big boost with claymore 4.0
7 cards = 395mh or about 56.5 H/s
Spent all night migrating entire farm to v4.... staggering results.... the farm now is nearly 6 KH/s -- it could have been more but I have retained the BIOS mods for 480s and Nanos since they perform maximum hash / power ETH mining on Claymore v7.3, to enable switching back to ETH at any time. I have disabled all CPU mining to support Claymore's CPU cycles required to drive the GPUs on v4 codes.
What sorcery this Claymore miner, 480s mid-80s, Nanos mid 70s and 290/290x mid 70s H/s and 390s mid 80s H/s -- worth the dev fees
Silentarmy seems to be getting competative figures now, I'll be testing that out on a couple rigs today.
I don't understand why Claymore is so insistant on pushing Windows and ignoring LINUX, I suspect that more mining rigs run LINUX than run WIndows.
im sure it has to do with the whole code stealing thing.... which imo is dumb its an open source product... granted he should have got credit but i think it went to far.. to blast it all over for everyone to see so you can boost your own ego saying im better than claymore is a little childish...
A lot of people hate that Claymore charges dev fee. My opinion is all the guys that wrote a program that works well should get some money.
Kano and ck did not. Then Luke of Bfg miner kind of ripped them off.
I would think if Kano and ck had the same amount of dev fees that claymore got they would be really loaded.
I would prefer claymore would retire his fees.
Say 1.2 then 1.1 then 1.0 Down to 0 after a year.
He still would make coin and look less greedy.
It also would encourage a new coin every year.
Or. Drop the fee every 2 months from 1.2 to 0 so two years and it is free.
Alt coins will always tend to be a more disposable coin then btc.
Not a fact a guess. As I see a super coin as the super highway and alt coins as taxis and trucks needed to move transactions.
im going to quote that sentence in my sign it is the best saying for alts coins i ever read
Sorry to be kinda off-topic, but here are the friendliest group of persons on the forum regarding mining. I have some problem with ZCash, since the very beggining : I've always been under profitable. While 215 H/s is written on the screen, Flypool reports me only a 24 hours average of about 185 H/s. Moreover, while the calculator says me that I should mine barely 0,04 ZEC a day, I just closed the actual day with 0,029 ZEC mined. I agree that the difficulty might be risibng or something, but 25% less is quite alarming. Does one has the answer to that problem or an idea from where it does come from ?
I have also an other problem, only with ZCash : my shares don't get validated. I have walls of SHARE FOUND (40 consecutive for now) but slightly less accepted shares. Any clue about it ?
Edit : they just all got rejected, except 4, so 10% of them.
i have 900sol/s going into flypool sometimes it goes from 770-1ksol/s it bounces around.. the pool is still in alpha so it isnt going to be a solid set number like on the ether pool they have..
now onto the rejected shares.. what miner are you using?
