update
miner avg speed shows 198 sols but pool only 185-189
gminer shows 192-195 but on pool 195-205
Topic: miniZ v2.0a Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX - page 74. (Read 59781 times)
November 29, 2018, 01:12:35 PM
November 28, 2018, 05:42:26 PM
Good job!!!
But not all color symbol remove from log with --nocolor option
and show ping latency too high (911 ms)
Fix it in next version
But not all color symbol remove from log with --nocolor option
Code:
0>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 #033[0m[#033[00;32m54°C#033[0m/55%] 27.13 I/s #033[01;37m54.4#033[0m(54.3) Sol/s 136.8W clk=1809MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.40
1>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 #033[0m[#033[00;32m46°C#033[0m/55%]#033[01;32m*#033[0m27.59 I/s #033[01;37m56.2#033[0m(55.5) Sol/s 136.3W clk=1847MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.41
2>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 #033[0m[#033[00;32m48°C#033[0m/55%] 27.88 I/s #033[01;37m55.4#033[0m(55.4) Sol/s 137.1W clk=1898MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.40
3>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 #033[0m[#033[00;32m45°C#033[0m/55%] 27.70 I/s #033[01;37m55.9#033[0m(55.7) Sol/s 133.3W clk=1885MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.42
4>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 #033[0m[#033[00;32m49°C#033[0m/55%] 27.78 I/s #033[01;37m56.0#033[0m(55.7) Sol/s 134.8W clk=1873MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.41
5>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 Ti #033[0m[#033[00;32m41°C#033[0m/55%]#033[01;32m*#033[0m32.18 I/s #033[01;37m63.8#033[0m(64.5) Sol/s 135.1W clk=1847MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.48
6>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 Ti #033[0m[#033[00;32m44°C#033[0m/55%] 32.15 I/s #033[01;37m64.1#033[0m(63.7) Sol/s 136.2W clk=1809MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.47
7>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 Ti #033[0m[#033[00;32m49°C#033[0m/55%] 31.58 I/s #033[01;37m63.1#033[0m(63.4) Sol/s 135.5W clk=1809MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.47
8>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 Ti #033[0m[#033[00;32m46°C#033[0m/55%] 31.76 I/s #033[01;37m63.6#033[0m(63.6) Sol/s 133.9W clk=1797MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.47
9>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 Ti #033[0m[#033[00;32m48°C#033[0m/55%] 31.97 I/s #033[01;37m64.0#033[0m(64.2) Sol/s 134.3W clk=1797MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.48
10>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 Ti #033[0m[#033[00;32m49°C#033[0m/55%] 31.16 I/s #033[01;37m61.6#033[0m(62.3) Sol/s 134.0W clk=1771MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.46
11>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 Ti #033[0m[#033[00;32m46°C#033[0m/55%] 31.49 I/s #033[01;37m62.6#033[0m(62.9) Sol/s 130.2W clk=1822MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.48
#033[0m[ 0d 0h10m09s]#033[0m S:#033[01;32m159#033[0m/0 #033[01;37m720#033[0m(713) [europe.equihash-hub.miningpoolhub.com]- 913ms (#033[01;33m95.9%#033[0m) (#033[00;33m4.1%#033[0m)
0>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 #033[0m[#033[00;32m54°C#033[0m/55%] 27.13 I/s #033[01;37m54.2#033[0m(54.2) Sol/s 136.8W clk=1809MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.40
1>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 #033[0m[#033[00;32m46°C#033[0m/55%] 27.59 I/s #033[01;37m56.1#033[0m(55.5) Sol/s 136.4W clk=1860MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.41
2>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 #033[0m[#033[00;32m48°C#033[0m/55%] 27.89 I/s #033[01;37m55.9#033[0m(55.5) Sol/s 137.3W clk=1898MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.40
3>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 #033[0m[#033[00;32m45°C#033[0m/55%] 27.68 I/s #033[01;37m56.2#033[0m(55.8) Sol/s 133.6W clk=1860MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.42
4>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 #033[0m[#033[00;32m49°C#033[0m/55%] 27.79 I/s #033[01;37m55.7#033[0m(55.6) Sol/s 134.7W clk=1873MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.41
5>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 Ti #033[0m[#033[00;32m41°C#033[0m/55%] 32.18 I/s #033[01;37m63.8#033[0m(64.4) Sol/s 135.0W clk=1847MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.48
6>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 Ti #033[0m[#033[00;32m44°C#033[0m/55%]#033[01;32m*#033[0m32.15 I/s #033[01;37m64.2#033[0m(63.8) Sol/s 136.2W clk=1835MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.47
7>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 Ti #033[0m[#033[00;32m49°C#033[0m/55%] 31.57 I/s #033[01;37m63.0#033[0m(63.3) Sol/s 135.5W clk=1784MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.47
8>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 Ti #033[0m[#033[00;32m46°C#033[0m/55%]#033[01;32m*#033[0m31.76 I/s #033[01;37m63.7#033[0m(63.6) Sol/s 133.7W clk=1784MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.48
9>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 Ti #033[0m[#033[00;32m48°C#033[0m/55%]#033[01;32m*#033[0m31.97 I/s #033[01;37m64.0#033[0m(64.2) Sol/s 134.3W clk=1835MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.48
10>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 Ti #033[0m[#033[00;32m49°C#033[0m/55%]#033[01;32m*#033[0m31.16 I/s #033[01;37m61.8#033[0m(62.3) Sol/s 134.4W clk=1746MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.46
11>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 Ti #033[0m[#033[00;32m46°C#033[0m/55%] 31.49 I/s #033[01;37m62.7#033[0m(62.9) Sol/s 130.6W clk=1797MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.48
#033[0m[ 0d 0h10m19s]#033[0m S:#033[01;32m162#033[0m/0 #033[01;37m720#033[0m(713) [europe.equihash-hub.miningpoolhub.com]- 911ms (#033[01;33m96.0%#033[0m) (#033[00;33m4.0%#033[0m)
Code:
PING europe.equihash-hub.miningpoolhub.com (172.104.189.59): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 172.104.189.59: icmp_seq=0 ttl=49 time=337.772 ms
64 bytes from 172.104.189.59: icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=358.011 ms
64 bytes from 172.104.189.59: icmp_seq=2 ttl=49 time=298.913 ms
64 bytes from 172.104.189.59: icmp_seq=3 ttl=49 time=398.775 ms
64 bytes from 172.104.189.59: icmp_seq=4 ttl=49 time=315.557 ms
November 28, 2018, 12:54:14 PM
hi!
Updating results
looks faster than gminer but miner increase power consuption when im overclock hmm
now testing:
195 core
700 memory
62% power limit
[ 0d 0h15m50s] S:75/0 198(197) 198(197)
0>GTX 1060 6GB [55°C/36]*16.35 I/s 32.9(32.
Sol/s 76.1W clk=1632MHz mclk=4498MHz Sol/W=0.43
1>GTX 1060 6GB [55°C/38] 16.47 I/s 33.9(33.4) Sol/s 75.6W clk=1645MHz mclk=4498MHz Sol/W=0.44
2>GTX 1060 6GB [54°C/17] 16.55 I/s 33.6(33.3) Sol/s 75.4W clk=1695MHz mclk=4498MHz Sol/W=0.44
3>GTX 1060 6GB [56°C/41] 16.43 I/s 32.7(32.7) Sol/s 75.8W clk=1620MHz mclk=4498MHz Sol/W=0.43
4>GTX 1060 6GB [54°C/33] 16.23 I/s 32.6(32.6) Sol/s 74.8W clk=1594MHz mclk=4498MHz Sol/W=0.44
5>GTX 1060 6GB [58°C/43] 16.27 I/s 32.5(32.6) Sol/s 76.1W clk=1632MHz mclk=4498MHz Sol/W=0.43
edit: 195 crash , back to 185 core
edit2:
[ 0d 0h55m38s] S:314/0 198(198) 198(198)
0>GTX 1060 6GB [55°C/32]*16.51 I/s 32.8(33.4) Sol/s 74.4W clk=1670MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.45
1>GTX 1060 6GB [55°C/40]*16.58 I/s 33.1(33.1) Sol/s 76.0W clk=1657MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.44
2>GTX 1060 6GB [54°C/20]*16.60 I/s 33.4(33.1) Sol/s 74.9W clk=1683MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.44
3>GTX 1060 6GB [56°C/41]*16.60 I/s 32.7(33.1) Sol/s 75.9W clk=1670MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.44
4>GTX 1060 6GB [54°C/37]*16.33 I/s 32.5(32.5) Sol/s 75.0W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.43
5>GTX 1060 6GB [58°C/43]*16.29 I/s 33.2(32.6) Sol/s 75.0W clk=1620MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.44
miner recomended :3 the fastest at this moment
Try to add watchdog like in gminer
Updating results
looks faster than gminer but miner increase power consuption when im overclock hmm
now testing:
195 core
700 memory
62% power limit
[ 0d 0h15m50s] S:75/0 198(197) 198(197)
0>GTX 1060 6GB [55°C/36]*16.35 I/s 32.9(32.
Sol/s 76.1W clk=1632MHz mclk=4498MHz Sol/W=0.431>GTX 1060 6GB [55°C/38] 16.47 I/s 33.9(33.4) Sol/s 75.6W clk=1645MHz mclk=4498MHz Sol/W=0.44
2>GTX 1060 6GB [54°C/17] 16.55 I/s 33.6(33.3) Sol/s 75.4W clk=1695MHz mclk=4498MHz Sol/W=0.44
3>GTX 1060 6GB [56°C/41] 16.43 I/s 32.7(32.7) Sol/s 75.8W clk=1620MHz mclk=4498MHz Sol/W=0.43
4>GTX 1060 6GB [54°C/33] 16.23 I/s 32.6(32.6) Sol/s 74.8W clk=1594MHz mclk=4498MHz Sol/W=0.44
5>GTX 1060 6GB [58°C/43] 16.27 I/s 32.5(32.6) Sol/s 76.1W clk=1632MHz mclk=4498MHz Sol/W=0.43
edit: 195 crash , back to 185 core
edit2:
[ 0d 0h55m38s] S:314/0 198(198) 198(198)
0>GTX 1060 6GB [55°C/32]*16.51 I/s 32.8(33.4) Sol/s 74.4W clk=1670MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.45
1>GTX 1060 6GB [55°C/40]*16.58 I/s 33.1(33.1) Sol/s 76.0W clk=1657MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.44
2>GTX 1060 6GB [54°C/20]*16.60 I/s 33.4(33.1) Sol/s 74.9W clk=1683MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.44
3>GTX 1060 6GB [56°C/41]*16.60 I/s 32.7(33.1) Sol/s 75.9W clk=1670MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.44
4>GTX 1060 6GB [54°C/37]*16.33 I/s 32.5(32.5) Sol/s 75.0W clk=1645MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.43
5>GTX 1060 6GB [58°C/43]*16.29 I/s 33.2(32.6) Sol/s 75.0W clk=1620MHz mclk=4201MHz Sol/W=0.44
miner recomended :3 the fastest at this moment
Try to add watchdog like in gminer
November 28, 2018, 07:25:07 AM
Hi dgeo, this has been added in the latest version, v1.0h.
Hello!It works fine but shows average ping rather than actual.
When I start mining, I see a large ping and after a while it becomes relevant.
And hive os support is also interesting
Thanks for your job
November 28, 2018, 04:29:22 AM
Hello!
when you add your wonderful manners to the platform of hive OS
when you add your wonderful manners to the platform of hive OS
November 27, 2018, 09:42:02 PM
Hi everyone,
Thank you all for your feedback!
There is a new miniZ miner version v1.0h!
Current Sols/s:
* GTX 1050 2GB ~17-19 Sol/s
* GTX 1050Ti 4GB ~19-21 Sol/s
* GTX 1060 3GB ~33-36 Sol/s
* GTX 1070Ti 8GB ~60-67 Sol/s
* GTX 1080 8GB ~61-67 Sol/s
Like the previous version, we added support for RTX 20xx GPUs (alpha stage). If you happen to try miniZ on these GPUs, give us feedback so that we can keep improving the miner.
For more information, download, and support check the website: https://miniz.ch/
Download miniZ miner here: https://miniz.ch/download/
Happy mining!
Thank you all for your feedback!
There is a new miniZ miner version v1.0h!
Current Sols/s:
* GTX 1050 2GB ~17-19 Sol/s
* GTX 1050Ti 4GB ~19-21 Sol/s
* GTX 1060 3GB ~33-36 Sol/s
* GTX 1070Ti 8GB ~60-67 Sol/s
* GTX 1080 8GB ~61-67 Sol/s
Like the previous version, we added support for RTX 20xx GPUs (alpha stage). If you happen to try miniZ on these GPUs, give us feedback so that we can keep improving the miner.
For more information, download, and support check the website: https://miniz.ch/
Download miniZ miner here: https://miniz.ch/download/
Happy mining!
November 27, 2018, 09:37:59 PM
having an issue with logging. program is not logging errors so i cant see what happened when computer restarts
Hi fistsofgod, we added cuda_error.log file that will log cuda fatal errors. Maybe this will help to diagnose the problem.
Please add pool ping
Hi dgeo, this has been added in the latest version, v1.0h.
Hello, on one of my rigs miner crashes with error:
0:error:1409F07F:SSL routines:ssl3_write_pending:bad write retry:..\..\openssl-1.1.0f\ssl\record\rec_layer_s3.c:902:
How can i fix this?
0:error:1409F07F:SSL routines:ssl3_write_pending:bad write retry:..\..\openssl-1.1.0f\ssl\record\rec_layer_s3.c:902:
How can i fix this?
Hi aklakl, we made the ssl functions more robust and this may be able to deal with that error. If the problem persists we'll need more information (OS, mining pool address and port number, and error occurrence frequency).
Thank you all!
Cheers
November 27, 2018, 01:28:58 PM
Nice job
[ 0d 3h34m39s] S:248/1 215(217) [btg.2miners.com] (97.9) (2.1)
0>GTX 1070 [63°C/87] 27.19 I/s 54.8(54.2) Sol/s 155.1W clk=1911MHz mclk=4353MHz Sol/W=0.35
1>GTX 1070 [63°C/87] 27.18 I/s 53.2(54.4) Sol/s 169.4W clk=1923MHz mclk=4387MHz Sol/W=0.32
2>GTX 1070 [61°C/85] 27.46 I/s 53.9(55.0) Sol/s 161.1W clk=1923MHz mclk=4387MHz Sol/W=0.34
3>GTX 1070 [65°C/92] 26.43 I/s 53.4(53.0) Sol/s 138.9W clk=1911MHz mclk=4387MHz Sol/W=0.38
about +10% than ewbf with same settings
Please add pool ping
you should lower power and increase efficiency. will also increase your profits, especially in this market, unless your electricity is free. [ 0d 3h34m39s] S:248/1 215(217) [btg.2miners.com] (97.9) (2.1)
0>GTX 1070 [63°C/87] 27.19 I/s 54.8(54.2) Sol/s 155.1W clk=1911MHz mclk=4353MHz Sol/W=0.35
1>GTX 1070 [63°C/87] 27.18 I/s 53.2(54.4) Sol/s 169.4W clk=1923MHz mclk=4387MHz Sol/W=0.32
2>GTX 1070 [61°C/85] 27.46 I/s 53.9(55.0) Sol/s 161.1W clk=1923MHz mclk=4387MHz Sol/W=0.34
3>GTX 1070 [65°C/92] 26.43 I/s 53.4(53.0) Sol/s 138.9W clk=1911MHz mclk=4387MHz Sol/W=0.38
about +10% than ewbf with same settings
Please add pool ping
November 27, 2018, 04:30:26 AM
Hello, on one of my rigs miner crashes with error:
0:error:1409F07F:SSL routines:ssl3_write_pending:bad write retry:..\..\openssl-1.1.0f\ssl\record\rec_layer_s3.c:902:
How can i fix this?
0:error:1409F07F:SSL routines:ssl3_write_pending:bad write retry:..\..\openssl-1.1.0f\ssl\record\rec_layer_s3.c:902:
How can i fix this?
November 26, 2018, 09:18:18 PM
Nice job
[ 0d 3h34m39s] S:248/1 215(217) [btg.2miners.com] (97.9) (2.1)
0>GTX 1070 [63°C/87] 27.19 I/s 54.8(54.2) Sol/s 155.1W clk=1911MHz mclk=4353MHz Sol/W=0.35
1>GTX 1070 [63°C/87] 27.18 I/s 53.2(54.4) Sol/s 169.4W clk=1923MHz mclk=4387MHz Sol/W=0.32
2>GTX 1070 [61°C/85] 27.46 I/s 53.9(55.0) Sol/s 161.1W clk=1923MHz mclk=4387MHz Sol/W=0.34
3>GTX 1070 [65°C/92] 26.43 I/s 53.4(53.0) Sol/s 138.9W clk=1911MHz mclk=4387MHz Sol/W=0.38
about +10% than ewbf with same settings
Please add pool ping
[ 0d 3h34m39s] S:248/1 215(217) [btg.2miners.com] (97.9) (2.1)
0>GTX 1070 [63°C/87] 27.19 I/s 54.8(54.2) Sol/s 155.1W clk=1911MHz mclk=4353MHz Sol/W=0.35
1>GTX 1070 [63°C/87] 27.18 I/s 53.2(54.4) Sol/s 169.4W clk=1923MHz mclk=4387MHz Sol/W=0.32
2>GTX 1070 [61°C/85] 27.46 I/s 53.9(55.0) Sol/s 161.1W clk=1923MHz mclk=4387MHz Sol/W=0.34
3>GTX 1070 [65°C/92] 26.43 I/s 53.4(53.0) Sol/s 138.9W clk=1911MHz mclk=4387MHz Sol/W=0.38
about +10% than ewbf with same settings
Please add pool ping
November 25, 2018, 03:15:28 PM
having an issue with logging. program is not logging errors so i cant see what happened when computer restarts
November 25, 2018, 06:59:10 AM
505 all rig, graphic cards about ~445, i got i5 7400 for gaming.
November 24, 2018, 08:11:20 PM
When you plan to release next version?
This week.
1080 ti on Zhash (144.5) ---> 78 - 80 sol/s with 80 tdp , +80 core +350 mem
pretty good
pretty good
Good to know! Thanks for reporting.
220 core is impossible on my 1060 6gb, max stable value is 185.
At this moment i got 0.44-0.45 sols/W on gminer, 74W per card, 90W its to much for me.
Thanks for answer. Don`t stop development your miner, like others
At this moment i got 0.44-0.45 sols/W on gminer, 74W per card, 90W its to much for me.
Thanks for answer. Don`t stop development your miner, like others
Hi reciu, just to make sure, you reported for that other miner ~198 @ 505W right? With these values we get 198/505 = 0.39 Sol/W s (505/6 = 84W not 74W)
We'll look at this and try to improve efficiency for the 1060 6Gb. Thanks!
November 24, 2018, 03:13:07 AM
Nice job man but still gminer winning
189-191 sols, 515W- miniZ
194-201 sols, 505W- gminer
6xGTX 1060 6gb Asus Strix
65% power limit
185 core
-520 memory
144,5 needs + mem not -189-191 sols, 515W- miniZ
194-201 sols, 505W- gminer
6xGTX 1060 6gb Asus Strix
65% power limit
185 core
-520 memory
nope all cards required personal options, i didnt see difference with -520 and +100-700
Hi reclu, thanks for reporting your values for the 1060 6Gb.
We only have a 1060 3GB, so our values can differ a little.
However, it has been reported widely on the web that the 1060 6GB can perform 5-15% better than the 1060 3Gb.
If we limit power to 90 W, and OC settings to +220 core, +1000 mem, we can get ~31.6 Sol/s @ 85 W (=505/6 W) out of our 1060 3Gb.
Assuming that the 1060 GB performs 10% better this means that 31.6*1.1= ~34.8 Sol/s, or ~208.6 Sol/S for 6 1060 6Gb GPUs.
You may want to give these values a try. You can also try other values as the ones we have on our website https://miniz.ch/features/ (these may change as we keep testing the miner).
Cheers.
220 core is impossible on my 1060 6gb, max stable value is 185.
At this moment i got 0.44-0.45 sols/W on gminer, 74W per card, 90W its to much for me.
Thanks for answer. Don`t stop development your miner, like others
November 23, 2018, 08:55:52 PM
hi, i cant run more than 5 gpu.
C:\Users\Chinfei\Desktop\miniz>miniZ --url [email protected]:3436 --pers Safecoin --cuda-devices 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
************ miniZ v1.0g ************
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#0 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#1 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#3 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#4 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#5 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#6 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#7 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Algo: EQ[144,5]
Pool#0: user[RaYR4hnnJwFNFLeiV2DmgPFCgreb3En4N4] server[safecoin.catspool.org] port[3436] ssl[no] pers[Safecoin]
Telemetry: [http://localhost:20000]
Temp. limit: [90°C]
[ 0d 0h 0m07s] 73(73) 0>GTX 1050 Ti[38°C/60] 8.76 I/s 17.4(17.4) Sol/s 1>GTX 1050 Ti[40°C/60]* 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0) Sol/s 2>GTX 1050 Ti[39°C/60] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0) Sol/s 3>GTX 1050 Ti[41°C/60] 8.59 I/s 16.7(16.7) Sol/s 4>GTX 1050 Ti[39°C/60] 3.40 I/s 5.8( 5. Sol/s 5>GTX 1050 Ti[32°C/60] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0) Sol/s 6>GTX 1050 Ti[32°C/60] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0) Sol/s 7>GTX 1050 Ti[30°C/60] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0) Sol/s
Wanted to alloc: 2696 MB
out of memory::CUDA: failed to alloc memory for main data
C:\Users\Chinfei\Desktop\miniz>miniZ --url [email protected]:3436 --pers Safecoin --cuda-devices 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
************ miniZ v1.0g ************
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#0 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#1 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#3 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#4 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#5 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#6 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#7 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Algo: EQ[144,5]
Pool#0: user[RaYR4hnnJwFNFLeiV2DmgPFCgreb3En4N4] server[safecoin.catspool.org] port[3436] ssl[no] pers[Safecoin]
Telemetry: [http://localhost:20000]
Temp. limit: [90°C]
[ 0d 0h 0m07s] 73(73) 0>GTX 1050 Ti[38°C/60] 8.76 I/s 17.4(17.4) Sol/s 1>GTX 1050 Ti[40°C/60]* 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0) Sol/s 2>GTX 1050 Ti[39°C/60] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0) Sol/s 3>GTX 1050 Ti[41°C/60] 8.59 I/s 16.7(16.7) Sol/s 4>GTX 1050 Ti[39°C/60] 3.40 I/s 5.8( 5.
Sol/s 5>GTX 1050 Ti[32°C/60] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0) Sol/s 6>GTX 1050 Ti[32°C/60] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0) Sol/s 7>GTX 1050 Ti[30°C/60] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0) Sol/sWanted to alloc: 2696 MB
out of memory::CUDA: failed to alloc memory for main data
Hi dillony,
on Windows to use all memory of your GPUs you must increase the page file to have ~32GB. For miniZ it may work with 24 GB, but if you have enough space go with at least 32 GB.
Cheers.
November 23, 2018, 08:21:12 PM
1080 ti on Zhash (144.5) ---> 78 - 80 sol/s with 80 tdp , +80 core +350 mem
pretty good
pretty good
November 23, 2018, 12:49:08 PM
Regarding the --nocolor option, it will be added in the next version.
November 22, 2018, 06:44:49 PM
hi, i cant run more than 5 gpu.
C:\Users\Chinfei\Desktop\miniz>miniZ --url [email protected]:3436 --pers Safecoin --cuda-devices 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
************ miniZ v1.0g ************
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#0 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#1 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#3 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#4 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#5 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#6 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#7 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Algo: EQ[144,5]
Pool#0: user[RaYR4hnnJwFNFLeiV2DmgPFCgreb3En4N4] server[safecoin.catspool.org] port[3436] ssl[no] pers[Safecoin]
Telemetry: [http://localhost:20000]
Temp. limit: [90°C]
[ 0d 0h 0m07s] 73(73) 0>GTX 1050 Ti[38°C/60] 8.76 I/s 17.4(17.4) Sol/s 1>GTX 1050 Ti[40°C/60]* 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0) Sol/s 2>GTX 1050 Ti[39°C/60] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0) Sol/s 3>GTX 1050 Ti[41°C/60] 8.59 I/s 16.7(16.7) Sol/s 4>GTX 1050 Ti[39°C/60] 3.40 I/s 5.8( 5. Sol/s 5>GTX 1050 Ti[32°C/60] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0) Sol/s 6>GTX 1050 Ti[32°C/60] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0) Sol/s 7>GTX 1050 Ti[30°C/60] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0) Sol/s
Wanted to alloc: 2696 MB
out of memory::CUDA: failed to alloc memory for main data
C:\Users\Chinfei\Desktop\miniz>miniZ --url [email protected]:3436 --pers Safecoin --cuda-devices 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
************ miniZ v1.0g ************
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#0 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#1 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#3 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#4 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#5 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#6 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#7 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Algo: EQ[144,5]
Pool#0: user[RaYR4hnnJwFNFLeiV2DmgPFCgreb3En4N4] server[safecoin.catspool.org] port[3436] ssl[no] pers[Safecoin]
Telemetry: [http://localhost:20000]
Temp. limit: [90°C]
[ 0d 0h 0m07s] 73(73) 0>GTX 1050 Ti[38°C/60] 8.76 I/s 17.4(17.4) Sol/s 1>GTX 1050 Ti[40°C/60]* 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0) Sol/s 2>GTX 1050 Ti[39°C/60] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0) Sol/s 3>GTX 1050 Ti[41°C/60] 8.59 I/s 16.7(16.7) Sol/s 4>GTX 1050 Ti[39°C/60] 3.40 I/s 5.8( 5.
Sol/s 5>GTX 1050 Ti[32°C/60] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0) Sol/s 6>GTX 1050 Ti[32°C/60] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0) Sol/s 7>GTX 1050 Ti[30°C/60] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0) Sol/sWanted to alloc: 2696 MB
out of memory::CUDA: failed to alloc memory for main data
Hi dillony,
on Windows to use all memory of your GPUs you must increase the page file to have ~32GB. For miniZ it may work with 24 GB, but if you have enough space go with at least 32 GB.
Cheers.
November 22, 2018, 06:25:02 PM
hi, i cant run more than 5 gpu.
C:\Users\Chinfei\Desktop\miniz>miniZ --url [email protected]:3436 --pers Safecoin --cuda-devices 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
************ miniZ v1.0g ************
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#0 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#1 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#3 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#4 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#5 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#6 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#7 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Algo: EQ[144,5]
Pool#0: user[RaYR4hnnJwFNFLeiV2DmgPFCgreb3En4N4] server[safecoin.catspool.org] port[3436] ssl[no] pers[Safecoin]
Telemetry: [http://localhost:20000]
Temp. limit: [90°C]
[ 0d 0h 0m07s] 73(73) 0>GTX 1050 Ti[38°C/60] 8.76 I/s 17.4(17.4) Sol/s 1>GTX 1050 Ti[40°C/60]* 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0) Sol/s 2>GTX 1050 Ti[39°C/60] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0) Sol/s 3>GTX 1050 Ti[41°C/60] 8.59 I/s 16.7(16.7) Sol/s 4>GTX 1050 Ti[39°C/60] 3.40 I/s 5.8( 5. Sol/s 5>GTX 1050 Ti[32°C/60] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0) Sol/s 6>GTX 1050 Ti[32°C/60] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0) Sol/s 7>GTX 1050 Ti[30°C/60] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0) Sol/s
Wanted to alloc: 2696 MB
out of memory::CUDA: failed to alloc memory for main data
C:\Users\Chinfei\Desktop\miniz>miniZ --url [email protected]:3436 --pers Safecoin --cuda-devices 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
************ miniZ v1.0g ************
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#0 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#1 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#2 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#3 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#4 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#5 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#6 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ,144,5[1]: Selecting GPU#7 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Algo: EQ[144,5]
Pool#0: user[RaYR4hnnJwFNFLeiV2DmgPFCgreb3En4N4] server[safecoin.catspool.org] port[3436] ssl[no] pers[Safecoin]
Telemetry: [http://localhost:20000]
Temp. limit: [90°C]
[ 0d 0h 0m07s] 73(73) 0>GTX 1050 Ti[38°C/60] 8.76 I/s 17.4(17.4) Sol/s 1>GTX 1050 Ti[40°C/60]* 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0) Sol/s 2>GTX 1050 Ti[39°C/60] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0) Sol/s 3>GTX 1050 Ti[41°C/60] 8.59 I/s 16.7(16.7) Sol/s 4>GTX 1050 Ti[39°C/60] 3.40 I/s 5.8( 5.
Sol/s 5>GTX 1050 Ti[32°C/60] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0) Sol/s 6>GTX 1050 Ti[32°C/60] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0) Sol/s 7>GTX 1050 Ti[30°C/60] 0.00 I/s 0.0( 0.0) Sol/sWanted to alloc: 2696 MB
out of memory::CUDA: failed to alloc memory for main data
November 22, 2018, 05:02:25 PM
I think 1.0g propels miniz into 1st place. but its unstable for me at certain power levels. still currently more efficient than gminer. unfortunately the mrkt is sh*t
Hi fistsofgod,
Thanks for the nice words. We are working in order to improve stability.
Cheers.
Jump to: