Topic: [MOON] Mooncoin 🌙 move to a new thread - page 320. (Read 317730 times)
I personally like the current logo better. The proposed new one looks like a kids picture of a hang glider.
The new logo is nicer than before but too plain 
If you have any idea how to improve it, you're welcome.
I believe I agree with temmuz... the new logo is nice but still missing something. I do like the angled crescent idea, so, how about something closer to these:
http://i.imgur.com/YzQ8y5v.png
http://i.imgur.com/r3GV8Na.png
http://i.imgur.com/PQyyfQa.png
http://i.imgur.com/NSnHO00.png
The new logo is not crescent like only.
It symbolizes an impulse/motion (2 da moon!) and looks like a sail and a spacecraft at the same time.
Crescent pictures are not bad, one problem, they are with small details,
and when the logo appears in a small size (at exchanges, at Coinmarketcap), the details are not visible and the logo will look like a small picture or small photo, not like a professional logo).
All top coins have very simple logos. See them at http://coinmarketcap.com.
Waiting for more ideas.
The new logo is nicer than before but too plain
If you have any idea how to improve it, you're welcome.
I believe I agree with temmuz... the new logo is nice but still missing something. I do like the angled crescent idea, so, how about something closer to these:
The exact amount of coins according to the Court report is 8,421,008,915MOON,
the balance of 2M5kiseCXp6X5g75ZcWeo3BNsMYJxtDCzq is 8,421,008,915, the last transaction was on 2016-09-20,
http://cryptoguru.tk/Address/index.php?Currency=MOON&Address=2M5kiseCXp6X5g75ZcWeo3BNsMYJxtDCzq
Thus the new report confirms that 2 top rich MOON addresses (Cryptsy-derived) are illegitimate.
2cLG2RzF6rDCtNws6We8o8avXs1grqARHU
2FgWY2MjPn9AG3bhuRLH5mhCKyc17eVHRY
Warning: exchanges should not let any deposits from these addresses (they are known and proven to be illegitimate, containing only coins that were illegally obtained),
otherwise it can be treated as stolen funds laundering.
the balance of 2M5kiseCXp6X5g75ZcWeo3BNsMYJxtDCzq is 8,421,008,915, the last transaction was on 2016-09-20,
http://cryptoguru.tk/Address/index.php?Currency=MOON&Address=2M5kiseCXp6X5g75ZcWeo3BNsMYJxtDCzq
Thus the new report confirms that 2 top rich MOON addresses (Cryptsy-derived) are illegitimate.
2cLG2RzF6rDCtNws6We8o8avXs1grqARHU
2FgWY2MjPn9AG3bhuRLH5mhCKyc17eVHRY
Warning: exchanges should not let any deposits from these addresses (they are known and proven to be illegitimate, containing only coins that were illegally obtained),
otherwise it can be treated as stolen funds laundering.
In his 4th report (Case 9:16-cv-80060-KAM Document 99-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/30/2017)
the Cryptsy Receiver has confirmed that only about 8.42 billion MOON are under his control.
The report is available at http://cryptsyreceivership.com.
the Cryptsy Receiver has confirmed that only about 8.42 billion MOON are under his control.
The report is available at http://cryptsyreceivership.com.
this is due to the way sends occur - also change addresses. Still if you send from your address to your own address,
all 3 addresses A,B,C remain under your control.
all 3 addresses A,B,C remain under your control.
Thanks for clarifying!
Someone who tried to record the Moonlite command with this MOON address 2RcAiS8X7Y6bCydbc5guYyZDNU9Syhf7TZ
this command was already recorded by CryptoDatabase (see above).
this command was already recorded by CryptoDatabase (see above).
I sent 29292632.40392 MOON from address 2SjixsJyViqFYcM92c1PbcFKs2Z2KaWsHh to 2RcAiS8X7Y6bCydbc5guYyZDNU9Syhf7TZ, but https://bchain.info/MOON/tx/709c1b82cbb3d01ebdbb5ab26b7ab3f2bf064d0a1ac6cb81c8c4b251d21791b1 stated that it was sent 58000000 MOON! What happened? TxID: 709c1b82cbb3d01ebdbb5ab26b7ab3f2bf064d0a1ac6cb81c8c4b251d21791b1
It's normal, it is how blockchain works, not only MOON.
58 mil is an output of this transaction, coins sent in one operation 29292632.40392 MOON.
Addresses change, but coins are in your wallet.
Say you have an address (A) with 5000 coins; and you send 1000 of them to another address (B)
you would expect the ledger to show (after the fact):
A: 4000
B: 1000
but in fact, it would show:
A: 0
C: 4000 (this address is newly created)
B: 1000
this is due to the way sends occur - also change addresses. Still if you send from your address to your own address,
all 3 addresses A,B,C remain under your control.
Someone who tried to record the Moonlite command with this MOON address 2RcAiS8X7Y6bCydbc5guYyZDNU9Syhf7TZ
this command was already recorded by CryptoDatabase (see above).
this command was already recorded by CryptoDatabase (see above).
I sent 29292632.40392 MOON from address 2SjixsJyViqFYcM92c1PbcFKs2Z2KaWsHh to 2RcAiS8X7Y6bCydbc5guYyZDNU9Syhf7TZ, but https://bchain.info/MOON/tx/709c1b82cbb3d01ebdbb5ab26b7ab3f2bf064d0a1ac6cb81c8c4b251d21791b1 stated that it was sent 58000000 MOON! What happened? TxID: 709c1b82cbb3d01ebdbb5ab26b7ab3f2bf064d0a1ac6cb81c8c4b251d21791b1
http://archive.is/VqEFW has been submitted, TxID: 9deab9d001daa23e3f5dd1d5d726c5fffa46b0a2ce5438487d11ba0e3a63c9f4
The new logo is nicer than before but too plain
If you have any idea how to improve it, you're welcome.
Doing the archive thing for Moonlite, seeing if I got it right.
http://archive.is/GMUTA
Update - I put the archive address into the moonlite explorer and sent the requested 29292632.40392 moon to another address and the transaction has confirmed. Now what?
http://archive.is/GMUTA
Update - I put the archive address into the moonlite explorer and sent the requested 29292632.40392 moon to another address and the transaction has confirmed. Now what?
Someone who tried to record the Moonlite command with this MOON address 2RcAiS8X7Y6bCydbc5guYyZDNU9Syhf7TZ
this command was already recorded by CryptoDatabase (see above).
The new logo is nicer than before but too plain
You have not published a lot of updates, even though the work is intense. Hope will succeed.
You have not published a lot of updates, even though the work is intense. Hope will succeed.
The archive link checker on the explorer isn't recognizing commands at the moment.
Did you submit it directly at mooncoin.com/ml or via cryptodatabase.net/ml?
What was the archive link?
Edit: fixed.
The archive link checker on the explorer isn't recognizing commands at the moment.
I added a new section to my database site for Moonlite transactions. It should provide a fast and easily searchable way to see if an archive address has been confirmed yet.
You can view this new section by going to http://cryptodatabase.net/ml
You can search for transaction ids, commands, or the archived link.
As Mooncoin Foundation posted above, please post here when you confirm a command. This helps me as well as I'll only update the list when I see a new post here.
If there is a confirmed command that isn't listed yet please let me know here or via private message.
You can view this new section by going to http://cryptodatabase.net/ml
You can search for transaction ids, commands, or the archived link.
As Mooncoin Foundation posted above, please post here when you confirm a command. This helps me as well as I'll only update the list when I see a new post here.
If there is a confirmed command that isn't listed yet please let me know here or via private message.
If you record a Moonlite command on the blockchain,
please let other users know by posting here,
as it's seen from the block explorers people are trying to record one command several times now,
however only the first one who records the unique command, receives a mining reward in moonlite, and double recording is ignored by an algo.
The latest command (see above) was not recorded yet at the moment.
please let other users know by posting here,
as it's seen from the block explorers people are trying to record one command several times now,
however only the first one who records the unique command, receives a mining reward in moonlite, and double recording is ignored by an algo.
The latest command (see above) was not recorded yet at the moment.
Previous command has been recorded now, e573c8d47d846d7a4bfeb7819bb5a306bd5c62821c2a788b6a9e2e0e85938b31
Would it be possible to have the decoder check to see if a command has been processed? That way instead of it saying to send so many coins it would say that it has been confirmed?
In future, yes,
currently the explorer script works with some delay and it will not see the command immediately after it's recorded, and it can show that it's not recorded when in fact it's already done, so better just to post here, no need to post the tx id, only that command is written.
Remember that if people share their experience by posting here, at this stage, it improves visibility of our new ANN thread,
lets newbies raise their post count not by posting garbage posts, quite the opposite - by participating in a fair interesting project (other than mining moonlite)
and it lets people see how real usage of our new platform is progressing.
If you record a Moonlite command on the blockchain,
please let other users know by posting here,
as it's seen from the block explorers people are trying to record one command several times now,
however only the first one who records the unique command, receives a mining reward in moonlite, and double recording is ignored by an algo.
The latest command (see above) was not recorded yet at the moment.
please let other users know by posting here,
as it's seen from the block explorers people are trying to record one command several times now,
however only the first one who records the unique command, receives a mining reward in moonlite, and double recording is ignored by an algo.
The latest command (see above) was not recorded yet at the moment.
Previous command has been recorded now, e573c8d47d846d7a4bfeb7819bb5a306bd5c62821c2a788b6a9e2e0e85938b31
Would it be possible to have the decoder check to see if a command has been processed? That way instead of it saying to send so many coins it would say that it has been confirmed?
If you record a Moonlite command on the blockchain,
please let other users know by posting here,
as it's seen from the block explorers people are trying to record one command several times now,
however only the first one who records the unique command, receives a mining reward in moonlite, and double recording is ignored by an algo.
The latest command (see above) was not recorded yet at the moment.
please let other users know by posting here,
as it's seen from the block explorers people are trying to record one command several times now,
however only the first one who records the unique command, receives a mining reward in moonlite, and double recording is ignored by an algo.
The latest command (see above) was not recorded yet at the moment.
One more Moonlite command, to record on the blockchain:
moonlitecmd! send: ml: 12345 to: 2VCUmLJUeQ3GLGjJui931VLKKyZypoFZXm
comment: 3 (Crypto Books) !2themoon
archived at http://archive.is/f1822
moonlitecmd! send: ml: 12345 to: 2VCUmLJUeQ3GLGjJui931VLKKyZypoFZXm
comment: 3 (Crypto Books) !2themoon
archived at http://archive.is/f1822
Mooncoin nova wallet is in maintenance, when the problem is fixed sir
No idea. That depends on NovaExchange.
In theory an exchange can put a wallet into maintenance forever, like Cryptsy,
so it's not recommended to keep coins at exchanges.
If you want to sell your coins, you can do it at other exchanges:
https://bleutrade.com
http://coingather.com
http://coinexchange.io.
Jump to: