Topic: mkxminer: Fast Lyra2Z/Lyra2rev2 miner for AMD GPU (ZCoin, GINcoin, VERT, MONA... - page 10. (Read 52758 times)
March 04, 2018, 08:57:14 PM
drop mem down to 1400 or so, undervolt it. my 4gb rx580's get 39-40 at 1400mhz core, 1400mhz mem. undervolted to 1075 on core, 850 on mem. about 125-130 watts. My 570 will only run up to about 1300 mhz at +50% power. If you use overdriventool copy the fastest core state and voltage to everything but slot 1 and 2.
March 04, 2018, 11:35:04 AM
Asus Strix RX480 (straps moded ETH), Radeon Software Version 17.7 - 32MH
Miner does not want to raise the frequency to the standard 1310, but keeps at 1200 MHz
Miner does not want to raise the frequency to the standard 1310, but keeps at 1200 MHz
March 03, 2018, 01:09:39 PM
I was also getting 28-30Mhz per RX570 4Gb
RX 580 4Gb - 31Mhs, 8Gb - 32-33Mhs
But my hashrate is not 100% stable. It could go down 10% in 30 min, some gpus drop half speed during a day.
RX 580 4Gb - 31Mhs, 8Gb - 32-33Mhs
But my hashrate is not 100% stable. It could go down 10% in 30 min, some gpus drop half speed during a day.
March 03, 2018, 08:02:27 AM
Hey everyone,
I was just wondering what clock/memory/voltage settings people are using to get 35mh on the RX570? I'm getting about 29/30... I am using the asm core.
I've tried running an 1150 clock and a 1200... My memory is all around 2000 with some up to 2200.
Edit: With some changes I'm getting around 31.5. For sure not bad...
I was just wondering what clock/memory/voltage settings people are using to get 35mh on the RX570? I'm getting about 29/30... I am using the asm core.
I've tried running an 1150 clock and a 1200... My memory is all around 2000 with some up to 2200.
Edit: With some changes I'm getting around 31.5. For sure not bad...
February 27, 2018, 04:04:58 AM
My GPU is Asus Dual RX580 mod bios, I am having 1 or 2 card sick or dead after 1 hours mining, average speed is 29~30Mh/s with Block chain driver 23 Aug.
The parameter I use is —exitsick —asm -I 20 only,
My card core on fresh reboot is 1150 and 2020 mem.
I do try —auto-fan it crash into blue screen immediately.
Anyone got overcome this strange issue?
The parameter I use is —exitsick —asm -I 20 only,
My card core on fresh reboot is 1150 and 2020 mem.
I do try —auto-fan it crash into blue screen immediately.
Anyone got overcome this strange issue?
Finally figured out how to get my miner working duh! When your borrowing from the example batch files make sure you change the tls stratum to tcp if your mining pool does not support this. My brain was frying over this stupid oversight when I kept on getting errors. I'm currently running at -I 22 intensity but I do have asm turned off. I'm getting around 26 mh (xfx 580)and 24mhs (xfx 570) but that's because I've reduced the frequency by 6% and the power by 10%. I will say after 8 hours it's running rock solid and this is with an old motherboard and processor with a pci express multi-split adapter, The lyra2v2 algo uses more power than equihash and ethash but I feel it's more stable than neoscrypt mining pools when you get it working right. Kind of reminds me of library algo when it was mineable on cards. My observation is that this miner works very well with amd 570 as you get 24 mhs very stable. I think if your getting 28 hashes and its unstable your simply cooking your cards and pushing them too hard. maybe if your in a really cold climate like canada or siberia you can push the hell out of them. LOL!
February 27, 2018, 02:41:56 AM
Anyone managed to pull off more than 55 Mh/s with Vega?
This miner considered to be the most profitable for non-ETH only GPUs.. but Fury X giving the same hashrate as brand new Vega? Sounds uncool
This miner considered to be the most profitable for non-ETH only GPUs.. but Fury X giving the same hashrate as brand new Vega? Sounds uncool
Think about it for a moment...the only major differences are an increase in memory from 4 gb to 8 gb and a few architectural tweaks...its more evolution than revolution in design. vega 2 at 7nm is where it will get interesting...
The difference in frequency should bring some increase in hashrate. This is the case for some algo but not for this miner.
The reason is that there is some assembly code, specific to a given architecture, which is pretty well optimized for fidji and not so well for vega.
Agree to you, it always comes up to driver-miner synergy. That being said, this miner is no longer most profitable since Claymore NeoScrypt has been developed.
Sorry to say that
February 26, 2018, 07:55:20 AM
Hi Developer,
Is it possible to add feature to exit miner for DEAD gpu, I se eyou have option for SICK status of GPU, but not for DEAD.
Thanks.
Is it possible to add feature to exit miner for DEAD gpu, I se eyou have option for SICK status of GPU, but not for DEAD.
Thanks.
February 25, 2018, 06:30:36 PM
Hey peeps, I built a 3 card gpu mining rig with an r9 270, r9 390, rx 480, Ive been trying to mine monacoin using the mkx lyra2rev miner with windows 10 but Ive been having so many problems that I started to mine other coins that are cryptonight since I dont seem to have many problems with that,
now before I built this 3 gpu rig I was just using the r9 270 with the mkxminer on windows 10 and I had 0 problems, I was getting 14mh steady and up to 16mh if I pushed it, now that I added all 3 gpus I can barely get it to run for more than a few minutes without it crashing, no overcloaking, for the few minutes that it does run I get about half the mhs I do when I run them solo, I tested all cards by them selves and the rx 480 gets 28-30mhs and the r9 390 26-31mh and the r9 270 14-16mh, but as soon as I add all 3 together I get nothing but problems, they all get really hot super and if I crank up the fans to 100% the stay cool but it all still crashes, Ive tested both windows 7 and windows 10 with the same results, any help or suggestions would be much appreciated, thanks in advance
now before I built this 3 gpu rig I was just using the r9 270 with the mkxminer on windows 10 and I had 0 problems, I was getting 14mh steady and up to 16mh if I pushed it, now that I added all 3 gpus I can barely get it to run for more than a few minutes without it crashing, no overcloaking, for the few minutes that it does run I get about half the mhs I do when I run them solo, I tested all cards by them selves and the rx 480 gets 28-30mhs and the r9 390 26-31mh and the r9 270 14-16mh, but as soon as I add all 3 together I get nothing but problems, they all get really hot super and if I crank up the fans to 100% the stay cool but it all still crashes, Ive tested both windows 7 and windows 10 with the same results, any help or suggestions would be much appreciated, thanks in advance
Are these GPUs all in the same closed case? That could be creating an issue with overheating that you may not have with Cryptonight (since it's allot less intensive on the GPUs). As for crashing and lower hashrate, have you tried increasing the virtual memory size (page file) to equal that of your combined VRAM plus a bit extra?
February 25, 2018, 05:32:31 PM
@winmkx
Hi Admin, any new update and optimization for this great AMD GPU Miner ?
Thanks in advance for the support.
Hi Admin, any new update and optimization for this great AMD GPU Miner ?
Thanks in advance for the support.
February 25, 2018, 03:17:17 PM
Hey peeps, I built a 3 card gpu mining rig with an r9 270, r9 390, rx 480, Ive been trying to mine monacoin using the mkx lyra2rev miner with windows 10 but Ive been having so many problems that I started to mine other coins that are cryptonight since I dont seem to have many problems with that,
now before I built this 3 gpu rig I was just using the r9 270 with the mkxminer on windows 10 and I had 0 problems, I was getting 14mh steady and up to 16mh if I pushed it, now that I added all 3 gpus I can barely get it to run for more than a few minutes without it crashing, no overcloaking, for the few minutes that it does run I get about half the mhs I do when I run them solo, I tested all cards by them selves and the rx 480 gets 28-30mhs and the r9 390 26-31mh and the r9 270 14-16mh, but as soon as I add all 3 together I get nothing but problems, they all get really hot super and if I crank up the fans to 100% the stay cool but it all still crashes, Ive tested both windows 7 and windows 10 with the same results, any help or suggestions would be much appreciated, thanks in advance
now before I built this 3 gpu rig I was just using the r9 270 with the mkxminer on windows 10 and I had 0 problems, I was getting 14mh steady and up to 16mh if I pushed it, now that I added all 3 gpus I can barely get it to run for more than a few minutes without it crashing, no overcloaking, for the few minutes that it does run I get about half the mhs I do when I run them solo, I tested all cards by them selves and the rx 480 gets 28-30mhs and the r9 390 26-31mh and the r9 270 14-16mh, but as soon as I add all 3 together I get nothing but problems, they all get really hot super and if I crank up the fans to 100% the stay cool but it all still crashes, Ive tested both windows 7 and windows 10 with the same results, any help or suggestions would be much appreciated, thanks in advance
February 25, 2018, 04:53:33 AM
My GPU is Asus Dual RX580 mod bios, I am having 1 or 2 card sick or dead after 1 hours mining, average speed is 29~30Mh/s with Block chain driver 23 Aug.
The parameter I use is —exitsick —asm -I 20 only,
My card core on fresh reboot is 1150 and 2020 mem.
I do try —auto-fan it crash into blue screen immediately.
Anyone got overcome this strange issue?
The parameter I use is —exitsick —asm -I 20 only,
My card core on fresh reboot is 1150 and 2020 mem.
I do try —auto-fan it crash into blue screen immediately.
Anyone got overcome this strange issue?
February 24, 2018, 03:16:29 PM
Same. My workaround (on linux). In a screen session:
Code:
while true; do ./mkxminer -o stratum+tls://vtc.suprnova.cc:5676 -u-p -I 21 --asm | tee /tmp/mkxminer.log; sleep 5; done
Code:
while true; do ISODT=$(date --iso-8601=ns); if grep 'server reply - error 301' /tmp/mkxminer.log; then killall -9 mkxminer; mv -v /tmp/mkxminer.log /tmp/mkxminer_${ISODT}.log; else echo $ISODT; sleep 30; fi; done
Keeps it running most of the time. Seriously, this code is pretty bad. Just give up the source so we can fix it? Sigh.
February 24, 2018, 05:22:10 AM
February 24, 2018, 04:34:14 AM
You would get sooooo many more users if you weren't so greedy and changed your donation to 1% and add allium (for garlicoin).
Food for thought my friend
My 36 RX570's would be with you
Food for thought my friend
My 36 RX570's would be with you
February 22, 2018, 06:40:50 PM
What driver version are people using with this miner and the AMD R9 Fury series of GPUs? Does it require an older driver, or is the current AMD driver a good choice?
February 22, 2018, 05:42:18 PM
you can use newest drivers if you turn compute off in radeon settings.
my score rx480,rx580 stock , asicpool:
win7 64bit, newest drivers, 29-30mh per card, without --asm cose crashed, I-22 max
win10 64bit, blochchain drivers, 35-36 mh, --asm, I-23
temp. 74c, fan 40-50%
win7 64bit, newest drivers, 29-30mh per card, without --asm cose crashed, I-22 max
win10 64bit, blochchain drivers, 35-36 mh, --asm, I-23
temp. 74c, fan 40-50%
February 22, 2018, 05:11:36 PM
my score rx480,rx580 stock , asicpool:
win7 64bit, newest drivers, 29-30mh per card, without --asm cose crashed, I-22 max
win10 64bit, blochchain drivers, 35-36 mh, --asm, I-23
temp. 74c, fan 40-50%
win7 64bit, newest drivers, 29-30mh per card, without --asm cose crashed, I-22 max
win10 64bit, blochchain drivers, 35-36 mh, --asm, I-23
temp. 74c, fan 40-50%
February 22, 2018, 05:04:42 PM
Will this miner work with the Ubuntu fglrx driver?
February 22, 2018, 02:10:28 PM
Anyone have managed to mine in a pool different from suprnova ?
I keep receiving error 500
and q doesn't work in that situation
I keep receiving error 500
and q doesn't work in that situation
February 22, 2018, 10:16:17 AM
Anyone managed to pull off more than 55 Mh/s with Vega?
This miner considered to be the most profitable for non-ETH only GPUs.. but Fury X giving the same hashrate as brand new Vega? Sounds uncool
This miner considered to be the most profitable for non-ETH only GPUs.. but Fury X giving the same hashrate as brand new Vega? Sounds uncool
Think about it for a moment...the only major differences are an increase in memory from 4 gb to 8 gb and a few architectural tweaks...its more evolution than revolution in design. vega 2 at 7nm is where it will get interesting...
The difference in frequency should bring some increase in hashrate. This is the case for some algo but not for this miner.
The reason is that there is some assembly code, specific to a given architecture, which is pretty well optimized for fidji and not so well for vega.
Jump to: