Pages:
Author

Topic: Minor trust score algorithm change - page 4. (Read 7377 times)

legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
May 21, 2015, 02:43:03 AM
#87
In situations like TECSHARE's, you can (if you trust TECSHARE and disagree with Vod) post an additional positive rating responding to whatever Vod said. This will counteract Vod's negative rating.

So in effect, what you are saying is that the trust system is no longer about who trades and who is trusted with what, rather it is now about a popularity contest, and who you can convince to join your own circlejerk club. Can you explain to me why I deserve to be excluded from the entire default trust tree over one rating while Vod can negative rate me (and lots of others) without repercussion negating my entire trust over the fact that he doesn't like what I have to say about him? Every time you "improve" the trust system it becomes more and more arbitrary and able to be manipulated from the top.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
That Darn Cat
May 21, 2015, 01:08:25 AM
#86
Good changes staff.  Smiley  I feel it is a little easier to understand now for newer users.
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 509
I prefer Zakir over Muhammed when mentioning me!
May 21, 2015, 01:03:47 AM
#85
Thank you, theymos! It looks good now.

-snip-

I also agree with what others said a few pages back though, it doesn't seem right for users with a single positive feedback to have a +10 score after a year of doing nothing, I definitely think it creates a sense of false trust, at least if people don't go and check out the user's actual ratings.

I also agree. Something should be done about this.
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1001
https://keybase.io/masterp FREE Escrow Service
May 21, 2015, 12:36:09 AM
#84
I'm liking this new trust system, seems to give older scammers a red tag like they deserve. I noticed this on the 'creativex' account, the guy who ran the bASIC-MINING scam now has red trust, and before he didn't.

I also agree with what others said a few pages back though, it doesn't seem right for users with a single positive feedback to have a +10 score after a year of doing nothing, I definitely think it creates a sense of false trust, at least if people don't go and check out the user's actual ratings.

I believe a +10 trust score will eventually even out and not be as much compared to other trust scores. Since the new system basically makes older trust ratings add more value to your trust score. A member with a single trust rating can get a +10 score from that rating alone but nothing more. I do like the new system more, it makes more sense to me and I believe it is easier for others to understand as well. The old algorithm was honestly a pretty big mystery to me that I didn't bother looking into too much.
legendary
Activity: 1694
Merit: 1024
May 20, 2015, 08:14:53 PM
#83
I'm liking this new trust system, seems to give older scammers a red tag like they deserve. I noticed this on the 'creativex' account, the guy who ran the bASIC-MINING scam now has red trust, and before he didn't.

I also agree with what others said a few pages back though, it doesn't seem right for users with a single positive feedback to have a +10 score after a year of doing nothing, I definitely think it creates a sense of false trust, at least if people don't go and check out the user's actual ratings.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
May 20, 2015, 07:26:08 PM
#82
Brand new trust ratings are worth 1 point, rising to 10 after 10 months have passed.

So old trust is worth more than new trust .  I like it.  Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1185
dogiecoin.com
May 20, 2015, 07:11:33 PM
#81
Can i ask a clear explanation on what does the 'month' do or its effect? I cant understand it clearly

Brand new trust ratings are worth 1 point, rising to 10 after 10 months have passed.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
May 20, 2015, 07:00:51 PM
#80
Can i ask a clear explanation on what does the 'month' do or its effect? I cant understand it clearly
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
May 20, 2015, 06:27:30 PM
#79
After a quick perusal of your trust, I challenge that statement.   Smiley

I stand corrected. Geez man, people getting platinum mad with your ratings.

Most of them are abandoned, throw away accounts.   Smiley
vip
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1043
👻
May 20, 2015, 06:05:08 PM
#78
My trust network has me at a trust rating of -9999...  Huh
legendary
Activity: 2800
Merit: 1012
Get Paid Crypto To Walk or Drive
May 20, 2015, 06:03:29 PM
#77
After a quick perusal of your trust, I challenge that statement.   Smiley

I stand corrected. Geez man, people getting platinum mad with your ratings.

I still have way more. Or maybe Bick does, will be close. [BFL "competition"]

Psh, all I got is stupid BA, I need to start outing more scammers.
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1185
dogiecoin.com
May 20, 2015, 05:58:15 PM
#76
After a quick perusal of your trust, I challenge that statement.   Smiley

I stand corrected. Geez man, people getting platinum mad with your ratings.

I still have way more. Or maybe Bick does, will be close. [BFL "competition"]
legendary
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1222
brb keeping up with the Kardashians
May 20, 2015, 05:52:08 PM
#75
After a quick perusal of your trust, I challenge that statement.   Smiley

I stand corrected. Geez man, people getting platinum mad with your ratings.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
May 20, 2015, 05:49:44 PM
#74
I don't get it. I probably have more negative trust than anybody else on this forum, but my second # is still 0. Are the trust ratings still weighted (sorry if this has already been answered since I didn't actually read the entire thread).

After a quick perusal of your trust, I challenge that statement.   Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1222
brb keeping up with the Kardashians
May 20, 2015, 05:41:51 PM
#73
Ah, ok. Thanks for the explanation Smiley
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
May 20, 2015, 05:40:48 PM
#72
I don't get it. I probably have more negative trust than anybody else on this forum, but my second # is still 0. Are the trust ratings still weighted (sorry if this has already been answered since I didn't actually read the entire thread).

It only counts users from default trust, no? All the negatives you have are in the untrusted list, as far as I can see at least.
It only counts users from people within your trust network.
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 1001
https://keybase.io/masterp FREE Escrow Service
May 20, 2015, 05:39:35 PM
#71
I don't get it. I probably have more negative trust than anybody else on this forum, but my second # is still 0. Are the trust ratings still weighted (sorry if this has already been answered since I didn't actually read the entire thread).

It only counts users from default trust, no? All the negatives you have are in the untrusted list, as far as I can see at least.
legendary
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1222
brb keeping up with the Kardashians
May 20, 2015, 05:37:16 PM
#70
I don't get it. I probably have more negative trust than anybody else on this forum, but my second # is still 0. Are the trust ratings still weighted (sorry if this has already been answered since I didn't actually read the entire thread).
legendary
Activity: 2072
Merit: 1049
┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴
May 20, 2015, 04:10:41 PM
#69
It does seem like the green points are too easy to obtain (easy to seem trusted) with this algorithm.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2970
Terminated.
May 20, 2015, 03:55:39 PM
#68
At least darkgreen should be hard to obtain. Getting 15 points is pretty easy with this algorithm.
Exactly. Even though my trust list has just 1 person included (that being you), it has jumped with the new changed.
I'm already: 15: -0 / +2
Although others won't see it that way I guess.
Pages:
Jump to: