Author

Topic: [NEM] NEM -New Economy Movement - No Envy Movement - Updates+Discussion thread - page 430. (Read 661525 times)

hero member
Activity: 1116
Merit: 535

I don't want to get in a fight with the NXT people, but it's conjecture to assume that the NXT creators would have allowed more than a total investment of 21 BTC. The NXT IPO was halted suddenly 6 weeks before the posted end date and well below the desired number of stakeholders. In my opinion, there's no reason to believe it wouldn't have ended much sooner if there was more interest earlier. For example, if the NXT IPO received 21BTC on the first day why do we think it wouldn't have been shut down immediately?

We can only speculate on this if would be ended the 1st day or not?
Was the 21 btc the limit to invest?
If the dev wanted to have greater number of stakeholders within 21 BTC
they should have been set a smaller btc cap per person "investor".
Was it ended sooner for other reasons unknown to us or because 21 btc was collected?
Who knows the answers to this questions?!

It ended how it ended Sad we can not change it any more
so there is no reason to dissipate any more energy and time to this issue.

hero member
Activity: 490
Merit: 504

How is starting with 3000 stakes similar to starting with 71 stakes ?
there didn't have to be 71 stakes, 100.000 people in Bitcointalk could send 0.001 Btc during 61 days

They could but they didn't as the
thread was shoveled under other hundreds  shitcoin [ANN] threads. Wink
Who was lucky to find the thread and had balls to send some btc at the right moment
has been rewarded the others who were not so lucky or did not had balls to put some btc
or have been slow to convert FIAT to btc to buy nxt like myself paid or has to pay higher price.
 
There is nothing we can do about this anymore.
The cards have been dealt and the game has started.


I don't want to get in a fight with the NXT people, but it's conjecture to assume that the NXT creators would have allowed more than a total investment of 21 BTC. The NXT IPO was halted suddenly 6 weeks before the posted end date and well below the desired number of stakeholders. In my opinion, there's no reason to believe it wouldn't have ended much sooner if there was more interest earlier. For example, if the NXT IPO received 21BTC on the first day why do we think it wouldn't have been shut down immediately?
It wasn't about 21 Bitcoins, there was a problem with small amount of new incoming stakeholders and with increasing price for Bitcoin, whose price was tripled by those 61 days since September till November
sr. member
Activity: 299
Merit: 250

No new source codes yet. We are at brainstorming/ draft/ assigning high level tasks stage. Some updates will come this weekend.

And sorry we are not asking for investors (no need for investors at all); we are asking for participants in a crypto movement/ community. It is not conceptualized as a corporation like Mastercoin or Bitshare. Developers participate in the technical development side and we expect other participants to contribute to other efforts as they can to spread NEM. Distribution is certainly something worthwhile to discuss, just no need to escalate the discussion to a level contrary to our spirit.  

As a participant I would like to know how far is the development so that I can contribute.
Why don't you put a website somewhere, telling what you have decided so far after three weeks of brainstorming, so that I can contribute more.

Or are you expecting the community to do everything for you and you continue collecting money from 'participants'?
I dont want to be a kill joy but after weeks of announcing NEM, I see no progress, no announcements, but just fund collection and 'brain storming', which is making me nervous
as there are so many scams going on in this space.

Thanks.


Updates this weekend Smiley we can't have a community without trust, can't we ? I have put up  bounties for managing nemcoin.com; .info and .org so prepare a plan if you want to manage one of them. I think i will put them out for anyone capable after the fund raising is over.

Let me know if you can be a core developer then you can have an access to the core development plan.

For this type of project, funding is never a big factor. for an example you can just compare Mastercoin with NXT and Counter-Party-Protocol. I have explained before, the amount of funding is never a big factor for this project to progress. But the funding is there to establish participant's commitment and to establish the floor price of NEM.
We could have used Proof of Burn instead and this project will still progress, but I just don't see why we should enrich the current Bitcoin holders, so the funding will be kept for development but it will not be the deciding factor of NEM's success or failure.



Of this Updates i wait

Your patience is rewarded. Please find a link to the official NEM development document here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NhxTyi4Eo2D_1m1Ca8zvzQr0_RB0dgM2VuWXAIzcS-I. A few sections are still in flux (they are marked with TODOs), but are being worked on at the moment.

I will be monitoring this thread and comments in the document for feedback.
sr. member
Activity: 299
Merit: 250

How is starting with 3000 stakes similar to starting with 71 stakes ?
there didn't have to be 71 stakes, 100.000 people in Bitcointalk could send 0.001 Btc during 61 days

They could but they didn't as the
thread was shoveled under other hundreds  shitcoin [ANN] threads. Wink
Who was lucky to find the thread and had balls to send some btc at the right moment
has been rewarded the others who were not so lucky or did not had balls to put some btc
or have been slow to convert FIAT to btc to buy nxt like myself paid or has to pay higher price.
 
There is nothing we can do about this anymore.
The cards have been dealt and the game has started.


I don't want to get in a fight with the NXT people, but it's conjecture to assume that the NXT creators would have allowed more than a total investment of 21 BTC. The NXT IPO was halted suddenly 6 weeks before the posted end date and well below the desired number of stakeholders. In my opinion, there's no reason to believe it wouldn't have ended much sooner if there was more interest earlier. For example, if the NXT IPO received 21BTC on the first day why do we think it wouldn't have been shut down immediately?
hero member
Activity: 1116
Merit: 535

How is starting with 3000 stakes similar to starting with 71 stakes ?
there didn't have to be 71 stakes, 100.000 people in Bitcointalk could send 0.001 Btc during 61 days

They could but they didn't as the
thread was shoveled under other hundreds  shitcoin [ANN] threads. Wink
Who was lucky to find the thread and had balls to send some btc at the right moment
has been rewarded the others who were not so lucky or did not had balls to put some btc
or have been slow to convert FIAT to btc to buy nxt like myself paid or has to pay higher price.
 
There is nothing we can do about this anymore.
The cards have been dealt and the game has started.
member
Activity: 85
Merit: 10

No new source codes yet. We are at brainstorming/ draft/ assigning high level tasks stage. Some updates will come this weekend.

And sorry we are not asking for investors (no need for investors at all); we are asking for participants in a crypto movement/ community. It is not conceptualized as a corporation like Mastercoin or Bitshare. Developers participate in the technical development side and we expect other participants to contribute to other efforts as they can to spread NEM. Distribution is certainly something worthwhile to discuss, just no need to escalate the discussion to a level contrary to our spirit.  

As a participant I would like to know how far is the development so that I can contribute.
Why don't you put a website somewhere, telling what you have decided so far after three weeks of brainstorming, so that I can contribute more.

Or are you expecting the community to do everything for you and you continue collecting money from 'participants'?
I dont want to be a kill joy but after weeks of announcing NEM, I see no progress, no announcements, but just fund collection and 'brain storming', which is making me nervous
as there are so many scams going on in this space.

Thanks.


Updates this weekend Smiley we can't have a community without trust, can't we ? I have put up  bounties for managing nemcoin.com; .info and .org so prepare a plan if you want to manage one of them. I think i will put them out for anyone capable after the fund raising is over.

Let me know if you can be a core developer then you can have an access to the core development plan.

For this type of project, funding is never a big factor. for an example you can just compare Mastercoin with NXT and Counter-Party-Protocol. I have explained before, the amount of funding is never a big factor for this project to progress. But the funding is there to establish participant's commitment and to establish the floor price of NEM.
We could have used Proof of Burn instead and this project will still progress, but I just don't see why we should enrich the current Bitcoin holders, so the funding will be kept for development but it will not be the deciding factor of NEM's success or failure.



Of this Updates i wait
hero member
Activity: 490
Merit: 504
Distribution of Nxt:
first 61 days, 1 Nxt = 2 Satoshi = 71 stakeholders
next week, 1 nxt = 100 Satoshi = 400 stakeholders
next weeks, 1 nxt = 400-2000 Satoshi = thousandts of stakeholders

Distribution of Nem:
First 20 pages   : free to join in
pages 21-30     : fee = 0.001 btc or  10nxt
page 81-90     :fee=0.03btc or 300nxt
b)
page 51-60          :fee=0.06btc or 600nxt  

So the distribution of Nxt and Nem is very similar, only with the biggest difference - first stage of Nxt first IPO was 61 days long and Nem had it for a few days (hours?)


How is starting with 3000 stakes similar to starting with 71 stakes ?
there didn't have to be 71 stakes, 100.000 people in Bitcointalk could send 0.001 Btc during 61 days
hero member
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
Distribution of Nxt:
first 61 days, 1 Nxt = 2 Satoshi = 71 stakeholders
next week, 1 nxt = 100 Satoshi = 400 stakeholders
next weeks, 1 nxt = 400-2000 Satoshi = thousandts of stakeholders

Distribution of Nem:
First 20 pages   : free to join in
pages 21-30     : fee = 0.001 btc or  10nxt
page 81-90     :fee=0.03btc or 300nxt
b)
page 51-60          :fee=0.06btc or 600nxt  

So the distribution of Nxt and Nem is very similar, only with the biggest difference - first stage of Nxt first IPO was 61 days long and Nem had it for a few days (hours?)


How is starting with 3000 stakes similar to starting with 71 stakes ?
hero member
Activity: 490
Merit: 504
Distribution of Nxt:
first 61 days, 1 Nxt = 2 Satoshi = 71 stakeholders
next week, 1 nxt = 100 Satoshi = 400 stakeholders
next weeks, 1 nxt = 400-2000 Satoshi = thousandts of stakeholders

Distribution of Nem:
First 20 pages   : free to join in
pages 21-30     : fee = 0.001 btc or  10nxt
page 81-90     :fee=0.03btc or 300nxt
b)
page 51-60          :fee=0.06btc or 600nxt  

So the distribution of Nxt and Nem is very similar, only with the biggest difference - first stage of Nxt first IPO was 61 days long and Nem had it for a few days (hours?)


hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
I am very excited about the news which will give it this weekend, the weekend ends with us in Germany in just over 4 hours

What news? Did I miss something?
member
Activity: 85
Merit: 10
I am very excited about the news which will give it this weekend, the weekend ends with us in Germany in just over 4 hours
hero member
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001
Has anyone any idea about how NEM can be better than NXT ?
Yes distribution will be by far (more stakeholders)
Copy cat clones are going to pop up like mushrooms.
i think we need an edge on a 100 % clone.
Can anyone think of a dev that is easy to implement ?
would programming in C be better ?
Just a few thoughts at the start of this journey !


There are already a couple of good ideas floating around like using PON together with POS.

I don't think the language will matter. C is imho not the language for the task at hand (unless I missed something final plan isn't out yet) but it's up to the devs anyways.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
Has anyone any idea about how NEM can be better than NXT ?
Yes distribution will be by far (more stakeholders)
Copy cat clones are going to pop up like mushrooms.
i think we need an edge on a 100 % clone.
Can anyone think of a dev that is easy to implement ?
would programming in C be better ?
Just a few thoughts at the start of this journey !






hero member
Activity: 1116
Merit: 535

I thinks could be a scam!
Bitcoin address does not match to the address given in this thread

Post from that link above:
1. Pay a fee to join in
   
    Send 650 NXT to the address      14343293611098709683
    Send 0.065 BTC to the address     1Lk5Paws9T1YpoSeLeZT7ZeSQKW7UNq4TJ
    Paypal option available at 50$ (you would need to send gift), this option is not available to users who can purchase NXT or BTC easily - NXT designated address for this service 3231774856984709013 Read here for How to use Paypal option https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4899575

newbie
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
For manning the domain, will the development team provide fund for hosting fees and yearly domain renewal?
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 108
Hi

I can´t find my Name in the Stakeholderlist. Why dat

I have send 600NXT

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4992032

pls check that

Thx
full member
Activity: 180
Merit: 100
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Here are some suggestions on how to improve over Nxt

(1) Don't let the user choose the passphrase by default. Brain wallet should be an advanced feature and not a default option. Generate a 256-bit random seed for the user, and save that (in encrypted form) in wallet.dat file. The user will provide the password for the encryption. Don't ever save the seed unencrypted on the hard drive, ever. Don't make that an available option.  Encryption password must be a requirement (and the user must type it twice).

(2) Make the accounts deterministic, so the user will only have to back up wallet.dat once (not like Bitcoin's QT where regular backups are required).

Basically, it should work something like this:

seed = 256-bit randomly generated and saved encrypted in wallet.dat

Account-One = Hash (seed)

If the user creates more accounts,

Account-two = Hash (Account-One + seed)
Account-three =  Hash (Account-two + seed)

etc etc .

The user can create as many accounts as they want. As long as they never lose the seed, they will be fine. No regular backups required.  

(3) Do not include any code that has anything to do with signing transaction in server code. The signing  should be client's job. That way the users who don't want to download the server software can just download a lightweight client and connect to a public node and safely use it without ever transmitting the secret seed over the internet.




Thanks forweighing in here. Ive already made these suggesions except for the detrministic part.  I like it.  Im quoting you so jg will be sure to not miss i
Jump to: