Topic: Megaminer 6.3 - Multi pool / Multi Algo launcher - page 33. (Read 70970 times)
no what you are getting is the 21% thats not being stolen
I decided to run a test. This time I mined 100% to AHASHPOOL and I watched it the entire time. The pool is recognizing the miner. I also see the balance increase over time. But I think the projected profits are way off. For example, the entire time I watched it was projecting anywhere from $8 - $22 a day. After an hour the profit was .00002056 which works out to about $3.50/day which is way off from the projected. Perhaps there's a math rounding issue. For my educational purposes would you help me understand how the projected profit calculations should be done? Here's how I think it's done:
(pool estimate for coin * adjusted pool hashrate) * GPU hashrate
I appreciate your help. Also here is a sample of what I saw during the test:
(pool estimate for coin * adjusted pool hashrate) * GPU hashrate
I appreciate your help. Also here is a sample of what I saw during the test:
Code:
Algorithm Coin Miner Speed BTC/Day USD/Day Pool Location
--------- ---- ----- ----- ------- ------- ---- --------
LYRA2V2 verge ccminerPalgin 108.84 MH/s 0.00233 16.87 AHASH US
NEOSCRYPT innova CcminerKlaust 2.48 MH/s 0.00123 8.89 AHASH US
X17 verge ccminerAlexis78 30.09 MH/s 0.00113 8.14 AHASH US
NEOSCRYPT feather CcminerKlaust 2.48 MH/s 0.00090 6.51 AHASH US
NEOSCRYPT guncoin CcminerKlaust 2.48 MH/s 0.00089 6.42 AHASH US
HSR hshare ccminerAlexis78-hsr 29.73 MH/s 0.00085 6.13 AHASH US
C11 chaincoin ccminerAlexis78 41.46 MH/s 0.00083 6.01 AHASH US
BITCORE bitcore ccminerSKUNKKrnlx 40.64 MH/s 0.00081 5.82 AHASH US
LYRA2V2 vertcoin ccminerPalgin 108.84 MH/s 0.00080 5.81 AHASH US
NEOSCRYPT vivo CcminerKlaust 2.48 MH/s 0.00070 5.07 AHASH US
Can you add SSL support on Claymore's ZEC and CryptoNight miners in order to reduce their dev fee?
I'm curious, what are your preferred pools for multipool mining? So far my favorites are NH, MPH and HR, but I'm not entirely sure whether the projected profits on HR are actually true.
I'm curious, what are your preferred pools for multipool mining? So far my favorites are NH, MPH and HR, but I'm not entirely sure whether the projected profits on HR are actually true.
Quote
Strange....MM only has one network activity: pool API comunication. I have a rig with a extremely poor wifi connection and never seen that. What interval are you using?, perhaps you have too small interval (<60 secs) and this generates too many network activity.
I´ll try to investigate open connections.
Thanks for your reply. I am using a 600 sec. interval. Sometimes mij CPU and mem usage get suspiciously high. I sometimes get the feeling that there might be multiple processes running. So when it starts a new miner, the old one might keep doing something in the background (although i can't find anything to back my feeling up)
Maybe i should download MM all fresh and new to be sure that there is nothing screwed up in the previous download.
For me, the powershell process:
CPU is less than 25% on a pentium G4560
Memory occupped is less than 100Mb
Thanks, for me it looks about the same. Did a fresh download and changed the config file. Got an error on downloading one miner (url is incorrect, klaust, ccminer).
Started mining without any problems, till after some time. Network down, and i was unable to get a remote session going. Did a hard-reset.
Checked the logs and found this:
PS>TerminatingError(): "The pipeline has been stopped."
>> TerminatingError(): "The pipeline has been stopped."
After that Megaminer tried and tried without success. It was mining without any issues for a few days already without megaminer in between.
Very weird
ps. there is ubq.suprnova.cc in a script, that should be ubiq.suprnova.cc
Has anyone been able to add the following pools?
italyiimp.com, says it converts coins to BTC
crypto.n-engine.com, says dont use a btc address
Could someone be so kind to update the github with these pools
italyiimp.com, says it converts coins to BTC
crypto.n-engine.com, says dont use a btc address
Could someone be so kind to update the github with these pools
I have upload Italyiimp pool file to github, This pool has not enough hash power, I don´t recommed.
Crypto.N-engine is dead pool, no workers.
I´m getting best results with ahashpool last days.
Has anyone been able to add the following pools?
italyiimp.com, says it converts coins to BTC
crypto.n-engine.com, says dont use a btc address
Could someone be so kind to update the github with these pools
italyiimp.com, says it converts coins to BTC
crypto.n-engine.com, says dont use a btc address
Could someone be so kind to update the github with these pools
I'm trying to learn how the script determines the coin to mine. From what I can tell it takes the pool's estimate for the coin and divides it by the divisor and then multiplies that by the hashrate. What is the purpose of adjusting the divisor like is done with Get-Algo-Divisor? I'm trying to understand why in the profit screen it will show a coin with a high profit ( for example), yet after mining for an hour on that pool with high rates my real profit is like . for that hour. Thanks.
Get-Algo-Divisor unifies api received data to hashes unit, not kilohash, megahash, etc. like pool api send.
Pools estimations are only that...estimations, not future proof., it is based on past luck, net hash, difficulty, etc.
I suspect some pools are overestimating stats, for example zpool always shows unreal profit estimation, while other like ahashpool shows near reality data. But only a suspect.
Note: only real data is Nicehash where you are renting your power, not mining.
I'm trying to learn how the script determines the coin to mine. From what I can tell it takes the pool's estimate for the coin and divides it by the divisor and then multiplies that by the hashrate. What is the purpose of adjusting the divisor like is done with Get-Algo-Divisor? I'm trying to understand why in the profit screen it will show a coin with a high profit (12.00 USD for example), yet after mining for an hour on that pool with high rates my real profit is like .02 USD for that hour. Thanks.
I will try as soon as possible.
Thank You.
Thank You.
Is there one alternative launcher like this?
I just test same launch conditions and bechmarks runs well.
If miner shows speed but ActiveMiner section on MM dont it seems api comunication problem, I see for your post 3333 port is used, it is correct.
I can´t get same bug on development enviroment, I only can tell you to use other pools for benchmarking.
Good eye - I didn't notice that message. But honestly that message is misleading as it appears to suggest the port has been opened. I performed a netstat but nothing was listed as using port 3333 but a telnet to 127.0.0.1:3333 proves it was being used. Very strange. I rebooted and now the port is unused and benchmarking is running as it should. Thank you for taking the time to help.
I was wondering if you have consider support for users to add their own pools?
A good example is when using whattomine often high paying coins come up that SuprNova or the ones you use do not list.
Like PIRL. I mine PIRL at pirl.minerpool.net:8004 and would love to be able to use my any pool I want while using WhatToMine virtual.
Thanks for consideration
A good example is when using whattomine often high paying coins come up that SuprNova or the ones you use do not list.
Like PIRL. I mine PIRL at pirl.minerpool.net:8004 and would love to be able to use my any pool I want while using WhatToMine virtual.
Thanks for consideration
You can add pool and miners, for miners is easier, only json edit. Pools are harder, are ps1 files. I recommend you take similar pool file, copy and edit.
WTM pool has a commented section for adding user pools, you must quit # to uncomment and replace values under {}
Code:
#Manual Pools zone
#$Pools +=[pscustomobject]@{"coin" = "ZCLASSIC";"algo"="Equihash"; "symbol"= "ZCL";"server"="us-east.equihash-hub.miningpoolhub.com"; "port"= "20575";"location"="US"}
#$Pools +=[pscustomobject]@{"coin" = "ORBITCOIN"; "algo"="NEOSCRYPT"; "symbol"= "ORB"; "server"="yiimp.ccminer.org";"port"="4233";"location"="US"}
Cool thanks! I will try that today.
So many new coins and pools these days.
I was wondering if you have consider support for users to add their own pools?
A good example is when using whattomine often high paying coins come up that SuprNova or the ones you use do not list.
Like PIRL. I mine PIRL at pirl.minerpool.net:8004 and would love to be able to use my any pool I want while using WhatToMine virtual.
Thanks for consideration
A good example is when using whattomine often high paying coins come up that SuprNova or the ones you use do not list.
Like PIRL. I mine PIRL at pirl.minerpool.net:8004 and would love to be able to use my any pool I want while using WhatToMine virtual.
Thanks for consideration
You can add pool and miners, for miners is easier, only json edit. Pools are harder, are ps1 files. I recommend you take similar pool file, copy and edit.
WTM pool has a commented section for adding user pools, you must quit # to uncomment and replace values under {}
Code:
#Manual Pools zone
#$Pools +=[pscustomobject]@{"coin" = "ZCLASSIC";"algo"="Equihash"; "symbol"= "ZCL";"server"="us-east.equihash-hub.miningpoolhub.com"; "port"= "20575";"location"="US"}
#$Pools +=[pscustomobject]@{"coin" = "ORBITCOIN"; "algo"="NEOSCRYPT"; "symbol"= "ORB"; "server"="yiimp.ccminer.org";"port"="4233";"location"="US"}
When launching with Nicehash the benchmark process hangs the script. The miner is running away but the script never updates. I started with "-PoolsName AHASHPOOL,HASH_REFINERY,NICEHASH,ZPOOL". If I disable NICEHASH the other pool benchmark and run just fine. Any suggestions to debug would be appreciated. Thanks.
Windows 10
NVIDIA 1080, 1070, 1060
Windows 10
NVIDIA 1080, 1070, 1060
Code:
Speed BTC/Day USD/Day Algorithm Coin Miner Pool Location PoolWorkers
----- ------- ------- --------- ---- ----- ---- -------- -----------
0.00 PH/s|0.00 PH/s Benchmarking Benchmarking ETHASH|BLAKE2B ethereum|siacoin Nvidia-ClayDual140 NH|NH US
Code:
╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ Claymore's Dual ETH + DCR/SC/LBC/PASC GPU Miner v10.0 ║
╚════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
ETH: 1 pool is specified
Main Ethereum pool is daggerhashimoto.USA.nicehash.com:3353
SC: 1 pool is specified
Main Siacoin pool is sia.USA.nicehash.com:3360
AMD OpenCL platform not found
Be careful with overclocking, use default clocks for first tests
Press "s" for current statistics, "0".."9" to turn on/off cards, "r" to reload pools, "e" or "d" to select current pool
CUDA initializing...
NVIDIA Cards available: 3
CUDA Driver Version/Runtime Version: 9.1/8.0
GPU #0: GeForce GTX 1080, 8192 MB available, 20 compute units, capability: 6.1
GPU #1: GeForce GTX 1070, 8192 MB available, 15 compute units, capability: 6.1
GPU #2: GeForce GTX 1060 3GB, 3072 MB available, 9 compute units, capability: 6.1
Total cards: 3
ETH: Stratum - connecting to 'daggerhashimoto.USA.nicehash.com' <169.45.93.83> port 3353
ETH: Stratum - Connected (daggerhashimoto.USA.nicehash.com:3353)
DUAL MINING MODE ENABLED: ETHEREUM+SIACOIN
SC: Stratum - connecting to 'sia.USA.nicehash.com' <169.45.93.83> port 3360
ETH: nicehash stratum mode
"-allpools" option is set, default pools can be used for devfee, check "Readme" file for details.
Watchdog enabled
Remote management (READ-ONLY MODE) is enabled on port 3333
SC: Stratum - Connected (sia.USA.nicehash.com:3360)
ETH: Authorized
Setting DAG epoch #151...
SC: Authorized
SC: Share accepted!
Setting DAG epoch #151 for GPU1
Setting DAG epoch #151 for GPU0
Setting DAG epoch #151 for GPU2
Create GPU buffer for GPU1
Create GPU buffer for GPU0
Create GPU buffer for GPU2
ETH: 11/13/17-14:13:07 - New job from daggerhashimoto.USA.nicehash.com:3353
ETH - Total Speed: 0.000 Mh/s, Total Shares: 0, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00
ETH: GPU0 0.000 Mh/s, GPU1 0.000 Mh/s, GPU2 0.000 Mh/s
SC - Total Speed: 0.000 Mh/s, Total Shares: 0, Rejected: 0
SC: GPU0 0.000 Mh/s, GPU1 0.000 Mh/s, GPU2 0.000 Mh/s
GPU1 DAG creation time - 6846 ms
GPU0 DAG creation time - 7200 ms
GPU2 DAG creation time - 9185 ms
Setting DAG epoch #151 for GPU1 done
Setting DAG epoch #151 for GPU0 done
Setting DAG epoch #151 for GPU2 done
SC: 11/13/17-14:13:23 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
SC: Share accepted (110 ms)!
GPU0 t=56C fan=75%, GPU1 t=70C fan=45%, GPU2 t=65C fan=45%
SC: 11/13/17-14:13:23 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
SC: Share accepted (110 ms)!
GPU0 t=56C fan=75%, GPU1 t=70C fan=45%, GPU2 t=65C fan=45%
ETH: 11/13/17-14:13:32 - New job from daggerhashimoto.USA.nicehash.com:3353
ETH - Total Speed: 58.017 Mh/s, Total Shares: 0, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00
ETH: GPU0 23.087 Mh/s, GPU1 21.796 Mh/s, GPU2 13.134 Mh/s
SC - Total Speed: 2707.460 Mh/s, Total Shares: 1, Rejected: 0
SC: GPU0 1077.394 Mh/s, GPU1 1017.158 Mh/s, GPU2 612.908 Mh/s
ETH: 11/13/17-14:13:38 - New job from daggerhashimoto.USA.nicehash.com:3353
ETH - Total Speed: 58.017 Mh/s, Total Shares: 0, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00
ETH: GPU0 23.087 Mh/s, GPU1 21.796 Mh/s, GPU2 13.134 Mh/s
SC - Total Speed: 2707.460 Mh/s, Total Shares: 1, Rejected: 0
SC: GPU0 1077.394 Mh/s, GPU1 1017.158 Mh/s, GPU2 612.908 Mh/s
SC: 11/13/17-14:13:38 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
SC: Share accepted (125 ms)!
I just test same launch conditions and bechmarks runs well.
If miner shows speed but ActiveMiner section on MM dont it seems api comunication problem, I see for your post 3333 port is used, it is correct.
I can´t get same bug on development enviroment, I only can tell you to use other pools for benchmarking.
Quote
Strange....MM only has one network activity: pool API comunication. I have a rig with a extremely poor wifi connection and never seen that. What interval are you using?, perhaps you have too small interval (<60 secs) and this generates too many network activity.
I´ll try to investigate open connections.
Thanks for your reply. I am using a 600 sec. interval. Sometimes mij CPU and mem usage get suspiciously high. I sometimes get the feeling that there might be multiple processes running. So when it starts a new miner, the old one might keep doing something in the background (although i can't find anything to back my feeling up)
Maybe i should download MM all fresh and new to be sure that there is nothing screwed up in the previous download.
For me, the powershell process:
CPU is less than 25% on a pentium G4560
Memory occupped is less than 100Mb
When launching with Nicehash the benchmark process hangs the script. The miner is running away but the script never updates. I started with "-PoolsName AHASHPOOL,HASH_REFINERY,NICEHASH,ZPOOL". If I disable NICEHASH the other pool benchmark and run just fine. Any suggestions to debug would be appreciated. Thanks.
Windows 10
NVIDIA 1080, 1070, 1060
Windows 10
NVIDIA 1080, 1070, 1060
Code:
Speed BTC/Day USD/Day Algorithm Coin Miner Pool Location PoolWorkers
----- ------- ------- --------- ---- ----- ---- -------- -----------
0.00 PH/s|0.00 PH/s Benchmarking Benchmarking ETHASH|BLAKE2B ethereum|siacoin Nvidia-ClayDual140 NH|NH US
Code:
╔════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ Claymore's Dual ETH + DCR/SC/LBC/PASC GPU Miner v10.0 ║
╚════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
ETH: 1 pool is specified
Main Ethereum pool is daggerhashimoto.USA.nicehash.com:3353
SC: 1 pool is specified
Main Siacoin pool is sia.USA.nicehash.com:3360
AMD OpenCL platform not found
Be careful with overclocking, use default clocks for first tests
Press "s" for current statistics, "0".."9" to turn on/off cards, "r" to reload pools, "e" or "d" to select current pool
CUDA initializing...
NVIDIA Cards available: 3
CUDA Driver Version/Runtime Version: 9.1/8.0
GPU #0: GeForce GTX 1080, 8192 MB available, 20 compute units, capability: 6.1
GPU #1: GeForce GTX 1070, 8192 MB available, 15 compute units, capability: 6.1
GPU #2: GeForce GTX 1060 3GB, 3072 MB available, 9 compute units, capability: 6.1
Total cards: 3
ETH: Stratum - connecting to 'daggerhashimoto.USA.nicehash.com' <169.45.93.83> port 3353
ETH: Stratum - Connected (daggerhashimoto.USA.nicehash.com:3353)
DUAL MINING MODE ENABLED: ETHEREUM+SIACOIN
SC: Stratum - connecting to 'sia.USA.nicehash.com' <169.45.93.83> port 3360
ETH: nicehash stratum mode
"-allpools" option is set, default pools can be used for devfee, check "Readme" file for details.
Watchdog enabled
Remote management (READ-ONLY MODE) is enabled on port 3333
SC: Stratum - Connected (sia.USA.nicehash.com:3360)
ETH: Authorized
Setting DAG epoch #151...
SC: Authorized
SC: Share accepted!
Setting DAG epoch #151 for GPU1
Setting DAG epoch #151 for GPU0
Setting DAG epoch #151 for GPU2
Create GPU buffer for GPU1
Create GPU buffer for GPU0
Create GPU buffer for GPU2
ETH: 11/13/17-14:13:07 - New job from daggerhashimoto.USA.nicehash.com:3353
ETH - Total Speed: 0.000 Mh/s, Total Shares: 0, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00
ETH: GPU0 0.000 Mh/s, GPU1 0.000 Mh/s, GPU2 0.000 Mh/s
SC - Total Speed: 0.000 Mh/s, Total Shares: 0, Rejected: 0
SC: GPU0 0.000 Mh/s, GPU1 0.000 Mh/s, GPU2 0.000 Mh/s
GPU1 DAG creation time - 6846 ms
GPU0 DAG creation time - 7200 ms
GPU2 DAG creation time - 9185 ms
Setting DAG epoch #151 for GPU1 done
Setting DAG epoch #151 for GPU0 done
Setting DAG epoch #151 for GPU2 done
SC: 11/13/17-14:13:23 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
SC: Share accepted (110 ms)!
GPU0 t=56C fan=75%, GPU1 t=70C fan=45%, GPU2 t=65C fan=45%
SC: 11/13/17-14:13:23 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 2)
SC: Share accepted (110 ms)!
GPU0 t=56C fan=75%, GPU1 t=70C fan=45%, GPU2 t=65C fan=45%
ETH: 11/13/17-14:13:32 - New job from daggerhashimoto.USA.nicehash.com:3353
ETH - Total Speed: 58.017 Mh/s, Total Shares: 0, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00
ETH: GPU0 23.087 Mh/s, GPU1 21.796 Mh/s, GPU2 13.134 Mh/s
SC - Total Speed: 2707.460 Mh/s, Total Shares: 1, Rejected: 0
SC: GPU0 1077.394 Mh/s, GPU1 1017.158 Mh/s, GPU2 612.908 Mh/s
ETH: 11/13/17-14:13:38 - New job from daggerhashimoto.USA.nicehash.com:3353
ETH - Total Speed: 58.017 Mh/s, Total Shares: 0, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00
ETH: GPU0 23.087 Mh/s, GPU1 21.796 Mh/s, GPU2 13.134 Mh/s
SC - Total Speed: 2707.460 Mh/s, Total Shares: 1, Rejected: 0
SC: GPU0 1077.394 Mh/s, GPU1 1017.158 Mh/s, GPU2 612.908 Mh/s
SC: 11/13/17-14:13:38 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
SC: Share accepted (125 ms)!
Quote
Strange....MM only has one network activity: pool API comunication. I have a rig with a extremely poor wifi connection and never seen that. What interval are you using?, perhaps you have too small interval (<60 secs) and this generates too many network activity.
I´ll try to investigate open connections.
Thanks for your reply. I am using a 600 sec. interval. Sometimes mij CPU and mem usage get suspiciously high. I sometimes get the feeling that there might be multiple processes running. So when it starts a new miner, the old one might keep doing something in the background (although i can't find anything to back my feeling up)
Maybe i should download MM all fresh and new to be sure that there is nothing screwed up in the previous download.
I love the idea of this software. I am however experiencing network instability when i use it.
When i start it, it works fine. But after some time the hashrates go down, and it looks like to overload my wifi connection.
Even RDP is not working anymore at that time so i am forced to restart the machine.
If i use the same config to start a miner without megaminer then is keeps on running stable. So it is not a hardware or settings issue.
I have no ability to get a wired network to test. The Wifi however is stable untill i run megaminer.
Any ideas on this issue? Is megaminer opening loads of simultanious connections or something? Data thruput is not the issue.
Thanks!
When i start it, it works fine. But after some time the hashrates go down, and it looks like to overload my wifi connection.
Even RDP is not working anymore at that time so i am forced to restart the machine.
If i use the same config to start a miner without megaminer then is keeps on running stable. So it is not a hardware or settings issue.
I have no ability to get a wired network to test. The Wifi however is stable untill i run megaminer.
Any ideas on this issue? Is megaminer opening loads of simultanious connections or something? Data thruput is not the issue.
Thanks!
Strange....MM only has one network activity: pool API comunication. I have a rig with a extremely poor wifi connection and never seen that. What interval are you using?, perhaps you have too small interval (<60 secs) and this generates too many network activity.
I´ll try to investigate open connections.
I love the idea of this software. I am however experiencing network instability when i use it.
When i start it, it works fine. But after some time the hashrates go down, and it looks like to overload my wifi connection.
Even RDP is not working anymore at that time so i am forced to restart the machine.
If i use the same config to start a miner without megaminer then is keeps on running stable. So it is not a hardware or settings issue.
I have no ability to get a wired network to test. The Wifi however is stable untill i run megaminer.
Any ideas on this issue? Is megaminer opening loads of simultanious connections or something? Data thruput is not the issue.
Thanks!
When i start it, it works fine. But after some time the hashrates go down, and it looks like to overload my wifi connection.
Even RDP is not working anymore at that time so i am forced to restart the machine.
If i use the same config to start a miner without megaminer then is keeps on running stable. So it is not a hardware or settings issue.
I have no ability to get a wired network to test. The Wifi however is stable untill i run megaminer.
Any ideas on this issue? Is megaminer opening loads of simultanious connections or something? Data thruput is not the issue.
Thanks!
I was wondering if you have consider support for users to add their own pools?
A good example is when using whattomine often high paying coins come up that SuprNova or the ones you use do not list.
Like PIRL. I mine PIRL at pirl.minerpool.net:8004 and would love to be able to use my any pool I want while using WhatToMine virtual.
Thanks for consideration
A good example is when using whattomine often high paying coins come up that SuprNova or the ones you use do not list.
Like PIRL. I mine PIRL at pirl.minerpool.net:8004 and would love to be able to use my any pool I want while using WhatToMine virtual.
Thanks for consideration
Jump to: