miniZ v2.0a Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX - page 74.

miniZ

member

Activity: 679

Merit: 17

Quote from: fistsofgod on November 21, 2018, 04:22:12 AM

I think 1.0g propels miniz into 1st place. but its unstable for me at certain power levels. still currently more efficient than gminer. unfortunately the mrkt is sh*t

Hi fistsofgod,

Thanks for the nice words. We are working in order to improve stability.

Cheers.

miniZ

member

Activity: 679

Merit: 17

Quote from: topteam on November 21, 2018, 01:49:07 AM

Now 12 GPU work fine!!!
Please add --nocolor option or use

Code:

export SYSLOG=1

Order right now, i have line in sh

Code:

export CUDA_DEVICE_ORDER=PCI_BUS_ID

Hi topteam,

Great that it works!

Good that you found a solution for PCI bus order.

Regarding the --nocolor option, it will be added in the next version.

Cheers.

miniZ

member

Activity: 679

Merit: 17

Quote from: reciu on November 22, 2018, 02:12:48 PM

Quote from: fistsofgod on November 21, 2018, 03:47:50 PM

Quote from: reciu on November 21, 2018, 02:53:41 PM

Nice job man but still gminer winning

189-191 sols, 515W- miniZ
194-201 sols, 505W- gminer

6xGTX 1060 6gb Asus Strix

65% power limit
185 core
-520 memory

144,5 needs + mem not -

nope all cards required personal options, i didnt see difference with -520 and +100-700

Hi reclu, thanks for reporting your values for the 1060 6Gb.

We only have a 1060 3GB, so our values can differ a little.
However, it has been reported widely on the web that the 1060 6GB can perform 5-15% better than the 1060 3Gb.

If we limit power to 90 W, and OC settings to +220 core, +1000 mem, we can get ~31.6 Sol/s @ 85 W (=505/6 W) out of our 1060 3Gb.
Assuming that the 1060 GB performs 10% better this means that 31.6*1.1= ~34.8 Sol/s, or ~208.6 Sol/S for 6 1060 6Gb GPUs.

You may want to give these values a try. You can also try other values as the ones we have on our website https://miniz.ch/features/ (these may change as we keep testing the miner).

Cheers.

reciu

newbie

Activity: 22

Merit: 0

Quote from: fistsofgod on November 21, 2018, 03:47:50 PM

Quote from: reciu on November 21, 2018, 02:53:41 PM

Nice job man but still gminer winning

189-191 sols, 515W- miniZ
194-201 sols, 505W- gminer

6xGTX 1060 6gb Asus Strix

65% power limit
185 core
-520 memory

144,5 needs + mem not -

nope all cards required personal options, i didnt see difference with -520 and +100-700

fistsofgod

newbie

Activity: 164

Merit: 0

Quote from: reciu on November 21, 2018, 02:53:41 PM

Nice job man but still gminer winning

189-191 sols, 515W- miniZ
194-201 sols, 505W- gminer

6xGTX 1060 6gb Asus Strix

65% power limit
185 core
-520 memory

144,5 needs + mem not -

reciu

newbie

Activity: 22

Merit: 0

Nice job man 😎 but still gminer winning

189-191 sols, 515W- miniZ
194-201 sols, 505W- gminer

6xGTX 1060 6gb Asus Strix

65% power limit
185 core
-520 memory

fistsofgod

newbie

Activity: 164

Merit: 0

I think 1.0g propels miniz into 1st place. but its unstable for me at certain power levels. still currently more efficient than gminer. unfortunately the mrkt is sh*t

topteam

newbie

Activity: 157

Merit: 0

Now 12 GPU work fine!!!
Please add --nocolor option or use

Code:

export SYSLOG=1

Order right now, i have line in sh

Code:

export CUDA_DEVICE_ORDER=PCI_BUS_ID

Code:

 #033[22;33m[ 0d 0h11m59s]#033[0m S:#033[01;32m143#033[0m/0 #033[01;37m702#033[0m(696) [europe.equihash-hub.miningpoolhub.com] (#033[01;33m97.1%#033[0m) (#033[00;33m2.9%#033[0m)
   0>#033[00;36mGTX 1070       #033[0m[#033[00;32m56°C#033[0m/55%] 26.39 I/s #033[01;37m52.9#033[0m(52.8) Sol/s 135.3W clk=1809MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.39
   1>#033[00;36mGTX 1070       #033[0m[#033[00;32m51°C#033[0m/55%] 26.87 I/s #033[01;37m53.8#033[0m(53.6) Sol/s 134.3W clk=1847MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.40
   2>#033[00;36mGTX 1070       #033[0m[#033[00;32m52°C#033[0m/55%] 27.17 I/s #033[01;37m54.0#033[0m(54.1) Sol/s 136.8W clk=1873MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.40
   3>#033[00;36mGTX 1070       #033[0m[#033[00;32m47°C#033[0m/55%] 27.01 I/s #033[01;37m53.4#033[0m(53.9) Sol/s 134.4W clk=1936MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.40
   4>#033[00;36mGTX 1070       #033[0m[#033[00;32m51°C#033[0m/55%] 27.16 I/s #033[01;37m53.7#033[0m(54.4) Sol/s 136.3W clk=1911MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.40
   5>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 Ti    #033[0m[#033[00;32m44°C#033[0m/55%] 31.43 I/s #033[01;37m62.6#033[0m(62.7) Sol/s 134.1W clk=1809MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.47
   6>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 Ti    #033[0m[#033[00;32m46°C#033[0m/55%] 31.43 I/s #033[01;37m62.9#033[0m(63.1) Sol/s 134.9W clk=1835MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.47
   7>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 Ti    #033[0m[#033[00;32m53°C#033[0m/55%] 30.91 I/s #033[01;37m61.5#033[0m(62.2) Sol/s 134.7W clk=1771MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.46
   8>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 Ti    #033[0m[#033[00;32m49°C#033[0m/55%]#033[01;32m*#033[0m31.08 I/s #033[01;37m61.9#033[0m(61.9) Sol/s 134.1W clk=1784MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.46
   9>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 Ti    #033[0m[#033[00;32m50°C#033[0m/55%] 31.23 I/s #033[01;37m63.0#033[0m(62.5) Sol/s 132.5W clk=1797MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.47
  10>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 Ti    #033[0m[#033[00;32m52°C#033[0m/55%] 30.47 I/s #033[01;37m60.2#033[0m(60.5) Sol/s 133.4W clk=1746MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.45
  11>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 Ti    #033[0m[#033[00;32m48°C#033[0m/55%] 30.53 I/s #033[01;37m61.6#033[0m(61.2) Sol/s 131.3W clk=1746MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.47
 #033[0m[ 0d 0h12m09s]#033[0m S:#033[01;32m145#033[0m/0 #033[01;37m701#033[0m(696) [europe.equihash-hub.miningpoolhub.com] (#033[01;33m97.1%#033[0m) (#033[00;33m2.9%#033[0m)
   0>#033[00;36mGTX 1070       #033[0m[#033[00;32m56°C#033[0m/55%] 26.39 I/s #033[01;37m52.8#033[0m(52.8) Sol/s 135.3W clk=1809MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.39
   1>#033[00;36mGTX 1070       #033[0m[#033[00;32m51°C#033[0m/55%]#033[01;32m*#033[0m26.87 I/s #033[01;37m53.8#033[0m(53.6) Sol/s 134.7W clk=1873MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.40
   2>#033[00;36mGTX 1070       #033[0m[#033[00;32m52°C#033[0m/55%] 27.18 I/s #033[01;37m54.1#033[0m(54.1) Sol/s 136.9W clk=1898MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.40
   3>#033[00;36mGTX 1070       #033[0m[#033[00;32m48°C#033[0m/55%] 27.01 I/s #033[01;37m53.2#033[0m(53.8) Sol/s 134.4W clk=1911MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.40
   4>#033[00;36mGTX 1070       #033[0m[#033[00;32m51°C#033[0m/55%] 27.15 I/s #033[01;37m53.3#033[0m(54.2) Sol/s 136.2W clk=1885MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.40
   5>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 Ti    #033[0m[#033[00;32m44°C#033[0m/55%] 31.43 I/s #033[01;37m62.6#033[0m(62.7) Sol/s 133.8W clk=1822MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.47
   6>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 Ti    #033[0m[#033[00;32m46°C#033[0m/55%] 31.43 I/s #033[01;37m63.2#033[0m(63.2) Sol/s 134.9W clk=1835MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.47
   7>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 Ti    #033[0m[#033[00;32m53°C#033[0m/55%] 30.92 I/s #033[01;37m61.9#033[0m(62.3) Sol/s 134.6W clk=1809MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.46
   8>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 Ti    #033[0m[#033[00;32m49°C#033[0m/55%] 31.08 I/s #033[01;37m61.7#033[0m(61.9) Sol/s 133.9W clk=1784MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.46
   9>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 Ti    #033[0m[#033[00;32m51°C#033[0m/55%] 31.24 I/s #033[01;37m62.7#033[0m(62.5) Sol/s 132.6W clk=1797MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.47
  10>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 Ti    #033[0m[#033[00;32m52°C#033[0m/55%] 30.48 I/s #033[01;37m60.7#033[0m(60.6) Sol/s 133.5W clk=1746MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.45
  11>#033[00;36mGTX 1070 Ti    #033[0m[#033[00;32m48°C#033[0m/55%]#033[01;32m*#033[0m30.53 I/s #033[01;37m61.2#033[0m(61.1) Sol/s 131.3W clk=1759MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.47

miniZ

member

Activity: 679

Merit: 17

Hi everyone,

in the first place, we would like to thank you all for your support and feedback.

There is a new miniZ version v1.0g!

Like the previous version, we added support for RTX 20xx GPUs (alpha stage). If you happen to try miniZ on these GPUs, give us feedback so that we can keep improving the miner.

For more information, download, and support check the website: https://miniz.ch/
Download miniZ miner here: https://miniz.ch/download/

Happy mining!

miniZ

member

Activity: 679

Merit: 17

Hi topteam,

nvidia-smi does list PCI bus order but this is not the default cuda order.
ref: https://docs.nvidia.com/cuda/cuda-c-programming-guide/index.html#env-vars

To show the GPUs listed in PCI bus order, in Linux, you can run miniZ adding CUDA_DEVICE_ORDER=PCI_BUS_ID before miniZ. Example:
CUDA_DEVICE_ORDER=PCI_BUS_ID ./miniZ -ci

On Windows powershell command to change to PCI_BUS_ID before running miniZ:
env:CUDA_DEVICE_ORDER = "PCI_BUS_ID"

Thanks!! New version should out soon

topteam

newbie

Activity: 157

Merit: 0

Cuda device order and PCI bus order are the same on my board

Code:

| NVIDIA-SMI 396.44                 Driver Version: 396.44                    |
|-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
| GPU  Name        Persistence-M| Bus-Id        Disp.A | Volatile Uncorr. ECC |
| Fan  Temp  Perf  Pwr:Usage/Cap|         Memory-Usage | GPU-Util  Compute M. |
|===============================+======================+======================|
|   0  GeForce GTX 1070    On   | 00000000:01:00.0  On |                  N/A |
| 55%   56C    P2   140W / 140W |   2301MiB /  8118MiB |    100%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   1  GeForce GTX 1070    On   | 00000000:02:00.0  On |                  N/A |
| 55%   50C    P2   139W / 140W |   2301MiB /  8119MiB |    100%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   2  GeForce GTX 1070    On   | 00000000:03:00.0 Off |                  N/A |
| 55%   53C    P2   140W / 140W |   2300MiB /  8119MiB |    100%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   3  GeForce GTX 1070    On   | 00000000:04:00.0  On |                  N/A |
| 55%   48C    P2   138W / 140W |   2301MiB /  8119MiB |    100%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   4  GeForce GTX 1070    On   | 00000000:05:00.0  On |                  N/A |
| 55%   51C    P2   132W / 140W |   2301MiB /  8119MiB |    100%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   5  GeForce GTX 107...  On   | 00000000:07:00.0  On |                  N/A |
| 55%   45C    P2   133W / 140W |   2321MiB /  8119MiB |    100%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   6  GeForce GTX 107...  On   | 00000000:08:00.0  On |                  N/A |
| 55%   47C    P2   133W / 140W |   2321MiB /  8119MiB |    100%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   7  GeForce GTX 107...  On   | 00000000:09:00.0  On |                  N/A |
| 55%   53C    P2   130W / 140W |   2321MiB /  8119MiB |    100%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   8  GeForce GTX 107...  On   | 00000000:0A:00.0  On |                  N/A |
| 55%   50C    P2   138W / 140W |   2321MiB /  8119MiB |    100%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|   9  GeForce GTX 107...  On   | 00000000:0B:00.0  On |                  N/A |
| 55%   51C    P2   135W / 140W |   2321MiB /  8119MiB |    100%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|  10  GeForce GTX 107...  On   | 00000000:0C:00.0  On |                  N/A |
| 55%   51C    P2   134W / 140W |   2321MiB /  8119MiB |    100%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
|  11  GeForce GTX 107...  On   | 00000000:0D:00.0  On |                  N/A |
| 55%   49C    P2   131W / 140W |   2321MiB /  8119MiB |    100%      Default |
+-------------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+

waiting for the next version

miniZ

member

Activity: 679

Merit: 17

Hi everyone, thanks for the encouragement!

Quote from: Sikkan666 on November 15, 2018, 04:25:18 PM

Good effort..but it is not faster than Gminer

Quote from: nan931 on November 17, 2018, 09:12:18 PM

Thank you for giving us an alternate miner but with same fee and less hashrate than Gminer, it does not look attractive to use. I hope next release will beat Gminer.

We understand your point but keep following us!

Quote from: fistsofgod on November 17, 2018, 11:55:50 PM

add 192,7

At the moment we are improving the 144,5. But we'll have your request in consideration

Quote from: JeffJohnsonTheNameYouKnow on November 18, 2018, 12:19:23 AM

How does this do with a 1080ti ?
More than 80 sol/s ?

Unfortunately we do not have access to a 1080Ti. If you do, would you be so kind to test it and let everyone know? There'll be a new miniZ version soon!

Quote from: topteam on November 19, 2018, 02:03:31 PM

Not work on 12 GPU Sad

and please use PCI bus GPU order
Thanks for your work!!!
We need alternatives

Thank you for reporting this bug. It should be fixed in the next version. Can you try it out then and report back?
We'll look into PCI bus order in future releases. At the moment miniZ uses cuda devices order.

topteam

newbie

Activity: 157

Merit: 0

Not work on 12 GPU Sad

Code:

[ 0d 0h 2m07s] 511(511) [fee.server]9s (0.0%,0)
  0>GTX 1070 Ti    [43°C/55%] 29.41 I/s 60.1(60.1) Sol/s 132.7W clk=1860MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.45
  1>GTX 1070 Ti    [45°C/55%]*29.50 I/s 59.6(59.6) Sol/s 137.2W clk=1835MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.43
  2>GTX 1070 Ti    [50°C/55%] 28.83 I/s 57.8(57.8) Sol/s 138.7W clk=1835MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.42
  3>GTX 1070 Ti    [47°C/55%] 28.99 I/s 58.9(58.9) Sol/s 131.5W clk=1822MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.45
  4>GTX 1070 Ti    [48°C/55%] 29.21 I/s 58.4(58.4) Sol/s 134.7W clk=1898MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.43
  5>GTX 1070 Ti    [49°C/55%]*28.50 I/s 56.7(56.7) Sol/s 130.8W clk=1784MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.43
  6>GTX 1070 Ti    [47°C/55%]*28.58 I/s 57.8(57.8) Sol/s 124.6W clk=1784MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.46
  7>GTX 1070       [54°C/55%] 24.48 I/s 50.3(50.3) Sol/s 118.2W clk=1873MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.43
  8>GTX 1070       [44°C/55%] 25.02 I/s 49.5(49.5) Sol/s 106.2W clk=1847MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.47
  9>GTX 1070       [43°C/55%] 25.35 I/s 50.1(50.1) Sol/s 95.3W clk=1949MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.53
 10>GTX 1070       [36°C/55%] 406.59 I/s  0.0( 0.0) Sol/s 50.1W clk=2126MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.00
 11>GTX 1070       [35°C/55%]  0.13 I/s  0.2( 0.2) Sol/s 36.5W clk=1632MHz mclk=4657MHz Sol/W=0.01
[ 0d 0h 2m17s] 521(521) [europe.equihash-hub.miningpoolhub.com]126s (0.0%,0)
  0>GTX 1070 Ti    [43°C/55%]*29.42 I/s 59.8(59.8) Sol/s 132.7W clk=1860MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.45
  1>GTX 1070 Ti    [45°C/55%] 29.49 I/s 59.0(59.0) Sol/s 137.2W clk=1835MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.43
  2>GTX 1070 Ti    [50°C/55%]*28.84 I/s 57.9(57.9) Sol/s 136.8W clk=1784MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.42
  3>GTX 1070 Ti    [48°C/55%] 29.01 I/s 59.1(59.1) Sol/s 131.5W clk=1784MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.45
  4>GTX 1070 Ti    [49°C/55%] 29.24 I/s 58.1(58.1) Sol/s 136.5W clk=1847MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.43
  5>GTX 1070 Ti    [50°C/55%]*28.52 I/s 56.6(56.6) Sol/s 130.7W clk=1771MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.43
  6>GTX 1070 Ti    [47°C/55%] 28.57 I/s 56.4(56.4) Sol/s 126.4W clk=1797MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.45
  7>GTX 1070       [54°C/55%] 24.53 I/s 49.7(49.7) Sol/s 122.9W clk=1873MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.40
  8>GTX 1070       [45°C/55%]*25.06 I/s 49.4(49.4) Sol/s 113.5W clk=1923MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.44
  9>GTX 1070       [44°C/55%] 25.37 I/s 50.7(50.7) Sol/s 102.7W clk=1974MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.49
 10>GTX 1070       [37°C/55%] 406.64 I/s  0.0( 0.0) Sol/s 54.9W clk=2126MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.00
 11>GTX 1070       [41°C/55%]*24.03 I/s 45.3(45.3) Sol/s 52.6W clk=1949MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.86
[ 0d 0h 2m27s] 531(531) [europe.equihash-hub.miningpoolhub.com]136s (0.0%,0)
  0>GTX 1070 Ti    [43°C/55%] 29.43 I/s 59.7(59.7) Sol/s 131.8W clk=1822MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.45
  1>GTX 1070 Ti    [45°C/55%] 29.50 I/s 58.9(58.9) Sol/s 136.3W clk=1860MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.43
  2>GTX 1070 Ti    [50°C/55%]*28.87 I/s 57.3(57.3) Sol/s 136.3W clk=1797MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.42
  3>GTX 1070 Ti    [48°C/55%] 29.03 I/s 58.8(58.8) Sol/s 133.5W clk=1835MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.44
  4>GTX 1070 Ti    [49°C/55%]*29.26 I/s 58.0(58.0) Sol/s 136.3W clk=1822MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.43
  5>GTX 1070 Ti    [50°C/55%] 28.53 I/s 56.4(56.4) Sol/s 131.0W clk=1784MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.43
  6>GTX 1070 Ti    [47°C/55%] 28.59 I/s 56.5(56.5) Sol/s 129.7W clk=1797MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.44
  7>GTX 1070       [54°C/55%] 24.53 I/s 49.6(49.6) Sol/s 126.1W clk=1898MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.39
  8>GTX 1070       [45°C/55%] 25.07 I/s 49.3(49.3) Sol/s 118.0W clk=1923MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.42
  9>GTX 1070       [45°C/55%] 25.38 I/s 51.7(51.7) Sol/s 106.8W clk=1961MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.48
 10>GTX 1070       [37°C/55%] 406.70 I/s  0.0( 0.0) Sol/s 58.5W clk=2126MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.00
 11>GTX 1070       [43°C/55%] 24.97 I/s 47.3(47.3) Sol/s 65.9W clk=1936MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.72
[ 0d 0h 2m37s] 540(540) [europe.equihash-hub.miningpoolhub.com]145s (0.0%,0)
  0>GTX 1070 Ti    [43°C/55%] 29.45 I/s 59.8(59.8) Sol/s 131.3W clk=1822MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.46
  1>GTX 1070 Ti    [45°C/55%] 29.50 I/s 58.8(58.8) Sol/s 135.9W clk=1847MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.43
  2>GTX 1070 Ti    [51°C/55%]*28.91 I/s 57.2(57.2) Sol/s 137.1W clk=1822MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.42
  3>GTX 1070 Ti    [48°C/55%]*29.06 I/s 59.2(59.2) Sol/s 133.1W clk=1822MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.44
  4>GTX 1070 Ti    [49°C/55%] 29.28 I/s 58.3(58.3) Sol/s 136.1W clk=1847MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.43
  5>GTX 1070 Ti    [50°C/55%] 28.54 I/s 56.5(56.5) Sol/s 134.0W clk=1822MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.42
  6>GTX 1070 Ti    [47°C/55%] 28.62 I/s 56.5(56.5) Sol/s 130.9W clk=1797MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.43
  7>GTX 1070       [54°C/55%] 24.55 I/s 50.2(50.2) Sol/s 128.5W clk=1860MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.39
  8>GTX 1070       [45°C/55%] 25.07 I/s 49.3(49.3) Sol/s 119.9W clk=1911MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.41
  9>GTX 1070       [45°C/55%] 25.39 I/s 51.1(51.1) Sol/s 112.5W clk=1949MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.45
 10>GTX 1070       [38°C/55%] 407.04 I/s  0.0( 0.0) Sol/s 61.5W clk=2126MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.00
 11>GTX 1070       [44°C/55%] 25.19 I/s 50.1(50.1) Sol/s 75.8W clk=1949MHz mclk=4452MHz Sol/W=0.66

and please use PCI bus GPU order
Thanks for your work!!!
We need alternatives

JeffJohnsonTheNameYouKnow

jr. member

Activity: 41

Merit: 2

How does this do with a 1080ti ?

More than 80 sol/s ?

fistsofgod

newbie

Activity: 164

Merit: 0

add 192,7

nan931

newbie

Activity: 9

Merit: 0

Thank you for giving us an alternate miner but with same fee and less hashrate than Gminer, it does not look attractive to use. I hope next release will beat Gminer.

Sikkan666

member

Activity: 239

Merit: 11

Good effort..but it is not faster than Gminer

miniZ

member

Activity: 679

Merit: 17

Hi everyone,

miniZ v1.0f is out!

  * Major speed improvement. Up to 16%, depending on GPU.
  * Minor bug fixes.
  * Added extra version compiled with cuda 10.0.
  * Added support for RTX 20xx GPUs (alpha stage).

For download and more information check the website:
https://miniz.ch

Happy mining!

miniZ

member

Activity: 679

Merit: 17

Quote from: Overdrive5 on November 09, 2018, 11:28:01 PM

Just wanted to give you a update on this post and to correct a error in it. I indicated that it worked with a 348.111 driver.

I have now corrected that post to show it is the 384.111 driver that it works with.

When I posted, it was late for me and I was pretty tired at the moment.

My sincere apologies for taking so long in recognizing the error.

I just discovered it now as I was viewing your website looking to see what version Cuda you are compiled with and noticed the 348.111 statement.

I sincerely hope this error has not caused you or anyone any difficulties. From what I can see here, no one has mentioned anything about it and it is very unlikely anyone would be using a driver that old for mining anyway.

Hi Overdrive5, thank you for letting us know! As you wrote "no one has mentioned anything about it and it is very unlikely anyone would be using a driver that old for mining", so we do not think that caused any trouble.

We corrected both the website (https://miniz.ch/features-miniz-equihash-1445-miner/) and the post (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.43081625)

Quote from: Overdrive5 on November 09, 2018, 11:28:01 PM

So what version Cuda are you compiling with?

I am in the process of compiling/testing both 390.87 & 410.73 drivers and I now am seeing a slight Sol rate increase between a competitor's cuda 8.0 and cuda 9.1 versions.

So I wanted to let you know that if you are compiling with cuda 8.0, you may want to offer a cuda 9.1 or higher version as well.

This may be a piece of the puzzle in improving your Sol rate even further.

Hope this Helps

Windows release is compiled with Cuda 9.1 already.
Linux version is compiled with Cuda 8.0. We've tried Cuda 9.1 but did not see much difference, so for sake of compatibility with older systems we will keep Cuda 8.0. But, if we see that it is holding us back we'll change, of course. Thanks for the tip!

We keep working on improvements. It is likely we'll be able to release an even better miniZ soon.

Johnjay06

newbie

Activity: 93

Merit: 0

Any vets try this yet?

Topic: miniZ v2.0a Equihash 144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 BeamHash3 ProgPoW Ethash CFX - page 74. (Read 59063 times)