You received any shareholder info from him yet Og?
No. I'm hoping I don't receive a partial list either. If I do, we may have to vote on whether to proceed or wait for the final list.
Topic: 📈 NastyFans: The Bitcoin Enthusiast Fan Club (est. 2012) - page 191. (Read 957542 times)
No. I'm hoping I don't receive a partial list either. If I do, we may have to vote on whether to proceed or wait for the final list.
Anyone that received a double payment from GLBSE, please make sure you've contacted Nefario per his blog post and returned the overpayment.
http://blog.glbse.com/refunding-double-payments-and-getting-your-as
http://blog.glbse.com/refunding-double-payments-and-getting-your-as
You received any shareholder info from him yet Og?
Anyone that received a double payment from GLBSE, please make sure you've contacted Nefario per his blog post and returned the overpayment.
http://blog.glbse.com/refunding-double-payments-and-getting-your-as
http://blog.glbse.com/refunding-double-payments-and-getting-your-as
check out:
http://blog.glbse.com/issuers-being-given-shareholder-lists
OgNasty should be receiving an email with the list *soon*.
http://blog.glbse.com/issuers-being-given-shareholder-lists
OgNasty should be receiving an email with the list *soon*.
Wonderful!!! Thanks or sharing that link
... out of town this week, so I'm looking forward to the status updates after I've returned.
(This is likely my last post on bitcointalk... until at or around November 25th 2012)
Thx. fingers crossed;)
Does that sound satisfactory to you OgNasty?
No. It would put me in the position of having to start judging the authenticity of screenshots and .csv files.
Hi Nasty
As mentioned before I can prove the authenticity of my 61 shares as I have the screenshot and communication to GLBSE saved on my gmail account. This cannot be forged. However I had 83 shares in total.
I just wonder what's gonna happen if we never hear from Nefario with the list because this is becoming more and more probable scenario.
check out:
http://blog.glbse.com/issuers-being-given-shareholder-lists
OgNasty should be receiving an email with the list *soon*.
Does that sound satisfactory to you OgNasty?
No. It would put me in the position of having to start judging the authenticity of screenshots and .csv files.
Hi Nasty
As mentioned before I can prove the authenticity of my 61 shares as I have the screenshot and communication to GLBSE saved on my gmail account. This cannot be forged. However I had 83 shares in total.
I just wonder what's gonna happen if we never hear from Nefario with the list because this is becoming more and more probable scenario.
I had a chat with James and hes is releasing about 4 assets per day.
Sunshine!
And now, please send him the flowers too
Sunshine!
And now, please send him the flowers too
I have still not received a list from GLBSE.
I hope it comes soon.
If you plan on continuing operations with a new exchange, I would highly recommend https://btct.co/
burnside has spent a lot of time on the Litecoin version of his exchange (where I manage an asset), and has now just released the BTC side.
Burnside got a lawyer, and registered it in Belize.
As a standard feature, you will be emailed all shareholder information on a routine basis--just in case. And, it's not slow!
I have still not received a list from GLBSE.
There might be hope yet:
To all Gigaminers:
Late yesterday I received an asset holder list from GLBSE. Per the email received, the list may grow some more so it may not be the final list.
This is good news as it means step one is near completion. I will be working with counsel later today and possibly into next week to finalize the next steps and to clarify what has to be done and why.
Best regards,
gigavps
Late yesterday I received an asset holder list from GLBSE. Per the email received, the list may grow some more so it may not be the final list.
This is good news as it means step one is near completion. I will be working with counsel later today and possibly into next week to finalize the next steps and to clarify what has to be done and why.
Best regards,
gigavps
Does that sound satisfactory to you OgNasty?
No. It would put me in the position of having to start judging the authenticity of screenshots and .csv files.
I have my screen shot from the day it went down plus the .csv file of my complete history. Stochastic has also posted this https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/possible-claims-process-for-glbse-assets-126673 . Does that sound satisfactory to you OgNasty? I have just received a confirmation from Friedcat for my claim with asicminer.
OgNasty, is the OP of this thread dynamically-updated, or does it only update when you manually change it? It'd be neat to have a dedicated page to constantly-updated Nasty Mining stats.
This thread is manually updated with not much in the way of statistics. GLBSE going down caused some changes to be made in how we calculate stats, since the bitcoin addresses we were tracking belonged to GLBSE. However, this operation is very much alive and I expect some positive developments in the near future.
well ok :/ guess we're not on ozcoin anymore. Any chance you'd be willing to either update stats more regularly or tell us which pool so we can check?
OgNasty, is the OP of this thread dynamically-updated, or does it only update when you manually change it? It'd be neat to have a dedicated page to constantly-updated Nasty Mining stats.
well ok :/ guess we're not on ozcoin anymore. Any chance you'd be willing to either update stats more regularly or tell us which pool so we can check?
Are we still mining?
Code:
(Timezone: NY / eastern time / summer time)
((UTC-0400 -- Wed Oct 03 2012 @ 02:09:04)) <@ozbot> This round nastymining has 235 shares (4 stales; 1.702%), avg 3551 MH/s - next payout estimate: 0.186 BTC
((UTC-0500 -- Fri Nov 16 2012 @ 01:01:05)) <@ozbot> This round nastymining has 0 shares (0 stales; 0.0%), avg 0 MH/s - next payout estimate: 0.0 BTC
((UTC-0400 -- Wed Oct 03 2012 @ 02:09:04)) <@ozbot> This round nastymining has 235 shares (4 stales; 1.702%), avg 3551 MH/s - next payout estimate: 0.186 BTC
((UTC-0500 -- Fri Nov 16 2012 @ 01:01:05)) <@ozbot> This round nastymining has 0 shares (0 stales; 0.0%), avg 0 MH/s - next payout estimate: 0.0 BTC
Yes.
Saw you updated the OP to reflect the 8th BFL single (non-asic) since my last post. Thanks...
Are we still mining?
Are we still mining?
Code:
(Timezone: NY / eastern time / summer time)
((UTC-0400 -- Wed Oct 03 2012 @ 02:09:04)) <@ozbot> This round nastymining has 235 shares (4 stales; 1.702%), avg 3551 MH/s - next payout estimate: 0.186 BTC
((UTC-0500 -- Fri Nov 16 2012 @ 01:01:05)) <@ozbot> This round nastymining has 0 shares (0 stales; 0.0%), avg 0 MH/s - next payout estimate: 0.0 BTC
((UTC-0400 -- Wed Oct 03 2012 @ 02:09:04)) <@ozbot> This round nastymining has 235 shares (4 stales; 1.702%), avg 3551 MH/s - next payout estimate: 0.186 BTC
((UTC-0500 -- Fri Nov 16 2012 @ 01:01:05)) <@ozbot> This round nastymining has 0 shares (0 stales; 0.0%), avg 0 MH/s - next payout estimate: 0.0 BTC
UPDATE:
Received BFL Single #8 today. It is up and running with no issues so far. Now to wait for the ASICs...
Received BFL Single #8 today. It is up and running with no issues so far. Now to wait for the ASICs...
^That was a few weeks ago...
Yet the OP hasn't been updated to reflect that 8 are up and running.
Edited to add:
Quote from another thread... apparently, asset lists shouldn't be delayed much longer
...in theory?
I'm really not sure what to make of this, nor do I really know if this is an accurate representation of the (continued delays) status:
nefario still is not complying with requests for shareholder information and, independently, he may or may not be facing prison time for violating financial laws in the UK. Everyone wants his head on a stick, next to pirate's and zhoutong's.
Everyone wants his head on stick because he is not complying with requests for shareholder information...
Absurd that he holds that info hostage because his script paid out more than it should. One has got nothing to do with the other ! One screw-up should NOT lead to another one !!!
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.1313150
He doesn't want to hold the assets hostages and he doesn't plan to do so, but he needs to change the script so that all the people that paid back the double payment get their assets while the once that didn't pay it, don't get their assets.
Hence the only assets that will be held hostage is the once of the people that didn't pay back, the rest will get their assets. That's how I have understood the situation.
//DeaDTerra
I think if nefario had bad intentions he wouldn't have paid back funds in accounts. The current with holding of shareholder information seems either to be either something he's holding ransom on clawbacks that haven't paid or possibly there's some legal issues with the lists being distributed and that's holding it up.
Jump to: