Topic: 🌟🎲🌟 MoneyPot.com - page 96. (Read 119056 times)

Hi, sorry if i did not introduce my self, as i rarely reply or talk on posts that does not concerns me. hehe

So anyway as dogedigital said, im responsible for all technical stuff of mp since last March. So Im responsibile for all downtimes, updates, upgrades, bet speeds etc since then. 

 All of the funds are secured and there is nothing wrong with the system.

The reason why withdrawals have been slow are because the fee being charged to send  (100 bits) isn't enough of a fee for high priority from the miners anymore.  We are setting it up so that a higher fee can be in place for faster confirmations to make up for this.

Uni is indeed on our team, he is our lead developer.

Sorry but I seem to be missing some good point here, are you part of the new MP team? I dont recall seeing you on the team before and you do speak as on behalf of the moneypot's team. If you are then it will be great addition, you are a great coder as well as quite a legend gambler around here

We should have a solution for this in place by end of tomorrow

The main problem is that i'm using a .innerHtml to add the messages to the chat. I need to switch it to .innerText

Bit-exo uses their own chat server + socketpot. Again socketpot is not mandatory. So what bit-exo did was to use their own chat server and then listens to socketpot for any System Announcement and then pipe this message to their chat room.

All of this is app owner's own choice. For now, we do not force app owners to use socketpot and they are free to use or develop their own chat server. Having said that, we do not and can not control how app's are made and coded.

I have suggested internally to tighten the requirements of verifying app domains and to have a written guidelines on how an app is made. But then again even with this, I myself can not monitor and/or control all moneypot apps.

Thanks
-uni

hi uni

thanks for the explanation. but as we know that exo has their own chat server and still get  mp-wide system announcements that means there is no advantage to have socketpot chat

but again in our opinion if you guys implement the universal chat and the  mp-wide system announcements it would be nice if all MP apps would use it and all will have the profit. but if this is not the case it does not sound fair for all

it would be like the NSA would watch socketpot apps only and not the chat servers of other
MP apps

you guys know that we like to see that all apps will have the same conditions

cheers

Please kindly inform the former owner, Rhavar (https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/rhavar-389331) and he'll send you your funds with confirmation of your identity.   He's a good guy and he'll take care of it.

Previous setup of socketpot allows "freedom of speech" and parses chat messages as "string". So whatever a user types in, it returns that message exactly as it is. So meaning, people can share code snippets on chat without compromising our servers or other apps. It up to app owners to parse this messages.

As for the recent issue, this only affects apps that uses the specific open-source script that dexon made.

As we all know, moneypot does not and can not control the app's codes. So please refrain from using open-source codes without validating the code's integrity and authenticity.

For now, all chat messages that has malicious codes that comes in and comes out of socketpot are escaped. Chat messages with symbols like < will now show as <. Its up to app owners to parse this.

It is true that socketpot is not a mandatory to have, you can have your own chat server if you want to. Tho there are advantages on using socketpot as well, like mp-wide system announcement.

I will again ask this to everyone that plans on opening an app on Moneypot. PLEASE refrain from using open-source scripts/codes without verifying the code's integrity and authencity. Moneypot can not control how apps are coded. And for players, PLEASE treat your access_tokens as if it is your password. Never give it to anyone.

Plans on binding the access_tokens to each user's ip is in the works. Meaning if ever your access_token is used by a different ip, this will automatically expire that token and logout the user.

Thanks
-uni

I never used socketpot - no need. However, this statement deserves seconding. It's a flippin' chat server, it should sanitize!

A xss injection inssue on the chat. I fixed it right away. When Cooldadd told me about it. I'm not responsible for other casinos that copied my code and didn't paid more attention than I did :p

No one got really affected on Sweepabit. (Besides me for tests) But on some others like Bitmine, everyone most likely lost all their bits. The user named Hax0r said he was going the refund but haven't heard more about it.

P.S.: I kind of feel like, as a chat server, socketpot should've escaped the html chars from the messages.

Why? Whats the problem with 'minesweeper' apps?
If there is security issue disable them manually

Good question Rubies investment would be very good as many of us use both.

Same here, i checked the thread out here and everything seemed great with good support so i went for it.
Obviously a good choice, keep up the good work.

always glad to get your feedback

yes it really matters to show an official list of all MP apps. it should matter for players, app owners and especially for investors. in case that someone is not interested in the list (i.e. you) he can easily ignore it.

I am too happy about the current owners. I was a bit scare previously when it was announced that the ownership will be transferred but i am fine now.

That was an old post before the new feature and Does it really matter anyway? I dont really think it is necessary to do so because the post  for the apps list is in 6th page and no one is really going to find that post up in the 6th page. People can just go to the site directly and check the all apps tab imo

A question about the Rubie integration. Will we receive credit for our staked rubies if we chose to deposit/invest with them?

Moneypot accepts bets where the max amount won = the house edge of that bet.

Like stated before, in order to win 99.99% of the bankroll, someone would have to bet at a 99.99% House Edge disadvantage. 

This would be liken to betting 750BTC on the Washington Generals to beat the Harlem Globetrotters to win even money at 750BTC.  No one should ever do this, but if someone actually ended up doing it, the odds would be overwhelmingly in the house's favour. 

We will be announcing a hard cap that can be won soon along with a few other changes that we have planned.  Don't quote me on this, but a possible max win might be capped at 25BTC.