| ┌
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 4711
**In BTC since 2013**
You did it well, this way at least there is a proper board section where they can monitor these things.
But in fairness to you, your perseverance to do this for the beauty of the forum platform, this is just showing that you care about the growth and beauty of this forum platform, nice job... Here's 1 merit for you as a sign of my gratitude for the effort you made, it may be small but it comes from my heart, if I had many merits I might not give just one. God bless you
Thanks. I really like things to be presented in a way that is enjoyable for everyone. And images are not always the most pleasant solution. So I try to develop something that makes everything a little better even if it's in BBCode. I'm glad you liked it.
sr. member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 271
DGbet.fun - Crypto Sportsbook
Do you have any software used to make this tree from loycev data? Or you just browse and copy paste those data manually?
That's lot of effort to do if doing this manually.
Indeed nice information shown. Thanks.
I take the LoyceV data and paste it into an Excel file that I developed for this purpose. Then, I define some filters and just change the user's name for it to appear the data referring to that user. And I even configured the format in BBCode, so that it is practically copy-paste. So it's almost just copy-paswt, although it does involve some manual work. But it turns out to be relatively fast. What took the longest was developing the Excel file. Which maybe takes almost a month to get the operational por. You did it well, this way at least there is a proper board section where they can monitor these things. But in fairness to you, your perseverance to do this for the beauty of the forum platform, this is just showing that you care about the growth and beauty of this forum platform, nice job... Here's 1 merit for you as a sign of my gratitude for the effort you made, it may be small but it comes from my heart, if I had many merits I might not give just one. God bless you
legendary
Activity: 1960
Merit: 2124
Nice to top this chart, and quite unexpected, as I think l saw other charts where I wasn’t on the top spot!
Anyway, always working up to keep up the work done!
Seems like you are again having more presence on the forum and getting back in position of attaining the top positions in most of the forum charts so slacking is slowing diminishing  You have always contributed well to the forum and still doing it in the right manner so yes keep it man..
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 16328
Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23
Nice to top this chart, and quite unexpected, as I think l saw other charts where I wasn’t on the top spot!
Anyway, always working up to keep up the work done!
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 4711
**In BTC since 2013**
Merits Tree
February'23
Small Summary:
@The Skeptical Chymist was the only one in this top that gave at least 3 users 50 merits.
With two merits difference from the second place @El duderino_, in the gobality, @fillippone was the one who gave more merits.
The pie contest was a success, with @RickDeckard receiving many merits. The only time it had appeared in a tree was in February 2022 with only 1 merit.
Description:
FIRST USER > TOP THREE OF FIRST USER (NO. MERITS RECEIVED FROM PREVIOUS LEVEL) > TOP THREE OF SECOND USERS (NO. MERITS RECEIVED FROM PREVIOUS LEVEL)
List Order:
From the first user with the most merits given this month, to the number 20th user with the most merits given.
| ◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇ | ◆◇ | ◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇ | ◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇ | | | | ► GazetaBitcoin (46) | | ┌
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 4711
**In BTC since 2013**
So I had to make a new post, so I apologize if you got notified twice. You can prevent this by making an empty post first, and editing it later on.You are absolutely right. Alias usually editor. The point is that everything was wrong... and I only noticed later, which made me click delete instead of edit. I acted almost without thinking. Sorry. 
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
So I had to make a new post, so I apologize if you got notified twice. You can prevent this by making an empty post first, and editing it later on.The incredible thing is that I committed myself giving away many merits and I ended up 7th on the month. And I wasn't able to max out only one user! The life of a Merit source 
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 16328
Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 4711
**In BTC since 2013**
Merits Tree
January'23
Small Summary:
Initially expected to be only during 2022 the merit trees, as it was well accepted, I will continue in 2023.
The year 2023 starts with @El duderino_ being the user who gave the most merits throughout the month.
@GazetaBitcoin was the user who most often received 50 merits from the same user.
Description:
FIRST USER > TOP THREE OF FIRST USER (NO. MERITS RECEIVED FROM PREVIOUS LEVEL) > TOP THREE OF SECOND USERS (NO. MERITS RECEIVED FROM PREVIOUS LEVEL)
List Order:
From the first user with the most merits given this month, to the number 20th user with the most merits given.
| ◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇ | ◆◇ | ◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇ | ◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇ | | | | ► cygan (3) | | ┌
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1225
Once a man, twice a child!
~snipped~
I'm going to analyze how this can be done, I'm not saying in the form of a tree to capture more information, but in a way that is interesting to analyze. Yes, even if it's not like a tree; it will still be ok provided those caught in such act will be quoted or mentioned. This will help rejig them to awareness. Perhaps, some of them may have forgotten they have merit or on the essence of distributing it. I ain't talking of inactive members here. I ran through some of the usernames there and those I'm talking about are still very much active till date. So, it's not as if some type of abandoned account with lots of merit in it. That can't be distributed.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
Is there any list of inactive users? I have to research this... You can ask the BPIP guys for a list, they count 55,855 Active Profiles.
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 4711
**In BTC since 2013**
As per a previous comment of mine, you should exclude inactive users from these charts. Of course we cannot blame satoshi for being a merit hoarder!
If I move forward with this project, I will try to avoid this type of user. Is there any list of inactive users? I have to research this...
Meanwhile I was thinking, this year (2023) to add another 20 places to the top list. But between place 21 and 40, only indicate the second level, not three. What do you think?
legendary
Activity: 2730
Merit: 7065
It's okay not to send Merit back to whoever gave it to you. Just send it to posts that deserve it, no matter who made them. I know, I am not saying it isn't nor should that be in your mind that you need to merit users A and B because they are meriting you. Or do the opposite and not merit them because they don't merit you either. Still, it's interesting stats. I am pretty sure I am stabbing a few guys in the back (unintentionally) who often merit my posts but I don't come across theirs that much. And since I am a merit source, I have a few wounds all over my back as well.
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 16328
Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23
Thanks for the feedback, I'll think about and study this. As per a previous comment of mine, you should exclude inactive users from these charts. Of course we cannot blame satoshi for being a merit hoarder! It's kinda expected that the biggest Merit sources get backstabbed the most. It's okay not to send Merit back to whoever gave it to you. Just send it to posts that deserve it, no matter who made them. In a sense, it’s advisable not sending merits back to a merit source!
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
It's nice to see who sends merits to who, but maybe you can make some type of overview of who doesn't send merits to people that send to them. I think LoyceV used to call them 'backstabbers'. We had 'backscratchers' and 'backstabbers'.
Maybe you can show something similar. For example, who are the top members I send merits to, but they don't reciprocate in the same way? Also, which users send to me, but I don't send to them? The term "backstabbers" needs a disclaimer. It was a parody (hence the big bloody knife) and has these disclaimers: make fun of this data, don't take it seriously (although it's all true)! It's kinda expected that the biggest Merit sources get backstabbed the most. It's okay not to send Merit back to whoever gave it to you. Just send it to posts that deserve it, no matter who made them.
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 4711
**In BTC since 2013**
Maybe you can show something similar. For example, who are the top members I send merits to, but they don't reciprocate in the same way? Also, which users send to me, but I don't send to them?
It's kind of discouraging to see from the trees members who garnered so much merits but still didn't distribute them, even after 150 days. Does it mean they haven't found deserving posts to splash those merits on. I thought we're to hoard or hodl only Bitcoin and not merit. Hoarding of merit wasn't theymos' plan from the beginning. Why users do it beats my comprehension.
Well, that would be like an inverted merit tree, of those who received the most and gave the least. Since I work with this data every month, I might consider doing something like that. I'm going to analyze how this can be done, I'm not saying in the form of a tree to capture more information, but in a way that is interesting to analyze. It is true that we talk a lot about the merits we achieve and which are distributed, and we forget that there are many who do not share the merits they receive. Thanks for the feedback, I'll think about and study this.
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1225
Once a man, twice a child!
I ask the community if they want the merit tree to continue in 2023?
Well, I don't think showcasing this helps the forum. Rather it could be depressive if you asked me. It's kind of discouraging to see from the trees members who garnered so much merits but still didn't distribute them, even after 150 days. Does it mean they haven't found deserving posts to splash those merits on. I thought we're to hoard or hodl only Bitcoin and not merit. Hoarding of merit wasn't theymos' plan from the beginning. Why users do it beats my comprehension.
legendary
Activity: 2730
Merit: 7065
I ask the community if they want the merit tree to continue in 2023?
If so, what news would you like to see? Sure, keep the merit trees coming and growing I find it interesting to look at. It's nice to see who sends merits to who, but maybe you can make some type of overview of who doesn't send merits to people that send to them. I think LoyceV used to call them ' backstabbers'. We had ' backscratchers' and ' backstabbers'. Maybe you can show something similar. For example, who are the top members I send merits to, but they don't reciprocate in the same way? Also, which users send to me, but I don't send to them?
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 16328
Fully fledged Merit Cycler - Golden Feather 22-23
Wow thank you!
Finally a chart where I can top it!
I tip my hat to @jeremypwr who was able to rack 519 merits from @LFC_Bitcoin, out of a theoretical maximum of 600 merits. In second position @babo, who got 492 merits from yours truly.
Well done!
|
|
|
