Pages:
Author

Topic: Merits Tree 2021 - Who gives merits to whom - page 3. (Read 956 times)

legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 10802
There are lies, damned lies and statistics. MTwain
<…> It might also be a nice addition to website like ddmrddmr merit dashboard, or <…>
Rather than tree-like structures, I’d favour more node graphs with vectors between nodes indicating the amount of sMerits sent to and fro (if applicable). The sMerit Network was partly what I wanted to see (although there was no weight on the vertex, and I has to separate Sent and Received charts for ease of use), and Piggy’s gephi based solution was very nice, despite not being able to see the weights of the vertex on the graphs (which is important).

Tableau can do graph charting, although it is something I haven’t tried out, and I believe you still need to resort to external tools to determine the x,y coordinates to give each node (i.e. gephi). I kind of get the feeling it won’t perform great on a large volume, and as I said, the ideal solution would be seamless for updates, filterable, and display values on the vertex. I may look into it at some point, but not now.

I did have a tab called reciprocal merit on the Merit Dashboard a while back, where you could see all reciprocal sMerits between accounts, but it was painfully slow, so I eventually scrapped it.

<…>
Nice one too. I think I tried something on Flourish, but it couldn’t handle all the data points I gave it at the time (all the TX BD basically).
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 4795
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
What immediately caught my eye in this graphical representation is how stingy mocacinno is with rewarding others with merits. Tongue
Let's see if he says anything...
People can never be the same, that is how merit system works on this forum. Some people just like to hoard all because they are not that active while they only reply to few they read. Mocacinno is not that active on this forum. But I get your point, he is a type that did not focus on sending merit also.  Grin

I for one subscribe to that idea of not paying any and I mean, any attention to anyone's merit history. It just doesn't help any one and since there is virtually nothing you could do about it as a forum user, there just isn't any point.
I was not part of Bitcointalk community in 2018 when the merit system was implement but I am very certain that many people will abused it at the time as they were automatically given half of their merit's smerits. It will be fun for some people to fetch out some merit abusers.

I like to check user's merit history just for fun and it can easily let me know how the person is good if I haven't noticed him before. Also I  easily know someone's local board if active and posting good there.

but as I said I'm not going to hold it against someone if they hoard all their sMerits, because nobody's required to participate in the merit system.
I either. But I can never send such people merit unless they quote my post for correction. But I think this type of people receive more merits by merit source because merit sources have to send to anyone if having quality posts.
legendary
Activity: 3388
Merit: 6887
Top Crypto Casino
If anyone wants me to make their tree, just ask.  Wink
OK then, you don't have to twist my arm: Can you please make me a tree?  Thanks in advance (although I'm fairly sure I know what it's going to look like).

For sure I like the sentiments about this and the way you did put it. To be a no man's business on how smerits ate being handled. I for one subscribe to that idea of not paying any and I mean, any attention to anyone's merit history. It just doesn't help any one and since there is virtually nothing you could do about it as a forum user, there just isn't any point.
I think some members just do it for fun, and others are probably looking for people who might be abusing the system/sniffing out alts/whatever.  There's no harm in it, but as I said I'm not going to hold it against someone if they hoard all their sMerits, because nobody's required to participate in the merit system.

Side note: it's more fun browsing through some members' trust pages, though I haven't done that in quite some time.  It kind of gets old quick, and just like looking through people's merit history there's little point to it.
legendary
Activity: 2730
Merit: 7065
a person with Legendary rank has no advantages in receiving merits, as much as in spending them to incremental the pool of reliable users (with high rank)
That's not really accurate. They are crucial for signature campaigns, no matter the rank. Imagine if most people refused meriting legendary users despite their level of posting and a spot opened up in a signature campaign. A legendary member with 4 earned merits in the recent months goes head-to-head with a hero member who has earned 300 in the same period. Who do you think will have the bigger chance to get accepted by most campaign managers?

Besides that, it's a recognition of your work and contribution. For that, rank doesn't matter. Time and effort should be rewarded.

What immediately caught my eye in this graphical representation is how stingy mocacinno is with rewarding others with merits. Tongue
Let's see if he says anything...
legendary
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1108
What really bugs me is users receiving many merits and not sending enough.
I've expressed this sentiment before: People are free to do whatever they like with their sMerits, and it isn't a requirement of forum membership that you have to participate in--or even like--the merit system.  I'd say if it bugs you that someone is hoarding merits, you're probably paying too much attention to other members' sending history. 
For sure I like the sentiments about this and the way you did put it. To be a no man's business on how smerits ate being handled. I for one subscribe to that idea of not paying any and I mean, any attention to anyone's merit history. It just doesn't help any one and since there is virtually nothing you could do about it as a forum user, there just isn't any point. For sure, you can't provide any base to some forum users sense of judgment that could warrant the meriting of a post as that in itself, contradicts an ethic to meriting.

Though, its really of no using hoarding what adds no value to your account or user. Forum has so designed it that, merits counts for you, how many you earn through a period as well (120 days, 150days etc) but the smerits like a power to reward or acknowledge. Its best you use it at times. For a proactive user of the forum, its hard to say ig any user won't come across something intriguing and merit deserving. Not liking the merit system is some reason but really shouldn't be as, it could in some way, promote the very thing the merit system was meant to discourage (trolling and sh*t posting).

OP, that's some cool data set and presentation method right there.
legendary
Activity: 1694
Merit: 4687
**In BTC since 2013**
OP, this is a pretty cool visual representation of merit flow between selected members, and I'd like to see more (which I'm assuming is the purpose of your reserved posts).  I've seen very complicated merit maps before, and while those are cool I like this more limited display of where merit ends up two members removed from a merit source.  I'm assuming they're merit sources if they're on the most generous list.

Thanks! I will try to add a few more users soon.

If anyone wants me to make their tree, just ask.  Wink
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
It is very long time and LoyceV did not update his threads

I expect LoyceV to update those threads after more than 1 year  Cheesy
I updated both topics less than half a year ago. I've seen "complaints" about too frequent bumping, so if someone wants an update, they'll have to ask for it in the topic.
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 2094
I honestly don't really like hoarding the sMerit I've had for longer when I find quality posts. I'm more inclined to spend it than to have to keep it for months as it's the best way to maintain the cycle of achievement. But since I've never had a lot of sMerit so I'm more selective about spending it except when I can't find any other ideas than to spend it on previous transactions.

By the way, this is a good thread. It doesn't matter if more distribution of merit is given to highly rank users if they post something quality. Merit is not for a certain rank, but merit for anyone whose post is quality regardless of what rank they have at that time.
copper member
Activity: 2184
Merit: 4241
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
It wouldn't be new years' weekend without a merited Meta thread about Merit.
Yeah, what's up with that?  I've noticed at least two threads like that in the past couple of days.

Well, I'm trying to be more diplomatic in 2022, so I'll refrain from expressing my opinion.   Grin
legendary
Activity: 3388
Merit: 6887
Top Crypto Casino
What really bugs me is users receiving many merits and not sending enough.
I've expressed this sentiment before: People are free to do whatever they like with their sMerits, and it isn't a requirement of forum membership that you have to participate in--or even like--the merit system.  I'd say if it bugs you that someone is hoarding merits, you're probably paying too much attention to other members' sending history. 

OP, this is a pretty cool visual representation of merit flow between selected members, and I'd like to see more (which I'm assuming is the purpose of your reserved posts).  I've seen very complicated merit maps before, and while those are cool I like this more limited display of where merit ends up two members removed from a merit source.  I'm assuming they're merit sources if they're on the most generous list.

It wouldn't be new years' weekend without a merited Meta thread about Merit.
Yeah, what's up with that?  I've noticed at least two threads like that in the past couple of days.
legendary
Activity: 2310
Merit: 4085
Farewell o_e_l_e_o
It is very long time and LoyceV did not update his threads

I expect LoyceV to update those threads after more than 1 year  Cheesy
copper member
Activity: 2184
Merit: 4241
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
It wouldn't be new years' weekend without a merited Meta thread about Merit.

Happy New Year, all.
legendary
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1118
...gambling responsibly. Do not be addicted.
Good work OP

I believe that merits must be given, regardless of the user's level. Merits are a form of reward for a user's post, like an applause for what he said/did.

Therefore, regardless of the strategy used, everyone can be entitled to receive merit.
It is true that some members are receiving merits but not sending, this can be because the user is not active like before, like Satoshi and Hal. Some people have no much time to the extent some do not have the maximum posts required for weekly post requirements, some even do not join a campaign and have no much time but are only here once in awhile for little time to post something quality that will get them merit from other users.

But one thing I like about merit and smerit given is that if a member is good and spending quality time and post on this forum, such members are easy to rank up. People think differently, some people are active but strict in giving smerits but it still happens in a way only spammers and other no quality posters are unable to rank as they are the only one left out to be merited. There could be some bias in merit and smerit receiving and giving but it still works in a way no good poster is left out.
legendary
Activity: 1694
Merit: 4687
**In BTC since 2013**
Top 1-10
Top 11-30 (Some users may not appear, for not having given merits in 2021.)
Top 31-50
Top 51-75


◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇
► Ratimov (26)
legendary
Activity: 2114
Merit: 15144
Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23
Soon, I will add more users to the tree.  Roll Eyes

I think it would be interesting to see more of those trees.
It might also be a nice addition to website like ddmrddmr merit dashboard, or Loyce website or even bpip.org.

legendary
Activity: 1694
Merit: 4687
**In BTC since 2013**
everyone has their own strategy
there is no right strategy or wrong strategy
there is giving merits following a more or less "good" criterion

I believe that merits must be given, regardless of the user's level. Merits are a form of reward for a user's post, like an applause for what he said/did.

Therefore, regardless of the strategy used, everyone can be entitled to receive merit.



Soon, I will add more users to the tree.  Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 4255
With very small number of exceptions, I never merit based on user. I merit the post. If the post deserves something, I'll give it that.
I am also not overly generous, the vast majority of merits I give is in the 1-3 range.
I also merit the local board, but it's not as active as I'd like, so most of my merit goes "international".

everyone has their own strategy
there is no right strategy or wrong strategy
there is giving merits following a more or less "good" criterion

in the end, if you deserve a user or deserve a post you are still making a selection

for example I usually boost the brand new with 1-2 merits to make them understand that I am not one who belongs to the Legendary caste and wants to keep the Legendary number as low as possible

I want a live, active forum that discusses and talks (even argues there is)

I don't want a forum overrun by spammers who want to do account farming

so any strategy that nurtures people with good intentions is fine, yours included
hero member
Activity: 2520
Merit: 952
Patterns will always exists. People do browse the forum by their interests and this has a high potential of creating merit circles/"gangs".
a person with Legendary rank has no advantages in receiving merits, as much as in spending them to incremental the pool of reliable users (with high rank)

Exactly, I love your comment but won't merit it cause you are already leggy Tongue plus for me it's rather rare sight to earn merits (ik improve post quality). Would rather hold whatever some are left and spend when opportunity arises (good post + rank < leggy).
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 6382
Looking for campaign manager? Contact icopress!
I basically prefer (if I can choose) to give my merits according to this criterion (in order of importance)
- users with low rank
- users of the local board

With very small number of exceptions, I never merit based on user. I merit the post. If the post deserves something, I'll give it that.
I am also not overly generous, the vast majority of merits I give is in the 1-3 range.
I also merit the local board, but it's not as active as I'd like, so most of my merit goes "international".
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 4255
so it's unrewarding work

This is not always true, based on human psychology.
I've noticed that since I'm merit source I also receive more merits. And it can't be that my post have become that much better Cheesy
There was a topic (I won't search now) about people getting inclined to give merits back from where they've received it. Back then I didn't think that's possible, now I tend to agree that it does happen.

So it can become rewarding as position (merits received).

I think it is due to the fact that being also a source of merit, you have become even more attentive to how you write and what you write
consequently this responsibility has increased your quality of posts, consequently this plus other effects (such as gratitude) tend to increase in% the dose of merits received

there is no particular pattern, just a series of small things that happen and that concur in some particular cycles


look for example at me / fillippone / duesoldi, we are part of the Italian community, very small
we are trying to grow it, but in the end the active users are always around 40-50
in the end the ones talking are always the ones

I basically prefer (if I can choose) to give my merits according to this criterion (in order of importance)
- users with low rank
- users of the local board

unfortunately it is not always possible and at the end of the 30 days I have to spend the merits (otherwise they expire)
I prefer to give them to people who in turn spend the merits received in order to have a higher efficiency (from merits)

and therefore that they give them to others
Pages:
Jump to:
© 2020, Bitcointalksearch.org