Topic: Multiple Round ICOs? - page 4. (Read 1384 times)
more ico has multi rounds on their own, sometimes it can be more dangerous some time it's good, that mean its all depend on project quality so we have to recognise good project on that, I recently search about hawk network and it has pretty great idea about IEO planing so you can learn more with twitter link given below https://twitter.com/Hawk_HKC/status/1184768244802052096
Usually a project should have 2 rounds of ICO's but when it happens to have multiple rounds then the project didn't raise the necessary funds and the lack of investors force them to make another round with another discount which can be dangerous for the previous investors. When someones sees projects with multiple rounds of ICO's , just stay away , its better and safer.
they do not care for investors , they do care only to raise funds that can be use to the project the more funds they accumulated the better for them. Since most of the ICO right now is just want money not to make a good project.legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1102
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
in general, ICO sales are divided into 2 phases, Pre-ICO, and ICO. however, at the time of the ICO, sometimes they made the ICO part into several rounds. it is used to accelerate the achievement of investment, such as Round 1 must collect $ 100k, Round 2 $ 50k, and Round 3 $ 25k. every round maybe the price of the token will always increase. I think that is one of the sales techniques and quite a lot of projects like that.
Of course and almost all ICOs do multiple rounds on each token sale, because with that they can maximize their fund income from investors with multiple rounds and bonuses in each round are different
And the duration is arguably quite long in each round
And the duration is arguably quite long in each round
Projects that do multiple rounds of ICOs are not many, they are very few and yet these few ones have failed at last even after the long ICO fund raising, i don't see anything wrong in this idea and its another good way to make sure that they met their fund target by means necessary
Usually a project should have 2 rounds of ICO's but when it happens to have multiple rounds then the project didn't raise the necessary funds and the lack of investors force them to make another round with another discount which can be dangerous for the previous investors. When someones sees projects with multiple rounds of ICO's , just stay away , its better and safer.
they do not care for investors , they do care only to raise funds that can be use to the project the more funds they accumulated the better for them. Since most of the ICO right now is just want money not to make a good project. 
Have you heard of ICOs with multiple rounds? Like they raise a certain amount of money now, use that money for primary aims and goals, and then a few months/years down the line (as part of their original plan) launch a second round to fund additional goals and further project development? Just wondering if this is a thing, if so please provide me with some links to projects that have done so.
I relate to several rounds of ICO quite normal. Mostly these rounds are due to the current poor state of the cryptocurrency market. The ICO team cannot raise the necessary funds right away and is trying to do this in stages. Sometimes unforeseen circumstances and changes occur in the project itself. Of course, the appearance of other rounds of ICOs indicates that certain malfunctions are occurring in the project plans, however, the realities of our life always make their own adjustments.
I hate ICO running with multiple round, I find many ICO have round is not for first phase but also can round for many phase, after first phase ended they are running with second until third phase with six months for ICO sell, after ICO ended they make IEO for selling their coin and investor keep hold their coin very long, I hate this because if use for other investment we have get much profit.
Some projects who are legit one really doing a multiple batches of ICO rounds. Normally for a project this is what they do since its really hard to raised money and at the same time do some development without ample budget. Of course developing something needs people to pay for unless the team are consists of all developer that shoulder their own work for the projects
Usually a project should have 2 rounds of ICO's but when it happens to have multiple rounds then the project didn't raise the necessary funds and the lack of investors force them to make another round with another discount which can be dangerous for the previous investors. When someones sees projects with multiple rounds of ICO's , just stay away , its better and safer.
I heard that and if I'm not mistaken like the etherbase project they did a round of return last month and raised funds from that round to develop the next program. Q3 in 2020. I think a plan like this is very good because the team is really serious about developing their projects properly.
I am pleased to join the ICO bounty campaign if the team has already worked well in the first round and their token is already being traded on the exchange. This gives confidence that our work will not be in vain. The cryptocurrency market is very unpredictable and gives different results at different times. Therefore, I completely allow repeated rounds of ICO, if only it would benefit the project and cryptocurrency. From my point of view, there are 3 issues to discuss:
1- The need and plan/roadmap to do multiple rounds of ICOs. Like traditional investment rounds (Seed, round A, B, C, etc.). I think that if this is documented well in the project whitepaper and business plan and made clear to the investors including clear milestones that are aimed to be achieved per each round of ICOs then it would be trusted to some extent.
2- The mechanism to do it. ICOs by nature are a one time crowdfund mechanism. However, if the portion of tokens offered at each ICO round is quite small and the rest is kept as reserve so as to be released in batches into subsequent ICOs, it might work!
3- Maintaining and increasing the coin price. This is the most important task of the project by making sure to reach the milestones as promised and excellent marketing and PR activities.
Do you have good examples of projects who did this?
Good analysis on your part. I met several projects that carried out a number of stages of ICO. This is usually displayed on its roadmap.As an example the recent Orbis project, which carried out several stages of ICO and plans listing and trading on the big exchanges in november 2019 year1- The need and plan/roadmap to do multiple rounds of ICOs. Like traditional investment rounds (Seed, round A, B, C, etc.). I think that if this is documented well in the project whitepaper and business plan and made clear to the investors including clear milestones that are aimed to be achieved per each round of ICOs then it would be trusted to some extent.
2- The mechanism to do it. ICOs by nature are a one time crowdfund mechanism. However, if the portion of tokens offered at each ICO round is quite small and the rest is kept as reserve so as to be released in batches into subsequent ICOs, it might work!
3- Maintaining and increasing the coin price. This is the most important task of the project by making sure to reach the milestones as promised and excellent marketing and PR activities.
Do you have good examples of projects who did this?
Orbis was an old ICO sales project and it was very long and heard that Orbis was a scammer but hearing your statement that Orbis will be trading in November, I'm happy
Yes I have heard about it in various projects, although I don't know if they later carried it out. That is, after their first ICO the project will kick off then in the future they will conduct another so as to start another phase of development; but the issue there is, what will guarantee they have a good ICO later on? However, if the project is working according to plan and the results is visible for all to see, then maybe investors will be encouraged to participate in the another round of ICO.
Several project has done that in time past, they can be trusted if they have good and experience team, also when they follow the road map set, early investors can trust them, therefore to reinvest and also invite or encourage new investors will be easy.
From my point of view, there are 3 issues to discuss:
1- The need and plan/roadmap to do multiple rounds of ICOs. Like traditional investment rounds (Seed, round A, B, C, etc.). I think that if this is documented well in the project whitepaper and business plan and made clear to the investors including clear milestones that are aimed to be achieved per each round of ICOs then it would be trusted to some extent.
2- The mechanism to do it. ICOs by nature are a one time crowdfund mechanism. However, if the portion of tokens offered at each ICO round is quite small and the rest is kept as reserve so as to be released in batches into subsequent ICOs, it might work!
3- Maintaining and increasing the coin price. This is the most important task of the project by making sure to reach the milestones as promised and excellent marketing and PR activities.
Do you have good examples of projects who did this?
Good analysis on your part. I met several projects that carried out a number of stages of ICO. This is usually displayed on its roadmap.As an example the recent Orbis project, which carried out several stages of ICO and plans listing and trading on the big exchanges in november 2019 year 1- The need and plan/roadmap to do multiple rounds of ICOs. Like traditional investment rounds (Seed, round A, B, C, etc.). I think that if this is documented well in the project whitepaper and business plan and made clear to the investors including clear milestones that are aimed to be achieved per each round of ICOs then it would be trusted to some extent.
2- The mechanism to do it. ICOs by nature are a one time crowdfund mechanism. However, if the portion of tokens offered at each ICO round is quite small and the rest is kept as reserve so as to be released in batches into subsequent ICOs, it might work!
3- Maintaining and increasing the coin price. This is the most important task of the project by making sure to reach the milestones as promised and excellent marketing and PR activities.
Do you have good examples of projects who did this?
Have you heard of ICOs with multiple rounds? Like they raise a certain amount of money now, use that money for primary aims and goals, and then a few months/years down the line (as part of their original plan) launch a second round to fund additional goals and further project development? Just wondering if this is a thing, if so please provide me with some links to projects that have done so.
I can't provide any link now but know some project that did this. Synereo team did this, they raise money from the space atleast twice another project that did this was Fetch.ai, they have raised money last year and this year did another round on Binance through IEO.
Many times you see some dev and team performing different rounds of ICO because they fail to meet up with their target and in order for them to continue with their development, they have to conduct another ICO.
Have you heard of ICOs with multiple rounds? Like they raise a certain amount of money now, use that money for primary aims and goals, and then a few months/years down the line (as part of their original plan) launch a second round to fund additional goals and further project development? Just wondering if this is a thing, if so please provide me with some links to projects that have done so.
Yes I have seen a few of them, according to their road map the first ICO is for starting the platform while setting things in motion such that the platform will run in accordance to the road map, then with successful results they will be able to launch another round of ICO to kick start another level of development within the platform. However, owing to the nature of most of them, some don't even last let alone running another ICO, also owing to the nature of ICOs nowadays even if they should host another, I doubt if investors will consider them as it might also look like exit scam (just saying). 
Since the market of ico companies is very much compromised, I very much doubt that spending a few rounds of ico companies, a particular project can attract more investors. In any case, each investor must be either fearless or very confident in the prospects of this project.
I think it is normal for any bounty campaigns. I think they are strategies to attract more investors or just as what you said gain more funds for the development of their projects.
Jump to: