Topic: [NEM] Public auditing of stakeholder list - page 5. (Read 20669 times)

That is a fair comment and I will wait. The groups with less than one per cent of the stakes are small fish compared to those 30+ guys and what about those who know how to avoid the taint analysis ? That is where the focus should be.

What we are trying to find here are users that created many accounts to claim an unfair amount of stakes so I'll agree that fraudster is not the ideal term.
During registration people were encouraged to get other people into this as well and that's still cool. However there are cases where it's crystal clear that that's not what's behind the multiple buy-ins and those are the cases we're trying to find and refund. Also those "newcomsers" are supposed to be active as well. If someone bough 10 stakes and says they're all for his family and freinds then that's worthless for the movement if none of them are going to be active.

Like I said - don't waste time worrying until the refund list is done.

I think a lot of effort is being wasted by some of the 'fraudster chasers'. Firstly, that word 'fraudster' is being brandished around far too much.

Also, I dont know about the BTC accounts but do people here seriously think there are enough 'single only' NXT accounts to fill up all these stakes.

As soon as a Group appears they are instantly called FRAUDSTERS. But a big community doesnt grow just from 'singles'. Of course groups of people spring up too.In some cases it is obvious that NXT accounts have been used to introduce other people because it is far simpler and quicker to do it this way.You can not prove that small groups are all fraudsters and do you wish to expel some potentially good contributors?.

Super.
Nevertheless, it is called a cheater.

With so many experts here, then please tell me but as I'm on this list

This thread is not an official list. The only remotely offical list is the one linked to in the inital post and even that is not final.
Once the list is completed this will be communicated and then everyone on that list will be able to make their case. Until that time there is no need to argue or trying to justify anything.

It's also worth mentioning that no rules are being changed or applied retroactively.

my enthusiasm is limited.
Who knows yet how many members are on it for no reason?

ohhh man,,!!!, really !are u kicking out all the fraudsters   wooooow finally
this audit is the best news for 2014

I knew a guy, who said: I don't like law and order.
Now I have to say that I don't like audit and lists. I like law and order and I have my own eyes to read the lists and brains to think and learn.

There are many names in < - chains but they are not mentioned

why?

Hey, just found me on your list.
What is this???

I have made ​​a payment of 8639894066908583102 and one of 10535472106309128239. That was allowed!

Groups to check to see if you have missed:  
(This is a list of users who have sent NXT to three or more other users who signed up for NEM accounts.)

Edited:  put into alphabetical order

abcworrior -> Raymondo
abcworrior -> Spiritas
abcworrior -> asmodeus
abcworrior -> jack
abcworrior -> leonardos
abcworrior -> slither

aekm -> AliceRosennn
aekm -> AmnDav
aekm -> JGRand
aekm -> neer.g

andrisskuja -> Kruudmn46
andrisskuja -> nemtothemoon2
andrisskuja -> nikrowpusher

asmodeus -> Raymondo
asmodeus -> Spiritas
asmodeus -> abcworrior
asmodeus -> kronnos2000ad
asmodeus -> leonardos
asmodeus -> slither

coinsfuture -> Dogmygod
coinsfuture -> Olano
coinsfuture -> Rexthewounder

coloredcoin -> Coinonaer
coloredcoin -> demon5858
coloredcoin -> h1h2h3_c
coloredcoin -> mindact
coloredcoin -> tfyt

dautumaohiem -> NemJoker
dautumaohiem -> noitev99
dautumaohiem -> sss222sss

dave5555 -> NastyTrades
dave5555 -> camaronloco
dave5555 -> eylucu4531

Dogmygod -> coinsfuture
Dogmygod -> memecoinerz1
Dogmygod -> theoceanismyhome

fRames6 -> Arturro333
fRames6 -> ArvinPan
fRames6 -> GWElli
fRames6 -> OLHD
fRames6 -> WXGermany
fRames6 -> cntrlsquare
fRames6 -> irrawaddybtc
fRames6 -> lyka
fRames6 -> panita

HenryMiller -> NemJoker
HenryMiller -> noitev99
HenryMiller -> sss222sss

jack -> Raymondo
jack -> Spiritas
jack -> abcworrior
jack -> kronnos2000ad
jack -> leonardos
jack -> slither

Jengo -> Coininator
Jengo -> PonziCoin
Jengo -> Spacebean

Jerek -> Raymondo
Jerek -> Spiritas
Jerek -> abcworrior
Jerek -> asmodeus
Jerek -> bazka
Jerek -> jack
Jerek -> judek
Jerek -> kennywho
Jerek -> kronnos2000ad
Jerek -> leonardos
Jerek -> rougetrooper
Jerek -> slither

kodtycoon -> bitmadaboutcoin
kodtycoon -> kodtycoon
kodtycoon -> nemnation

Krombi666 -> AltcoinNewbie
Krombi666 -> CK2904
Krombi666 -> Gabby18
Krombi666 -> Schultereisen
Krombi666 -> Siegtal81
Krombi666 -> Stadtfeger

kronnos2000ad -> Raymondo
kronnos2000ad -> Spiritas
kronnos2000ad -> asmodeus
kronnos2000ad -> jack
kronnos2000ad -> leonardos
kronnos2000ad -> slither

leonardos -> Raymondo
leonardos -> abcworrior
leonardos -> asmodeus
leonardos -> jack
leonardos -> kronnos2000ad
leonardos -> slither

memecoinerz1 -> Dogmygod
memecoinerz1 -> Olano
memecoinerz1 -> Rexthewounder

mindblown -> VKNP60
mindblown -> numbed
mindblown -> smilingatit

Moloch -> Raymondo
Moloch -> Spiritas
Moloch -> abcworrior
Moloch -> asmodeus
Moloch -> bazka
Moloch -> jack
Moloch -> judek
Moloch -> kennywho
Moloch -> kronnos2000ad
Moloch -> leonardos
Moloch -> rougetrooper
Moloch -> slither

mr -> Carrera2
mr -> Carrera2
mr -> Emill
mr -> Emill

NastyTrades -> annT78
NastyTrades -> dave5555
NastyTrades -> mich38754
NastyTrades -> michaelW8796i
NastyTrades -> nateM7654

NemJoker -> HenryMiller
NemJoker -> crypto_girl
NemJoker -> dautumaohiem
NemJoker -> onemorechance
NemJoker -> qsmd

noitev99 -> HenryMiller
noitev99 -> crypto_girl
noitev99 -> dautumaohiem
noitev99 -> onemorechance
noitev99 -> qsmd

Olano -> coinsfuture
Olano -> memecoinerz1
Olano -> theoceanismyhome

onemorechance -> NemJoker
onemorechance -> noitev99
onemorechance -> sss222sss

qingmu1992 -> huluwa12
qingmu1992 -> lingyong1992
qingmu1992 -> moke1983
qingmu1992 -> moke1992
qingmu1992 -> qq1949
qingmu1992 -> shiyang1992
qingmu1992 -> xianglan
qingmu1992 -> xiangping1968
qingmu1992 -> zaizai12
qingmu1992 -> zhiyan1993

qsmd -> NemJoker
qsmd -> noitev99
qsmd -> sss222sss

rmoraos -> CryptoWolf
rmoraos -> Goku999
rmoraos -> Nabopolasar
rmoraos -> Nem_fanatic
rmoraos -> YeahBaby
rmoraos -> ipozom
rmoraos -> lisliam

Raymondo -> Spiritas
Raymondo -> abcworrior
Raymondo -> asmodeus
Raymondo -> jack
Raymondo -> kronnos2000ad
Raymondo -> leonardos

Rexthewounder -> coinsfuture
Rexthewounder -> memecoinerz1
Rexthewounder -> theoceanismyhome

SchlappeSeppel -> AltcoinNewbie
SchlappeSeppel -> CK2904
SchlappeSeppel -> Gabby18
SchlappeSeppel -> Schultereisen
SchlappeSeppel -> Siegtal81
SchlappeSeppel -> Stadtfeger

SLIPSTER14 -> greatlife
SLIPSTER14 -> smilingatit
SLIPSTER14 -> staffer

slither -> Spiritas
slither -> abcworrior
slither -> asmodeus
slither -> jack
slither -> kronnos2000ad
slither -> leonardos

smoking -> Knisch
smoking -> falseflag14
smoking -> staffer

Spiritas -> Raymondo
Spiritas -> abcworrior
Spiritas -> asmodeus
Spiritas -> jack
Spiritas -> kronnos2000ad
Spiritas -> slither

sss222sss -> HenryMiller
sss222sss -> crypto_girl
sss222sss -> dautumaohiem
sss222sss -> onemorechance
sss222sss -> qsmd

theoceanismyhome -> Dogmygod
theoceanismyhome -> Olano
theoceanismyhome -> Rexthewounder

Voluntold -> Palimino
Voluntold -> Renoriff
Voluntold -> Wilburbone

XDM -> BabyK
XDM -> Sojourner1
XDM -> lilSunBeam

ok, then it might have been able to use to this last verification part:
give to it a group of names, eg.
and then it would have verified that they have connections.
That would have saved time

Maybe there is no time to make or even to use such feature.
But that would still be useful, if python code makes kind of quantitative selection, like it now does:
it counts which groups need to be checked.
I made visual selection by own eyes and memory from these "shapes":

That may have been enough for detecting the bigger groups, but still there may be some, which I haven't noticed; eg. if someone has been active rarely, it may lie everywhere in the data...

The data collector "project" started too late in this week, so I thought there is no time to another. Fortunately you had some spare time
 

I have the script running.  It is able to go through multiple pages of transactions for each user so it will take a few minutes.

I will print out groups of NEM registrants who gave NXT to more than 5 other users who also registered for NEM.
I have removed the exchange addresses, and it will be sorted.

Then we can check for groups that may have been missed in either list.

I used the blockchain explorer itself: http://87.230.14.1/

I just access it from python, it is easy to use using http requests.

few groups:


3 names paid from one NXT account:  wzl4022561 Allen wangzhaolong





1807,144159710415029,Schultereisen, tx:14415971041502964860,12357137163271253797
http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=3000&acc=12357137163271253797
has paid to NEM 2 times  (CK2904 Schultereisen)

and to http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=3000&acc=4522822829209294571
   1720,158434295940714,Krombi666, tx:15843429594071462137,4522822829209294571

   who has paid to NEM 2 times  (SchlappeSeppel Krombi666)





XDM
    513,717364365336727,XDM, tx:7173643653367273758,6979495612857394437
http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=3000&acc=6979495612857394437&offset=11&filter=1
paid to NEM
and to http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=3000&acc=9309147811479153909  lilSunBeam
   924,344569007838835,lilSunBeam, tx:3445690078388359040,9309147811479153909
   who paid to NEM

and to http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=3000&acc=9986852148399054397  BabyK
   986,30305580712986,BabyK, tx:3030558071298603047,9986852148399054397
   who paid to NEM

and to http://87.230.14.1/nxt/nxt.cgi?action=3000&acc=9233225626570053584  Sojourner1
   844,159521683668888,Sojourner1, tx:15952168366888824681,9233225626570053584
   who paid to NEM

I noticed this.  I can remove those three.  Asides from those a lot of the groupings that have been discussed in this thread are reflected in the list of names I posted.  

There will be false positives, which means that my list is only a starting point and each group will need to be doublechecked like you are currently doing.

Hope the list of names I just posted helps some, even if it is just as a reference to double check things as you were saying.