Topic: Merits Tree - Monthly Results - page 5. (Read 9968 times)
That would be really interesting, and something definitely worth of analysis.
It would definitely add something to my “meta” analysis.
On a more technical side: how would you identify a thread on a given board?
I just have this thing in my subconscious that might be some kind of pathological disorder, that when I see a rank or a chart I must immediately fit into it.
There are many ways of doing things, and not necessarily you have to do that topping some weird metric of choice.
(Not meaning your trees are a weird metric).
I hope I could make myself understood.
There are many ways of doing things, and not necessarily you have to do that topping some weird metric of choice.
(Not meaning your trees are a weird metric).
I hope I could make myself understood.
Clearly understood.
And I believe that this is a way to keep motivated to continue to be better. These trees allow you to have another type of analysis, for your subconscious purpose.
I'm thinking about making these trees, for about the top 10 of the local boards. What do you think?
It may seem difficult at times, but I believe that you can manage it well, and proof of that is being able to be in the top 20 of those who give the most merits every month.
If one day I reach your level, I will certainly want to learn from you. Undoubtedly, you are doing an excellent job!
I just have this thing in my subconscious that might be some kind of pathological disorder, that when I see a rank or a chart I must immediately fit into it.
There are many ways of doing things, and not necessarily you have to do that topping some weird metric of choice.
(Not meaning your trees are a weird metric).
I hope I could make myself understood.
Hell yeah it's real.
Everyday it passes I Do realise more and more ho much I underestimated the effort to be at par with that topic.
It may seem difficult at times, but I believe that you can manage it well, and proof of that is being able to be in the top 20 of those who give the most merits every month.
If one day I reach your level, I will certainly want to learn from you. Undoubtedly, you are doing an excellent job!
Everyday it passes I Do realise more and more ho much I underestimated the effort to be at par with that topic.
It's pretty busy IRL in these days for reasons , but this thread is a time sink.
]Not sure what you mean exactly.
To top this particular chart you must be sure you topped 50 merits to everyone on the last day of the month.
So you need a bit of commitment for being sure no more merits can be sent to your peers on that evening.
Slacking is real.
Hell yeah it's real. Before I started that thread in Meta with my rules for post review requests, I was only getting a handful every month and I was accumulating earned sMerits in the hundreds and never running out of sauce sMerits. There were long periods when I wasn't doing a great job as a merit source, or at least not as good as I wanted to. After creating that thread, I suddenly got a ton of "targets" for merits, and I'm chronically out of both sauce and earned sMerits. But honestly, I prefer the current situation (though it'd be better if I had enough sMerits to keep up with the requests).Truly, even if I top some user with 50 merits is usually difficult to micromanage the merit stash on order to get to 50 merits senta on the last day of the month.
Not sure what you mean exactly. You're talking about it being hard to get rid of your sMerit stash by the last day of the month? Didn't you create a thread that's similar to my offer? I would think there'd be no problem whatsoever giving away as many merits as you're able to.
Not only I finished second this month, something that I expected to happen, but also I wasn’t even able to top 50 merits to my first three most valuable merit destinations.
Slacking is real.
Truly, even if I top some user with 50 merits is usually difficult to micromanage the merit stash on order to get to 50 merits senta on the last day of the month.
Slacking is real.
Truly, even if I top some user with 50 merits is usually difficult to micromanage the merit stash on order to get to 50 merits senta on the last day of the month.
Merits Tree
September'22
Small Summary:
The September Merits Tree took a little longer because I was readjusting the filters for data collection.
Following the request of some users, the tree was readjusted, only for users who sent at least 1 merit throughout the month to appear.
In this way, users who did not submit any merit during the month do not appear in the tree.
Description:
FIRST USER > TOP THREE OF FIRST USER (NO. MERITS RECEIVED FROM PREVIOUS LEVEL) > TOP THREE OF SECOND USERS (NO. MERITS RECEIVED FROM PREVIOUS LEVEL)
List Order:
From the first user with the most merits given this month, to the number 20th user with the most merits given.
September'22
Small Summary:
The September Merits Tree took a little longer because I was readjusting the filters for data collection.
Following the request of some users, the tree was readjusted, only for users who sent at least 1 merit throughout the month to appear.
In this way, users who did not submit any merit during the month do not appear in the tree.
Description:
FIRST USER > TOP THREE OF FIRST USER (NO. MERITS RECEIVED FROM PREVIOUS LEVEL) > TOP THREE OF SECOND USERS (NO. MERITS RECEIVED FROM PREVIOUS LEVEL)
List Order:
From the first user with the most merits given this month, to the number 20th user with the most merits given.
| ◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇ | ◆◇ | ◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇ | ◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇◆◇ | |||||||||||||||||||
| ► DdmrDdmr (22) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
┌
I reported your peculiarity only as a “fun fact”, without attaching any consideration. Undoubtedly, the analysis that we do here is more curiosities, and it is not intended to do a scrutiny. I'm planning to readjust the filters you used, to try to stop counting members who don't give anyone merits, especially on the second level. <…> DdmrDdmr is the only one who received merit from each of the top three users he sent merits <…> Now you’ve got me "Merit Treeing" with my DB for all merited accounts (not just top 20 merited accounts).I reported your peculiarity only as a “fun fact”, without attaching any consideration. I didn't even bother to notice that EFS sent 150 merits to users who didn’t send back a single merit. The reality is that merit distribution criteria are not under scrutiny here (and it would really hard to scrutinise your own, particularly). <…> DdmrDdmr is the only one who received merit from each of the top three users he sent merits <…> Now you’ve got me "Merit Treeing" with my DB for all merited accounts (not just top 20 merited accounts). Without detailing all the cases (unless someone wants it), I make it:Code: Jan 2022 -> 1 case If we aggregate the whole of 2022 (so far) as one, we get 8 cases on the whole (flat table tree): Code: rn1 UserFrom UserTo nMeritsL1 rn2 UserToFrom nMeritsL2 <…> That’s how I interpreted it, being part of the derived curiosity for me determining how often the case was encountered.
Well... it's 11 and not 10. Thanks for the alert, post corrected.
 DdmrDdmr is the only one who received merit from each of the top three users he sent merits to I also added this observation to the summary of the post, which I found very interesting. Thanks. Only 10 users, from the top 20, received merit from the users they gave again. Can you find out who they were
DdmrDdmr is the only one who received merit from each of the top three users he sent merits to Merits Tree August'22 Small Summary: In August for the first time this year @The Pharmacist took first place in this tree, with more merits distributed. Only 11 users, from the top 20, received merit from the users they gave again. Can you find out who they were? DdmrDdmr is the only one who received merit from each of the top three users he sent merits to. Description: FIRST USER > TOP THREE OF FIRST USER (NO. MERITS RECEIVED FROM PREVIOUS LEVEL) > TOP THREE OF SECOND USERS (NO. MERITS RECEIVED FROM PREVIOUS LEVEL) List Order: From the first user with the most merits given this month, to the number 20th user with the most merits given.
|
