question for you folks
i see lots of 470s vs 480, also 380s vs 390s here and there.
now my 2 390s do 30 mhs so 60 mhs on eth. 3 380 at 20 mhs will also do 60 mhs.
so why build with lesser cards when you can use less cards for same hash rate. plus go to 6 cards like 390s at say 180 mhz vs 6 cards, like 380s, for 120 mhs. thats an extra 70 mhz per rig. so less power wasted on mobos which would be what 40-50 watts?
used 390s vs 380s as i have 2 390s and 1 380 so know their rates.
So, I get what you're saying about maximizing profit-per-rig. Indeed, if you are able to afford them, rigs with 4-6 cards in general should be more profitable than say 2 or 3 2-cards rigs because for every rig you build, you have a bunch of fixed costs, such as MoBo, PSU, RAM, casing, etc.
Also, your further argument makes a ton of sense as well, at least on the surface. If 390's really do get 50% more hash rate than 380's, and their total cost (including power draw) is less than 50% more than a 380, then certainly your best ROI (all else being equal) would be to load your rig with 390's vs 380's.
I have not researched any of the 300-series cards so can't say much about the other factors, but speaking for the 480 vs 470 issue, it does not seem to be nearly as significant difference in HR as you describe for the 300's. best I have been able to tell is that a decent average for a 470 is mid 20's untweaked, and maybe pushing 30-ish if tweaked. But, the 480's only seem to get nominally higher hash rates... maybe a couple Mh and that's it (from what I have read). AND... here's the other thing to consider... at least for the 400's, the 480's run around $50 higher cost per unit vs 470's. BUT, in addition, they also pull 150W vs 110W on the 470. So, they cost 20% more initially and cost 36% more to run... meaning, they would really have to be somewhere in the neighborhood of providing 25-30% more effective HR vs a 470 to make any sense financially, and I don't think they are more than +10% at this point... especially given the fact that the 470s seems to be a lot easier to overclock than the 480s. And, this is not even considering that you would also need to get a larger PSU to support 6x150 (900) vs 6x110 (660), which would further reduce ROI.
Now, if the 480's were providing the 50% bump over 470s as in your 300 example, it would of course be a much difference story because providing mid-to-high 30's HR would indeed give you a better ROI, even accounting for the extra initial costs and electricity.