Why did you lie?
Answer: cause your mother is a fat ugly cow.
Vlad admits to lying about... something, I can't even understand the gibberish post of his that was quoted in the earlier post?
Topic: -- Miner's Official Coin LAUNCH - NUGGETS (NUGS) -- - page 79. (Read 121524 times)
Why did you lie?
Answer: cause your mother is a fat ugly cow.
Vlad admits to lying about... something, I can't even understand the gibberish post of his that was quoted in the earlier post?
Do a majority of the people on this thread want the repo returned to Vlad's control/ownership?
-MarkM-
-MarkM-
Why did you lie?
Answer: cause your mother is a fat ugly cow.
I'm going to bed. I have screen shots of his blackmail.
I emailed a bunch of the top global mods and admins. No local small timers.
I gotta get some sleep cause I gotta meet with that PhD guy around 12. I can't miss that appointment. Maybe he can fix the mess this troll r3wt, created. Greedy troll.
I emailed a bunch of the top global mods and admins. No local small timers.
I gotta get some sleep cause I gotta meet with that PhD guy around 12. I can't miss that appointment. Maybe he can fix the mess this troll r3wt, created. Greedy troll.
Why did you lie?
Turn your commuter off or unplug your hard drives.
Vlad, shut upIdiot, shut your gash.
Seriously do you realise how what you say is dumb?
ANSWER ME VLAD!
1. SHUT UP FFS!
I fucking proposed to help you but you never responded!
3. You're a fucking liar, these are YOUR words, YOU are the ONLY ONE on the forum to put 3 spaces or even more after a '.'
4. How can we know the hijacker is not you trying to make us think r3 is a scammer?
5. Name him or you're a FUCKING LIAR! Surely you'll say he wants to remain anonymous, then post a screenshot without his name!
1. SHUT UP FFS!
I fucking proposed to help you but you never responded!
I'm unplugging my laptop even though my wallet is encrypted and I'm behind a mother of all firewalls cause I had enough NUGs stolen from me, I can't lose the little I have left for bounties.
3. You're a fucking liar, these are YOUR words, YOU are the ONLY ONE on the forum to put 3 spaces or even more after a '.'
"The fork is not done right. It will take away everyones nuggets the way it was done. It was a hijack, not a fix, and I am not sure why markm is not expressing it as such. See how they changed the readme to something like 'all your nuggets are belong to us'.
You never had control of this coin it seems, as you never locked down and controlled the repo that you linked to in the announcement post. Whoever you gave that to, has now taken over the coin, and in a way that will take away everyones existing coins.
If you really want to try, even though you now would probably be better off going back to laucnh a new sha coin intead, the first thing for you to do is get control of the repo and change the passwords. Then apply a proper patch and fix as was discussed in the thread. Then get out new binaries that give people time to update before the fork kicks in. You may also at this point have to hire some miners to secure the coin against the hijackers."
You never had control of this coin it seems, as you never locked down and controlled the repo that you linked to in the announcement post. Whoever you gave that to, has now taken over the coin, and in a way that will take away everyones existing coins.
If you really want to try, even though you now would probably be better off going back to laucnh a new sha coin intead, the first thing for you to do is get control of the repo and change the passwords. Then apply a proper patch and fix as was discussed in the thread. Then get out new binaries that give people time to update before the fork kicks in. You may also at this point have to hire some miners to secure the coin against the hijackers."
4. How can we know the hijacker is not you trying to make us think r3 is a scammer?
5. Name him or you're a FUCKING LIAR! Surely you'll say he wants to remain anonymous, then post a screenshot without his name!
I found a PhD programmer who actually worked on the original Bitcoin code
Answer: Your fat ugly mom.
Turn your commuter off or unplug your hard drives.
Vlad, shut upIdiot, shut your gash.
Seriously do you realise how what you say is dumb?
ANSWER ME VLAD!
1. SHUT UP FFS!
I fucking proposed to help you but you never responded!
3. You're a fucking liar, these are YOUR words, YOU are the ONLY ONE on the forum to put 3 spaces or even more after a '.'
4. How can we know the hijacker is not you trying to make us think r3 is a scammer?
5. Name him or you're a FUCKING LIAR! Surely you'll say he wants to remain anonymous, then post a screenshot without his name!
1. SHUT UP FFS!
I fucking proposed to help you but you never responded!
I'm unplugging my laptop even though my wallet is encrypted and I'm behind a mother of all firewalls cause I had enough NUGs stolen from me, I can't lose the little I have left for bounties.
3. You're a fucking liar, these are YOUR words, YOU are the ONLY ONE on the forum to put 3 spaces or even more after a '.'
"The fork is not done right. It will take away everyones nuggets the way it was done. It was a hijack, not a fix, and I am not sure why markm is not expressing it as such. See how they changed the readme to something like 'all your nuggets are belong to us'.
You never had control of this coin it seems, as you never locked down and controlled the repo that you linked to in the announcement post. Whoever you gave that to, has now taken over the coin, and in a way that will take away everyones existing coins.
If you really want to try, even though you now would probably be better off going back to laucnh a new sha coin intead, the first thing for you to do is get control of the repo and change the passwords. Then apply a proper patch and fix as was discussed in the thread. Then get out new binaries that give people time to update before the fork kicks in. You may also at this point have to hire some miners to secure the coin against the hijackers."
You never had control of this coin it seems, as you never locked down and controlled the repo that you linked to in the announcement post. Whoever you gave that to, has now taken over the coin, and in a way that will take away everyones existing coins.
If you really want to try, even though you now would probably be better off going back to laucnh a new sha coin intead, the first thing for you to do is get control of the repo and change the passwords. Then apply a proper patch and fix as was discussed in the thread. Then get out new binaries that give people time to update before the fork kicks in. You may also at this point have to hire some miners to secure the coin against the hijackers."
4. How can we know the hijacker is not you trying to make us think r3 is a scammer?
5. Name him or you're a FUCKING LIAR! Surely you'll say he wants to remain anonymous, then post a screenshot without his name!
I found a PhD programmer who actually worked on the original Bitcoin code
Answer: Your fat ugly mom.
I can't believe we have hackers and programmers here and novody can stop this loser r3. Unreal.
The project admin/manager should have set up a team account for the repo, and should kick his access. Others can not do that, they do not have admin rights to the project on github. Whoever gave him access should revoke it. If they gave it in a way that it can not be revoked now, then they made a mistake. No one else can fix that mistake directly here.
I think the programmer Shakezula gave. Him access but I don't knowz. He offered to help so I paid him in coins and then he obviously had access.
But why did he want to buy such a crappy coin from day one? This baffles me? He had something for this coin From day one but I'm no programmer so I can't see it.
Turn your commuter off or unplug your hard drives.
Vlad, shut upIdiot, shut your gash.
Seriously do you realise how what you say is dumb?
ANSWER ME VLAD!
1. SHUT UP FFS!
I fucking proposed to help you but you never responded!
3. You're a fucking liar, these are YOUR words, YOU are the ONLY ONE on the forum to put 3 spaces or even more after a '.'
4. How can we know the hijacker is not you trying to make us think r3 is a scammer?
5. Name him or you're a FUCKING LIAR! Surely you'll say he wants to remain anonymous, then post a screenshot without his name!
1. SHUT UP FFS!
I fucking proposed to help you but you never responded!
I'm unplugging my laptop even though my wallet is encrypted and I'm behind a mother of all firewalls cause I had enough NUGs stolen from me, I can't lose the little I have left for bounties.
3. You're a fucking liar, these are YOUR words, YOU are the ONLY ONE on the forum to put 3 spaces or even more after a '.'
"The fork is not done right. It will take away everyones nuggets the way it was done. It was a hijack, not a fix, and I am not sure why markm is not expressing it as such. See how they changed the readme to something like 'all your nuggets are belong to us'.
You never had control of this coin it seems, as you never locked down and controlled the repo that you linked to in the announcement post. Whoever you gave that to, has now taken over the coin, and in a way that will take away everyones existing coins.
If you really want to try, even though you now would probably be better off going back to laucnh a new sha coin intead, the first thing for you to do is get control of the repo and change the passwords. Then apply a proper patch and fix as was discussed in the thread. Then get out new binaries that give people time to update before the fork kicks in. You may also at this point have to hire some miners to secure the coin against the hijackers."
You never had control of this coin it seems, as you never locked down and controlled the repo that you linked to in the announcement post. Whoever you gave that to, has now taken over the coin, and in a way that will take away everyones existing coins.
If you really want to try, even though you now would probably be better off going back to laucnh a new sha coin intead, the first thing for you to do is get control of the repo and change the passwords. Then apply a proper patch and fix as was discussed in the thread. Then get out new binaries that give people time to update before the fork kicks in. You may also at this point have to hire some miners to secure the coin against the hijackers."
4. How can we know the hijacker is not you trying to make us think r3 is a scammer?
5. Name him or you're a FUCKING LIAR! Surely you'll say he wants to remain anonymous, then post a screenshot without his name!
I found a PhD programmer who actually worked on the original Bitcoin code
No but they can point to some other repo containing whatever version they prefer be used.
-MarkM-
-MarkM-
I can't believe we have hackers and programmers here and novody can stop this loser r3. Unreal.
The project admin/manager should have set up a team account for the repo, and should kick his access. Others can not do that, they do not have admin rights to the project on github. Whoever gave him access should revoke it. If they gave it in a way that it can not be revoked now, then they made a mistake. No one else can fix that mistake directly here.
Well has anyone actually mined a lucky block?
If so, has it been orphaned?
if it wasn't orphaned, have they continued finding lucky blocks still?
-MarkM-
If so, has it been orphaned?
if it wasn't orphaned, have they continued finding lucky blocks still?
-MarkM-
I never ran the code, so no I guess I would not have run it. However some people did, and whoever has coins after the new code hits the first superblock will lose them if this new code becomes the accepted chain.
Ah, yep, looks like the code was changed again from when I last looked at it. So at least three potential chains from the repo versions now.
Turn your commuter off or unplug your hard drives.
Vlad, shut upIdiot, shut your gash.
Turn your commuter off or unplug your hard drives.
Vlad, shut up
The global mods and global admins are coming for this guy, I wrote them all. They can't allow bitcointalk to be part of a blackmail scheme. It would open them up for a huge lawsuit. I just don't know if they can get into my repo files. If they can overide his password. But I wrote them all. I'm pretty sure these never seen an idiot try to literally blackmail someone put of their coin after just 3 days.
And this guy r3 had a hand in setting the bounty and getting VGB TO fail. Then he offers to buy my coin on day one? WHYHHHHH.
Why can't a single programmer asker me why this guy would sabotage my coin and then offer to buy it on day one and when I said no he stole 3 million coins, dumped on nis exchange and now is straight stew,ing my coin. What is special about this coin. Can't anybody see what this guys sees its gotta be something cause there's so many other essh target to go after so hey my coin. Somebody please answer this question.
I'm tired. I'm going to bed.
Good night.
Oh heads up guys. He's lying again.
His NUGs exchange is down. Oh what a coincidence. He doesn't want anyone dumping their coins?
I wonder why?
So he can steal all of them? That would be a good plan. Turn your commuter off or unplug your hard drives.
I can't believe we have hackers and programmers here and novody can stop this loser r3. Unreal.
And this guy r3 had a hand in setting the bounty and getting VGB TO fail. Then he offers to buy my coin on day one? WHYHHHHH.
Why can't a single programmer asker me why this guy would sabotage my coin and then offer to buy it on day one and when I said no he stole 3 million coins, dumped on nis exchange and now is straight stew,ing my coin. What is special about this coin. Can't anybody see what this guys sees its gotta be something cause there's so many other essh target to go after so hey my coin. Somebody please answer this question.
I'm tired. I'm going to bed.
Good night.
Oh heads up guys. He's lying again.
His NUGs exchange is down. Oh what a coincidence. He doesn't want anyone dumping their coins?
I wonder why?
So he can steal all of them? That would be a good plan. Turn your commuter off or unplug your hard drives.
I can't believe we have hackers and programmers here and novody can stop this loser r3. Unreal.
Actually all the coins will be lost as the repo-guy changed the subsidy of block 1
Again that is only in the repo.
Each miner gets to choose whether to run that code or a version they prefer.
Does the blackmailer have enough hashing power to catch up to the currently running blockchain? Even if so, is he or she going to spend that much hashing power on doing so?
-MarkM-
Quote
if this new code becomes the accepted chain.
Actually all the coins will be lost as the repo-guy changed the subsidy of block 1
Again that is only in the repo.
Each miner gets to choose whether to run that code or a version they prefer.
Does the blackmailer have enough hashing power to catch up to the currently running blockchain? Even if so, is he or she going to spend that much hashing power on doing so?
-MarkM-
So far there still does not seem to be any hijacking happening, the chain still seems to be rolling smoothly along with the fix that was published way back before block 250 first happened... Is there any sign that block 250 happened more than once?
-MarkM-
-MarkM-
The change, can't really call it a fix, was put into the repo two days ago it looks like. Pretty sure that was long after block 250.
But was anyone even using the repo by then? Due to all the drama is seems more likely everyone either shut down to wait for the dust to settle or put the fix published in the thread into their copy of the code and ran with that fix, which was available to them right here in the thread long before block 250.
Would you sit there running broken code that come block 250 was not going to give you any lucky blocks to wait for some purportedly evil github-repo-maintainer to get around to merging the patch into the github, or just go ahead with what the founder wanted regardless of the procratinations of the purportedly evil repo-guy?
Maybe by block 250 all nodes running old broken code had already shut down?
-MarkM-
I never ran the code, so no I guess I would not have run it. However some people did, and whoever has coins after the new code hits the first superblock will lose them if this new code becomes the accepted chain.
So far there still does not seem to be any hijacking happening, the chain still seems to be rolling smoothly along with the fix that was published way back before block 250 first happened... Is there any sign that block 250 happened more than once?
-MarkM-
-MarkM-
The change, can't really call it a fix, was put into the repo two days ago it looks like. Pretty sure that was long after block 250.
But was anyone even using the repo by then? Due to all the drama is seems more likely everyone either shut down to wait for the dust to settle or put the fix published in the thread into their copy of the code and ran with that fix, which was available to them right here in the thread long before block 250.
Would you sit there running broken code that come block 250 was not going to give you any lucky blocks to wait for some purportedly evil github-repo-maintainer to get around to merging the patch into the github, or just go ahead with what the founder wanted regardless of the procratinations of the purportedly evil repo-guy?
Maybe by block 250 all nodes running old broken code had already shut down?
-MarkM-
I never ran the code, so no I guess I would not have run it. However some people did, and whoever has coins after the new code hits the first superblock will lose them if this new code becomes the accepted chain.
Jump to: