Topic: More abuse by TECSHARE NSFW reee(sponse) (Read 1056 times)

---

Bump and adding:

@TECHARE, about this:


Can you please:

Stop trolling, I PMed you about that locked thread where you posted false things about moderator and you literally didn't do anything. You ignored PM like it wasn't there.

Here is good point https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53514120 and one of many examples of your trolling and attempted trolling.

Go fetch QS or PN7 and ask them/him. If he confirms or starts weaseling out then that's proof enough (except for the likes of you and TECSHARE of course). If he categorically denies then we'll have some fun I reckon.

Anyways we could confirm PN7 being QS ? ( Something Solid ).
I don't know why should TECSHARE act on this if he doesn't know the valid reason behind the connection. He already doesn't trusts QS's judgement according to the trust list.


It doesn't even seem logical that he would deny excluding an alt of an already excluded user if he gets some proofs, as you think.

Again, whatever you need to say to paint yourself as infallible is fine with me and I would never expect you to say that you fucked up, or even to e.g address your Quick-schizo-inclusion instead of deflecting. You've proven so many times that you're incapable of handling unpleasant facts like an adult - nothing new here. All that is part of your profile that makes you unsuitable for DT.

Not sure how I or anyone could "manufacture" your inclusions of banned users, scammers, etc but if you don't think that's a problem then you're welcome to keep them in your trust list.

Is that the point? Because to me it sounds like the point is during your deep dive through my toilet looking for stray peanuts, you couldn't find any crimes so you had to manufacture some. This is not about my trust inclusions, this is about putting on a show and manufacturing narratives. Still I prefer the books.

You're missing the point. If you need this kind of hand-holding via PM then you're not fit for DT. You're supposed to use your trust list any way you see fit and other users are supposed to evaluate your judgement based on that, not to coach you. If this DT1 thing is too hard you can always ask theymos to blacklist you and you won't have to worry anymore.

Besides it's very likely that you'd be just as belligerent if anyone (particularly someone you dislike) tried to PM you about something like this. Your inability to be wrong is legendary.

All everyone is seeing is every time I say something critical of the inhabitants of a certain DT clown car, a tent is pitched, clown music plays, and a circus is conducted. As I have said last time you tried to do this, if you have a problem with my inclusions you could PM me about it, but this is all about conducting an act for public consumption. This is exactly the type of anal retentive subjugation the forums members should be free from.

One might think that adding people to one's trust list would require some due diligence but if you're happy having the same person included and excluded at the same time it's up to you. Hopefully more DT1 members will see that your woefully flawed judgement is not fit for DT and exclude you.

It is not my fault that you think 2019. was 6 years ago.

Anyway:

These threads are better than those old "Choose Your Own Adventure" books.



You have been some busy beavers. Basically what you are saying is because I don't spend way too much time digging into other people's business and obsessively know every little detail of every account like you do I am complicit? This is yet another one one of many narratives you constantly attempt to leverage against me. The red arrows are I nice touch too BTW, I don't know if we could have found it without the red arrows.

where is the PROOF PN7 = QS??

where is the PROOF QS is any more dangerous  than Nutildah?? who has admitted that they will willingly scam facilitate other members for 0.3btc AND THEN DELETE THE EVIDENCE if they can, or lauda or tman ??

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/nutildah-willing-to-facilitate-scammers-for-around-300bucks-deleting-evidence-5190369

I would like to see a comparison between QS if pn7 is even QS, lauda, tman and nutildah and have a big debate on who is clearly more dangerous and desperate to scam.

I note that moronbozo is STILL quoting this version of TROLL that the forum has CLEARLY demonstrated  is NOT their version of trolling since that would be IMPOSSIBLE to police. They prefer to use the definition of trolling as those that consistently present as true information that is conclusively debunked nonsense.

QS to me looks MORE trustworthy than nutildah, lauda tman and most of their double standards scammer supporting pals. How can they be here lecturing on this ??

Moronbozo's initial post is such a mess, the central point other than he has been fisted too much by lauda and can't stop spraying his shit everywhere is a waste of time since we mostly already knew that too much anal fisting creates these kind of symptoms by watching it happen in real time to other members here.

Moronbozo finds it very difficult to form structured thoughts that others can follow so we should not be too upset by this. I think he is best to continue his research into the theory of people "spamming words" here on the  forum. I think he is on to something there.

Moronbozo clearly trust abused TS because he is either lauda from laudas moronic gene pool of scamming scum who is previously given red trust for completely stupid reasons. I think he knows he can not control his retarded urges hence why he probably requested to be removed from DT.

Moronbozos claims in the initial post... as usual look moronic.

Ask him.

How do we know this?

Why do you think he included you? I think its specifically because I excluded you, which happened before his inclusion.

Not addressing the off-topic parts of your reply.

How do you know this? Ok, lets say this is true and you are correct, tell me one good reason why TECSHARE would make this account DT? Not out of spite?

Good question. While reading previous post, I just figured that I forget to say something about bold part above:



http://loyce.club/trust/2020-01-04_Sat_06.10h/18021.html



Probably if account don't do this:
It is OK then.

You are just making up things.

He has included me in the trust list pretty much from when mine one was blank, nothing was out of spite.

On the opposite I think you excluded me from your trust list out of spite. The only reason I got until was, that I am a reformed shitposter, still don't expect a better one.

Nice pinging about my shady past. I took your advice already of eating criticism.

(should I tell him? OK, I'm just going to tell him)

PrimeNumber7 is an alt of Quickseller. You have Quickseller distrusted and PN7 trusted. Which is funny. It was an inside joke, until now. You never traded with PN7, he only has left 3 ratings which were all neutral, he didn't add you to his trust list -- is the reason why you may have decided to include him this one?


Because PN7 had long been excluded by suchmoon and foxpup when you decided to include him, and lo and behold, the same week you added PN7 you also added by rallier, who is also excluded by suchmoon and foxpup.

I wonder which other questionable members, scammers, or their alts you have added to your trust list in an attempt to spite the resident clowns...

Oh, well we can start with:

- hacker1001101001 (he may well be a decent guy with a shady past, but had a blank trust list up until last week; pretty weird for you to include him for reasons other than spite)

- 3meek (distrusted by the Russian section moderator and several senior Russian members, but what do they know)

Long story short: you've been using the trust system to satisfy your personal grudges and ended up including Quickseller as a result of it. Further proof you belong nowhere near DT.

Bold part. Account has already been tagged a year and a half before TECSHARE's negative:



So account Koshgel didn't like what TECSHARE said, placed him -ve and TECSHARE decided it is best to find some dirt (because retaliatory feedback won't look nice), find something users are normally tagged for and retaliate:



I don't see any other explanation why TECSHARE would do this a year and a half after account has been tagged left and right, so back to this https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53520292 and his mental gymnastic then.


Speaking of
TECSHARE has loong history of including shady accounts to his trust network (and doing nothing unless it is pointed or doing nothing after it was pointed):

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dt-everyone-tecshare-5118173
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52406482
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/nsfw-phisical-violence-in-dt-not-safe-for-work-content-5182672

...and, abusing trust system https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52385837



@TECSHARE, can you please answer this:

You know what that reminds me of? That time you pulled that live flamingo out of your ass. You know how I know it happened? I can imagine it therefore it happened.