protocol.
you guys even paid a bounty to get to know at which state of developtment counterparty is
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/100-bounty-for-a-snapshot-status-of-xcp-counterparty-509616 .
I am completely with you that the door needs to be open for institutional investors, and I believe that this metacoins/ bitcoin2.0 have a huge potential to make cryptocurrency really really superior to normal money - the idea of programmable money becomes reality here.
anyway I also think that this was bad and unneccessary regarding pr.