miniZ v2.0a Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX - page 74.

abudfv2008

full member

Activity: 728

Merit: 106

Quote from: miniZ on November 29, 2018, 08:29:02 PM

Hi everyone,

You can now run miniZ with Hive OS.

Support @ https://miniz.ch/2018/11/29/hive-os-support/

Happy mining!

I'm getting this on 0.5-82. That's because Hive folder for custom miners has changed in 0.6 for which you did the package. On 0.6 it is fine.

Quote

/hive/custom/miniZ/h-run.sh: line 7: /hive/miners/custom/miniZ/h-manifest.conf: No such file or directory
No CUSTOM_CONFIG_FILENAME is set

custom miniZ exited, waiting to cooldown a bit

reciu

newbie

Activity: 22

Merit: 0

im using coinblockers, today miner stop again without error. I must add log option

topteam

newbie

Activity: 157

Merit: 0

Quote from: miniZ on November 29, 2018, 08:23:48 PM

Quote from: topteam on November 28, 2018, 05:42:26 PM

Good job!!!
But not all color symbol remove from log with --nocolor option

and show ping latency too high (911 ms)

Fix it in next version

Hi topteam, we cannot see any color symbols in our log. Can you double check the log file? The miner appends the log to an existing file, is it possible that you looked at a previous version log part of the file? If not, can you check whether you wrote --nocolor in the command line?
Regarding ping latency, we wil reduce ping time window used to compute average in the next version.

Thank you all for your feedback.

Cheers

I write log directly to syslog, can you check your syslog?
And have line in sh before miner

Code:

export SYSLOG=1

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Hi everyone,

You can now run miniZ with Hive OS.

Support @ https://miniz.ch/2018/12/13/hive-os-support/

Happy mining!

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Quote from: reciu on November 28, 2018, 12:54:14 PM

195 core
700 memory
62% power limit

edit: 195 crash , back to 185 core

miner recomended :3 the fastest at this moment

Try to add watchdog like in gminer

Quote from: reciu on November 29, 2018, 01:12:35 PM

update
miner avg speed shows 198 sols but pool only 185-189
gminer shows 192-195 but on pool 195-205

Hi reciu,

the program should not crash, with watchdog the program restarts with same OC settings so it is likely that it will crash again.
It is better to modify the OC settings. Watchdog can make it harder to understand other crash causes. But we may look into it in the future.
For the time being, if you really want to restart automatically, you can run the program within a while loop.

Regarding the reported speed in the pool vs miner, can you tell us which pool you are using?
This should not happen and in all our tests we never saw anything like that happening, usually the pool reports a little more than the miner.

Be sure that miniZ runs stable for at least 3h without any restarts, or modifications to setting values.

We are currently carefully rechecking this matter.

Thank you for your feedback.

Cheers

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Quote from: A11an on November 28, 2018, 04:29:22 AM

Hello!
when you add your wonderful manners to the platform of hive OS

Quote from: dgeo on November 28, 2018, 07:25:07 AM

Hello!
It works fine but shows average ping rather than actual.
When I start mining, I see a large ping and after a while it becomes relevant.
And hive os support is also interesting
Thanks for your job

Hi A11an, dgeo,
thank you. We made a package for support with Hive OS. Check @ https://miniz.ch/2018/12/13/hive-os-support/
Regarding ping latency, we wil reduce ping time window used to compute average the average in the next version.

Quote from: topteam on November 28, 2018, 05:42:26 PM

Good job!!!
But not all color symbol remove from log with --nocolor option

and show ping latency too high (911 ms)

Fix it in next version

Hi topteam, we cannot see any color symbols in our log. Can you double check the log file? The miner appends the log to an existing file, is it possible that you looked at a previous version log part of the file? If not, can you check whether you wrote --nocolor in the command line?
Regarding ping latency, we wil reduce ping time window used to compute average in the next version.

Thank you all for your feedback.

Cheers

reciu

newbie

Activity: 22

Merit: 0

update
miner avg speed shows 198 sols but pool only 185-189
gminer shows 192-195 but on pool 195-205

topteam

newbie

Activity: 157

Merit: 0

Good job!!!
But not all color symbol remove from log with --nocolor option

Code:

0>#033[00;36mGTX 1070       #033[0m[#033[00;32m54°C#033[0m/55%] 27.13 I/s #033[01;37m54.4#033[0m(54.3) Sol/s 136.8W clk=1809MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.40
1>#033[00;36mGTX 1070       #033[0m[#033[00;32m46°C#033[0m/55%]#033[01;32m*#033[0m27.59 I/s #033[01;37m56.2#033[0m(55.5) Sol/s 136.3W clk=1847MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.41
2>#033[00;36mGTX 1070       #033[0m[#033[00;32m48°C#033[0m/55%] 27.88 I/s #033[01;37m55.4#033[0m(55.4) Sol/s 137.1W clk=1898MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.40
3>#033[00;36mGTX 1070       #033[0m[#033[00;32m45°C#033[0m/55%] 27.70 I/s #033[01;37m55.9#033[0m(55.7) Sol/s 133.3W clk=1885MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.42
4>#033[00;36mGTX 1070       #033[0m[#033[00;32m49°C#033[0m/55%] 27.78 I/s #033[01;37m56.0#033[0m(55.7) Sol/s 134.8W clk=1873MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.41
5>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 Ti    #033[0m[#033[00;32m41°C#033[0m/55%]#033[01;32m*#033[0m32.18 I/s #033[01;37m63.8#033[0m(64.5) Sol/s 135.1W clk=1847MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.48
6>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 Ti    #033[0m[#033[00;32m44°C#033[0m/55%] 32.15 I/s #033[01;37m64.1#033[0m(63.7) Sol/s 136.2W clk=1809MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.47
7>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 Ti    #033[0m[#033[00;32m49°C#033[0m/55%] 31.58 I/s #033[01;37m63.1#033[0m(63.4) Sol/s 135.5W clk=1809MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.47
8>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 Ti    #033[0m[#033[00;32m46°C#033[0m/55%] 31.76 I/s #033[01;37m63.6#033[0m(63.6) Sol/s 133.9W clk=1797MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.47
9>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 Ti    #033[0m[#033[00;32m48°C#033[0m/55%] 31.97 I/s #033[01;37m64.0#033[0m(64.2) Sol/s 134.3W clk=1797MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.48
10>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 Ti    #033[0m[#033[00;32m49°C#033[0m/55%] 31.16 I/s #033[01;37m61.6#033[0m(62.3) Sol/s 134.0W clk=1771MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.46
11>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 Ti    #033[0m[#033[00;32m46°C#033[0m/55%] 31.49 I/s #033[01;37m62.6#033[0m(62.9) Sol/s 130.2W clk=1822MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.48
#033[0m[ 0d 0h10m09s]#033[0m S:#033[01;32m159#033[0m/0 #033[01;37m720#033[0m(713) [europe.equihash-hub.miningpoolhub.com]- 913ms (#033[01;33m95.9%#033[0m) (#033[00;33m4.1%#033[0m)
0>#033[00;36mGTX 1070       #033[0m[#033[00;32m54°C#033[0m/55%] 27.13 I/s #033[01;37m54.2#033[0m(54.2) Sol/s 136.8W clk=1809MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.40
1>#033[00;36mGTX 1070       #033[0m[#033[00;32m46°C#033[0m/55%] 27.59 I/s #033[01;37m56.1#033[0m(55.5) Sol/s 136.4W clk=1860MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.41
2>#033[00;36mGTX 1070       #033[0m[#033[00;32m48°C#033[0m/55%] 27.89 I/s #033[01;37m55.9#033[0m(55.5) Sol/s 137.3W clk=1898MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.40
3>#033[00;36mGTX 1070       #033[0m[#033[00;32m45°C#033[0m/55%] 27.68 I/s #033[01;37m56.2#033[0m(55.8) Sol/s 133.6W clk=1860MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.42
4>#033[00;36mGTX 1070       #033[0m[#033[00;32m49°C#033[0m/55%] 27.79 I/s #033[01;37m55.7#033[0m(55.6) Sol/s 134.7W clk=1873MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.41
5>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 Ti    #033[0m[#033[00;32m41°C#033[0m/55%] 32.18 I/s #033[01;37m63.8#033[0m(64.4) Sol/s 135.0W clk=1847MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.48
6>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 Ti    #033[0m[#033[00;32m44°C#033[0m/55%]#033[01;32m*#033[0m32.15 I/s #033[01;37m64.2#033[0m(63.8) Sol/s 136.2W clk=1835MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.47
7>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 Ti    #033[0m[#033[00;32m49°C#033[0m/55%] 31.57 I/s #033[01;37m63.0#033[0m(63.3) Sol/s 135.5W clk=1784MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.47
8>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 Ti    #033[0m[#033[00;32m46°C#033[0m/55%]#033[01;32m*#033[0m31.76 I/s #033[01;37m63.7#033[0m(63.6) Sol/s 133.7W clk=1784MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.48
9>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 Ti    #033[0m[#033[00;32m48°C#033[0m/55%]#033[01;32m*#033[0m31.97 I/s #033[01;37m64.0#033[0m(64.2) Sol/s 134.3W clk=1835MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.48
10>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 Ti    #033[0m[#033[00;32m49°C#033[0m/55%]#033[01;32m*#033[0m31.16 I/s #033[01;37m61.8#033[0m(62.3) Sol/s 134.4W clk=1746MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.46
11>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 Ti    #033[0m[#033[00;32m46°C#033[0m/55%] 31.49 I/s #033[01;37m62.7#033[0m(62.9) Sol/s 130.6W clk=1797MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.48
#033[0m[ 0d 0h10m19s]#033[0m S:#033[01;32m162#033[0m/0 #033[01;37m720#033[0m(713) [europe.equihash-hub.miningpoolhub.com]- 911ms (#033[01;33m96.0%#033[0m) (#033[00;33m4.0%#033[0m)

and show ping latency too high (911 ms)

Code:

PING europe.equihash-hub.miningpoolhub.com (172.104.189.59): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 172.104.189.59: icmp_seq=0 ttl=49 time=337.772 ms
64 bytes from 172.104.189.59: icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=358.011 ms
64 bytes from 172.104.189.59: icmp_seq=2 ttl=49 time=298.913 ms
64 bytes from 172.104.189.59: icmp_seq=3 ttl=49 time=398.775 ms
64 bytes from 172.104.189.59: icmp_seq=4 ttl=49 time=315.557 ms

Fix it in next version

reciu

newbie

Activity: 22

Merit: 0

hi!
Updating results

looks faster than gminer but miner increase power consuption when im overclock hmm

now testing:

195 core
700 memory
62% power limit

[ 0d 0h15m50s] S:75/0 198(197) 198(197)
0>GTX 1060 6GB [55°C/36]*16.35 I/s 32.9(32. Cool

Sol/s 76.1W clk=1632MHz mclk=4498MHz Sol/W=0.43
1>GTX 1060 6GB [55°C/38] 16.47 I/s 33.9(33.4) Sol/s 75.6W clk=1645MHz mclk=4498MHz Sol/W=0.44
2>GTX 1060 6GB [54°C/17] 16.55 I/s 33.6(33.3) Sol/s 75.4W clk=1695MHz mclk=4498MHz Sol/W=0.44
3>GTX 1060 6GB [56°C/41] 16.43 I/s 32.7(32.7) Sol/s 75.8W clk=1620MHz mclk=4498MHz Sol/W=0.43
4>GTX 1060 6GB [54°C/33] 16.23 I/s 32.6(32.6) Sol/s 74.8W clk=1594MHz mclk=4498MHz Sol/W=0.44
5>GTX 1060 6GB [58°C/43] 16.27 I/s 32.5(32.6) Sol/s 76.1W clk=1632MHz mclk=4498MHz Sol/W=0.43

edit: 195 crash , back to 185 core

edit2:
[ 0d 0h55m38s] S:314/0 198(198) 198(198)
0>GTX 1060 6GB [55°C/32]*16.51 I/s 32.8(33.4) Sol/s 74.4W clk=1670MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.45
1>GTX 1060 6GB [55°C/40]*16.58 I/s 33.1(33.1) Sol/s 76.0W clk=1657MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.44
2>GTX 1060 6GB [54°C/20]*16.60 I/s 33.4(33.1) Sol/s 74.9W clk=1683MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.44
3>GTX 1060 6GB [56°C/41]*16.60 I/s 32.7(33.1) Sol/s 75.9W clk=1670MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.44
4>GTX 1060 6GB [54°C/37]*16.33 I/s 32.5(32.5) Sol/s 75.0W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.43
5>GTX 1060 6GB [58°C/43]*16.29 I/s 33.2(32.6) Sol/s 75.0W clk=1620MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.44

miner recomended :3 the fastest at this moment

Try to add watchdog like in gminer

dgeo

newbie

Activity: 15

Merit: 0

Quote from: miniZ on November 27, 2018, 09:37:59 PM

Hi dgeo, this has been added in the latest version, v1.0h.

Hello!
It works fine but shows average ping rather than actual.
When I start mining, I see a large ping and after a while it becomes relevant.
And hive os support is also interesting

Thanks for your job

A11an

newbie

Activity: 2

Merit: 0

Hello!

when you add your wonderful manners to the platform of hive OS

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Hi everyone,

Thank you all for your feedback!

There is a new miniZ miner version v1.0h!

Current Sols/s:
* GTX 1050 2GB ~17-19 Sol/s
* GTX 1050Ti 4GB ~19-21 Sol/s
* GTX 1060 3GB ~33-36 Sol/s
* GTX 1070Ti 8GB ~60-67 Sol/s
* GTX 1080 8GB ~61-67 Sol/s

Like the previous version, we added support for RTX 20xx GPUs (alpha stage). If you happen to try miniZ on these GPUs, give us feedback so that we can keep improving the miner.

For more information, download, and support check the website: https://miniz.ch/
Download miniZ miner here: https://miniz.ch/download/

Happy mining!

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Quote from: fistsofgod on November 25, 2018, 03:15:28 PM

having an issue with logging. program is not logging errors so i cant see what happened when computer restarts

Hi fistsofgod, we added cuda_error.log file that will log cuda fatal errors. Maybe this will help to diagnose the problem.

Quote from: dgeo on November 26, 2018, 09:18:18 PM

Please add pool ping

Hi dgeo, this has been added in the latest version, v1.0h.

Quote from: aklakl on November 27, 2018, 04:30:26 AM

Hello, on one of my rigs miner crashes with error:

0:error:1409F07F:SSL routines:ssl3_write_pending:bad write retry:..\..\openssl-1.1.0f\ssl\record\rec_layer_s3.c:902:

How can i fix this?

Hi aklakl, we made the ssl functions more robust and this may be able to deal with that error. If the problem persists we'll need more information (OS, mining pool address and port number, and error occurrence frequency).

Thank you all!
Cheers

fistsofgod

newbie

Activity: 164

Merit: 0

Quote from: dgeo on November 26, 2018, 09:18:18 PM

Nice job

[ 0d 3h34m39s] S:248/1 215(217) [btg.2miners.com] (97.9) (2.1)
0>GTX 1070 [63°C/87] 27.19 I/s 54.8(54.2) Sol/s 155.1W clk=1911MHz mclk=4353MHz Sol/W=0.35
1>GTX 1070 [63°C/87] 27.18 I/s 53.2(54.4) Sol/s 169.4W clk=1923MHz mclk=4387MHz Sol/W=0.32
2>GTX 1070 [61°C/85] 27.46 I/s 53.9(55.0) Sol/s 161.1W clk=1923MHz mclk=4387MHz Sol/W=0.34
3>GTX 1070 [65°C/92] 26.43 I/s 53.4(53.0) Sol/s 138.9W clk=1911MHz mclk=4387MHz Sol/W=0.38

about +10% than ewbf with same settings

Please add pool ping

you should lower power and increase efficiency. will also increase your profits, especially in this market, unless your electricity is free.

aklakl

newbie

Activity: 52

Merit: 0

Hello, on one of my rigs miner crashes with error:

0:error:1409F07F:SSL routines:ssl3_write_pending:bad write retry:..\..\openssl-1.1.0f\ssl\record\rec_layer_s3.c:902:

How can i fix this?

dgeo

newbie

Activity: 15

Merit: 0

Nice job

[ 0d 3h34m39s] S:248/1 215(217) [btg.2miners.com] (97.9) (2.1)
0>GTX 1070 [63°C/87] 27.19 I/s 54.8(54.2) Sol/s 155.1W clk=1911MHz mclk=4353MHz Sol/W=0.35
1>GTX 1070 [63°C/87] 27.18 I/s 53.2(54.4) Sol/s 169.4W clk=1923MHz mclk=4387MHz Sol/W=0.32
2>GTX 1070 [61°C/85] 27.46 I/s 53.9(55.0) Sol/s 161.1W clk=1923MHz mclk=4387MHz Sol/W=0.34
3>GTX 1070 [65°C/92] 26.43 I/s 53.4(53.0) Sol/s 138.9W clk=1911MHz mclk=4387MHz Sol/W=0.38

about +10% than ewbf with same settings

Please add pool ping

fistsofgod

newbie

Activity: 164

Merit: 0

having an issue with logging. program is not logging errors so i cant see what happened when computer restarts

reciu

newbie

Activity: 22

Merit: 0

505 all rig, graphic cards about ~445, i got i5 7400 for gaming.

miniZ

member

Activity: 690

Merit: 17

Quote from: topteam on November 23, 2018, 12:49:08 PM

When you plan to release next version?

This week.

Quote from: Dawnnu on November 23, 2018, 08:21:12 PM

1080 ti on Zhash (144.5) ---> 78 - 80 sol/s with 80 tdp , +80 core +350 mem

pretty good

Good to know! Thanks for reporting.

Quote from: reciu on November 24, 2018, 03:13:07 AM

220 core is impossible on my 1060 6gb, max stable value is 185.
At this moment i got 0.44-0.45 sols/W on gminer, 74W per card, 90W its to much for me.
Thanks for answer. Don`t stop development your miner, like others

Hi reciu, just to make sure, you reported for that other miner ~198 @ 505W right? With these values we get 198/505 = 0.39 Sol/W s (505/6 = 84W not 74W)
We'll look at this and try to improve efficiency for the 1060 6Gb. Thanks!

reciu

newbie

Activity: 22

Merit: 0

Quote from: miniZ on November 22, 2018, 04:56:24 PM

Quote from: reciu on November 22, 2018, 01:12:48 PM

Quote from: fistsofgod on November 21, 2018, 02:47:50 PM

Quote from: reciu on November 21, 2018, 01:53:41 PM

Nice job man but still gminer winning

189-191 sols, 515W- miniZ
194-201 sols, 505W- gminer

6xGTX 1060 6gb Asus Strix

65% power limit
185 core
-520 memory

144,5 needs + mem not -

nope all cards required personal options, i didnt see difference with -520 and +100-700

Hi reclu, thanks for reporting your values for the 1060 6Gb.

We only have a 1060 3GB, so our values can differ a little.
However, it has been reported widely on the web that the 1060 6GB can perform 5-15% better than the 1060 3Gb.

If we limit power to 90 W, and OC settings to +220 core, +1000 mem, we can get ~31.6 Sol/s @ 85 W (=505/6 W) out of our 1060 3Gb.
Assuming that the 1060 GB performs 10% better this means that 31.6*1.1= ~34.8 Sol/s, or ~208.6 Sol/S for 6 1060 6Gb GPUs.

You may want to give these values a try. You can also try other values as the ones we have on our website https://miniz.ch/features/ (these may change as we keep testing the miner).

Cheers.

220 core is impossible on my 1060 6gb, max stable value is 185.
At this moment i got 0.44-0.45 sols/W on gminer, 74W per card, 90W its to much for me.
Thanks for answer. Don`t stop development your miner, like others

Topic: miniZ v2.0a Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX - page 74. (Read 60093 times)